FibromyalgiaNCT03843203
Long Term Home Based tDCS in Fibromyalgia
A study testing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS in people with Fibromyalgia and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Fibromyalgia(FM) is a widespread musculoskeletal pain syndrome characterized by fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and neuro-vegetative symptoms. It is a multivariable and complex neurobiological process. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Fibromyalgia, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
- What is being tested?
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to 1 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women, who are able to read and write, with confirmed diagnosis of FM according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (2010-2016).
- Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.
Who cannot join
- Reside outside the Greater Porto Alegre area
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemaker; cochlear implant;
- History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological diseases; history of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases, and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or under treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90.450-120
Wolnei Caumo, PhD, +5551 3359 8083, wcaumo@hcpa.edu.br
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Effectivity of Long Term Home Based tDCS in Fibromyalgia: an Explanatory Randomized Clinical Trial
Fibromyalgia(FM) is a widespread musculoskeletal pain syndrome characterized by fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and neuro-vegetative symptoms. It is a multivariable and complex neurobiological process. FM worldwide prevalence according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 diagnostic criteria is estimated under 5,4%. In USA the burden caused by FM is estimated at 29 billions every year, due to assistance, health care costs and retirement to loss of productivity. It is known that conventional pharmacological approaches present poor therapeutic response in more than 50% of these patients. It is conceivable that this limited results, at least in part, due to the lack of a complete elucidation of its pathophysiology.
Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment. In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. FM patients will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex.
Read the detailed description
Fibromyalgia(FM) is a widespread musculoskeletal pain syndrome characterized by fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and neuro-vegetative symptoms. It is a multivariable and complex neurobiological process. FM worldwide prevalence according to ACR 2010 diagnostic criteria is estimated under 5,4%. In USA the burden caused by FM is estimated at 29 billions every year, due to assistance, health care costs and retirement to loss of productivity. It is known that conventional pharmacological approaches present poor therapeutic response in more than 50% of these patients. It is conceivable that this limited results, at least in part, due to the lack of a complete elucidation of its pathophysiology.
What is known so far is that the peripheral mechanisms contribute to the FM frame, but the central component surely commands the process, because the peripheral component does not explain ubiquitous fatigue, sleep problems, depressed mood and memory, catastrophic thinking, which are invariably as or more relevant than the pain of superficial structures. Diffuse hyperalgesia, allodynia, and the summation effect are added to the symptoms mentioned. Such symptoms are part of the central sensitization. Among dysfunctional FM processes, functional alterations of the motor cortex and its connections with subcortical structures that constitute the neuromatrix of pain have been demonstrated, as well as quantitative and qualitative alterations in fine sensitive fibers of the peripheral nervous system. Based on this complex nature of FM, the objective of this research is to obtain greater clarity about its pathophysiology and to identify distinctions between subgroups of patients with a view to advancing diagnosis and treatment, aiming at individualized therapy and improving outcomes, thereby attenuating , the significant loss to patients' lives and the heavy social and economic burden to patients and society.
As for the current therapeutic approach, in addition to drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - duloxetine, milnacipran and pregabalin) the target has been techniques that may modify the dysfunctional neuroplasticity process, such as transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS) in order to counter-regulate the dysfunction responsible for triggering and maintaining FM symptoms. Although this technique is gaining space in the research and in the clinical scenario, many questions remain to be answered, such as: time of treatment, place to be stimulated (assembly method), how to perform maintenance therapy and benefit time after treatment, and, above all, which techniques could produce an additive effect (eg, physical activity, cognitive and pharmacological activity). From the presented scenario, the present project was organized, which is characterized as a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the dose (in the sessions) in the treatment of FM, with measures of pain, functional capacity and function of the descending pain modulator system as the outcomes. Also, potential predictors of (tDCS) response in primary outcomes will be: (a) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) parameters (motor evoked potential (MEP), intracortical inhibition (ICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF) and silent period (CSP)) ; (b) serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its polymorphisms for the G (Val; / Met) alleles, as well as levels of the S100B protein; (c) level of central sensitization, catastrophism of pain and depressive symptoms.
