AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainNCT03880370

RELATIONSHIP OF LUMBOPELVIC MUSCULATURE WITH FUNCTIONAL TESTS IN NON-PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES WITH LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION

An observational study of Low Back Pain and Herniated Lumbar Disk, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a control-case study. It has been designed to determine if there is a relationship between the cross sectional (thickness), through RUSI ultrasound, of the abdominal muscles, lumbar and hip muscles with the results of the functional tests, to determine its relevance in patients with low back pain and / or… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain, Herniated Lumbar Disk, Sciatica
What is being tested?
Questionnaires / scales, Ultrasound imaging and FLEXIBILITY
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Apr 2019to 31 Dec 2019
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult

Study population: Men and women between 18 and 55 years old. Non-professional sports practice equal to greater than 3 hours per week

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 to 55 years of age.
  • Sports practice equal to greater than three hours per week.
  • No low back pain or ciatalgia in the last 12 months.

Who cannot join

  • Traumatic process or surgery in the lower back or lower limb in the last year.
  • Alterations of the skin or local infection in the area to be examined or that impedes the ultrasonographic measurement or performance of the functional tests.
  • Peripheral or central neurological pathology.
  • Psychiatric pathology and / or cognitive alterations.
  • Inflammatory and tumor diseases.
  • Alterations that prevent the understanding of the indications and / or the performance of the tests.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Group selection criteria:
  • Group 1(group without low back pain): No low back pain or ciatalgia in the last 12 months.
  • Group 2 (low back pain group): History of at least one episode of low back pain and / or ciatalgia in the last 12 months lasting no longer than three months and diagnosis of hernia lumbar disc using MRI.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Diego Miñambres Martin, Pt contact

+34 675 887 126

dminambr@ucm.es

About this study

This is a control-case study. It has been designed to determine if there is a relationship between the cross sectional (thickness), through RUSI ultrasound, of the abdominal muscles, lumbar and hip muscles with the results of the functional tests, to determine its relevance in patients with low back pain and / or ciatalgia and lumbar disc herniation in non-professional athletes. The secondary objectives of the study will be to know if there is a relationship between the results of ultrasound measurements and functional tests with the result of the disability questionnaires, the amount of pain and its location, as well as determine the relevance, depending on the results of ultrasound measurements and test of the presence or not of a lumbar disc herniation.

Being tested
Questionnaires / scales, Ultrasound imaging, FLEXIBILITY, FUNCTIONAL TESTS
Keywords
ultrasound, functional test, herniated lumbar disk, low back pain
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain, Sciatica

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Questionnaires / scalesBehavioural

    EVA, ROLAND MORRIS, OWESTRY and Global Questionnaire of Physical Activity (GPAQ)

  • Ultrasound imagingDiagnostic test

    Rectus abdominis dominant side \& non-dominant side external oblique dominant side \& non-dominant side internal oblique dominant side \& non-dominant side transversus abdominis dominant side \& non-dominant side lumbar multififidus l4-l5-s1 gluteus medius dominant side \& non-dominant side

  • FLEXIBILITYDiagnostic test

    weight-bearing lunge hip lateral rotation straight leg raise fingertip to floor test

  • FUNCTIONAL TESTSDiagnostic test

    Star excursion balance test (sebt) prone bridging test Side bridging test Modified biering-sørensen

Study groups in NCT03880370
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
group 1(group without low back pain)Participants inclusion criteria an age 18 to 55 years of age who practice sports equal to greater than three hours per week who have not had low back pain or ciatalgia in the last 12 months.
Receives: Behavioral: Questionnaires / scales; Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound imaging; Diagnostic Test: FLEXIBILITY; Diagnostic Test: FUNCTIONAL TESTS
group 2 (low back pain group)Participants inclusion criteria an age 18 and 55 years of age who practice sports equal to greater than three hours a week, with a history of at least one episode of low back pain and / or ciatalgia in the last 12 months lasting no longer than three months and diagnosis of hernia lumbar disc using MRI.
Receives: Behavioral: Questionnaires / scales; Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound imaging; Diagnostic Test: FLEXIBILITY; Diagnostic Test: FUNCTIONAL TESTS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area produced of the transversus abdominis.

    Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area produced of the transversus abdominis.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  2. Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) produced of the internal oblique.

    Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) produced of the internal oblique.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  3. Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA)produced of the external oblique.

    Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) produced of the external oblique.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  4. Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA)produced of the rectus abdominis.

    Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA)produced of the rectus abdominis.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  5. Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA)produced of the lumbar multifidus.

    Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA)produced of the lumbar multifidus.

    Measured: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) produced of the gluteus medius.

    Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) produced of the gluteus medius.

