SchizophreniaHALFEEDNCT03852706
EEG-based Neurofeedback for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (HALFEED)
A study testing LORETA and Treatment as usual in people with Schizophrenia, run by University of Dublin, Trinity College at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
This study's primary objective is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of using EEG-based neurofeedback to reduce the severity of treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations ('hearing voices') in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- LORETA and Treatment as usual
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to 25 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Are ≥ 18 years old
- Have a clinical diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder
- Have been experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations for at least one year
- Score 2 or more on the frequency item of the auditory hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) at time of initial assessment (representing voices occurring at least once a day)
- Are deemed refractory to antipsychotic treatment (defined as still hearing voices despite 4-6 weeks of treatment with two different antipsychotics)
- Have been on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for the three months prior to study enrolment
- Are right-handed, as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971)
- Are able to provide written, informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Having a diagnosed substance abuse disorder
- Prior head injury with loss of consciousness for more than five minutes
- At immediate risk of harm to self or others.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Low-resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Neurofeedback Training for Treatment-resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia
This study's primary objective is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of using EEG-based neurofeedback to reduce the severity of treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations ('hearing voices') in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Patients will be randomized to receive either EEG-based neurofeedback or treatment-as-usual.
Read the detailed description
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are experienced by up to 80% of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, where they can cause significant occupational and social impairment. Current treatments are incompletely effective. Around 25-30% of AVH are refractory to antipsychotic drugs, and cognitive behavioural therapy only shows a small-medium effect size. Initially promising studies of neurostimulation have shown smaller effect sizes as better controlled trials have been conducted. There is hence the need for innovative new treatments. One potential option is neurofeedback training. The primary objective of study is to perform a randomized, controlled, rater-blinded pilot trial (n=40) of EEG neurofeedback for AVH in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, to assess trial process, which will then inform a future definitive trial. The secondary objective is to calculate a 95% confidence interval that will allow interpretation of statistical difference between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual groups to assess neurofeedback for reducing auditory verbal hallucinations. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a neurofeedback (plus treatment-as-usual) or treatment-as-usual alone condition. Neurofeedback will employ Z-score based LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography). After a baseline assessment, twenty sessions of personalized neurofeedback training will be delivered over a period of approximately four months. This is the first registered trial of EEG neurofeedback for hallucinations. The primary focus of the pilot trial is on feasibility. However, a 95% confidence interval will be determined for the difference on PSYRATS-AH and AHRS scores between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual to help inform a future definitive trial.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- LORETA, Treatment as usual
- Keywords
- Hallucinations
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia, Hallucinations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LORETAOther
Twenty sessions of neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with z-scores.
Treatment as usualOther
Treatment-as-usual
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LORETA | Experimental | In the first session, Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) will be used in combination with Z-scores to identify participants' resting state EEG differences relative to a database of norms of their demographic. EEG abnormalities which are consistent with the research literature on neural changes associated with AVH will then be targeted for normalization using neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with Z-scores. Receives: Other: LORETA; Other: Treatment as usual |
| Treatment as usual | Other | Maintenance use of an atypical antipsychotic (e.g., clozapine) with support, when needed, of a community nurse. Receives: Other: Treatment as usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment rate
We will measure how many patients were recruited into the trial per calendar month of active recruitment.
Measured: 24 months
Willingness of participants to be randomised.
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered in the trial but refused randomisation.
Measured: 24 months
Willingness of participants to complete assessments
We will measure the proportion of participants who were entered into the trial and completed all baseline assessment measures.
Measured: 24 months
Drop-out rate: LORETA condition
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the neurofeedback condition, and dropped out of the study.
Measured: 24 months
Success of blinding of raters
We will measure the proportion of blind raters who were correctly able to guess the group allocation of participants, and assess if this was greater than chance.
Measured: 24 months
Rates of adverse psychiatric events
We will assess the proportion of patients entered into the trial who experienced adverse psychiatric events reported.
Measured: 24 months
Drop-out rate: Controls
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the control condition, and dropped out of the study.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
The Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) is an 11-item measure of the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. Total scores can range from 0 to 44 with higher scores indicating greater severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. The PSYRATS-AH has been found to have a four-factor structure (Woodward et al., 2014). These are Emotion (range 0-20), Physical (range 0-12), Cognitive (range 0-8) and Loudness (range 0-4). Higher scores on each of these subscales represents more severe auditory verbal hallucinations. We will assess between group differences in both the total and four factor scores of the PSYRATS-AH at end of therapy.
Measured: End of intervention (~4 months)
Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS)
The Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS; Hoffman et al., 2003) is a seven-item structured clinical interview, which assesses the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations in the past week. Its items assess frequency, reality, loudness, number, length, attentional salience (how demanding of attention the voice is) and distress level. Items are rated on unique scales. Total scores on this measure can range from 0 - 41 . Higher scores represent more severe auditory verbal hallucinations.
Measured: End of intervention (~4 months)
Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings (PSYRATS-D).
Delusions will be assessed by the Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-D; Haddock et al., 1999). This is a 6-item structured clinical interview. Total scores can range from 0-24, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. It has been found to have two factors (Woodward et al., 2014), namely Distress (distress amount, distress intensity) and Frequency (preoccupation amount, preoccupation duration, conviction, disruption). Total scores on these factors can range from 0-8 and 0-16 respectively, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. Both total PSYRATS-D and factor scores will be employed.