In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial with 60 female patients with FM, diagnosed according to the criteria of the American Society of Rheumatology (2010 - revised in 2016), age between 19 and 65 years old, who will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex. The sessions will last 20 min, the current intensity will be 2 milliamperes, with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the left hemisphere. Patients will receive, in addition to training to administer home-based (tDCS) treatment, written instructions on physical exercises suggested by the investigator. The duration of treatment will be 8 weeks and a follow-up time after the end of the 12-week stimulation as recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). Patients should respond daily to two questionnaires, one on the type of exercise performed and the duration of the exercises and another on the possible side effects of the tDCS. The home tDCS will be carried out with equipment developed by the research group coordinated by the proponent of this project, in partnership with the Biomedical Engineering of the Hospital of Clinics of Porto Alegre (HCPA), with a patent application with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) under the number BR2020150164500. In addition to the possible contribution to knowledge production, this project aims to transfer the technology acquired and developed to the community, and in this way, it can benefit millions of people suffering from chronic FM pain with limited diagnostic and therapeutic perspective. In addition, to provide a cost-effective therapeutic technique for phase III studies on the use of large-scale home-based tDCS, a technique that can be extended to several neuropsychiatric conditions, such as depression and besides being able to assist as an adjuvant in the rehabilitation of sequelae of cerebral ischemia. Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment.
- Being tested
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
- Keywords
- Pain, Brain derived neurotrophic factor, functional capacity
- Medical subject headings
- Fibromyalgia, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCSDevice
- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| s-tDCS | Sham comparator | - Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS The patients will receive tDCS sham treatment. The patients will receive sham tDCS treatment over primary motor cortex. According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at o contralateral F3. In sham stimulation the device only release flow current, in the first 30 s of session and in the remaining 30s in the end of the session, during 20 minutes. Receives: Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS |
| M1 a-tDCS | Active comparator | * Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
* The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over primary motor cortex.
* According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at contralateral supraorbital Fp2.
* Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes. Receives: Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS |
| DLPFC a-tDCS | Active comparator | * Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS
* The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
* According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4.
* Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes. Receives: Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain level - first phase
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Pain scores assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 to 100mm) (0 means no pain - 100 means the worst pain imaginable)
Measured: 1 month
Change in functional capacity - first phase
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Total score on the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (BPCP:S) (range from 0 to 93; high numbers means more pain severity, interference in daily activities and emotional burden)
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in pain level - second phase
Change from before and after the Second phase of treatment on Pain scores assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 to 100mm) (0 means no pain - 100 means the worst pain imaginable)
Measured: 3 months
Change in functional capacity - second phase
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Total score on the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (BPCP:S) (range from 0 to 93; high numbers means more pain severity, interference in daily activities and emotional burden)
Measured: 3 months
Change in Function of modulatory descending system
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on the score in a numerical pain scale (NPS 0-10) for a moderate heat pain stimulus to the right arm (ventral region) during a conditioned pain modulation task (CPM-task), where participant keeps the counter-lateral hand in an iced cold water (0 to 1º Celsius)
Measured: 1 month
Change in Function of corticospinal pathway
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on measures of motor threshold (MT), motor evoked potential (MEP), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), and cortical silent period (CSP) assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Measured: 1 month
Change in levels of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF
Blood samples will be collected at baseline and after the First phase of intervention in order to determine BDNF serum levels using a standardized kit
Measured: 1 month
Polymorphism of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF
Blood samples will be collected at baseline in order to determine BDNF gene polymorphism for the G allele (rs6265)
Measured: 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completion1 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FibromyalgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wolnei Caumo, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Investigators
- Wolnei Caumo, PhD, Study director, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03843203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-0330
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, McCarberg BH; FibroCollaborative. The science of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):907-11. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0206.
PubMed 21878603Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C, Brunelin J, Moller HJ, Reiser M, Padberg F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15284-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011.
