AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT03864822

Enhancing Inhibition With tDCS in Low Back Pain

A study testing High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in people with Low Back Pain, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cross-over study intends to use consecutive days of active versus sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance descending inhibition and look at resulting clinical effects in people with low back pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
29 Apr 2019to 7 Oct 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Otherwise healthy men and women
  • Aged 18-60 years
  • Continuous pain (>3days pain/week) episode lasting at least 3 months, sufficient to limit daily activities
  • Pain in the region posteriorly between the inferior border of the 12th rib and the lower gluteal fold (low back pain) at the time of recruitment
  • Able to speak, read and understand English

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Low back pain associated with menstruation
  • Currently seeking active treatment for low back pain
  • Red flags symptoms (i.e. fever, malaise, progressive neurologic deficit, significant trauma, prolonged corticosteroid use or osteoporosis, pain worst at night, urinary or faecal incontinence, or unintended weight loss)
  • Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
  • Current or previous neurologic, musculoskeletal, mental, or other illnesses which may affect the trial
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Current or previous chronic or recurrent pain condition other than low back pain
  • Current regular use of analgesic medication or other medication which may affect the trial
  • Lack of ability to cooperate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • CNAP, SMI, Aalborg University

    Aalborg, 9000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

This cross-over study intends to use consecutive days of active versus sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance descending inhibition and look at resulting clinical effects in people with low back pain.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current StimulationDevice

    Device uses an array of electrodes over the scalp, in contact via gel, to provide a weak electrical current.

Study groups in NCT03864822
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active tDCSExperimental30s ramp to 2mA with 20 minute session of active High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at 2mA
Receives: Device: High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sham tDCSPlacebo comparator30s ramp to 2mA with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, then device stops stimulating for 20 minutes
Receives: Device: High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Conditioned Pain Modulation

    Change in cuff pain threshold with contralateral cuff conditioning stimulus

    Measured: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) in each stimulation phase

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Temporal Summation of Pain

    Change in pain intensity ratings (i.e. on an electronic Visual Analogue Scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable) across series of 10 x 1s cuff stimuli at 0.5Hz (scores are normalized to first rating by subtraction and grouped into 3 epochs of 3 inflations with higher change scores indicating higher summation/facilitation)

    Measured: Day 1 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) in each stimulation phase

  2. Pressure Pain Thresholds

    Handheld algometry over the extensor carpi radialis, upper trapezius, lower back and gastrocnemius muscles

    Measured: Day 1 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) in each stimulation phase

  3. Pain Intensity

    Visual Analogue Scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable currently at rest and with worst movement, as well as maximum in past week

    Measured: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) and 2 weeks post for each stimulation phase

  4. Pain Unpleasantness

    Visual Analogue Scale from 0=not unpleasant at all to 10=most unpleasant sensation imaginable currently at rest and with worst movement, as well as maximum in past week

    Measured: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) and 2 weeks post for each stimulation phase

  5. Pain Area

    Total number of pixels coloured on an electronic body chart (Navigate Pain)

    Measured: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) and 2 weeks post for each stimulation phase

  6. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

    Measures back-related disability for 24 statements of potentially afflicted tasks with dichotomous responses. Minimum 0 to maximum 24 with higher scores indicating worse disability.

    Measured: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) and 2 weeks post for each stimulation phase

  7. Back Performance Scale

    5 Task scale rated as per performance as a functional measure of back-related disability (each task is rated on a 4 point Likert scale 0-3 and summed to give total), scored from 0-15 with higher scores indicating more pain and dysfunction during task performance. Here will be used to characterize functional disability.

    Measured: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) and 2 weeks post for each stimulation phase

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2019
  2. Study start29 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion7 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion7 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03864822
Sponsor's protocol ID
VN-20170034-v5
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
1 Mar 2019
Last updated
11 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Data will be shared after study completion and publication in necessary cases on request

Publications

  • McPhee ME, Graven-Nielsen T. Medial Prefrontal High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve Pain Modulation in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial. J Pain. 2021 Aug;22(8):952-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

    PubMed 33676009

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in people with Low Back Pain, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Conditioned Pain Modulation (time frame: Day 0 (Pre) to Day 3 (Post) in each stimulation phase). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03864822, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in