Measured: End of intervention (~4 months)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS; Zigmund \& Snaith, 1983) is a 16-item self-report measure of both anxiety and depression. Eight items assess depression and eight items assess anxiety. Depression scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of depression. Anxiety scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety.
Measured: End of intervention (~4 months)
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Quality of life will be assessed by the short-form of the self-report Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ; Endicott et al., 1993). Total scores on 16-item measure can range from 14 to 70, with higher scores representing greater quality of life.
Measured: End of intervention (~4 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completion25 Mar 2022
- Study completion25 Mar 2022
Why it stopped: A national Covid-19 lockdown prevented completion of the trial
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dublin, Trinity College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Actualise
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Simon McCarthy-Jones, University of Dublin, Trinity College
- Investigators
- Simon McCarthy-Jones, Principal investigator, University of Dublin, Trinity College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03852706
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 206789
- Other IDs
- 25911
- Acronym
- HALFEED
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Low-resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Neurofeedback Training for Treatment-resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03852706
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HALFEED / 206789
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- Hallucinations
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: A national Covid-19 lockdown prevented completion of the trial
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dublin, Trinity CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Actualise
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study's primary objective is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of using EEG-based neurofeedback to reduce the severity of treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations ('hearing voices') in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Patients will be randomized to receive either EEG-based neurofeedback or treatment-as-usual.
Detailed description
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are experienced by up to 80% of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, where they can cause significant occupational and social impairment. Current treatments are incompletely effective. Around 25-30% of AVH are refractory to antipsychotic drugs, and cognitive behavioural therapy only shows a small-medium effect size. Initially promising studies of neurostimulation have shown smaller effect sizes as better controlled trials have been conducted. There is hence the need for innovative new treatments. One potential option is neurofeedback training. The primary objective of study is to perform a randomized, controlled, rater-blinded pilot trial (n=40) of EEG neurofeedback for AVH in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, to assess trial process, which will then inform a future definitive trial. The secondary objective is to calculate a 95% confidence interval that will allow interpretation of statistical difference between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual groups to assess neurofeedback for reducing auditory verbal hallucinations. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a neurofeedback (plus treatment-as-usual) or treatment-as-usual alone condition. Neurofeedback will employ Z-score based LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography). After a baseline assessment, twenty sessions of personalized neurofeedback training will be delivered over a period of approximately four months. This is the first registered trial of EEG neurofeedback for hallucinations. The primary focus of the pilot trial is on feasibility. However, a 95% confidence interval will be determined for the difference on PSYRATS-AH and AHRS scores between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual to help inform a future definitive trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LORETA | Experimental | Other: LORETA, Other: Treatment as usualIn the first session, Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) will be used in combination with Z-scores to identify participants' resting state EEG differences relative to a database of norms of their demographic. EEG abnormalities which are consistent with the research literature on neural changes associated with AVH will then be targeted for normalization using neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with Z-scores. |
| Treatment as usual | Other | Other: Treatment as usualMaintenance use of an atypical antipsychotic (e.g., clozapine) with support, when needed, of a community nurse. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Are ≥ 18 years old
- Have a clinical diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder
- Have been experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations for at least one year
- Score 2 or more on the frequency item of the auditory hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) at time of initial assessment (representing voices occurring at least once a day)
- Are deemed refractory to antipsychotic treatment (defined as still hearing voices despite 4-6 weeks of treatment with two different antipsychotics)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having a diagnosed substance abuse disorder
- Prior head injury with loss of consciousness for more than five minutes
- At immediate risk of harm to self or others.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LORETATwenty sessions of neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with z-scores. | Other | LORETA |
| Treatment as usualTreatment-as-usual | Other | LORETA, Treatment as usual |
Primary outcome
Recruitment rate
Time frame: 24 months
We will measure how many patients were recruited into the trial per calendar month of active recruitment.
Willingness of participants to be randomised.
Time frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered in the trial but refused randomisation.
Willingness of participants to complete assessments
Time frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of participants who were entered into the trial and completed all baseline assessment measures.
Drop-out rate: LORETA condition
Time frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the neurofeedback condition, and dropped out of the study.
Success of blinding of raters
Time frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of blind raters who were correctly able to guess the group allocation of participants, and assess if this was greater than chance.
Rates of adverse psychiatric events
Time frame: 24 months
We will assess the proportion of patients entered into the trial who experienced adverse psychiatric events reported.
Drop-out rate: Controls
Time frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the control condition, and dropped out of the study.
5 secondary outcomes
Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS)
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings (PSYRATS-D).
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: A national Covid-19 lockdown prevented completion of the trial). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of the Feasibility, Safety and Tolerability of Aticaprant as Adjunctive Treatment in Participants With Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia
Recruiting
A Relation Between Craving Induction and Treatment Response in Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) for Reducing Antipsychotic-induced Weight Gain in Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Induced Weight Gain
Recruiting
Impact of Cerebellar TMS on Brain and Cognitive Functions in Schizophrenia: a Pilot Study
Schizophrenia, Cerebellar Function
Recruiting
tACS for Working Memory in Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia, Working Memory
Recruiting
Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability and Clinical Applications Consortium: Study 3
Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Simon McCarthy-Jones principal investigator
University of Dublin, Trinity College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing LORETA and Treatment as usual in people with Schizophrenia, run by University of Dublin, Trinity College at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: A national Covid-19 lockdown prevented completion of the trial). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment rate (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2022.