PubMed 22031874Silva AF, Zortea M, Carvalho S, Leite J, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates attention and pain in fibromyalgia: randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 9;7(1):135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00185-w.
PubMed 28273933Zanette SA, Dussan-Sarria JA, Souza A, Deitos A, Torres IL, Caumo W. Higher serum S100B and BDNF levels are correlated with a lower pressure-pain threshold in fibromyalgia. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 8;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-10-46.
PubMed 25005881Lopes Alves R, Zortea M, Vicuna Serrano P, Laranjeira VDS, Franceschini Tocchetto B, Ramalho L, Fernanda da Silveira Alves C, Brugnera Tomedi R, Pereira de Almeida R, Machado Bruck S, Medeiros L, R S Sanches P, P Silva D Jr, Torres ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Modulation of neural networks and symptom correlated in fibromyalgia: A randomized double-blind multi-group explanatory clinical trial of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation. PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0288830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288830. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39536019Caumo W, Lopes Ramos R, Vicuna Serrano P, da Silveira Alves CF, Medeiros L, Ramalho L, Tomeddi R, Bruck S, Boher L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Ls Torres I, Fregni F. Efficacy of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in the Disability Due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Factorial Sham-Randomized Clinical Study. J Pain. 2024 Feb;25(2):376-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
PubMed 37689323Serrano PV, Zortea M, Alves RL, Beltran G, Bavaresco C, Ramalho L, Alves CFDS, Medeiros L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Lucena da Silva Torres I, Fregni F, Caumo W. The effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive performance in fibromyalgia: A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:992742. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.992742. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36504629Caumo W, Alves RL, Vicuna P, Alves CFDS, Ramalho L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP, da Silva Torres IL, Fregni F. Impact of Bifrontal Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain Catastrophizing and Disability due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study. J Pain. 2022 Apr;23(4):641-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
PubMed 34785366
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Effectivity of Long Term Home Based tDCS in Fibromyalgia: an Explanatory Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03843203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-0330
- Keywords
- Pain, Brain derived neurotrophic factor, functional capacity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Fibromyalgia(FM) is a widespread musculoskeletal pain syndrome characterized by fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and neuro-vegetative symptoms. It is a multivariable and complex neurobiological process. FM worldwide prevalence according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 diagnostic criteria is estimated under 5,4%. In USA the burden caused by FM is estimated at 29 billions every year, due to assistance, health care costs and retirement to loss of productivity. It is known that conventional pharmacological approaches present poor therapeutic response in more than 50% of these patients. It is conceivable that this limited results, at least in part, due to the lack of a complete elucidation of its pathophysiology.
Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment. In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. FM patients will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex.
Detailed description
Fibromyalgia(FM) is a widespread musculoskeletal pain syndrome characterized by fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and neuro-vegetative symptoms. It is a multivariable and complex neurobiological process. FM worldwide prevalence according to ACR 2010 diagnostic criteria is estimated under 5,4%. In USA the burden caused by FM is estimated at 29 billions every year, due to assistance, health care costs and retirement to loss of productivity. It is known that conventional pharmacological approaches present poor therapeutic response in more than 50% of these patients. It is conceivable that this limited results, at least in part, due to the lack of a complete elucidation of its pathophysiology.
What is known so far is that the peripheral mechanisms contribute to the FM frame, but the central component surely commands the process, because the peripheral component does not explain ubiquitous fatigue, sleep problems, depressed mood and memory, catastrophic thinking, which are invariably as or more relevant than the pain of superficial structures. Diffuse hyperalgesia, allodynia, and the summation effect are added to the symptoms mentioned. Such symptoms are part of the central sensitization. Among dysfunctional FM processes, functional alterations of the motor cortex and its connections with subcortical structures that constitute the neuromatrix of pain have been demonstrated, as well as quantitative and qualitative alterations in fine sensitive fibers of the peripheral nervous system. Based on this complex nature of FM, the objective of this research is to obtain greater clarity about its pathophysiology and to identify distinctions between subgroups of patients with a view to advancing diagnosis and treatment, aiming at individualized therapy and improving outcomes, thereby attenuating , the significant loss to patients' lives and the heavy social and economic burden to patients and society.
