HemodialysisNCT03820401
Dialysis Performance of Different Dialyzer Membranes Using Different Coagulation Strategies
A study testing choice of dialyzer, choice of dialysis mode and choice of anticoagulation strategy in people with Hemodialysis and Coagulation, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Coagulation within the dialyzer membrane fibres is an obvious biological sign of bio-incompatibility. To avoid clotting during extracorporeal treatment, an anticoagulant is added to the circuit, resulting in an increased risk for bleeding complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodialysis, Coagulation
- What is being tested?
- choice of dialyzer, choice of dialysis mode and choice of anticoagulation strategy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 7 Mar 2018to 17 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older
- experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks
- double needle/lumen well-functioning vascular access
Who cannot join
- known coagulation disorder
- active inflammation
- malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Quantification of Dialysis Performance of Different Dialyzer Membranes With Different Coagulation Strategies, Using a Reference microCT Scanning Technique
Coagulation within the dialyzer membrane fibres is an obvious biological sign of bio-incompatibility. To avoid clotting during extracorporeal treatment, an anticoagulant is added to the circuit, resulting in an increased risk for bleeding complications.
In addition, there is evidence that a substantial number of fibers can become blocked before this is reflected in routinely observed parameters, or in termination of the dialysis session. Little is known about the impact of such subclinical clotting on dialyzer performance in terms of solute clearance.
Read more
Membrane clogging due to deposition of proteins and red blood cells on the dialysis membrane may influence both the diffusive and convective transport characteristics of the dialyzer membrane before leading to complete dialyzer clotting.
In 2018, the invesitgators described a method to objectively count the number of blocked fibres inside a dialyzer using a micro-CT scanning technique.
In the present trial, the investigators use this method to assess the resistance of the dialyzer to clotting, and to evaluate the impact of subclinical fibre blocking on solute removal and thus performance of a dialyzer during a dialysis session.
The aim of this randomized cross-over study is to objectively quantify the performance of different dialyzer membranes: ATA™ membrane in the Solacea™ dialyzer, polysulfone membrane in the FX800 dialyzer, and the heparin-coated AN membrane in the Evodial dialyzer, and this with different anticoagulation strategies.
Read the detailed description
This single centre, randomized cross-over study includes ten consecutive stable chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients who experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks, and had no known coagulation disorder, active inflammation or malignancy.
Double-needle vascular access is achieved through a native arterio-venous fistula or a well-functioning double lumen tunnelled central venous catheter.
In a first test series, each patient is dialyzed for 240min (at midweek) in 4 different regimens, randomly using 2 different dialyzers and 2 different anticoagulation schemes. Patients receive their regular brand of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin anticoagulation at the beginning of the dialysis session, and this randomly either at their regular dose (full dose 1/1) or at only 50% of their regular dose (half dose 1/2). All test sessions are performed with blood flow at 300mL/min and dialysate flow at 500mL/min in post dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) mode (substitution flow 75mL/min). Ultrafiltration rates is set according to the patient's interdialytic weight gain and clinical status:
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HDF - 1/1 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HDF - 1/2 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HDF - 1/1 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HDF - 1/2 anticoagulation
During the 4 experimental midweek sessions, blood is sampled from the arterial and venous blood lines, and spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet line, all at 60min after the dialysis start. Blood samples are immediately centrifuged and serum and dialysate are stored at -80°C until batch analysis.
Concentrations of urea, kappa and lambda free light chains, and myoglobin are determined. Extraction ratios and adsorption on the membrane are calculated from concentrations.
At the end of the dialysis session, a standard rinsing procedure of the hemodialyzer is performed using exact 300mL rinsing solution. Next, the hemodialyzer is dried using continuous positive pressure ventilation. Dialyzer fibre blocking is visualized in the dialyzer outlet potting using a 3D CT scanning technique on micrometer resolution. HECTOR is a High Energy CT scanner Optimized for Research, built by the Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography (UGCT) in collaboration with the UGCT spin-off company XRE (Gent, Belgium). In front of the X-ray source, the dialyzer is mounted vertically on a precision rotation stage, and radiographies were recorded over 360° with an angular interval of 0.15°. Scan conditions are optimized to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio based on the sample size and structure, and the scanner properties. The tube voltage is set at 80kV, at a power of 20 Watts, the maximal power that allowed imaging at a resolution of 25µm. A total of 2401 projections are recorded with 500ms exposure each, resulting in a total exposure time of 20 minutes. Acquired images at 0 (projection 1) and 360° (projection 2401) are compared to exclude movement of the hemodialyzer during the scanning process. Reconstruction of the raw projection data is performed with the Octopus Reconstruction software package, licensed by XRE23.
