Emergence DeliriumEPOPEDNCT03787849
Epigenetics in PostOperative Pediatric Emergence Delirium
A study testing Sevoflurane and Propofol in people with Emergence Delirium and Postoperative Complications, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Emergence delirium (ED) infers the occurrence of behavior and cognition changes during the early postoperative period. Main signs and symptoms of ED are the disturbances of consciousness and awareness of the environment, with disorientation and perceptual alterations, including hypersensitivity to external stimuli and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergence Delirium, Postoperative Complications, DNA Methylation
- What is being tested?
- Sevoflurane and Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 24 Sep 2018to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- children with ASA physical status 1, 2 or 3
Who cannot join
- children under psychiatric medication
- developmental delays
- genetics syndromes that course with developmental delays
- contraindication to randomization
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the DNA Methylation Profile in Children Who Presented Emergence Delirium
Emergence delirium (ED) infers the occurrence of behavior and cognition changes during the early postoperative period. Main signs and symptoms of ED are the disturbances of consciousness and awareness of the environment, with disorientation and perceptual alterations, including hypersensitivity to external stimuli and hyperactive motor behaviors. The incidence may be higher than 80%. Risk factors include pre-school age, use of sevoflurane, ophthalmologic and otorhinolaryngologic surgeries, child anxiety, parental or caregiver anxiety. The recurrence of ED is controversial. The only validated scale for diagnosis of ED is the PAED (Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium). Prevention is the best approach, as well as the use of alpha-2 agonists, propofol and total intravenous anesthesia. There are still no clear markers for postoperative delirium, especially ED. Cognitive alterations may be related to epigenetic modifications. Anesthesia-induced epigenetic changes may be the key to understanding perioperative complications and outcomes and is a field of future research in anesthesia. The study aims to analyze the DNA methylation profile in children with ED. A prospective, randomized study will be carried out in up to 322 children undergoing general anesthesia (inhalation group or intravenous group) to perform endoscopic procedures at the Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Patients will have blood samples drawn, and analysis of the DNA methylation profile through the array technique will be performed in 40 children (20 of each group ) who presented ED as well as in 08 control cases. Also, the occurrence of ED will be correlated with the degree of anxiety of the child, parents and during anesthetic induction, in addition to comparing the two anesthetic techniques with the occurrence of ED and late postoperative cognitive alterations.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: The risks of neurotoxicity and late cognitive impairment supported the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation on caution in the indication of anesthesia in children up to 3 years of age. Among the cognitive alterations related to pediatric anesthesia, emergence delirium (ED) is frequent in pre-school children. There is no consensus on the risk factors and forms of ED prevention, which occurs more frequently after inhalation anesthesia. On the other hand, anesthesia-induced epigenetic changes may be the key to understanding various complications and perioperative outcomes. There are no specific biomarkers for ED. Such biomarkers would be used to measure the risk of ED and would contribute to prevention and treatment. It has been hypothesized that behavioral changes in ED may be related to epigenetic modifications, analyzed through the DNA methylation profile. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the study is to investigate the DNA methylation profile in children with ED. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the correlation between the DNA methylation profile with the anesthetic technique and the degree of preoperative anxiety. METHODS: Children (N=322) from 1 to 12 years old, candidates to digestive endoscopy under general anesthesia will be recruited in an outpatient clinic from a tertiary university hospital. After informed consent, the child and parents' preoperative anxiety will be assessed through the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) and VAS-Anx (Anxiety Visual Analogic Scale), respectively. The quality of anesthetic induction will be evaluated through Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior (PAB) scale and Perioperative Adult Child Behavior Interaction Scale (PACBIS). After inhaled induction with sevoflurane, blood sample collection will be performed to evaluate DNA methylation, followed by randomization in two groups to maintain anesthesia using the venous technique, with propofol or inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane. Upon awakening, the ED will be evaluated through PAED (Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium) scale. Twenty children from each group presenting ED as well as 08 control cases will have their venous blood samples sent for DNA methylation analysis using the array technique. After hospital discharge, the postoperative behavioral changes will be observed through the PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire) questionnaire.
- Being tested
- Sevoflurane, Propofol
- Keywords
- Emergence delirium, Child, Postoperative complications, DNA methylation, Epigenetic
- Medical subject headings
- Emergence Delirium, Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SevofluraneDrug
Also called Inhalation Anesthesia
All children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% for anesthesia induction. After induction and peripheral vein puncture, the anesthesia will be maintained only with sevoflurane 3% until completion of the procedure.