As for the current therapeutic approach, in addition to drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - duloxetine, milnacipran and pregabalin) the target has been techniques that may modify the dysfunctional neuroplasticity process, such as transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS) in order to counter-regulate the dysfunction responsible for triggering and maintaining FM symptoms. Although this technique is gaining space in the research and in the clinical scenario, many questions remain to be answered, such as: time of treatment, place to be stimulated (assembly method), how to perform maintenance therapy and benefit time after treatment, and, above all, which techniques could produce an additive effect (eg, physical activity, cognitive and pharmacological activity). From the presented scenario, the present project was organized, which is characterized as a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the dose (in the sessions) in the treatment of FM, with measures of pain, functional capacity and function of the descending pain modulator system as the outcomes. Also, potential predictors of (tDCS) response in primary outcomes will be: (a) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) parameters (motor evoked potential (MEP), intracortical inhibition (ICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF) and silent period (CSP)) ; (b) serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its polymorphisms for the G (Val; / Met) alleles, as well as levels of the S100B protein; (c) level of central sensitization, catastrophism of pain and depressive symptoms.
In order to respond to the objectives of this study, a randomized, parallel-blinded clinical trial with 60 female patients with FM, diagnosed according to the criteria of the American Society of Rheumatology (2010 - revised in 2016), age between 19 and 65 years old, who will be randomized to receive tDCS with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the contralateral prefrontal cortex. The sessions will last 20 min, the current intensity will be 2 milliamperes, with anodic pole on the primary motor cortex and the cathode pole on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the left hemisphere. Patients will receive, in addition to training to administer home-based (tDCS) treatment, written instructions on physical exercises suggested by the investigator. The duration of treatment will be 8 weeks and a follow-up time after the end of the 12-week stimulation as recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). Patients should respond daily to two questionnaires, one on the type of exercise performed and the duration of the exercises and another on the possible side effects of the tDCS. The home tDCS will be carried out with equipment developed by the research group coordinated by the proponent of this project, in partnership with the Biomedical Engineering of the Hospital of Clinics of Porto Alegre (HCPA), with a patent application with the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) under the number BR2020150164500. In addition to the possible contribution to knowledge production, this project aims to transfer the technology acquired and developed to the community, and in this way, it can benefit millions of people suffering from chronic FM pain with limited diagnostic and therapeutic perspective. In addition, to provide a cost-effective therapeutic technique for phase III studies on the use of large-scale home-based tDCS, a technique that can be extended to several neuropsychiatric conditions, such as depression and besides being able to assist as an adjuvant in the rehabilitation of sequelae of cerebral ischemia. Our hypothesis is that tDCS has a superior effect on clinical outcomes, functional capacity, cortical excitability, and psycho-affective functions compared to simulated treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| s-tDCS | Sham comparator | Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS- Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS The patients will receive tDCS sham treatment. The patients will receive sham tDCS treatment over primary motor cortex. According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at o contralateral F3. In sham stimulation the device only release flow current, in the first 30 s of session and in the remaining 30s in the end of the session, during 20 minutes. |
| M1 a-tDCS | Active comparator | Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS* Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over primary motor cortex. * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left C3 and cathode at contralateral supraorbital Fp2. * Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes. |
| DLPFC a-tDCS | Active comparator | Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS* Intervention: 'Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS * The patients will receive tDCS active treatment over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. * According to 10-20 EEG system, anode will be placed at left F3 and cathode at contralateral F4. * Active stimulation uses a 2 milliamperes current during 20 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women, who are able to read and write, with confirmed diagnosis of FM according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (2010-2016).