Fibers are counted in the central cross-section of the dialyzer outlet potting in a computer-based way using the Fiji image processing toolkit of ImageJ analysis software (ImageJ 1.51H, NIH, Bethesda, USA), an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.
In a second test series in 10 stable HD patients, no blood sampling is performed but dialyzers are scanned post dialysis. The following different dialyzers in HD modus at midweek are tested:
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/1 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/1 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation - with predialysis albmuin priming of the membrane
- Evodial - HD - no anticoagulation
- Evodial - HD - no anticoagulation - with predialysis albmuin priming of the membrane
In a third test series in 10 stable HD patients, no blood sampling is performed but dialyzers are scanned post dialysis. The following different dialyzers at midweek are tested:
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - pre dilution HDF (substitution 150mL/min) - 1/4 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - post dilution HDF (substitution 75mL/min) - 1/4 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/4 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - pre dilution HDF (substitution 150mL/min) - no anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - post dilution HDF (substitution 75mL/min) - no anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - no anticoagulation
First outcome measure: relative number of open fibers in each tested dialyzer. Second outcome measure: dialyzer performance (extraction ratio, adsorption).
- Conditions
- Hemodialysis, Coagulation
- Being tested
- choice of dialyzer, choice of dialysis mode, choice of anticoagulation strategy, preparation of dialyzer
- Keywords
- hemodialyzer, fibre clotting
- Medical subject headings
- Thrombosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
choice of dialyzerDevice
Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers
choice of dialysis modeOther
Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies
choice of anticoagulation strategyOther
Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies
preparation of dialyzerOther
Fiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers either preprimed with Albumin or not
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Solacea_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| FX800_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| FX800_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
* blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start
* microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_HD_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose
measurement:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_HD_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| FX800_HD_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy; Other: preparation of dialyzer |
| FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
* preparation of dialyzer: the dialyzer was preprimed with albumin solution
measurement:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy; Other: preparation of dialyzer |
| Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Evodial 1.3 (Baxter, USA)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered
measurement:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Evodial 1.3 (Baxter, USA)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered
* preparation of dialyzer: the dialyzer was preprimed with albumin solution
measurement:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy; Other: preparation of dialyzer |
| Solacea_preHDF_1/4anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: pre dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_postHDF_1/4anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_HD_1/4anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose
measurements:microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_preHDF_no anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: pre dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_postHDF_no anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
| Solacea_HD_no anticoagulation | Experimental | intervention:
* choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan)
* choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis
* choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered
measurements:
- microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers Receives: Device: choice of dialyzer; Other: choice of dialysis mode; Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of open fibres in the dialyzer
Number of open fibres as assessed post dialysis by a reference microCT scanning technique
Measured: 17 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Extraction ratio of three middle molecules in the dialyzer
Extraction ratio from myoglobin, kappa and lambda free light chains as calculated from their concentrations at the dialyzer inlet en outlet
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2019
- Study start7 Mar 2018
- Primary completion30 May 2018
- Study completion17 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemodialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GhentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Ghent
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03820401
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UGent_FiberClotting_1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vanommeslaeghe F, Van Biesen W, Dierick M, Boone M, Dhondt A, Eloot S. Micro-computed tomography for the quantification of blocked fibers in hemodialyzers. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20898-w.
PubMed 29422614Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.
PubMed 38189593
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quantification of Dialysis Performance of Different Dialyzer Membranes With Different Coagulation Strategies, Using a Reference microCT Scanning Technique
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03820401
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UGent_FiberClotting_1
- Conditions
- Hemodialysis, Coagulation
- Keywords
- hemodialyzer, fibre clotting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Ghent
- Study start
- 7 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Coagulation within the dialyzer membrane fibres is an obvious biological sign of bio-incompatibility. To avoid clotting during extracorporeal treatment, an anticoagulant is added to the circuit, resulting in an increased risk for bleeding complications.