PropofolDrug
Also called Intravenous Anesthesia
All children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% until lost of conscience and peripheral vein puncture. After that, sevoflurane will be turned off and its clearance will be analyzed through gas analyzer monitor. From here, anesthesia will be maintained as total venous with continuous propofol infusion 100 mcg.kg.min-1 until completion of the procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sevoflurane | Active comparator | All children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% for anesthesia induction . After induction and peripheral vein puncture, the anesthesia will be maintained only with sevoflurane 3% until completion of the procedure. Receives: Drug: Sevoflurane |
| Propofol | Active comparator | All children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% until lost of conscience and peripheral vein puncture. After that, sevoflurane will be turned off and its clearance will be analyzed through gas analyzer monitor. From here, anesthesia will be maintained as total venous with continuous propofol infusion 100 mcg.kg.min-1 until completion of the procedure. Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DNA methylation profile of children who presented emergence delirium
DNA methylation profile will be measured through an array experiment in the Illumina iScanSQ (Illumina®) platform using the BeadChip Infinium MethylationEPIC and BeadChip HumanCytoSNP850K kits, following the protocol and manufacturer's instructions. The extracted samples will be initially treated with bisulfite using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research®). The methylation profile is measured by the Beta value. This value ranges from 0 to 1. Closer to zero, more hypomethylated is the DNA and closer to 1, more hypermethylated is the DNA. To compare the profile, the average Beta value of each patient with emergence delirium and their controls will be used. All raw data obtained will be analyzed by bioinformatics methods to compose the DNA methylation profile of each patient.
Measured: An average of one month after discharge from outpatient clinic.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Emergence delirium
Emergence delirium will be measured through Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. This scale measures 5 items regarding child's awakening: eye contact with the caregiver, purposefulness of child's action, awareness of child's surroundings, child's restlessness and if the child is inconsolable. The first three items are scored from 4 to 1 as follow: 4 not at all, 3 just a little, 2 quite a bit, 1 very much, 0 extremely. Items 4 and 5 are scored as follow: 0 not at all, 1 just a little, 2 quite a bit, 3 very much, 4 extremely. The scores of each item were summed to obtain a total Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale score. The degree of emergence delirium increased directly with the total score. We considered a score of ≥ 10 as a cutoff of emergence delirium.
Measured: First, 5th, 10th and 15th minutes after anesthesia awakening
Children's preoperative anxiety
This outcome will be measured through modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS). This scale analysis 5 items regarding child's behavior right before induction of anesthesia. A. Activity 1 Looking around. 2 Not exploring. 3 Moving from toy to parent in unfocused manner. 4 Actively trying to get away. B. Vocalizations 1 Reading or asking questions. 2 Responding to adults but whispers. 3 Quiet or no sounds. 4 Whimpering or silently crying. 5 Crying. 6 Crying or screaming loudly. C. Emotional expressivity 1 Manifestly happy. 2 Neutral. 3 Worried to frightened. 4 Distressed. D. State of apparent arousal 1 Alert. 2 Child sitting still and quiet. 3 Vigilant. 4 Panicked. E. Use of parents 1 Busy playing. 2 Reaches out to parent. 3 Looks to parents quietly. 4 Keeps parent. To calculate the final score, we divide each item rating by the highest possible, add all of the produced values, divide by 5, and multiply by 100. Score of ≥ 30 indicates high anxiety before anesthesia.
Measured: 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia
Caregiver's anxiety before anesthesia
This outcome will be measured through a Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) validated for anxiety. This is a 100-mm scale, which will be applied to caregivers right before induction of anesthesia. Score higher than or equal to 70 mm will be considered as high caregiver's anxiety.
Measured: 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia
Children's behavior and adult interaction during anesthesia induction
This outcome will be measured through Perioperative Adult Child Behavior Interaction Scale (PACBIS). The PACBIS consists of four domains (Child Coping, Child Distress, Parent Positive, and Parent Negative), each of which is assigned one of three possible scores (0, 1 or 2). Scores for each domain are assigned based upon the observer's impression of the most typical expression of the subject's behavior within that domain during the observation period. By identifying the specific area leading to maladaptive behavioral responses, we will be able to correlate with occurrence of emergence delirium.
Measured: First minute during monitoring and anesthesia induction
Children's behavior during anesthesia induction
This outcome will be measured through Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior (PAB) score. The Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior (PAB) score is scored from one to three based upon the criteria: Group 1 happy calm and controlled, compliant with induction, Group 2 (sad) tearful and/or withdrawn but compliant with induction or Group 3 (mad) loud vocal resistance (screaming or shouting) and/or physical resistance to induction requiring physical restraint by staff and/or parents. Higher scores (2 or 3) could be associated with emergence delirium, and the development of posthospitalization behavior changes.
