AzTrials
AzTrials

Vascular DementiaPhase 3NCT03789760

The Clinical Trial of Chinese Herbal Medicine (SaiLuoTong) Capsule

A Phase 3 study testing SaiLuoTong capsule in people with Vascular Dementia, run by Shineway Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd at 29 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

As a traditional Chinese medicine compound, SaiLuoTong capsule is proven to have beneficial effects on learning and memory ability in animal models of vascular dementia (VaD). According to the result of the phase II study, the efficacy of SaiLuoTong capsule in the treatment of patients with VaD was better than that of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Vascular Dementia
What is being tested?
SaiLuoTong capsule
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
493 participants
Where
29 sitesChina
Study dates
10 Apr 2019to 19 May 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 40 years≤Age≤75 years, female or male.
  • With an education at more than (including) 6 years.
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for dementia in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition (DSM-V).
  • Meet the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche etl'Enseignement en Neurosciences(NINDS-AIREN) Criteria of Probable Vascular Dementia (1993).
  • MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) supports the presence of ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and meets NINDS-AIREN Imaging Criteria; the diameter of each infarct≤ 30mm(And the perivascular spaces and cerebral microbleeds were excluded).
  • Modified Hachinski Ischemic (mHIS) Scale ≥ 4.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) ≤ 17.
  • Patients with mild or moderate VaD: 10 ≤ MMSE ≤ 26 and 1 ≤ CDR ≤ 2.
  • Willing to participate in this study and could sign the informed consent form by him/herself and lawful guardian prior to the study.
  • The subjects must have a care giver who are cognitively normal (MMSE scores: illiteracy> 17 points, 1 - 6 years of education > 20 points, 7 years and above of education > 24 points). The care giver shall also be able to take care of the patient at least 4 days a week for more than 4 hours a day while he or she can accompany the subjects to attend each visit. During the trial, a new caregiver must have MMSE score and the results would be presented in forms of subjects in the attachment.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with dementia caused by a brain disease other than VaD (such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, central nervous system demyelinative diseases, tumour, hydrocephalus, trauma, central nervous system infection, such as syphilis, AIDS and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease);
  • Patients with serious neurological impairment to finish the examination: hand hemiplegia, aphasia, and visual or hearing impairment.
  • Laboratory anomalies: hemoglobin (Hb) level less than 80g/L , platelet count (Plt) level less than 50×109/L, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) exceeds 2.5 times the normal upper level, fibrinogen(FIB) level less than 0.5g/L, prothrombin time (PT) exceeds 2.5 times the normal upper level, Serum creatinine (Scr) exceeds 3 times the normal upper level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) exceed 5 times the normal upper level , aspartate aminotransferase (AST) exceed 5 times the normal upper level, alkaline phosphates (ALP) exceed 5 times the normal upper level , γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) exceed 5 times the normal upper level, total bilirubin (TBiL) exceeds 3 times the normal upper level.
  • The subjects have nutritional and metabolic diseases and endocrine system diseases that cannot been controlled by therapy - thyroid diseases, parathyroid disease, vitamin or element deficiency.
  • Patients with serious circulatory system diseases, respiratory system diseases, urinary system diseases, digestive system diseases, haemopoietic system diseases (such as unstable angina, uncontrollable asthma and active gastrorrhagia) and cancer.
  • Serious mental disease (such as depression and schizophrenia) and epilepsy.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Gastrointestinal diseases that may affect the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of the investigational drug.
  • Alcohol and drug abuse.
  • Patients who have been given any drug that can affect the cognitive function (including Chinese herbal preparations containing any one of these: ginseng, ginkgo leaf, and saffron; Western medicines such as donepezil, karbalatine, rivastigmine, huperzine a, memantine and similar drugs, etc; Butylphthalide and other drugs with the same effect such as runeirergine, aniracetam, cytosporine, dihydroergine, nimodipine, etc) within one month before the start of this study and cannot be discontinued.
  • Patients who are allergic to more than 2 drugs or any component of the SLT capsules.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients who have participated in other clinical studies within 3 months prior to this study.
  • Cannot accept magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination.

Trial locations and contacts

29 sites in 1 country.

