Stroke, IschemicPhase 2TRANSPORT 2NCT03826030
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Motor Recovery
A Phase 2 study testing Low dose tDCS, High dose tDCS and mCIMT in people with Stroke, Ischemic and Motor Activity, run by Duke University at 14 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This research study is to find out if brain stimulation at different dosage level combined with an efficacy-proven rehabilitation therapy can improve arm function. The stimulation technique is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Ischemic, Motor Activity, Upper Extremity Paralysis
- What is being tested?
- Low dose tDCS, High dose tDCS and mCIMT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 129 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to 19 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Each subject must meet all of the following criteria to participate in this study:
- 18-80 years old; and
- First-ever unihemispheric ischemic stroke radiologically verified and occurred within the past 30-180 days; and
- >10° of active wrist extension, >10° of thumb abduction/extension, and > 10° of extension in at least 2 additional digits; and
- Unilateral limb weakness with a Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity score of ≤ 54 (out of 66) to avoid ceiling effects; and
- An absolute difference of FM-UE scores between the two baseline assessments that is ≤ 2 points indicating stable motor impairment; if subject is not stable, then he/she will be invited for a reassessment after 7-14 days (but no more than 3 reassessments); and
- Pre-stroke mRS ≤2; and
- Signed informed consent by the subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR).
Each Subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Primary intracerebral hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage or bi-hemispheric or bilateral brainstem ischemic strokes;
- Medication use at the time of study that may interfere with tDCS, including but not limited to carbamazepine, flunarizine, sulpiride, rivastigmine, dextromethorphan;
- Other co-existent neuromuscular disorders (pre- or post-stroke) affecting upper extremity motor function;
- Other neurological disorders (pre- or post-stroke) affecting subject's ability to participate in the study;
- Moderate to severe cognitive impairment defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score < 18/30;
- History of medically uncontrolled depression or other neuro-psychiatric disorders despite medications either before or after stroke that may affect subject's ability to participate in the study;
- Uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment(s) at the time of randomization, defined as SBP≥185 mmHg or DBP≥110 mmHg (patient can be treated, reassessed and randomized later);
- Presence of any MRI/tDCS/TMS risk factors including but not limited to: 8a) an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated metallic or nonmetallic implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system; 8b) a non-fixed metallic part in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to eye; 8c) pregnancy (effects of MRI, TMS, and tDCS on the fetus are unknown); 8d) history of seizure disorder or post-stroke seizure; 8e) preexisting scalp lesion under the intended electrode placement or a bone defect or hemicraniectomy;
- Planning to move from the local area within the next 6 months;
- Life expectancy less than 6 months;
- Has received Botulinum toxin injection to the affected upper extremity in the past 3 months prior to randomization or expectation that Botulinum will be given to the Upper Extremity prior to the completion of the last follow-up visit;
- Concurrent enrollment in another investigational stroke recovery study;
- Doesn't speak sufficient English to comply with study procedures;
- Expectation that subject cannot comply with study procedures and visits.
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
United States14 sites
Emory Rehabilitation Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
Medical University of South Carolina University Hospital
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, 19027
Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Keck Hospital of USC
Los Angeles, California, 90089
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199
MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Burke Rehabilitation Center
White Plains, New York, 10605
About this study
Official title: TRANScranial Direct Current Stimulation for POst-stroke Motor Recovery - a Phase II sTudy (TRANSPORT 2)
This research study is to find out if brain stimulation at different dosage level combined with an efficacy-proven rehabilitation therapy can improve arm function. The stimulation technique is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The treatment uses direct currents to stimulate specific parts of the brain affected by stroke. The adjunctive rehabilitation therapy is called "modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy" (mCIMT). During this therapy the subject will wear a mitt on the hand of the arm that was not affected by a stroke and force to use the weak arm. The study will test 3 different doses of brain stimulation in combination with mCIMT to find out the most promising one.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Ischemic, Motor Activity, Upper Extremity Paralysis
- Being tested
- Sham, Low dose tDCS, High dose tDCS, mCIMT
- Keywords
- stroke, stroke recovery, brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke, Motor Activity, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ShamDevice
Sham group only receives 30 seconds of stimulation at 2mA in the beginning to create a sensory perception to the scalp in order to blind the subject.
