SchizophreniaPhase 4NCT03860597
Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia
A Phase 4 study testing Memantine in people with Schizophrenia and Schizo Affective Disorder, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This application seeks to determine if neurophysiological metrics of memantine (MEM)-enhanced early auditory information processing (EAIP) in schizophrenia (SZ) mediate gains in auditory processing fidelity (APF) and auditory learning. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia, Schizo Affective Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Memantine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2018to 31 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of schizophrenia OR schizoaffective-depressed OR healthy subjects
- ages 18-50 for all subjects
- double barrier contraception for all subjects
- not pregnant for all subjects
Who cannot join
- DSM-IV Axis I or II Diagnosis for for healthy subjects
- MEM or amantadine for patients
- current substance abuse for all subjects
- current recreational drug use for all subjects
- history of other significant medical illness (e.g. cancer, diabetes, heart disease, HIV, seizures) for all subjects
- open head injury or closed head injury with loss of consciousness > 1 min for all subjects
Show all 10Show fewer
- hearing or visual impairment for all subjects
- pregnancy for all subjects
- dementia for all subjects
- mental retardation for all subjects
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center
San Diego, California, 92103
About this study
This application seeks to determine if neurophysiological metrics of memantine (MEM)-enhanced early auditory information processing (EAIP) in schizophrenia (SZ) mediate gains in auditory processing fidelity (APF) and auditory learning.
- Being tested
- Memantine, Placebos
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MemantineDrug
To assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS.
PlacebosDrug
To assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Memantine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
PPI of the startle reflex is the automatic reduction in startle magnitude (assessed by EMG of orbicularis oculi) when a startling stimulus (40 ms 118 dB(A) noise burst; "PULSE") is preceded (10-120 msec) by a weak stimulus (here a 20 msec burst 16 dB over background "PREPULSE"). A %PPI metric is calculated based on the relative startle magnitude on (PREPULSE + PULSE) trials vs. PULSE alone trials. Possible maximal inhibition is 100%; there is no maximal "negative" value of inhibition. There is no clear "advantage" or "disadvantage" for lower or higher %PPI values, though on average, schizophrenia patients demonstrate lower % values compared to matched healthy subjects. Day 1 was baseline testing: testing occurred, data was collected, but no "intervention" was given. There were two possible "interventions": active (MEM 20 mg po) and placebo. One intervention was given on day 7 post baseline, the other intervention was given on day 14 post baseline, with order of intervention balanced.
Measured: 7 and 14 days post baseline
Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Unit of Measure of MMN is Microvolts.
85 dB SPL stimuli were presented via Etymotic ER3-A insert earphones. A 4-tone auditory oddball paradigm with 82% standards \& 18% deviant stimuli, differed from standard in pitch, duration, or both. A pseudorandomized sequence produced a minimum of 3 standard tones between each deviant stimulus. All tones had 5-ms rise/fall times presented with a fixed 500-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Subjects viewed a silent movie \& instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. EEG were continuously recorded at a sampling rate of 2048-Hz from 64 channels, using BioSemi ActiveTwo system \& downsampled to 512-Hz. Deviant-minus-standard difference waves were generated for each deviant type \& low-pass filtered (20-Hz zerophase shift, 24 dB/octave rolloff). MMN was computed as mean amplitude across 135-205 ms range for each deviant type in difference waveforms at electrode Fz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between-subject factor, \& drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor.
Measured: 7 and 14 days post baseline
Gamma Auditory Steady-state Response (ASSR). The Primary Unit of Measure of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) is Gamma Evoked Power (γEP), Expressed as "Microvolts-squared".
1 ms, 85 dB clicks were presented in 500 ms trains at a frequency of 40 Hz; 250 click trains were played (inter-train interval=0.5 s). EEG was continuously recorded with 64-channel BioSemi ActiveTwo system (sampling rate=2048 Hz). Data processed offline via Matlab, EEGlab, \& BrainVision Analyzer. Continuous data were segmented relative to stimulus onset (-100 ms to 500 ms) \& each epoch was baseline-corrected relative to 100 ms pre-stimulus interval. γEP was assessed based on first 100 artifact-free epochs at Fz. Averaged epochs across click trains were transformed into power spectrum via fast Fourier transform using a bin width of 2 Hz. 40 Hz power spectrum was averaged across 4 Hz band from 38-42 Hz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between- \& drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor. Analyses revealed robust \& time bin-independent effects of diagnosis \& drug across 200-500 ms window \& thus this interval was the focus of all subsequent analyses.