29 sites in 1 country

China29 sites
  • Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University

    Baoding, Hebei

  • Baogang Hospital

    Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014000

  • Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053

  • Peking University Shougang Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100144

  • Xiyuan Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • The First Hospital of Changsha

    Changsha, Hunan, 41000

  • Xiangya Boai Rehability Hospital

    Changsha, Hunan

  • Changzhi People's Hospital

    Changzhi, Shanxi, 046000

  • Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College

    Chengde, Hebei, 067000

  • Handan First Hospital

    Handan, Hebei, 056000

  • The Fourth Hospital of Medical University

    Harbin, Hei Longjiang

  • Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Hospital

    Hohhot, Inner Mongolia

  • Jinzhong First People's Hospital

    Jinzhong, Shanxi

  • Jiujiang University Clinical Medical College ▪ Jiujiang University Hospital

    Jiujiang, Jiangxi, 332000

  • Hebei Central Hospital of petrochina

    Langfang, Hebei, 065000

  • The Central Hospital of Lishui City

    Lishui, Zhejiang, 323000

  • The First People's Hospital of Luoyang

    Luoyang, Henan, 471000

  • Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of TCM

    Nanchang, Jiangxi

  • The First affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical college

    Nanyang, Henan, 473000

  • Nanyang Second People's Hospital

    Nanyang, Henan, 473003

  • The Second people's Hospital of Neijiang

    Neijiang, Sichuan

  • The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

  • The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051

  • Taizhou Hospital of Chinese Medicine

    Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300

  • Second Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300250

  • The Second Hospital of Xingjiang Medical University

    Ürümqi, Xingjiang

  • Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University

    Xianyang, Shanxi, 712000

  • Yueyang Second People's Hospital

    Yueyang, Hunan, 414000

  • Yuncheng Central Hospital

    Yuncheng, Shanxi

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel, and Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of SaiLuoTong (SLT) in the Treatment of Vascular Dementia

As a traditional Chinese medicine compound, SaiLuoTong capsule is proven to have beneficial effects on learning and memory ability in animal models of vascular dementia (VaD). According to the result of the phase II study, the efficacy of SaiLuoTong capsule in the treatment of patients with VaD was better than that of placebo group and no difference in safety. So the study hypothesis is also that SaiLuoTong capsule will be effective in the treatment of patients with VaD and will be well tolerated. The purpose of the study is to confirm the efficacy and safety of SaiLuoTong capsule on patients with mild to moderate VaD. The outcome measures include general cognitive function, executive function, daily living skills, and mental behavior changes of symptoms in VaD patients.

Read the detailed description

Vascular dementia (VaD) is a clinical syndrome of acquired intellectual and functional impairment that results from cerebrovascular diseases. SaiLuoTong capsule is a traditional Chinese medicine compound; it is composed of ginseng extract (the main composition: ginseng total saponins), ginkgo biloba extract (the main composition: YinXingTong ester) and safflower extract (the main composition: the west safflower total glycosides). The function of SaiLuoTong capsule is Yiqi Huoxue and Huayu Tongluo in Chinese traditional medicine theory. Pharmacodynamics studies showed that SaiLuoTong capsule can significantly improve neurological symptoms caused by focal cerebral ischemia in animals, and learning and memory ability in animal models of VaD. The result of the phase II study showed that the efficacy of SaiLuoTong capsule in the treatment of patients with VaD was better than that of placebo group and no difference in safety. Based on these previous evidences, the investigators conduct this study to further confirm the efficacy and safety of SaiLuoTong capsule in patients with mild to moderate VaD. This study is a phase III clinical trial of SaiLuoTong capsule for treatment of vascular dementia. The study is a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double -blind, placebo-controlled study.

Being tested
SaiLuoTong capsule, placebo
Keywords
Vascular Dementia, cognitive
Medical subject headings
Dementia, Vascular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SaiLuoTong capsuleDrug

    Also called The effects of SaiLuoTong capsule on VaD

    500 subjects are randomly divided into two groups by 3:1. 375 subjects in the active group take two pills(120mg) of SaiLuoTong capsule each time, twice a day, 0.5 hours before breakfast and dinner, taking with lukewarm water.

  • placeboDrug

    500 subjects are randomly divided into two groups by 3:1. 125 subjects in the control group take two pills(120mg) of placebo each time, twice a day, 0.5 hours before breakfast and dinner, taking with lukewarm water.

