Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT03802435
Different Sessions of Perineural Injection With Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
A study testing two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT and One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. The technique of perineural injection therapy (PIT) by using 5% dextrose (D5W) is now commonly used for peeling the nerve from surrounding soft tissue (called nerve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT and One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2019to 31 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 20-80 year-old.
- Diagnosis was confirmed using an electrophysiological study
Who cannot join
- Cancer
- Coagulopathy
- Pregnancy
- Inflammation status
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy
- Thoracic outlet syndrome
- Previously undergone wrist surgery or steroid injection for CTS
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital
Taipei, Neihu District, 886
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Long-term Effect in Different Sessions of Perineural Injection With Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. The technique of perineural injection therapy (PIT) by using 5% dextrose (D5W) is now commonly used for peeling the nerve from surrounding soft tissue (called nerve hydrodissection), which may help antineurogenic inflammation, allow the impulse to pass, and rescue the nerve with ischemic damage. However, the evidence and reference of PIT and nerve hydrodissection are very seldom until our series researches since 2017. Moreover, our research revealed PIT with D5W is more beneficial than that of corticosteroid in patients with mild-to-moderate CTS at 4 to 6 months postinjection. However, the accumulative effect and long-term effect (more than 6 months) of PIT is still unknown. Hence, we design a randomized, double- blind, controlled trail to assess the long-term effect of ultrasound-guided PIT in patients with CTS. The aim one is to survey the possible accumulative effect of different sessions of PIT (6 months follow-up) and aim two is to evaluate the long-term effect and safety of PIT (one year follow-up).
Read the detailed description
After obtaining written informed consent, patients clinically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate CTS were includes and randomized into three groups. Group A, patients received two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W (3 months interval); Group B, patients received one-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W and 5cc normal saline separately (3 months interval); Group C (control group), patients received two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline. The primary outcome is Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) and secondary outcomes include visual analog scale (VAS), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve, and Global assessment of treatment. The evaluations were performed pretreatment as well as on the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after first injection.
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Being tested
- two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT, One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT, Placebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissection
- Keywords
- perineural injection therapy, nerve hydrodissection
- Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITProcedure or surgery
two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W (3 months interval)
One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITProcedure or surgery
One-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W and 10cc normal saline separately (3 months interval)
Placebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissectionProcedure or surgery
Two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline (3 months interval).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT | Experimental | two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc 5% dextrose (3 months interval) Receives: Procedure: two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT |
| One-session of ultrasound-guided PIT | Active comparator | one-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc 5% dextrose and 10cc normal saline separately (3 months interval) Receives: Procedure: One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT |
| Two-session of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection | Placebo comparator | two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline (3 months interval). Receives: Procedure: Placebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline of severity of symptoms and functional status on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of CTS which encompasses two components. In total, 11 questions and 8 items were evaluated to rate the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS), respectively. Both subscales range from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating a higher degree of disability. The mean of total SSS and FSS divided with each item score were used for further analysis.
Measured: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change from baseline of pain on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Digital pain severity or paresthesia/dysthesia was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS). Pain score scale ranged from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the most severe pain.
Measured: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Change from baseline of cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Using the musculoskeletal sonogram to measure the cross-sectional area of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
Measured: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Change from baseline of electrophysiological measurement on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.
Measured: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jan 2019
- Study start1 Aug 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2024
- Study completion31 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yung-Tsan Wu, Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)
- Investigators
- Yung-Tsan Wu, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03802435
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Different PIT for CTS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Wu YT, Chen SR, Li TY, Ho TY, Shen YP, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Feb;59(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/mus.26358. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
PubMed 30339737Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025.
PubMed 28778254Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):601-610. doi: 10.1002/ana.25332. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
PubMed 30187524
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Long-term Effect in Different Sessions of Perineural Injection With Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03802435
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Different PIT for CTS
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Keywords
- perineural injection therapy, nerve hydrodissection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. The technique of perineural injection therapy (PIT) by using 5% dextrose (D5W) is now commonly used for peeling the nerve from surrounding soft tissue (called nerve hydrodissection), which may help antineurogenic inflammation, allow the impulse to pass, and rescue the nerve with ischemic damage. However, the evidence and reference of PIT and nerve hydrodissection are very seldom until our series researches since 2017. Moreover, our research revealed PIT with D5W is more beneficial than that of corticosteroid in patients with mild-to-moderate CTS at 4 to 6 months postinjection. However, the accumulative effect and long-term effect (more than 6 months) of PIT is still unknown. Hence, we design a randomized, double- blind, controlled trail to assess the long-term effect of ultrasound-guided PIT in patients with CTS. The aim one is to survey the possible accumulative effect of different sessions of PIT (6 months follow-up) and aim two is to evaluate the long-term effect and safety of PIT (one year follow-up).
Detailed description
After obtaining written informed consent, patients clinically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate CTS were includes and randomized into three groups. Group A, patients received two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W (3 months interval); Group B, patients received one-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W and 5cc normal saline separately (3 months interval); Group C (control group), patients received two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline. The primary outcome is Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) and secondary outcomes include visual analog scale (VAS), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve, and Global assessment of treatment. The evaluations were performed pretreatment as well as on the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after first injection.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT | Experimental | Procedure: two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITtwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc 5% dextrose (3 months interval) |
| One-session of ultrasound-guided PIT | Active comparator | Procedure: One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITone-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc 5% dextrose and 10cc normal saline separately (3 months interval) |
| Two-session of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Placebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissectiontwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline (3 months interval). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age between 20-80 year-old.
- Diagnosis was confirmed using an electrophysiological study
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cancer
- Coagulopathy
- Pregnancy
- Inflammation status
- Cervical radiculopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITtwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W (3 months interval) | Procedure or surgery | Two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT |
| One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITOne-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W and 10cc normal saline separately (3 months interval) | Procedure or surgery | One-session of ultrasound-guided PIT |
| Placebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissectionTwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline (3 months interval). | Procedure or surgery | Two-session of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline of severity of symptoms and functional status on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of CTS which encompasses two components. In total, 11 questions and 8 items were evaluated to rate the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS), respectively. Both subscales range from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating a higher degree of disability. The mean of total SSS and FSS divided with each item score were used for further analysis.
3 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline of pain on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Change from baseline of cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Change from baseline of electrophysiological measurement on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 30339737Wu YT, Chen SR, Li TY, Ho TY, Shen YP, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Feb;59(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/mus.26358. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 28778254Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025.
- Results publication: PubMed 30187524Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):601-610. doi: 10.1002/ana.25332. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Recruiting
Comparison of Wrist Splint Positions in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Peripheral Neuropathies
Recruiting
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation(rPMS) on CTS(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Recruiting
Hand Function Outcome After the Application of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Post-burn Patients Presented With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burn
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Progressive Gamified Motor Rehabilitation After Carpal Tunnel Release
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yung-Tsan Wu, MD principal investigator
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT and One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline of severity of symptoms and functional status on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection (time frame: Pre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03802435, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2024.