Low dose tDCSDevice
The low dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 2 mA for 30 minutes per session
High dose tDCSDevice
The high dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 4 mA for 30 minutes per session
mCIMTBehavioural
All three tDCS groups receive constraint-induced movement therapy as the adjunctive behavioral therapy for 2 hours per session
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sham tDCS + mCIMT | Sham comparator | Sham tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers no dose or zero milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) Receives: Device: Sham; Behavioral: mCIMT |
| 2 mA tDCS + mCIMT | Active comparator | 2 mA tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers low dose or 2 milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) Receives: Device: Low dose tDCS; Behavioral: mCIMT |
| 4 mA + mCIMT | Active comparator | 4 mA tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers high dose or 4 milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) Receives: Device: High dose tDCS; Behavioral: mCIMT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in FM-UE From Baseline
The Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity (FM-UE) is a measure of motor impairment (0 to 66 points, with higher points indicating less impairment). FM-UE scale consists of a 33-item assessment which provides a global assessment of UE motor impairment. A rater provides an ordinal rating (2=near normal ability/response, 1=partial ability, 0=unable to perform/no response). The FM-UE scale is a proven scale with excellent intra-rater reliability (0.99), inter-rater reliability (0.99), test-retest reliability (0.94 -0.99), and internal consistency (0.97). FM-UE scale was assessed both by site raters (who were masked to the intervention) and by a central rater (who was masked to timepoint and intervention), by watching video recordings. The centrally rated score was used for the primary outcome analysis. For each element of the FM-UE scale, if the centrally rated score could not be determined, the site rater score was substituted.
Measured: Day 15
Secondary outcomes (2)
Mean Change in WMFT Time Score From Baseline
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a measure of functional motor activity that quantifies upper extremity (UE) motor ability through timed and functional tasks. The WMFT Time Score the median of 15 timed arm movements and hand dexterity tasks, each to be completed in 120s. If a task could not be completed in 120s, a score of 121s was assigned. A lower WMFT Time Score is better.
Measured: Day 15
Mean Change in SIS Hand Subscale From Baseline
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) has 8 subscales which ask questions regarding a patient's physical limitations, memory and thinking, emotions and mood, ability to communicate, daily activities, mobility at home and in the community, use of hand most affected by stroke, and ability to participate in meaningful life activities. Each subscale item is rated on a scale from 5-1 (5= None of the time, 4=a little of the time, 3=Some of the time, 2=Most of the time, 1=All of the time). The domain/subscale scores, including the SIS Hand Subscale, range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Measured: Day 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019
- Primary completion19 Sep 2024
- Study completion19 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke, IschemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wayne Feng, MD, Principal investigator, Duke UniversityGottfried Schlaug, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Baystate Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03826030
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00103316
- Other IDs
- U01NS102353
- Acronym
- TRANSPORT 2
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will follow the National Institute of Health Stroke Trial Network policy and procedure to share IPD. Please refer to https://nihstrokenet.org/ for detailed information.