Study groups in NCT03789760
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
active groupExperimentaltake two pills (120 mg) of SaiLuoTong capsule each time, twice a day, 0.5 hours before breakfast and dinner, taking with lukewarm water.
Receives: Drug: SaiLuoTong capsule
control groupPlacebo comparatortake two pills (120 mg) of placebo each time, twice a day, 0.5 hours before breakfast and dinner, taking with lukewarm water.
Receives: Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale(VaDAS-cog)

    The VaDAS-cog comprises the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale(ADAS-cog) plus the Maze and Number Cancellation test to specifically assess executive function. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The range of the total score was from 0(no cognitive impairment) to 90(severe cognitive impairment). The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at screening and week 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of Baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline VaDAS-cog score at Week 52

  2. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-clinical Global Impression of Change(ADCS-CGIC)

    The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-clinical Global Impression of Change(ADCS-CGIC) involves comparison of data acquisition from both home and clinic and the use of both informant-ratings and self-ratings. Important outcomes include clinical global impressions of change (CGIC) as indicators of clinically meaningful change. In week 0 (baseline), the score was to judge the severity of the cognitive, 0(no evaluate),1(normal),2(slight intelligence obstacle),3(mide intelligence obstacle),4(moderate intelligence obstacle),5(significantly intelligence obstacle),6(severe intelligence obstacle),7(intelligent obstacle end-stage). In week 13,26,39,52, the score was to judge the change of the clinical global impression,1(improved significantly),2(improve),3(improve a little),4(no change),5(a little deteriorated),6(deteriorated),7(serious deterioration).

    Measured: Change from baseline ADCS-CGIC score at Week 52

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-activities of Daily Living(ADCS-ADL)

    To assess the daily living activity of the patients, including a subgroup in which there are 23 items to be checked and the total score is 78. A higher score represents a better daily living activity, vice versa. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at week 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline ADCS-ADL score at Week 26

  2. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-activities of Daily Living(ADCS-ADL)

    To assess the daily living activity of the patients, including a subgroup in which there are 23 items to be checked and the total score is 78. A higher score represents a better daily living activity, vice versa. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at week 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline ADCS-ADL score at Week 52

  3. Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE)

    The MMSE is a global test of cognitive function, for which the total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating lesser severity. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean, SD) of precise scores at screening (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline MMSE score at Week 26

  4. Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE)

    The MMSE is a global test of cognitive function, for which the total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating lesser severity. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean, SD) of precise scores at screening (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline MMSE score at Week 52

  5. Clinical Dementia Rating(CDR Scale )

    The CDR is a numeric scale used to quantify the severity of symptoms of dementia (i.e. its 'stage'). Talk to the patients or those who know well about the patients and assess the 6 functions (memory, orientation, judgment and problem-solving ability, social activities, household duties and hobbies as well as self-care ability) to obtain the scores and based on the predetermined principles the CDR score is calculated. The diagnostic criteria[68]: normal-CDR=0; suspected dementia-CDR=0.5, mild dementia-CDR=1; moderate dementia- CDR=2; and serious dementia-CDR=3. The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean, SD) of precise scores at baseline and weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline CDR Scale score at Week 26

  6. Clinical Dementia Rating(CDR Scale )

    The CDR is a numeric scale used to quantify the severity of symptoms of dementia (i.e. its 'stage'). Talk to the patients or those who know well about the patients and assess the 6 functions (memory, orientation, judgment and problem-solving ability, social activities, household duties and hobbies as well as self-care ability) to obtain the scores and based on the predetermined principles the CDR score is calculated. The diagnostic criteria[68]: normal-CDR=0; suspected dementia-CDR=0.5, mild dementia-CDR=1; moderate dementia- CDR=2; and serious dementia-CDR=3. The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean, SD) of precise scores at baseline and weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline CDR Scale score at Week 52

  7. Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes(CDR-sb)

    CDR-sb is the sum of boxes of CDR, with higher scores indicating severer degree of impairment. CDR-sb is the algebraic sum of 6 functional domains with a range of 0(normal) - 18(severe dementia). The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline CDR-sb score at Week 26

  8. Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes(CDR-sb)

    CDR-sb is the sum of boxes of CDR, with higher scores indicating severer degree of impairment. CDR-sb is the algebraic sum of 6 functional domains with a range of 0(normal) - 18(severe dementia). The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline CDR-sb score at Week 52

  9. Blood biomarker: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor(BDNF)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline BDNF at Week 26

  10. Blood biomarker: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor(BDNF)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0(baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline BDNF at Week 52

  11. Blood biomarker: Vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline VEGF at Week 26

  12. Blood biomarker: Vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline VEGF at Week 52

  13. Blood biomarker: Matrix metalloproteinase-9(MMP-9)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline MMP-9 at Week 26

  14. Blood biomarker: Matrix metalloproteinase-9(MMP-9))

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline MMP-9 at Week 52

  15. Blood biomarker: Interleukin-6(IL-6)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline MMP-9 at Week 26

  16. Blood biomarker: Interleukin-6(IL-6)

    The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise measurement at weeks 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of baseline at weeks 52.