Measured: First minute during anesthesia induction
Post hospitalization behavior changes
This outcome will be measured through Post Hospital Behavior Questionnaire. This questionnaire is composed by the following questions: Does your child make a fuss about eating? Does your child spend time just sitting or lying? Is your child uninterested in what goes on around him/her? Does your child get upset when you leave him/her alone for a few minutes? Does your child need a lot of help doing things? Is it difficult to get your child interested in doing things? Does your child have temper tantrums? Is it difficult to get your child to talk to you? Does your child have bad dreams or wake up and cry? Does your child have trouble getting to sleep? Does your child have a poor appetite? For each item, parents are asked to compare their child's behavior before hospitalization to their current behavior as follows: much less than before (1), less than before (2), same as before (3), more than before (4), and much more than before (5). Score ≥ 3 will be considered positive.
Measured: First, 7th and 14th day after discharge from outpatient clinic
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Dec 2018
- Study start24 Sep 2018
- Primary completion7 Dec 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Emergence DeliriumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao PauloThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria José Carvalho Carmona, University of Sao Paulo
- Investigators
- Maria JC Carmona, PhD, Principal investigator, Associate Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03787849
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPOPED-USP
- Acronym
- EPOPED
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hansen TG. Use of anesthetics in young children Consensus statement of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA), the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA), and the European Safe Tots Anaesthesia Research Initiative (EuroSTAR). Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):558-559. doi: 10.1111/pan.13160. No abstract available.
PubMed 28474809Andropoulos DB, Greene MF. Anesthesia and Developing Brains - Implications of the FDA Warning. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):905-907. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700196. Epub 2017 Feb 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 28177852Mason KP. Paediatric emergence delirium: a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):335-343. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew477.
PubMed 28203739Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A, Radtke F, Riese F, Slooter AJ, Veyckemans F, Kramer S, Neuner B, Weiss B, Spies CD. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):192-214. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594.
PubMed 28187050Evered L, Silbert B, Knopman DS, Scott DA, DeKosky ST, Rasmussen LS, Oh ES, Crosby G, Berger M, Eckenhoff RG; Nomenclature Consensus Working Group. Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;121(5):1005-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.087. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PubMed 30336844Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1138-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00015.
PubMed 15114210Locatelli BG, Ingelmo PM, Emre S, Meroni V, Minardi C, Frawley G, Benigni A, Di Marco S, Spotti A, Busi I, Sonzogni V. Emergence delirium in children: a comparison of sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Apr;23(4):301-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12038. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
PubMed 23043512Jacob Z, Li H, Makaryus R, Zhang S, Reinsel R, Lee H, Feng T, Rothman DL, Benveniste H. Metabolomic profiling of children's brains undergoing general anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol. Anesthesiology. 2012 Nov;117(5):1062-71. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826be417.
PubMed 22929729Fournier A, Krause R, Winterer G, Schneider R. Biomarkers of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jun 9;7:112. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00112. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26106326Huett C, Baehner T, Erdfelder F, Hoehne C, Bode C, Hoeft A, Ellerkmann RK. Prevention and Therapy of Pediatric Emergence Delirium: A National Survey. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Apr;19(2):147-153. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0212-x.
PubMed 28130755Somaini M, Engelhardt T, Fumagalli R, Ingelmo PM. Emergence delirium or pain after anaesthesia--how to distinguish between the two in young children: a retrospective analysis of observational studies. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):377-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev552.
PubMed 26865130Moore AD, Anghelescu DL. Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
PubMed 27798810Almenrader N, Passariello M, Coccetti B, Haiberger R, Pietropaoli P. Premedication in children: a comparison of oral midazolam and oral clonidine. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Dec;17(12):1143-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02332.x.
PubMed 17986032Prabhu MK, Mehandale SG. Comparison of oral dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam as premedication to prevent emergence agitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;61(2):131-136. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.199852.
PubMed 28250481El Batawi HY. Effect of preoperative oral midazolam sedation on separation anxiety and emergence delirium among children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;5(2):88-94. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.155728.