In addition, there is evidence that a substantial number of fibers can become blocked before this is reflected in routinely observed parameters, or in termination of the dialysis session. Little is known about the impact of such subclinical clotting on dialyzer performance in terms of solute clearance.
Membrane clogging due to deposition of proteins and red blood cells on the dialysis membrane may influence both the diffusive and convective transport characteristics of the dialyzer membrane before leading to complete dialyzer clotting.
In 2018, the invesitgators described a method to objectively count the number of blocked fibres inside a dialyzer using a micro-CT scanning technique.
In the present trial, the investigators use this method to assess the resistance of the dialyzer to clotting, and to evaluate the impact of subclinical fibre blocking on solute removal and thus performance of a dialyzer during a dialysis session.
The aim of this randomized cross-over study is to objectively quantify the performance of different dialyzer membranes: ATA™ membrane in the Solacea™ dialyzer, polysulfone membrane in the FX800 dialyzer, and the heparin-coated AN membrane in the Evodial dialyzer, and this with different anticoagulation strategies.
Detailed description
This single centre, randomized cross-over study includes ten consecutive stable chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients who experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks, and had no known coagulation disorder, active inflammation or malignancy.
Double-needle vascular access is achieved through a native arterio-venous fistula or a well-functioning double lumen tunnelled central venous catheter.
In a first test series, each patient is dialyzed for 240min (at midweek) in 4 different regimens, randomly using 2 different dialyzers and 2 different anticoagulation schemes. Patients receive their regular brand of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin anticoagulation at the beginning of the dialysis session, and this randomly either at their regular dose (full dose 1/1) or at only 50% of their regular dose (half dose 1/2). All test sessions are performed with blood flow at 300mL/min and dialysate flow at 500mL/min in post dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) mode (substitution flow 75mL/min). Ultrafiltration rates is set according to the patient's interdialytic weight gain and clinical status:
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HDF - 1/1 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HDF - 1/2 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HDF - 1/1 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HDF - 1/2 anticoagulation
During the 4 experimental midweek sessions, blood is sampled from the arterial and venous blood lines, and spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet line, all at 60min after the dialysis start. Blood samples are immediately centrifuged and serum and dialysate are stored at -80°C until batch analysis.
Concentrations of urea, kappa and lambda free light chains, and myoglobin are determined. Extraction ratios and adsorption on the membrane are calculated from concentrations.
At the end of the dialysis session, a standard rinsing procedure of the hemodialyzer is performed using exact 300mL rinsing solution. Next, the hemodialyzer is dried using continuous positive pressure ventilation. Dialyzer fibre blocking is visualized in the dialyzer outlet potting using a 3D CT scanning technique on micrometer resolution. HECTOR is a High Energy CT scanner Optimized for Research, built by the Ghent University Centre for X-ray Tomography (UGCT) in collaboration with the UGCT spin-off company XRE (Gent, Belgium). In front of the X-ray source, the dialyzer is mounted vertically on a precision rotation stage, and radiographies were recorded over 360° with an angular interval of 0.15°. Scan conditions are optimized to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio based on the sample size and structure, and the scanner properties. The tube voltage is set at 80kV, at a power of 20 Watts, the maximal power that allowed imaging at a resolution of 25µm. A total of 2401 projections are recorded with 500ms exposure each, resulting in a total exposure time of 20 minutes. Acquired images at 0 (projection 1) and 360° (projection 2401) are compared to exclude movement of the hemodialyzer during the scanning process. Reconstruction of the raw projection data is performed with the Octopus Reconstruction software package, licensed by XRE23.
Fibers are counted in the central cross-section of the dialyzer outlet potting in a computer-based way using the Fiji image processing toolkit of ImageJ analysis software (ImageJ 1.51H, NIH, Bethesda, USA), an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.
