AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee ArthropathyNCT03840122

ACB + IPACK Block With or Without Local Infiltration in RA-TKA

A study testing ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic and ACB + IPACK block without injection in people with Knee Arthropathy, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of an Adductor canal block (ACB) + interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block along with a single intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic that includes Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Clonidine and saline… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Knee Arthropathy
What is being tested?
ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic and ACB + IPACK block without injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
8 Oct 2019to 8 Oct 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient is over the age of 21
  • Patient is scheduled to undergo a unilateral, primary TKA, secondary to osteoarthritis
  • Patient agrees to participate as a study subject and signs the Informed Consent and Research Authorization documents
  • Patient is able to read and speak English.

Who cannot join

  • Patient is under the age of 21
  • Patient's primary diagnosis is not osteoarthritis (e.g. post-traumatic arthritis)
  • Patient is scheduled to undergo a bilateral TKA surgery
  • Patient is unable to read and speak English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Jewish Hospital

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparing ACB + IPACK Block With or Without Local Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Primary Robotic Arm-Assisted TKA

The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of an Adductor canal block (ACB) + interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block along with a single intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic that includes Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Clonidine and saline to an ACB + IPACK block without the intraoperative injection of a standard local anesthetic in patients undergoing Robotic Arm-Assisted TKA (RA-TKA).

Being tested
ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic, ACB + IPACK block without injection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anestheticOther

    ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic which is comprised of the following agents and amounts:

    • Ropivacaine 5mg/ml (49.25ml)
    • Epinephrine 1mg/ml (0.5ml)
    • Ketorolac 30mg/ml (1ml)
    • Clonidine 0.1mg/ml (0.8ml)
    • Saline 48.45ml
  • ACB + IPACK block without injectionOther

    ACB + IPACK block without an injection of local anesthetic

Study groups in NCT03840122
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A - ACB + IPACK with injectionExperimental50 arms: ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic of Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, Ketorolac, Clonidine and saline
Receives: Other: ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic
B - ACB + IPACK without injectionActive comparator50 arms: ACB + IPACK block without injection of local anesthetic
Receives: Other: ACB + IPACK block without injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. total length of hospital stay

    total length of hospital stay as defined by number of days from date of surgery to date of discharge

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken at 2 weeks postoperatively

  2. Knee Society Score

    Knee Society Score as recorded preoperatively and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively. The score is on a scale from 0-100. A higher value represents a better outcome.

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken preoperatively (4-6 weeks prior to date of surgery) and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively.

  3. WOMAC score

    WOMAC score as recorded preoperatively and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively. The score is on a scale from 0-100. In contrast to the Knee Society Score, on the WOMAC a lower value represents a better outcome.

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken preoperatively (4-6 weeks prior to date of surgery) and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

  4. Visual Analog Scale

    The Visual Analog Scale measures the patient's level of knee pain on a scale of zero to ten via what the patient expresses verbally. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) represents the degree of pain that the patient is experiencing at the time the measure is taken. Zero represents "pain-free". A 10 would represent pain so excruciating as to warrant emergency medical assistance, or as it is described to the patient, "the worst pain imaginable". Obviously, the lower the number, the better the outcome. There is no subscale.

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively, and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively.

  5. Amount of narcotic medication utilized

    Amount of narcotic medication utilized (daily dosage measured as a Milligram Morphine Equivalent (MME) value).

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively, and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

  6. Ability to rise from a chair independently

    Ability to rise from a chair independently (Yes/No)

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively, and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

  7. Active range-of-motion (ROM)

    Active ROM (range-of-motion) as measured by a goniometer (range of 0-135 degrees)

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively, and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

  8. Distance that patient is able to walk

    Distance that patient is able to walk, as measured in feet

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively, and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

  9. Use of an ambulatory assistive device

    Use of an ambulatory assistive device (Yes/No)

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 24 hours postoperatively, 48 hours postoperatively, 72 hours postoperatively, 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively, 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

  10. Return to driving

    Return to driving (Yes/No)

    Measured: outcome measure will be taken 2 weeks (± 4 days) postoperatively and 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2019
  2. Study start8 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion8 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion8 Oct 2019

Why it stopped: The P.I. decided to cancel this study. On 10/08/19, a study closure request was submitted to the IRB.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03840122
Sponsor's protocol ID
18.1246
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
30 Jan 2019
Last updated
10 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ACB + IPACK block with injection of local anesthetic and ACB + IPACK block without injection in people with Knee Arthropathy, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

total length of hospital stay (time frame: outcome measure will be taken at 2 weeks postoperatively). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in