AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis APhase 4NCT03855176

Effectiveness of Booster With 1 or 2 Doses of HAV Vaccine Among HIV-infected Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Vaqta Injectable Product in people with Hepatitis A and Human Immunodeficiency Virus, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Though HAV is mainly transmitted through the fecal-oral route, infection by sexual intercourse and blood transfusion is also possible. Injection drug users (IDUs) and men who have sex with men (MSM) have a higher risk of acquiring HAV due to their behaviors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Vaqta Injectable Product
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
153 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
12 Sep 2017to 30 Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HIV-positive individuals aged 20 year or more, and
  • Those who had completed at least a primary series of HAV vaccination (i.e. two doses of HAVRIX 1440, 6-12 months apart; or two doses of Vaqta 50U, 6-18 months apart), and
  • Those who failed to achieve serological response at least 4 weeks after the last dose of primary HAV vaccination.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have acute illness or acute hepatitis A related symptoms (fever, malaise, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and jaundice) within 30 days.
  • Patients who have positive anti-HAV IgM within 30 days.
  • Patients who were taking immunosuppressant or steroid.
  • Patients who were allergic to HAV vaccine.
  • Incompetent or unconsented patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Booster Vaccination With 1 or 2 Doses of Hepatitis A Vaccine Among HIV-infected Patients During an Ongoing Outbreak in Taiwan

Though HAV is mainly transmitted through the fecal-oral route, infection by sexual intercourse and blood transfusion is also possible. Injection drug users (IDUs) and men who have sex with men (MSM) have a higher risk of acquiring HAV due to their behaviors. Reemerging threat of hepatitis A among MSM in Taiwan has been reported recently. Based on the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HIV/AIDS and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Taiwan, vaccination of individuals against HAV with any of the following indications is recommended: HIV patients, adults with chronic hepatic disease, hemophilia, liver transplantation, occupational exposure, MSM, persons who use injection or noninjection illicit drugs, or persons traveling to or working in countries that have endemicity of HAV.

In HIV-infected patients, the immunogenicity to HAV vaccination is sub-optimal in HIV-infected patients and the seroconversion rate is estimated 68-90% after administration of 2 or 3 doses of HAV vaccine. Furthermore, the antibody titers of HIV-infected patients following HAV vaccination are significantly lower compared to those of HIV-uninfected persons. The sub-optimal response among HIV-infected subjects remains an unresolved problem. In this study, the investigators aim to determine the to conduct a randomized clinical trial to compare the immunogenicity of 2 different doses of HAV vaccination (1 dose versus 2 doses) in HIV-infected patients who failed to achieve serologic response in the primary vaccination. This proposal will provide the solid evidence to elucidate the role of booster HAV vaccination in HIV-infected patients without response to primary HAV vaccination.

Read the detailed description

Though HAV is mainly transmitted through the fecal-oral route, infection by sexual intercourse and blood transfusion is also possible. Injection drug users (IDUs) and men who have sex with men (MSM) have a higher risk of acquiring HAV due to their behaviors. Acute hepatitis A outbreaks have been reported among these groups of patients in the USA, Europe and Australia. Reemerging threat of hepatitis A among MSM in Taiwan has been reported recently. HAV is generally a self-limited disease with marginal public health impact in countries with low HAV endemicity. HAV infection does not progress to chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis, but acute HAV infection poses a risk of acute liver failure or even death, particularly the persons with chronic HBV or HCV infection who develop super-infection with HAV.

In HIV-infected patients, liver disease is one of the three most common causes of death, and acute HAV infection is one cause of liver damage in HIV-infected patients. HIV-infected patients may experience prolonged HAV viremia, which can increase the risk of transmission to others. Furthermore, given that drug-induced liver injury associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and that HIV-infected subjects are frequently coinfected with HBV and HCV, these patients are considered especially susceptible to severe complications when they become infected by HAV. Risk factors for HIV infection, including MSM, IDUs, persons with multiple heterosexual contacts, and persons frequently exposed to blood and blood products, are also risk factors for HAV infection, since infection may occur through shared transmission routes. Based on the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HIV/AIDS and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Taiwan, vaccination of individuals against HAV with any of the following indications is recommended: HIV patients, adults with chronic hepatic disease, hemophilia, liver transplantation, occupational exposure, MSM, persons who use injection or noninjection illicit drugs, or persons traveling to or working in countries that have endemicity of HAV. The number of people living with HIV had grown to >28,000 persons by 2014 in Taiwan and MSM accounted for more than 50 % among all HIV-infected patients. Therefore, protection against HAV infection is essential in the care of HIV-infected patients.