- Pain score equal to or greater than six on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10) on most days of the last 3 months.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Reside outside the Greater Porto Alegre area
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications to TMS and tDCS: metallic implant in the brain; medical devices implanted in the brain, cardiac pacemaker; cochlear implant;
- History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 6 months; neurological diseases; history of head trauma or neurosurgery; decompensated systemic diseases, and chronic inflammatory diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, Reiter's syndrome); uncompensated hypothyroidism; personal history of cancer, past or under treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS- Intervention: tDCS is a therapeutic method that modulates the membrane potential, where anodic stimuli induce cortical excitability and cathodic stimuli reduce it | Device | DLPFC a-tDCS, M1 a-tDCS, s-tDCS |
Primary outcome
Change in pain level - first phase
Time frame: 1 month
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Pain scores assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 to 100mm) (0 means no pain - 100 means the worst pain imaginable)
Change in functional capacity - first phase
Time frame: 1 month
Change from before and after the First phase of treatment on Total score on the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (BPCP:S) (range from 0 to 93; high numbers means more pain severity, interference in daily activities and emotional burden)
6 secondary outcomes
Change in pain level - second phase
Time frame: 3 months
Change in functional capacity - second phase
Time frame: 3 months
Change in Function of modulatory descending system
Time frame: 1 month
Change in Function of corticospinal pathway
Time frame: 1 month
Change in levels of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF
Time frame: 1 month
Polymorphism of Brain derived neurotrophic factor - BDNF
Time frame: 10 minutes
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21878603Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, McCarberg BH; FibroCollaborative. The science of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Sep;86(9):907-11. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0206.
- Background: PubMed 22031874Keeser D, Meindl T, Bor J, Palm U, Pogarell O, Mulert C, Brunelin J, Moller HJ, Reiser M, Padberg F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15284-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0542-11.2011.
- Background: PubMed 28273933Silva AF, Zortea M, Carvalho S, Leite J, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates attention and pain in fibromyalgia: randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 9;7(1):135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00185-w.
- Background: PubMed 25005881Zanette SA, Dussan-Sarria JA, Souza A, Deitos A, Torres IL, Caumo W. Higher serum S100B and BDNF levels are correlated with a lower pressure-pain threshold in fibromyalgia. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 8;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-10-46.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39536019Lopes Alves R, Zortea M, Vicuna Serrano P, Laranjeira VDS, Franceschini Tocchetto B, Ramalho L, Fernanda da Silveira Alves C, Brugnera Tomedi R, Pereira de Almeida R, Machado Bruck S, Medeiros L, R S Sanches P, P Silva D Jr, Torres ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Modulation of neural networks and symptom correlated in fibromyalgia: A randomized double-blind multi-group explanatory clinical trial of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation. PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0288830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288830. eCollection 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37689323Caumo W, Lopes Ramos R, Vicuna Serrano P, da Silveira Alves CF, Medeiros L, Ramalho L, Tomeddi R, Bruck S, Boher L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Ls Torres I, Fregni F. Efficacy of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in the Disability Due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Factorial Sham-Randomized Clinical Study. J Pain. 2024 Feb;25(2):376-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36504629Serrano PV, Zortea M, Alves RL, Beltran G, Bavaresco C, Ramalho L, Alves CFDS, Medeiros L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP Jr, Lucena da Silva Torres I, Fregni F, Caumo W. The effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive performance in fibromyalgia: A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:992742. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.992742. eCollection 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34785366Caumo W, Alves RL, Vicuna P, Alves CFDS, Ramalho L, Sanches PRS, Silva DP, da Silva Torres IL, Fregni F. Impact of Bifrontal Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain Catastrophizing and Disability due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study. J Pain. 2022 Apr;23(4):641-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Correlates of Immersive Virtual Reality Adaptation of the Five Times Sit-to-stand Test and Timed up and go Tests in Women With Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Comparing Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique for Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Women
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Daily Cognitive Failures and Medication Adherence in Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruiting
Toward Biomarker-Guided Fibromyalgia Treatment With Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Agreement Between CSI and IASP Pain Classification in Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain
Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Neck
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wolnei Caumo, PhD study director
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - tDCS in people with Fibromyalgia and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wolnei Caumo, PhD (+5551 3359 8083, wcaumo@hcpa.edu.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain level - first phase (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03843203, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2019.