AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Kidney InjuryHEFCAANCT03836742

HEmoFiltration With Citric Acid Anticoagulation

An observational study of Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Failure, run by Medical University of Gdansk at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective observational study of all consecutive cardio-vascular surgical patients treated with post-dilution hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation as first-choice anticoagulation method. The filter life-span was assessed in the context of postoperative cardiac surgical antithrombotic prophylaxis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
Hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
54 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
11 Aug 2015to 31 Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All consecutive cardio-vascular surgery patients treated with post-dilution hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation from August 2015 through November 2017

Who may be able to join

  • cardiac and vascular surgery patients treated with continuous hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation

Who cannot join

  • severe chronic liver disease, acute liver injury with INR > 2, and refractory shock with lactate increasing above 8 mmol/L

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Romuald Lango

    Gdansk, Polska, 80-516

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of a Regional Anticoagulation Protocol for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies.

Prospective observational study of all consecutive cardio-vascular surgical patients treated with post-dilution hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation as first-choice anticoagulation method. The filter life-span was assessed in the context of postoperative cardiac surgical antithrombotic prophylaxis. Reasons for termination of hemofiltration sessions were assessed. The second aim of this study was to assess the influence ACD-A based anticoagulation protocol on acid-base and ion homeostasis in cardiac surgical patients with acute renal failure.

Read the detailed description

All consecutive cardio-vascular surgery patients treated with post-dilution hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation (HF RCA) from August 2015 through November 2017 were included to prospective audit. Indication to hemofiltration treatment was based on clinical assessment of patients renal function and clinical status by attending physician and conformed conventional indications to renal replacement therapy (RRT) in intensive care unit (ICU). Severe chronic liver disease or acute liver injury with INR > 2 and refractory shock with lactate increasing above 8 mmol/L were considered as contraindication to RCA.

Initially set blood flow was 5 times higher than filtrate flow, which makes filtration fraction of 20%. To reduce the risk of metabolic alkalosis, ACD-A citrate solution was proposed instead of most commonly used trisodium citrate solution, and relatively low target citrate concentration (2.8 mmol/L) was adopted. In case of pH increase above 7.5 or bicarbonate concentration above 40 mmol/L filtrate flow was decreased from initial 35 ml/kg/hour down to 25 ml/kg/hour which should reduce bicarbonate synthesis by 25%. If metabolic alkalosis persisted, the second step involved reduction of blood flow from initial 5 times down to 4 times filtrate flow, which reduced citrate flow by the same factor.

In order to avoid hypomagnesemia resulting from magnesium binding to citrate, and its removal with ultrafiltrate not balanced with magnesium content in replacement fluid, the original protocol was modified by connecting magnesium sulfate solution 2g/50 ml 0.9% NaCl at the flow 1 mL/hour.

All sessions stopped due to patients death before 48 hours of HF treatment were excluded from the analysis. Similarly, all cases where hemofiltration session was stopped before 48 hours of treatment due to organizational reasons, recovery of renal function, change of therapy, and when patients were treated with heparin infusion due to surgical indications were excluded from further circuit survival analysis.

Blood gas parameters together with pH, bicarbonate concentration, Na, Cl, K, Ca, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, lactate, and anion gap were analyzed every 6 hours. Post filter ionized calcium concentration was not assessed. Serum phosphate, magnesium and total calcium was assessed every 24 hours during hemofiltration treatment with RCA.

Being tested
Hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation
Medical subject headings
Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulationProcedure or surgery

    To reduce risk of metabolic alkalosis during hemofiltration treatment, ACD-A citrate solution was proposed instead of most commonly used trisodium citrate solution and relatively low target citrate concentration (2.8 mmol/L) was adopted. In case of pH increase above 7.5 or bicarbonate concentration above 40 mmol/L filtrate flow was decreased from initial 35 ml/kg/hour down to 25 ml/kg/hour which reduced bicarbonate delivery by 25%. If metabolic alkalosis persisted, the second step involved reduction of blood flow from initial 5 times down to 4 times filtrate flow, which reduced citrate flow by the same factor.

Study groups in NCT03836742
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HF RCACardiovascular surgery patients treated with hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation
Receives: Procedure: Hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hemofiltration circuit survival time

    in hours

    Measured: up to 120 hours from the beginning of hemofiltration session

  2. Incidence of metabolic alkalosis

    Arterial blood pH>7.5 or BE > 40 mmol/L

    Measured: From the beginning of hemofiltration session until 6 hours after its end

  3. Incidence of hypernatremia and hyponatremia

    Incidence of hypernatremia> 150 mmol/L and hyponatremia < 130 mmol/L in arterial blood sample

    Measured: From the beginning of hemofiltration session until 6 hours after its end

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Incidence of citrate accumulation

    Incidence of total to ionized calcium ratio > 2,5 in arterial blood sample

    Measured: From the beginning of hemofiltration session until 24 hours after its end

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2019
  2. Study start11 Aug 2015
  3. Primary completion10 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
54 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03836742
Sponsor's protocol ID
NKBBN/539/2016-17
Acronym
HEFCAA
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
6 Feb 2019
Last updated
15 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No IPD are to be shared with other researcher

Publications

  • Kirwan CJ, Hutchison R, Ghabina S, Schwarze S, Beane A, Ramsay S, Thompson E, Prowle JR. Implementation of a Simplified Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Protocol for Post-Dilution Continuous Hemofiltration Using a Bicarbonate Buffered, Calcium Containing Replacement Solution. Blood Purif. 2016;42(4):349-355. doi: 10.1159/000452755. Epub 2016 Nov 19.

    PubMed 27866200

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Kidney Failure, run by Medical University of Gdansk at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hemofiltration circuit survival time (time frame: up to 120 hours from the beginning of hemofiltration session). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03836742, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in