The response rate to HAV vaccination is almost 100% among HIV-uninfected persons who receive 2 standard doses of HAV vaccine. However, the immunogenicity to HAV vaccination is sub-optimal in HIV-infected patients and the seroconversion rate is estimated 68-90% after administration of 2 or 3 doses of HAV vaccine. Furthermore, the antibody titers of HIV-infected patients following HAV vaccination are significantly lower compared to those of HIV-uninfected persons. Though one randomized clinical trial in HIV-infected patients suggested the 3-dose schedule of HAV vaccination tended to achieve a higher seroconversion rate than the 2-dose schedule at week 72 (78.3% versus 61.2%; P = 0.07), the optimal doses of HAV vaccine in these subjects remained unclear. Recently, the research group from National Taiwan University Hospital leaded by the principle investigator in this proposal published the findings in Hepatology that the serologic response rate to 2 and 3 doses of HAV vaccine was similar in HIV-infected MSM (75.7 % and 77.8 % seroconversion rate at week 48 for 2 doses and 3 doses, respectively). Administration of HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients with higher CD4 counts (preferably >200 cells/μL) and suppression of HIV replication increased the seroconversion rate. This study provided the evidence that 2 doses of primary HAV vaccine was appropriate regimen in HIV-infected subjects. However, this study also found that the seroconversion rate (75.7 % and 77.8 % in 2 doses and 3 doses, respectively) in HIV-infected patients was lower than that in two-dose HIV-uninfected MSM (88.5 %). Around 20 patients receiving 2 doses of HAV vaccine and 30 patients with 3 doses of HAV vaccine did not have achieve seroconversion. This study based on Taiwanese population is the milestone for the research regarding HAV vaccination in HIV-infected patients. It not only demonstrates the safety of 2 or 3 doses of HAV vaccine among HIV-infected patients, but also gives as insight about the doses of primary vaccination. It is notable that the sub-optimal response among HIV-infected subjects remains an unresolved problem. The role of booster vaccination in HIV-infected patients without response to primary HAV vaccination has rarely been addressed in the literature. In one recent study conducted in Brazil, 23/29 (79.3%) from HIV-infected patients maintained HAV antibodies 7 years after primary HAV vaccination. The group that lost HAV seropositivity was revaccinated and 83.3% (5/6) responded with antibodies >20 mUI/mL after 2 doses of HAV vaccine. Though the limited numbers in this study, the data suggest that antibody titer monitoring is necessary in HIV-infected patients and revaccination is advisable to maintain protective levels of antibodies.

Although vaccination against HAV is essential for HIV-infected patients, the uptake of HAV vaccine is reported to be low. Studies of HAV vaccination coverage and screening rate for exposure to HAV in HIV patients are also limited. It is obvious that physicians interested in HIV care and vaccination planning is crucial to deal with this problem. In this study, we aim to determine the seroprevalence of HAV infection, the vaccine coverage rate and the factors associated with seropositivity in persons with HIV infection who sought HIV care over the past 6 years (2010-2016). Furthermore, the investigators aim to conduct a randomized clinical trial to compare the immunogenicity of 2 different doses of HAV vaccination (1 dose versus 2 doses) in HIV-infected patients who failed to achieve serologic response in the primary vaccination. This proposal will provide the solid evidence to elucidate the role of booster HAV vaccination in HIV-infected patients without response to primary HAV vaccination.

Being tested
Vaqta Injectable Product
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis A, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vaqta Injectable ProductDrug

    Inactive vaccine against hepatitis A virus

Study groups in NCT03855176
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1-dose groupActive comparatorProvide 1 booster dose of HAV vaccine (Vaqta Injectable Product) to those who failed to response after primary HAV vaccination.
Receives: Drug: Vaqta Injectable Product
2-dose groupExperimentalProvide 2 booster doses of HAV vaccine (Vaqta Injectable Product) to those who failed to response after primary HAV vaccination.
Receives: Drug: Vaqta Injectable Product

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Serological responses at week 48

    Serological responses to HAV vaccination at week 48 after boosting vaccination

    Measured: Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2019
  2. Study start12 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
153 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03855176
Sponsor's protocol ID
201608071MINB
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
12 Sep 2017
Last updated
26 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Chen GJ, Sun HY, Lin KY, Hsieh SM, Chuang YC, Liu WD, Huang YS, Pan SC, Wu UI, Cheng A, Huang YC, Wu CH, Su YC, Liu WC, Chang SY, Hung CC. A Randomized Clinical Trial of 1-Dose vs Accelerated 2-Dose Schedule for Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Revaccination Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Who Were Nonresponders or Had Seroreversion After Primary HAV Vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 22;77(4):529-536. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad206.

    PubMed 37036404

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Vaqta Injectable Product in people with Hepatitis A and Human Immunodeficiency Virus, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Serological responses at week 48 (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03855176, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in