PubMed 25992332
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the DNA Methylation Profile in Children Who Presented Emergence Delirium
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03787849
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPOPED / EPOPED-USP
- Keywords
- Emergence delirium, Child, Postoperative complications, DNA methylation, Epigenetic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Emergence delirium (ED) infers the occurrence of behavior and cognition changes during the early postoperative period. Main signs and symptoms of ED are the disturbances of consciousness and awareness of the environment, with disorientation and perceptual alterations, including hypersensitivity to external stimuli and hyperactive motor behaviors. The incidence may be higher than 80%. Risk factors include pre-school age, use of sevoflurane, ophthalmologic and otorhinolaryngologic surgeries, child anxiety, parental or caregiver anxiety. The recurrence of ED is controversial. The only validated scale for diagnosis of ED is the PAED (Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium). Prevention is the best approach, as well as the use of alpha-2 agonists, propofol and total intravenous anesthesia. There are still no clear markers for postoperative delirium, especially ED. Cognitive alterations may be related to epigenetic modifications. Anesthesia-induced epigenetic changes may be the key to understanding perioperative complications and outcomes and is a field of future research in anesthesia. The study aims to analyze the DNA methylation profile in children with ED. A prospective, randomized study will be carried out in up to 322 children undergoing general anesthesia (inhalation group or intravenous group) to perform endoscopic procedures at the Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Patients will have blood samples drawn, and analysis of the DNA methylation profile through the array technique will be performed in 40 children (20 of each group ) who presented ED as well as in 08 control cases. Also, the occurrence of ED will be correlated with the degree of anxiety of the child, parents and during anesthetic induction, in addition to comparing the two anesthetic techniques with the occurrence of ED and late postoperative cognitive alterations.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: The risks of neurotoxicity and late cognitive impairment supported the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation on caution in the indication of anesthesia in children up to 3 years of age. Among the cognitive alterations related to pediatric anesthesia, emergence delirium (ED) is frequent in pre-school children. There is no consensus on the risk factors and forms of ED prevention, which occurs more frequently after inhalation anesthesia. On the other hand, anesthesia-induced epigenetic changes may be the key to understanding various complications and perioperative outcomes. There are no specific biomarkers for ED. Such biomarkers would be used to measure the risk of ED and would contribute to prevention and treatment. It has been hypothesized that behavioral changes in ED may be related to epigenetic modifications, analyzed through the DNA methylation profile. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the study is to investigate the DNA methylation profile in children with ED. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the correlation between the DNA methylation profile with the anesthetic technique and the degree of preoperative anxiety. METHODS: Children (N=322) from 1 to 12 years old, candidates to digestive endoscopy under general anesthesia will be recruited in an outpatient clinic from a tertiary university hospital. After informed consent, the child and parents' preoperative anxiety will be assessed through the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) and VAS-Anx (Anxiety Visual Analogic Scale), respectively. The quality of anesthetic induction will be evaluated through Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior (PAB) scale and Perioperative Adult Child Behavior Interaction Scale (PACBIS). After inhaled induction with sevoflurane, blood sample collection will be performed to evaluate DNA methylation, followed by randomization in two groups to maintain anesthesia using the venous technique, with propofol or inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane. Upon awakening, the ED will be evaluated through PAED (Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium) scale. Twenty children from each group presenting ED as well as 08 control cases will have their venous blood samples sent for DNA methylation analysis using the array technique. After hospital discharge, the postoperative behavioral changes will be observed through the PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire) questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sevoflurane | Active comparator | Drug: SevofluraneAll children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% for anesthesia induction . After induction and peripheral vein puncture, the anesthesia will be maintained only with sevoflurane 3% until completion of the procedure. |
| Propofol | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolAll children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% until lost of conscience and peripheral vein puncture. After that, sevoflurane will be turned off and its clearance will be analyzed through gas analyzer monitor. From here, anesthesia will be maintained as total venous with continuous propofol infusion 100 mcg.kg.min-1 until completion of the procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- children with ASA physical status 1, 2 or 3
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- children under psychiatric medication
- developmental delays
- genetics syndromes that course with developmental delays
- contraindication to randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SevofluraneAlso: Inhalation AnesthesiaAll children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% for anesthesia induction. After induction and peripheral vein puncture, the anesthesia will be maintained only with sevoflurane 3% until completion of the procedure. | Drug | Sevoflurane |
| PropofolAlso: Intravenous AnesthesiaAll children will receive inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane through facial mask in concentrations between 3-8% until lost of conscience and peripheral vein puncture. After that, sevoflurane will be turned off and its clearance will be analyzed through gas analyzer monitor. From here, anesthesia will be maintained as total venous with continuous propofol infusion 100 mcg.kg.min-1 until completion of the procedure. | Drug | Propofol |
Primary outcome
DNA methylation profile of children who presented emergence delirium
Time frame: An average of one month after discharge from outpatient clinic.
