Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT03795961
Neuromedulatory Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Electrical Stimulation in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
A study testing transcranial direct current electrical stimulation in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This is a double blinded randomized clinical trial to study the neuromodulatory effect of tDCS in patients with CTS, the study subject will be randomly into two groups; active and sham group , the active group will receive five sessions of active TDCS over the M1 while the Sham group will receive sham tDCS in which… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- transcranial direct current electrical stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 16 Dec 2018to Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient diagnosed as CTS by history, clinical examination and NCS for more than 3 months.
- Both genders. Adult of aged 18 years and above. Able to understand the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with diabetes mellitus, collagen disorders, thyroid disease, peripheral neuropathy, traumatic nerve injury, cervical radiculopathy, fibromyalgia.
- Pregnancy. Malignant. Patients with any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Suez Canal University Hospital
Ismailia, 41522
Gehad Swilam, MSc, +201027089991, gsa237@gmail.com
Ahmed Maaty, MD, +201004978451, aimaaty@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of The Neuromedulatory Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): A Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
This is a double blinded randomized clinical trial to study the neuromodulatory effect of tDCS in patients with CTS, the study subject will be randomly into two groups; active and sham group , the active group will receive five sessions of active TDCS over the M1 while the Sham group will receive sham tDCS in which the device will be turned off after 30 seconds. The patient will be assessed by VAS score, Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire , central sensetization inventory , pressure pain threshold, sensory and pain threshold for electerical stimulation before , after the end of the sessions and 4 weeks later.
Read the detailed description
The study will be carried out on patients attending the Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, EGYPT and diagnosed with CTS according to clinical examination and to the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) practice recommendations for CTS.
Study subjects will be divided into two groups:
Group (1): (active group) will include 42 patients with CTS and will receive anodal tDCS of M1 for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions and less than 72 hrs. may be allowed between experimental sessions for each participant to avoid any interference.
Group (2): (sham group) will include 42 patients with CTS and will receive sham tDCS M1 (the set will be turned off after 30 seconds) for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions.
The study sample will be collected from all patients with CTS attending to the Physical medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in Suez Canal University Hospital fulfilling the eligibility criteria, will be eligible to join the study (either referred for electrophysiological study or presented to the clinic for primary assessment). To make sure that no bias should enter the assessment of the results, neither the patient nor the clinicians will be aware whether active tDCS will be applicated to a particular case. To ensure this result, two symbols (Square and Triangle) will be applicated to the physiotherapy sheet and only the physiotherapist knew the key for each symbol. The triangle may represent the cases of CTS for active tDCS and the square may represent the sham group or vice versa. At the end of the study the two groups will be revealed in order to analyze the results according to proper statistical measures.
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Being tested
- transcranial direct current electrical stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial direct current electrical stimulationDevice
anodal tDCS of M1 for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions (day after day)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS group | Experimental | This group will include 42 patients with CTS Intervention (active transcranial direct current electrical stimulation) Stimulation site (M1) Stimulation mode (anodal) Duration of session (20 minutes) Stimulation intensity (2 mA) Number of sessions (5 sessions) Intervals (every another day) Receives: Device: transcranial direct current electrical stimulation |
| Sham tDCS group | Sham comparator | This group will include 42 patients with CTS Intervention (sham or inactive transcranial direct current electrical stimulation) Stimulation site (M1) Stimulation mode (anodal) Duration of session (20 minutes) Stimulation intensity (2 mA) Number of sessions (5 sessions) Intervals (every another day) Receives: Device: transcranial direct current electrical stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual analogue scale
Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever.
Measured: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever.
Measured: immediately after the ending of sessions
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever.
Measured: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation
Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration - 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold.
Measured: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation
Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration - 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold.
Measured: immediately after the ending of sessions
Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation
Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration - 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold.
Measured: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold.
Measured: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold.
Measured: immediately after the ending of sessions
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold.