Publications
Schlaug G, Cassarly C, Feld JA, Wolf SL, Rowe VT, Fritz S, Chhatbar PY, Shinde A, Su Z, Broderick JP, Zorowitz R, Awosika O, Edwards D, Lin C, Franciso GE, Wittenberg GF, Pundik S, Gregory C, Borich MR, Ramakrishnan V, Feng W. Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in addition to constraint-induced movement therapy for post-stroke motor recovery (TRANSPORT2): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled triple-blind trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025 May;24(5):400-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00044-4. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
PubMed 40157380
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TRANScranial Direct Current Stimulation for POst-stroke Motor Recovery - a Phase II sTudy (TRANSPORT 2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03826030
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRANSPORT 2 / Pro00103316
- Conditions
- Stroke, Ischemic, Motor Activity, Upper Extremity Paralysis
- Keywords
- stroke, stroke recovery, brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 22 Aug 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study is to find out if brain stimulation at different dosage level combined with an efficacy-proven rehabilitation therapy can improve arm function. The stimulation technique is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The treatment uses direct currents to stimulate specific parts of the brain affected by stroke. The adjunctive rehabilitation therapy is called "modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy" (mCIMT). During this therapy the subject will wear a mitt on the hand of the arm that was not affected by a stroke and force to use the weak arm. The study will test 3 different doses of brain stimulation in combination with mCIMT to find out the most promising one.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sham tDCS + mCIMT | Sham comparator | Device: Sham, Behavioral: mCIMTSham tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers no dose or zero milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) |
| 2 mA tDCS + mCIMT | Active comparator | Device: Low dose tDCS, Behavioral: mCIMT2 mA tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers low dose or 2 milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) |
| 4 mA + mCIMT | Active comparator | Device: High dose tDCS, Behavioral: mCIMT4 mA tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers high dose or 4 milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ShamSham group only receives 30 seconds of stimulation at 2mA in the beginning to create a sensory perception to the scalp in order to blind the subject. | Device | Sham tDCS + mCIMT |
| Low dose tDCSThe low dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 2 mA for 30 minutes per session | Device | 2 mA tDCS + mCIMT |
| High dose tDCSThe high dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 4 mA for 30 minutes per session | Device | 4 mA + mCIMT |
| mCIMTAll three tDCS groups receive constraint-induced movement therapy as the adjunctive behavioral therapy for 2 hours per session | Behavioural | 2 mA tDCS + mCIMT, 4 mA + mCIMT, Sham tDCS + mCIMT |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in FM-UE From Baseline
Time frame: Day 15
The Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity (FM-UE) is a measure of motor impairment (0 to 66 points, with higher points indicating less impairment). FM-UE scale consists of a 33-item assessment which provides a global assessment of UE motor impairment. A rater provides an ordinal rating (2=near normal ability/response, 1=partial ability, 0=unable to perform/no response). The FM-UE scale is a proven scale with excellent intra-rater reliability (0.99), inter-rater reliability (0.99), test-retest reliability (0.94 -0.99), and internal consistency (0.97). FM-UE scale was assessed both by site raters (who were masked to the intervention) and by a central rater (who was masked to timepoint and intervention), by watching video recordings. The centrally rated score was used for the primary outcome analysis. For each element of the FM-UE scale, if the centrally rated score could not be determined, the site rater score was substituted.
2 secondary outcomes
Mean Change in WMFT Time Score From Baseline
Time frame: Day 15
Mean Change in SIS Hand Subscale From Baseline
Time frame: Day 15
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40157380Schlaug G, Cassarly C, Feld JA, Wolf SL, Rowe VT, Fritz S, Chhatbar PY, Shinde A, Su Z, Broderick JP, Zorowitz R, Awosika O, Edwards D, Lin C, Franciso GE, Wittenberg GF, Pundik S, Gregory C, Borich MR, Ramakrishnan V, Feng W. Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in addition to constraint-induced movement therapy for post-stroke motor recovery (TRANSPORT2): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled triple-blind trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025 May;24(5):400-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00044-4. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will follow the National Institute of Health Stroke Trial Network policy and procedure to share IPD. Please refer to https://nihstrokenet.org/ for detailed information.
Related trials for Stroke, Ischemic
Recruiting
Connectomic Alterations Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Territory
Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingPhase 3
Probucol for Symptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Artery Stenosis
Ischemic Stroke, TIA
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wayne Feng, MD principal investigator
Duke University
Gottfried Schlaug, MD, PhD principal investigator
Baystate Health
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Low dose tDCS, High dose tDCS and mCIMT in people with Stroke, Ischemic and Motor Activity, run by Duke University at 14 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in FM-UE From Baseline (time frame: Day 15). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03826030, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2025.