    Measured: Change from baseline MMP-9 at Week 52

  17. Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale(VaDAS-cog)

    The VaDAS-cog comprises the ADAS-cog plus the Maze and Number Cancellation test to specifically assess executive function. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The range of the total score was from 0(no cognitive impairment) to 90(severe cognitive impairment). The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at screening and week 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of Baseline at weeks 13.

    Measured: Change from baseline VaDAS-cog score at week 13

  18. Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale(VaDAS-cog)

    The VaDAS-cog comprises the ADAS-cog plus the Maze and Number Cancellation test to specifically assess executive function. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The range of the total score was from 0(no cognitive impairment) to 90(severe cognitive impairment). The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at screening and week 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of Baseline at weeks 26.

    Measured: Change from baseline VaDAS-cog score at week 26

  19. Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale(VaDAS-cog)

    The VaDAS-cog comprises the ADAS-cog plus the Maze and Number Cancellation test to specifically assess executive function. The score of each item is summed to compute a total score. The range of the total score was from 0(no cognitive impairment) to 90(severe cognitive impairment). The data in the table below is the statistical data (mean,SD) of precise scores at screening and week 0 (baseline), while the statistical data of difference value compared to the score of Baseline at weeks 39.

    Measured: Change from baseline VaDAS-cog score at week 39

  20. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-clinical Global Impression of Change(ADCS-CGIC)

    The ADCS-CGIC involves comparison of data acquisition from both home and clinic and the use of both informant-ratings and self-ratings. Important outcomes include clinical global impressions of change (CGIC) as indicators of clinically meaningful change. In week 0 (baseline), the score was to judge the severity of the cognitive, 0(no evaluate),1(normal),2(slight intelligence obstacle),3(mide intelligence obstacle),4(moderate intelligence obstacle),5(significantly intelligence obstacle),6(severe intelligence obstacle),7(intelligent obstacle end-stage). In week 13,26,39,52, the score was to judge the change of the clinical global impression,1(improved significantly),2(improve),3(improve a little),4(no change),5(a little deteriorated),6(deteriorated),7(serious deterioration).

    Measured: Change from baseline ADCS-CGIC score at week 13

  21. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-clinical Global Impression of Change(ADCS-CGIC)

    The ADCS-CGIC involves comparison of data acquisition from both home and clinic and the use of both informant-ratings and self-ratings. Important outcomes include clinical global impressions of change (CGIC) as indicators of clinically meaningful change. In week 0 (baseline), the score was to judge the severity of the cognitive, 0(no evaluate),1(normal),2(slight intelligence obstacle),3(mide intelligence obstacle),4(moderate intelligence obstacle),5(significantly intelligence obstacle),6(severe intelligence obstacle),7(intelligent obstacle end-stage). In week 13,26,39,52, the score was to judge the change of the clinical global impression,1(improved significantly),2(improve),3(improve a little),4(no change),5(a little deteriorated),6(deteriorated),7(serious deterioration).

    Measured: Change from baseline ADCS-CGIC score at week 26

  22. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-clinical Global Impression of Change(ADCS-CGIC)

    The ADCS-CGIC involves comparison of data acquisition from both home and clinic and the use of both informant-ratings and self-ratings. Important outcomes include clinical global impressions of change (CGIC) as indicators of clinically meaningful change. In week 0 (baseline), the score was to judge the severity of the cognitive, 0(no evaluate),1(normal),2(slight intelligence obstacle),3(mide intelligence obstacle),4(moderate intelligence obstacle),5(significantly intelligence obstacle),6(severe intelligence obstacle),7(intelligent obstacle end-stage). In week 13,26,39,52, the score was to judge the change of the clinical global impression,1(improved significantly),2(improve),3(improve a little),4(no change),5(a little deteriorated),6(deteriorated),7(serious deterioration).

    Measured: Change from baseline ADCS-CGIC score at week 39

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2018
  2. Study start10 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion12 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion19 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
493 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03789760
Sponsor's protocol ID
SW003
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
4 Sep 2018
Last updated
17 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing SaiLuoTong capsule in people with Vascular Dementia, run by Shineway Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd at 29 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 29 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale(VaDAS-cog) (time frame: Change from baseline VaDAS-cog score at Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in