DNA methylation profile will be measured through an array experiment in the Illumina iScanSQ (Illumina®) platform using the BeadChip Infinium MethylationEPIC and BeadChip HumanCytoSNP850K kits, following the protocol and manufacturer's instructions. The extracted samples will be initially treated with bisulfite using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research®). The methylation profile is measured by the Beta value. This value ranges from 0 to 1. Closer to zero, more hypomethylated is the DNA and closer to 1, more hypermethylated is the DNA. To compare the profile, the average Beta value of each patient with emergence delirium and their controls will be used. All raw data obtained will be analyzed by bioinformatics methods to compose the DNA methylation profile of each patient.
6 secondary outcomes
Emergence delirium
Time frame: First, 5th, 10th and 15th minutes after anesthesia awakening
Children's preoperative anxiety
Time frame: 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia
Caregiver's anxiety before anesthesia
Time frame: 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia
Children's behavior and adult interaction during anesthesia induction
Time frame: First minute during monitoring and anesthesia induction
Children's behavior during anesthesia induction
Time frame: First minute during anesthesia induction
Post hospitalization behavior changes
Time frame: First, 7th and 14th day after discharge from outpatient clinic
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jan 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28474809Hansen TG. Use of anesthetics in young children Consensus statement of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA), the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA), and the European Safe Tots Anaesthesia Research Initiative (EuroSTAR). Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):558-559. doi: 10.1111/pan.13160. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28177852Andropoulos DB, Greene MF. Anesthesia and Developing Brains - Implications of the FDA Warning. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):905-907. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700196. Epub 2017 Feb 8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28203739Mason KP. Paediatric emergence delirium: a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):335-343. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew477.
- Background: PubMed 28187050Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A, Radtke F, Riese F, Slooter AJ, Veyckemans F, Kramer S, Neuner B, Weiss B, Spies CD. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):192-214. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594.
- Background: PubMed 30336844Evered L, Silbert B, Knopman DS, Scott DA, DeKosky ST, Rasmussen LS, Oh ES, Crosby G, Berger M, Eckenhoff RG; Nomenclature Consensus Working Group. Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;121(5):1005-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.087. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 15114210Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1138-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00015.
- Background: PubMed 23043512Locatelli BG, Ingelmo PM, Emre S, Meroni V, Minardi C, Frawley G, Benigni A, Di Marco S, Spotti A, Busi I, Sonzogni V. Emergence delirium in children: a comparison of sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Apr;23(4):301-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12038. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 22929729Jacob Z, Li H, Makaryus R, Zhang S, Reinsel R, Lee H, Feng T, Rothman DL, Benveniste H. Metabolomic profiling of children's brains undergoing general anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol. Anesthesiology. 2012 Nov;117(5):1062-71. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826be417.
- Background: PubMed 26106326Fournier A, Krause R, Winterer G, Schneider R. Biomarkers of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jun 9;7:112. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00112. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 28130755Huett C, Baehner T, Erdfelder F, Hoehne C, Bode C, Hoeft A, Ellerkmann RK. Prevention and Therapy of Pediatric Emergence Delirium: A National Survey. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Apr;19(2):147-153. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0212-x.
- Background: PubMed 26865130Somaini M, Engelhardt T, Fumagalli R, Ingelmo PM. Emergence delirium or pain after anaesthesia--how to distinguish between the two in young children: a retrospective analysis of observational studies. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):377-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev552.
- Background: PubMed 27798810Moore AD, Anghelescu DL. Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Emergence Delirium
Not yet recruiting
Prediction and Prevention of Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity
Dementia, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Lactium Premedication to Prevent Emergence Agitation
Lactium, Premedication
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of IV Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine Versus no Alpha 2 Agonist on Emergency Delirium, PACU Length of Stay and Time to Hospital Discharge in Children Undergoing (Adeno)Tonsillectomy: a Prospective Observational Study
Emergency Delirium, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
Recruiting
Remimazolam for Reducing Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
Gastric Cancer, Postoperative Delirium
Not yet recruiting
Intracuff Dexmedetomidine Versus Alkalinized Lidocaine for Peri-Extubation Cough and Hemodynamic Responses in Elderly Patients
Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Hemodynamic Instability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maria JC Carmona, PhD principal investigator
Associate Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sevoflurane and Propofol in people with Emergence Delirium and Postoperative Complications, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
DNA methylation profile of children who presented emergence delirium (time frame: An average of one month after discharge from outpatient clinic.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03787849, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2022.