AzTrials
AzTrials

Musculoskeletal InjuryNCT03880981

NSAID Use and Healing After Tibia Fractures and Achilles Tendon Ruptures

A study testing Ibuprofen 600 mg and Acetaminophen in people with Musculoskeletal Injury, run by University of California, Los Angeles.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationale: The Emergency Department (ED) typically serves as the front line for patients with acute fractures and tendon ruptures. Pain control for these patients is an essential task of the ED physician. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Musculoskeletal Injury
What is being tested?
Ibuprofen 600 mg and Acetaminophen
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
456 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2019to 31 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (over 18) presenting within 24 hours of a tibia fracture
  • Adult patients (over 18) presenting within 24 hours of an Achilles tendon rupture
  • Exclusions:
  • Patients will be excluded if they:
  • have a contraindication to Ibuprofen or Acetaminophen use
  • don't have access to e-mail
Show all 11Show fewer
  • require emergent surgery (such as an open fracture)
  • have a diagnosis of osteoporosis
  • have already taken one of the study drugs since their injury
  • are pregnant (due to their inability to take NSAIDs)
  • are < 18 years old (due to differences in bone and tendon healing).

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Vanessa Franco, MD PhD contact

(310) 794-0585

vfranco@mednet.ucla.edu

About this study

Rationale: The Emergency Department (ED) typically serves as the front line for patients with acute fractures and tendon ruptures. Pain control for these patients is an essential task of the ED physician. With the advent of the opioid epidemic, ED physicians are becoming more inclined to prescribe non-narcotic pain medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Yet, the effects of NSAIDs on musculoskeletal healing are controversial. The few human studies examining the effects of NSAID use on fracture healing have provided conflicting results. Even less is known about the effects of NSAIDs on tendon healing as this information has largely been gleaned from rodent studies with contradictory findings. There has never been a large, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to determine the effects of NSAIDs on healing after fractures or tendon ruptures. Here, I propose to pilot the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded study examining the effects of NSAID use on healing after tibia fractures and Achilles tendon ruptures.

Aim 1 seeks to determine whether NSAID use is associated with an increased incidence of fracture nonunion and worse functional recovery six months following tibia fractures. I hypothesize that NSAID use after tibia fractures will be associated with an increased incidence of fracture nonunion and worse functional recovery. Aim 2 seeks to determine whether NSAID use is associated with worse functional recovery six months after Achilles tendon ruptures. I hypothesize that NSAID use after Achilles tendon ruptures will be associated with worse functional recovery.

Significance: Emergency Department providers commonly prescribe NSAIDs for pain control following fractures and tendon injuries. However, the implications of this practice on bone and tendon healing are unknown. This proposal will pilot the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to determine whether NSAID use affects healing after tibia fractures and Achilles tendon ruptures. Results from this study will impact NSAID prescribing patterns for tibia fractures and Achilles tendon ruptures in the ED, either by demonstrating that they impair recovery and should be avoided, or that they need not be withheld as an effective non-narcotic form of pain control.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aims The Emergency Department (ED) typically serves as the front line for patients with fractures and tendon ruptures. Pain control for these patients is an essential task of the ED physician. With the advent of the opioid epidemic, ED physicians are becoming more inclined to prescribe non-narcotic pain medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Yet, the effects of NSAIDs on musculoskeletal healing are highly controversial. There is some evidence that NSAIDs may prevent osteoblasts from rebuilding bone after fractures by inhibiting COX-2. Indeed, some retrospective studies have found NSAID use to be associated with an increased incidence of fracture nonunion after acetabular, tibial, and humeral shaft fractures, while other studies reported no difference. The only prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of NSAIDs on fracture healing reported no effect of NSAID use on healing after Colles fractures; however, these trials were likely underpowered to detect a difference in nonunion rates. Here, I propose to pilot the first large, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study examining the effects of NSAIDs on healing after tibia fractures, which are vulnerable to nonunion.

Similar to fractures, the effects of NSAIDs on tendon healing are unclear. Some studies suggest that NSAIDs may inhibit proliferation and migration of tendon cells after injury, while other studies indicate that NSAIDs enhance collagen synthesis. Rodent studies are equally conflicting, with some reports of worse outcomes associated with NSAID use and other studies showing no difference. Recently, I obtained preliminary data showing that NSAID use after Achilles tendon ruptures is associated with worse functional outcomes as measured by the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS). While this was the first study examining the effects of NSAID use on recovery after Achilles tendon rupture in humans, the data were retrospective, observational, and not blinded. Here, I propose to pilot the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to determine the effects of NSAIDs on recovery after Achilles tendon ruptures.

Aim 1: Determine whether NSAID use is associated with an increased incidence of fracture nonunion and worse functional recovery six months after tibia fractures.