In a second test series in 10 stable HD patients, no blood sampling is performed but dialyzers are scanned post dialysis. The following different dialyzers in HD modus at midweek are tested:
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/1 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/1 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation
- polysulfone FX800 - HD - 1/2 anticoagulation - with predialysis albmuin priming of the membrane
- Evodial - HD - no anticoagulation
- Evodial - HD - no anticoagulation - with predialysis albmuin priming of the membrane
In a third test series in 10 stable HD patients, no blood sampling is performed but dialyzers are scanned post dialysis. The following different dialyzers at midweek are tested:
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - pre dilution HDF (substitution 150mL/min) - 1/4 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - post dilution HDF (substitution 75mL/min) - 1/4 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - 1/4 anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - pre dilution HDF (substitution 150mL/min) - no anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - post dilution HDF (substitution 75mL/min) - no anticoagulation
- ATA™ Solacea 19H - HD - no anticoagulation
First outcome measure: relative number of open fibers in each tested dialyzer. Second outcome measure: dialyzer performance (extraction ratio, adsorption).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 17
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Solacea_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose measurements: * blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start * microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements: * blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start * microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| FX800_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) * choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose measurements: * blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start * microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| FX800_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) * choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements: * blood \& dialysate sampling at 60min after dialysis start * microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_HD_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose measurement: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_HD_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro, Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| FX800_HD_1/1anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: standard anticoagulation dose measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy, Other: preparation of dialyzerintervention: * choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy, Other: preparation of dialyzerintervention: * choice of dialyzer: FX800 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only half of his/her standard anticoagulation dose * preparation of dialyzer: the dialyzer was preprimed with albumin solution measurement: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Evodial 1.3 (Baxter, USA) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered measurement: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategy, Other: preparation of dialyzerintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Evodial 1.3 (Baxter, USA) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered * preparation of dialyzer: the dialyzer was preprimed with albumin solution measurement: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_preHDF_1/4anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: pre dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_postHDF_1/4anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_HD_1/4anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: the patient receives only 1/4th of his/her standard anticoagulation dose measurements:microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_preHDF_no anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: pre dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_postHDF_no anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: post dilution hemodiafiltration * choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
| Solacea_HD_no anticoagulation | Experimental | Device: choice of dialyzer, Other: choice of dialysis mode, Other: choice of anticoagulation strategyintervention: * choice of dialyzer: Solacea dialyzer (Nipro Japan) * choice of dialysis mode: hemodialysis * choice of anticoagulation strategy: no anticoagulation is administered measurements: - microCT scanning of rinsed and dried dialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years or older
- experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks
- double needle/lumen well-functioning vascular access
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- known coagulation disorder
- active inflammation
- malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| choice of dialyzerFiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers | Device | Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation, Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_HD_1/1anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation, FX800_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/1anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_no anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_no anticoagulation, Solacea_preHDF_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_preHDF_no anticoagulation |
| choice of dialysis modeFiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers used in different dialysis stategies | Other | Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation, Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_HD_1/1anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation, FX800_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/1anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_no anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_no anticoagulation, Solacea_preHDF_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_preHDF_no anticoagulation |
| choice of anticoagulation strategyFiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers using different anticoagulation strategies | Other | Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation, Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_HD_1/1anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation, FX800_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/1anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_HD_no anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/1anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/2anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_postHDF_no anticoagulation, Solacea_preHDF_1/4anticoagulation, Solacea_preHDF_no anticoagulation |
| preparation of dialyzerFiber blocking is calculated in different commercially available dialyzers either preprimed with Albumin or not | Other | Evodial_HD_no anticoagulation_albuprime, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation, FX800_HD_1/2anticoagulation_albuprime |
Primary outcome
Number of open fibres in the dialyzer
Time frame: 17 weeks
Number of open fibres as assessed post dialysis by a reference microCT scanning technique
1 secondary outcome
Extraction ratio of three middle molecules in the dialyzer
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 29422614Vanommeslaeghe F, Van Biesen W, Dierick M, Boone M, Dhondt A, Eloot S. Micro-computed tomography for the quantification of blocked fibers in hemodialyzers. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20898-w.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38189593Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Longmuir H, Dodds B, Prasad R, Batt TJ, Jose MD, Strippoli GF. Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemodialysis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Manual Acupuncture for Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Intradialytic Nausea and Vomiting, Chronic Kidney Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Test the Safety of the Study Drug Fosmanogepix and How the Body Handles It in Adults With Severe Kidney Failure on Dialysis
End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Adult
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Bupropion for Fatigue in End-stage Kidney Disease Patients on Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease, Fatigue
Active, not recruiting
Group Exercise Program Supported By Audiovisual Media During Hemodialysis
Chronic Kidney Failure, Hemodialysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing choice of dialyzer, choice of dialysis mode and choice of anticoagulation strategy in people with Hemodialysis and Coagulation, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of open fibres in the dialyzer (time frame: 17 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03820401, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2019.