HealthyNCT03788707
Capnogram and Fluid Responsiveness
A study testing Passive leg raising in people with Healthy and Blood Pressure, run by Augusta University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is of paramount importance. It can help define an adequate fluid balance. Overzealous fluid administration is poorly tolerated and has been associated with poor outcomes but so has insufficient administration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy, Blood Pressure
- What is being tested?
- Passive leg raising
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 1 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age older than 18 years
Who cannot join
- Cardiovascular and respiratory disease reported by the participant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Performance of CO2 Changes to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Volunteers
Predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is of paramount importance. It can help define an adequate fluid balance. Overzealous fluid administration is poorly tolerated and has been associated with poor outcomes but so has insufficient administration. Currently available predictors of fluid responsiveness rely on invasive monitors and require patients to be on mechanical ventilation. It is thus important to develop non invasive novel methods to assess fluid responsiveness to provide an accurate management for a favorable outcome. We propose a readily available non-invasive method that relies on improvement of the ventilation perfusion mismatch as recorded by end tidal CO2.
Ventilation of physiologic dead space is part of a spectrum of mismatch between ventilation and perfusion of the lungs. The extent of pulmonary dead space varies depending on factors affecting pulmonary perfusion (e.g. pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure) and alveolar pressure (e.g. positive pressure ventilation). Compromised pulmonary capillary perfusion can lead to ventilation-perfusion mismatch in a patient with clear conductive airway and adequate alveolar oxygen pressure. Alveolar dead space results in decreased CO2 exchange that translates into lower levels of expired CO2.
Read more
Stroke volume of the right ventricle is a major determinant of the pulmonary capillary perfusion. Right ventricular cardiac output can be increased by passive lower limb elevation maneuver, which ultimately results in improvement of the ventilation to perfusion ratio. This effect leads to a higher participation of perfused (and ventilated) alveolar units in gas exchange and narrowing of the gradient between arterial and expired CO2 concentration. Performing a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver leads to stroke volume enhancement in both healthy patients and in those experiencing hemodynamic instability. Responsiveness to PLR can be assessed by different methods including echocardiography and pulse pressure variation. Left ventricular cardiac output (LVCO) can be easily measured by transthoracic echo and be used as a surrogate of right ventricular preload changes. LVCO can thus be used to assess the fluid responsiveness of PLR and the effects of on end tidal CO2 that ensue.
We propose this study to test the hypothesis that expired CO2 is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness after performance of the PLR maneuver, based on the assumption that increasing right ventricular output causes a reduction of the ventilation to perfusion ratio, leading to increased levels of expired CO2. T
- Conditions
- Healthy, Blood Pressure
- Being tested
- Passive leg raising
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Passive leg raisingOther
After 30 seconds of lying flat, volunteers will have passive leg raising to 45 degrees. Expired CO2 will be measured via a face mask before and after leg raising.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Passive leg raising | Experimental | Passive leg raising for 3 minutes after 20 seconds of lying flat Receives: Other: Passive leg raising |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Expired CO2
Area under the curve of a capnogram tracing will be measured in milimiters
Measured: 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Mean arterial pressure
Mean arterial pressure in mmHg measured by non invasive oscillometer
Measured: 10 minutes
Heart rate
beats per minute measured by non invasive plethysmography
Measured: 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2018
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Due to COVID-19. The study was never started.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Volunteers will lay flat with a face mask breathing room air while expired CO2 is measured. After 30 seconds, legs will be passively raised for 3 minutes. Changes in expired CO2 before and after leg raising will be compared.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Augusta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Efrain Riveros Perez, MD, Augusta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03788707
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1368341
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 26 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Performance of CO2 Changes to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03788707
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1368341
- Conditions
- Healthy, Blood Pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Due to COVID-19. The study was never started.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Augusta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients is of paramount importance. It can help define an adequate fluid balance. Overzealous fluid administration is poorly tolerated and has been associated with poor outcomes but so has insufficient administration. Currently available predictors of fluid responsiveness rely on invasive monitors and require patients to be on mechanical ventilation. It is thus important to develop non invasive novel methods to assess fluid responsiveness to provide an accurate management for a favorable outcome. We propose a readily available non-invasive method that relies on improvement of the ventilation perfusion mismatch as recorded by end tidal CO2.
Ventilation of physiologic dead space is part of a spectrum of mismatch between ventilation and perfusion of the lungs. The extent of pulmonary dead space varies depending on factors affecting pulmonary perfusion (e.g. pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure) and alveolar pressure (e.g. positive pressure ventilation). Compromised pulmonary capillary perfusion can lead to ventilation-perfusion mismatch in a patient with clear conductive airway and adequate alveolar oxygen pressure. Alveolar dead space results in decreased CO2 exchange that translates into lower levels of expired CO2.
Stroke volume of the right ventricle is a major determinant of the pulmonary capillary perfusion. Right ventricular cardiac output can be increased by passive lower limb elevation maneuver, which ultimately results in improvement of the ventilation to perfusion ratio. This effect leads to a higher participation of perfused (and ventilated) alveolar units in gas exchange and narrowing of the gradient between arterial and expired CO2 concentration. Performing a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver leads to stroke volume enhancement in both healthy patients and in those experiencing hemodynamic instability. Responsiveness to PLR can be assessed by different methods including echocardiography and pulse pressure variation. Left ventricular cardiac output (LVCO) can be easily measured by transthoracic echo and be used as a surrogate of right ventricular preload changes. LVCO can thus be used to assess the fluid responsiveness of PLR and the effects of on end tidal CO2 that ensue.
We propose this study to test the hypothesis that expired CO2 is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness after performance of the PLR maneuver, based on the assumption that increasing right ventricular output causes a reduction of the ventilation to perfusion ratio, leading to increased levels of expired CO2. T
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Volunteers will lay flat with a face mask breathing room air while expired CO2 is measured. After 30 seconds, legs will be passively raised for 3 minutes. Changes in expired CO2 before and after leg raising will be compared.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Passive leg raising | Experimental | Other: Passive leg raisingPassive leg raising for 3 minutes after 20 seconds of lying flat |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age older than 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Cardiovascular and respiratory disease reported by the participant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Passive leg raisingAfter 30 seconds of lying flat, volunteers will have passive leg raising to 45 degrees. Expired CO2 will be measured via a face mask before and after leg raising. | Other | Passive leg raising |
Primary outcome
Expired CO2
Time frame: 10 minutes
Area under the curve of a capnogram tracing will be measured in milimiters
2 secondary outcomes
Mean arterial pressure
Time frame: 10 minutes
Heart rate
Time frame: 10 minutes
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use
Blood Donors, Apheresis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Subarachnoid Space Using Intrathecal Gadolinium Contrast
Healthy Volunteers
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Connors Protocol for the Management and Use of Stored Human Specimens (Stored Human Specimens)
Healthy Volunteer Samples
RecruitingObservational study
Viral Infections in Healthy and Immunocompromised Hosts
Anogenital Herpes, COVID-19
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study in Healthy People to Compare How 2 Different Formulations of Vicadrostat / Empagliflozin Tablets Are Taken up in the Body
Healthy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Passive leg raising in people with Healthy and Blood Pressure, run by Augusta University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Expired CO2 (time frame: 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2021.