    Measured: 10 minutes

  2. Functional test. Star excursion balance test (SEBT)

    Test Position: Standing barefoot on a grid with an anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral line at a 45° angle away from the projected anterior line.

    For the anterior test: most distal aspect of the toes aligned with the tape, centre of heel in line with the tape. For the posterior tests: most posterior aspect of the heel aligned with the tape and the second toe on the tape.

    Test: Stand barefoot with the foot aligned to the tape and hands to the side. With the other leg, reach out as far as possible in the tested direction with the most distal part of the foot. 4 practice trials are mandatory in each direction, test each direction 3 times.

    Measurement: Measure the reach distance in each direction and register the maximal reach distance in cm. The distances will be compared to each other and to the respective functional leg length. The best result is the longest distance

    Measured: 10 minutes

  3. Functional test. Side bridging test

    Test Position:

    Athlete is side-lying on an exercise mat. Both feet are in contact with the floor, the fore-arm perpendicular to the athlete's body. The other hand is holding the shoulder.

    Test:

    Athlete attains a side-bridge position, keeping both feet and one fore-arm in contact with the floor. Tester helps the athlete attain a neutral position of the lumbar spine and positions the head in the same line.

    Two practice trials are allowed. Test both sides, with at least 10 minutes of rest between sides.

    In some cases, only 1 side needs to be tested.

    Measurement:

    Measure the time the athlete is able to keep this neutral position. Correct the athlete's position if necessary, if he's unable to maintain the position for 2 consecutive seconds, stop the test. The best result is the longest time

    Measured: 10 minutes

  4. Functional test. Modified biering-sørensen

    Test Position:

    Prone position, the ASIS just over the edge of the treatment table. Arms crossed over shoulders.Neutral position of spine.

    Test:

    Instruct the athlete to maintain the neutral position as long as possible (surfaced at 4min).Test fails when the athlete is unable to maintain this position for more than 2 executive seconds (2 corrections allowed). Fail towards hyperextension/flexion. A horizontal cord at spina scapula level can be used to identify deficits.

    Measurement:

    Timing is recorded and marked in seconds. The best result is the longest time

    Measured: 10 minutes

  5. Functional test. Prone bridging test

    Test Position:

    Prone-lying with parallel forearms, thumbs up and straight legs.

    Test:

    Attain a bridging position with vertical upper arms and with the shoulder, greater trochanter and lateral malleolus in line. The head keeps in contact with an wall in front of a pacient to avoid excessive head movement. Two practice trials are allowed.

    Measurement:

    Measure the time the athlete is able to keep this frequency and the correct position. Correct the athlete's position if necessary, if he's unable to maintain the position or the frequency, stop the test. The best result is the longest time

    Measured: 10 minutes

  6. VAS escale

    The most simple VAS is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (symptom,pain,health) orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).

    Scoring and Interpretation: Using a ruler, the score is determined by mea-suring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    Measured: 1 minute

  7. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

    It is used to determine the degree of disability. The extreme values oscillate between 0 (absence of disability due to low back pain) and 24 (maximum possible disability).

    Measured: 5 minutes

  8. The Owestry Disability Index

    Interpretation:

    Add the points of each section and place them in the following formula, in order to calculate your level of disability. total points / 50 X 100 =% disability (also known as: 'total points' divided by' 50 ', multiplied by' 100 = percentage of disability)

    ODI score:

    0% to 20% (minimum disability) 21% to 40% (moderate disability) 41% to 60% (severe disability) 61% to 80% (paralyzed) 81% -100%: These patients may be bedridden or may be exaggerating symptoms. A careful evaluation is recommended.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  9. Global Questionnaire on Physical Activity (GPAQ)

    The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was developed by WHO for physical activity surveillance in countries. It collects information on physical activity participation in three settings (or domains) as well as sedentary behaviour, comprising 16 questions (P1-P16). The domains are:

    • Activity at work
    • Travel to and from places
    • Recreational activities METs (Metabolic Equivalents) are commonly used to express the intensity of physical activities, and are also used for the analysis of GPAQ data. Therefore, when calculating a person's overall energy expenditure using GPAQ data, 4 METs get assigned to the time spent in moderate activities, and 8 METs to the time spent in vigorous activities.

    Measured: 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2019
  2. Study start1 Apr 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03880370
Sponsor's protocol ID
19/044-E_Tesis
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
4 Mar 2019
Last updated
22 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Low Back Pain and Herniated Lumbar Disk, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Diego Miñambres Martin, Pt (+34 675 887 126, dminambr@ucm.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ultrasound changes in muscle cross-sectional area produced of the transversus abdominis. (time frame: 5 minutes). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in