Measured: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Secondary outcomes (6)
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire contains two sub-scales: symptom severity scale (11 items) and functional status scale (8 items). Scoring instructions: add the numbers corresponding to all answers and divide by the number of questions answered. Composite score (round to nearest 1/100th). The scores of symptom severity scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no pain and score 5 indicates very severe pain. The scores of functional status scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no difficulty and score 5 indicates cannot do at all due to hand or wrist.
Measured: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire contains two sub-scales: symptom severity scale (11 items) and functional status scale (8 items). Scoring instructions: add the numbers corresponding to all answers and divide by the number of questions answered. Composite score (round to nearest 1/100th). The scores of symptom severity scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no pain and score 5 indicates very severe pain. The scores of functional status scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no difficulty and score 5 indicates cannot do at all due to hand or wrist.
Measured: immediately after the ending of sessions
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire contains two sub-scales: symptom severity scale (11 items) and functional status scale (8 items). Scoring instructions: add the numbers corresponding to all answers and divide by the number of questions answered. Composite score (round to nearest 1/100th). The scores of symptom severity scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no pain and score 5 indicates very severe pain. The scores of functional status scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no difficulty and score 5 indicates cannot do at all due to hand or wrist.
Measured: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Central sensitization inventory
Central sensitization inventory is a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with central sensitivity syndrome. Central sensitization inventory consists of two parts. Part A, one is asked how often he/she experiences each symptom ("never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always"). Individual items are scored from "0" (never) to "4" (always), resulting in a total score range for all 25 items from "0" to "100." A score of 40 or higher indicates the presence of central sensitivity syndrome. Part B asked if one has been previously diagnosed with seven common central sensitivity syndrome diagnoses (tension headaches/migraines, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, restless leg syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivities) and three central sensitization-related diagnoses (depression, anxiety/panic attacks, and neck injury). Central sensitization inventory B is for information only and is not scored.
Measured: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Central sensitization inventory (CSI)
Central sensitization inventory is a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with central sensitivity syndrome. Central sensitization inventory consists of two parts. Part A, one is asked how often he/she experiences each symptom ("never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always"). Individual items are scored from "0" (never) to "4" (always), resulting in a total score range for all 25 items from "0" to "100." A score of 40 or higher indicates the presence of central sensitivity syndrome. Part B asked if one has been previously diagnosed with seven common central sensitivity syndrome diagnoses (tension headaches/migraines, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, restless leg syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivities) and three central sensitization-related diagnoses (depression, anxiety/panic attacks, and neck injury). Central sensitization inventory B is for information only and is not scored.
Measured: immediately after the ending of sessions
Central sensitization inventory (CSI)
Central sensitization inventory is a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with central sensitivity syndrome. Central sensitization inventory consists of two parts. Part A, one is asked how often he/she experiences each symptom ("never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always"). Individual items are scored from "0" (never) to "4" (always), resulting in a total score range for all 25 items from "0" to "100." A score of 40 or higher indicates the presence of central sensitivity syndrome. Part B asked if one has been previously diagnosed with seven common central sensitivity syndrome diagnoses (tension headaches/migraines, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, restless leg syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivities) and three central sensitization-related diagnoses (depression, anxiety/panic attacks, and neck injury). Central sensitization inventory B is for information only and is not scored.
Measured: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2019
- Study start16 Dec 2018
- Primary completionJan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Suez Canal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- the study subject will be allocated into two group ; active and sham group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gehad Swilam Abdelmonem Swilam, Suez Canal University
- Investigators
- Mona S Ghaly, MD, Study director, Suez Canal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03795961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GSMGAEAM
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD are not to be shared with other researchers
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of The Neuromedulatory Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Electrical Stimulation (tDCS) in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS): A Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03795961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GSMGAEAM
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a double blinded randomized clinical trial to study the neuromodulatory effect of tDCS in patients with CTS, the study subject will be randomly into two groups; active and sham group , the active group will receive five sessions of active TDCS over the M1 while the Sham group will receive sham tDCS in which the device will be turned off after 30 seconds. The patient will be assessed by VAS score, Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire , central sensetization inventory , pressure pain threshold, sensory and pain threshold for electerical stimulation before , after the end of the sessions and 4 weeks later.