Measured: 7 and 14 days post baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2019
- Study start1 Apr 2018
- Primary completion31 Mar 2021
- Study completion31 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San DiegoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Neal R. Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03860597
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01MH094320
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 21 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Molina JL, Voytek B, Thomas ML, Joshi YB, Bhakta SG, Talledo JA, Swerdlow NR, Light GA. Memantine Effects on Electroencephalographic Measures of Putative Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jun;5(6):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
PubMed 32340927
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Memantine Effects on Sensorimotor Gating and Neurocognition in Schizophrenia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03860597
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01MH094320
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Dec 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This application seeks to determine if neurophysiological metrics of memantine (MEM)-enhanced early auditory information processing (EAIP) in schizophrenia (SZ) mediate gains in auditory processing fidelity (APF) and auditory learning.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Memantine | Active comparator | Drug: Memantine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebos |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- diagnosis of schizophrenia OR schizoaffective-depressed OR healthy subjects
- ages 18-50 for all subjects
- double barrier contraception for all subjects
- not pregnant for all subjects
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- DSM-IV Axis I or II Diagnosis for for healthy subjects
- MEM or amantadine for patients
- current substance abuse for all subjects
- current recreational drug use for all subjects
- history of other significant medical illness (e.g. cancer, diabetes, heart disease, HIV, seizures) for all subjects
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MemantineTo assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS. | Drug | Memantine |
| PlacebosTo assess the acute effects of MEM (0 vs. 20 mg) on measures of auditory processing fidelity, auditory learning and EAIP, in AP-medicated adult SZ patients and HS. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI)
Time frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline
PPI of the startle reflex is the automatic reduction in startle magnitude (assessed by EMG of orbicularis oculi) when a startling stimulus (40 ms 118 dB(A) noise burst; "PULSE") is preceded (10-120 msec) by a weak stimulus (here a 20 msec burst 16 dB over background "PREPULSE"). A %PPI metric is calculated based on the relative startle magnitude on (PREPULSE + PULSE) trials vs. PULSE alone trials. Possible maximal inhibition is 100%; there is no maximal "negative" value of inhibition. There is no clear "advantage" or "disadvantage" for lower or higher %PPI values, though on average, schizophrenia patients demonstrate lower % values compared to matched healthy subjects. Day 1 was baseline testing: testing occurred, data was collected, but no "intervention" was given. There were two possible "interventions": active (MEM 20 mg po) and placebo. One intervention was given on day 7 post baseline, the other intervention was given on day 14 post baseline, with order of intervention balanced.
Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Unit of Measure of MMN is Microvolts.
Time frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline
85 dB SPL stimuli were presented via Etymotic ER3-A insert earphones. A 4-tone auditory oddball paradigm with 82% standards \& 18% deviant stimuli, differed from standard in pitch, duration, or both. A pseudorandomized sequence produced a minimum of 3 standard tones between each deviant stimulus. All tones had 5-ms rise/fall times presented with a fixed 500-ms stimulus onset asynchrony. Subjects viewed a silent movie \& instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. EEG were continuously recorded at a sampling rate of 2048-Hz from 64 channels, using BioSemi ActiveTwo system \& downsampled to 512-Hz. Deviant-minus-standard difference waves were generated for each deviant type \& low-pass filtered (20-Hz zerophase shift, 24 dB/octave rolloff). MMN was computed as mean amplitude across 135-205 ms range for each deviant type in difference waveforms at electrode Fz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between-subject factor, \& drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor.
Gamma Auditory Steady-state Response (ASSR). The Primary Unit of Measure of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) is Gamma Evoked Power (γEP), Expressed as "Microvolts-squared".
Time frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline
1 ms, 85 dB clicks were presented in 500 ms trains at a frequency of 40 Hz; 250 click trains were played (inter-train interval=0.5 s). EEG was continuously recorded with 64-channel BioSemi ActiveTwo system (sampling rate=2048 Hz). Data processed offline via Matlab, EEGlab, \& BrainVision Analyzer. Continuous data were segmented relative to stimulus onset (-100 ms to 500 ms) \& each epoch was baseline-corrected relative to 100 ms pre-stimulus interval. γEP was assessed based on first 100 artifact-free epochs at Fz. Averaged epochs across click trains were transformed into power spectrum via fast Fourier transform using a bin width of 2 Hz. 40 Hz power spectrum was averaged across 4 Hz band from 38-42 Hz. Data were analyzed by RM-ANOVA, with diagnosis as a between- \& drug condition (placebo vs MEM) as a within-subject factor. Analyses revealed robust \& time bin-independent effects of diagnosis \& drug across 200-500 ms window \& thus this interval was the focus of all subsequent analyses.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Dec 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32340927Molina JL, Voytek B, Thomas ML, Joshi YB, Bhakta SG, Talledo JA, Swerdlow NR, Light GA. Memantine Effects on Electroencephalographic Measures of Putative Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jun;5(6):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Memantine in people with Schizophrenia and Schizo Affective Disorder, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Dec 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prepulse Inhibition (PPI) (time frame: 7 and 14 days post baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03860597, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2022.