Hypothesis: I hypothesize that NSAID use after tibia fractures will be associated with an increased incidence of fracture nonunion and worse functional recovery.

Aim 2: Determine whether NSAID use is associated with worse functional recovery six months after Achilles tendon ruptures.

Hypothesis: I hypothesize that NSAID use after Achilles tendon ruptures will be associated with worse functional recovery.

Experimental Approach: Adult patients (18 years old and over) presenting to either the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Ronald Regan Emergency Department, the UCLA Santa Monica Emergency Department, or the UCLA Orthopedic after hours acute care clinic within 24 hours of sustaining a tibia fracture or Achilles tendon rupture will be screened for eligibility to participate. Patients will be excluded if they have a contraindication to Ibuprofen or Acetaminophen use, if they do not have access to e-mail, if they do not wish to participate, if they require emergent surgery (such as an open fracture), if they have a diagnosis of osteoporosis, or if they have already taken pain medication since their injury. Pregnant women will be excluded due to their inability to take NSAIDs. Children will be excluded due to differences in bone and tendon healing. The ED represents the optimal environment in which to conduct this study because most patients will initially present acutely to the ED with these injuries, often before taking any pain medication.

If patients elect to participate, they will be randomized to receive either Ibuprofen (600mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain) or Acetaminophen (650 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain). I will use a permuted block design to develop the randomization schedule. Randomization will be stratified by sex. Sealed envelopes will be used to conceal the allocation. The treating physician will open the envelope and provide the assigned study medication and prescription bottle at discharge. Patients will be provided a one-month supply of their assigned pain medication. Patients and providers will be blinded to which medication the patient received. The individual medication capsules will be formulated to lack identifying information. Study coordinators will record the patients' randomly generated study identification number and prescription bottle number in Qualtrics, a HIPAA-compliant online resource that collects, stores, and analyzes data. Demographic information such as age and sex will also be stored in Qualtrics. Each week for one month, patients will be sent an email with a link asking them to complete a Qualtrics survey to report 1) the number of remaining pills, 2) their average pain scale ranging from 1-9, 3) what additional medications they took, if any, and 4) whether they have experienced any medication-related side effects or complications. In this way, we will determine the timing of medication administration for each patient and quantify each patient's level of pain, while assessing for patient safety.

Six months post-injury, patients who sustained tibia fractures will receive repeat X-rays. One final Qualtrics survey will be e-mailed to these patients at this time to determine their average degree of pain on a scale of 1-9, their functional recovery on a scale of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, or severe impairment) and whether they underwent treatments such as physical therapy or surgery. The survey will also assess for lifestyle factors known to increase nonunion rates including body habitus, medical problems, and other medications taken.

Six months following enrollment, patients who ruptured their Achilles tendon will be sent a link to a Qualtrics survey via email. On this survey, they will be asked 10 questions with responses on a scale of 0 to 10 that comprise the ATRS (29). A higher score (out of 100) indicates better functional outcomes. Patients will also be asked if they underwent treatments such as physical therapy or surgery. Body habitus, medical problems, other medications taken, smoking status, pregnancy status, and fluoroquinolone use will also be assessed on this survey, as these factors may impact tendon recovery.

Being tested
Ibuprofen 600 mg, Acetaminophen
Keywords
fracture, tendon rupture, NSAID, healing
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ibuprofen 600 mgDrug

    ibuprofen 600mg Po q 6 hours prn pain

  • AcetaminophenDrug

    acetaminophen 600mg po q6 hours prn pain

Study groups in NCT03880981
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AcetaminophenActive comparatorPatients will receive 650mg PO Acetaminophen every 6 hours as needed for pain
Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen
IbuprofenActive comparatorPatients will receive 600mg PO Ibuprofen every 6 hours as needed for pain
Receives: Drug: Ibuprofen 600 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of non-union after tibia fracture

    Fractures

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Functional Recovery after Achilles Tendon Rupture

    Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score measures functional recovery after Achilles tendon rupture on a scale of 0 (worse) to 100 (best).

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Functional Impairment after Tibia Fracture on a scale of 1 to 3 (none to severe)

    The score quantifies functional impairment on a scale of 1 (none) to 3 (severe)

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Degree of pain after Tibia Fracture on a scale of 1-9

    The score quantifies pain on a scale of 1 (none) to 9 (severe)

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2019
  2. Study start1 Aug 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
456 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03880981
Sponsor's protocol ID
VFranco
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
22 Feb 2019
Last updated
19 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ibuprofen 600 mg and Acetaminophen in people with Musculoskeletal Injury, run by University of California, Los Angeles.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Vanessa Franco, MD PhD ((310) 794-0585, vfranco@mednet.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of non-union after tibia fracture (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in