Detailed description
The study will be carried out on patients attending the Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, EGYPT and diagnosed with CTS according to clinical examination and to the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) practice recommendations for CTS.
Study subjects will be divided into two groups:
Group (1): (active group) will include 42 patients with CTS and will receive anodal tDCS of M1 for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions and less than 72 hrs. may be allowed between experimental sessions for each participant to avoid any interference.
Group (2): (sham group) will include 42 patients with CTS and will receive sham tDCS M1 (the set will be turned off after 30 seconds) for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions.
The study sample will be collected from all patients with CTS attending to the Physical medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in Suez Canal University Hospital fulfilling the eligibility criteria, will be eligible to join the study (either referred for electrophysiological study or presented to the clinic for primary assessment). To make sure that no bias should enter the assessment of the results, neither the patient nor the clinicians will be aware whether active tDCS will be applicated to a particular case. To ensure this result, two symbols (Square and Triangle) will be applicated to the physiotherapy sheet and only the physiotherapist knew the key for each symbol. The triangle may represent the cases of CTS for active tDCS and the square may represent the sham group or vice versa. At the end of the study the two groups will be revealed in order to analyze the results according to proper statistical measures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- the study subject will be allocated into two group ; active and sham group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS group | Experimental | Device: transcranial direct current electrical stimulationThis group will include 42 patients with CTS Intervention (active transcranial direct current electrical stimulation) Stimulation site (M1) Stimulation mode (anodal) Duration of session (20 minutes) Stimulation intensity (2 mA) Number of sessions (5 sessions) Intervals (every another day) |
| Sham tDCS group | Sham comparator | Device: transcranial direct current electrical stimulationThis group will include 42 patients with CTS Intervention (sham or inactive transcranial direct current electrical stimulation) Stimulation site (M1) Stimulation mode (anodal) Duration of session (20 minutes) Stimulation intensity (2 mA) Number of sessions (5 sessions) Intervals (every another day) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient diagnosed as CTS by history, clinical examination and NCS for more than 3 months.
- Both genders. Adult of aged 18 years and above. Able to understand the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with diabetes mellitus, collagen disorders, thyroid disease, peripheral neuropathy, traumatic nerve injury, cervical radiculopathy, fibromyalgia.
- Pregnancy. Malignant. Patients with any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial direct current electrical stimulationanodal tDCS of M1 for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions (day after day) | Device | Active tDCS group, Sham tDCS group |
Primary outcome
Visual analogue scale
Time frame: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever.
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: immediately after the ending of sessions
Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever.
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever.
Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation
Time frame: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration - 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold.
Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation
Time frame: immediately after the ending of sessions
Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration - 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold.
Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation
Time frame: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration - 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold.
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Time frame: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold.
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Time frame: immediately after the ending of sessions
Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold.
Pressure pain threshold assessment
Time frame: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold.
6 secondary outcomes
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Time frame: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Time frame: immediately after the ending of sessions
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire
Time frame: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Central sensitization inventory
Time frame: before sessions (baseline assessment)
Central sensitization inventory (CSI)
Time frame: immediately after the ending of sessions
Central sensitization inventory (CSI)
Time frame: four weeks after the ending of sessions
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD are not to be shared with other researchers
Related trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Recruiting
Comparison of Wrist Splint Positions in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Peripheral Neuropathies
Recruiting
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation(rPMS) on CTS(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Recruiting
Hand Function Outcome After the Application of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Post-burn Patients Presented With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burn
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Progressive Gamified Motor Rehabilitation After Carpal Tunnel Release
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mona S Ghaly, MD study director
Suez Canal University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transcranial direct current electrical stimulation in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gehad Swilam (+201027089991, gsa237@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual analogue scale (time frame: before sessions (baseline assessment)). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2019.