AzTrials
AzTrials

FibromyalgiaSCENARNCT03882567

Effectiveness of Electro Neuro Adaptive Regulator in Patients With Fibromyalgia

A study testing Electro Neuro adaptative Regulator in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: There is evidence linking conditioned pain modulation (CPM) deficiency with musculoskeletal pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia, Evidence shows that different physical therapies could activation situations of chronic pain there is no activation of CPM. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Fibromyalgia
What is being tested?
Electro Neuro adaptative Regulator
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
30 Jun 2018to 31 Oct 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • . American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Fibromyalgia.
  • . reported average pain intensity ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 cm visual analogue scale based on 1 week of daily pain diaries;
  • on stable doses of medications for FM ≥ 4 weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded from enrolment if: (1) they suffer from an inflammatory rheumatic conditions; (2) have a planned elective surgery during the study period; (3) have ongoing unresolved disability claims; (4) experience symptoms of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, or psychosis; (5) do not speak Spanish fluently.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Electro Neuro Adaptive Regulator on Pain, Disability and Central Sensitization in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Background: There is evidence linking conditioned pain modulation (CPM) deficiency with musculoskeletal pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia, Evidence shows that different physical therapies could activation situations of chronic pain there is no activation of CPM.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to measure the CPM response and determine whether Electro Neuro Adaptative Regulator in patients with Fibromyalgia is effective in the improvement of CPM, TS, pain intensity, disability.

Read more

Design: Double-blind, randomized placebo clinical trial. Methods: Patients with fibromyalgia will be randomly allocated into two groups: the Electro Neuro Adaptative Regulator group (SCENAR) or the sham technique (ST) group.

Main outcomes measures: Pain intensity (with visual analogue scale, Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM), Temporal Summation (TS) and Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT´s) were the primary outcomes and will be assessed at baseline and at 3-months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire to measure disability, Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Jenkins Sleep Scale. Questionnaire of quality of life SF36.

Participants will be selected if they met the following inclusion criteria: (a) fulfilled the 1990 and 2010 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for FM; (b) reported an average pain intensity ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 cm visual analogue scale during the previous week to study commencement; (c) were on stable doses of medication for FM ≥ 4 weeks; and (d) were aged between 18 and 65 years.

Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Being tested
Electro Neuro adaptative Regulator
Keywords
visual analogue scale, conditioned pain modulation, disability, pressure pain threshold, temporal summation
Medical subject headings
Fibromyalgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electro Neuro adaptative RegulatorOther

    Also called InterX

    The SCENAR device has been previously described and generates high-amplitude, pulsed, damped biphasic sinusoidal current that is delivered to the tissue via a pair of concentric electrodes placed in direct contact with the target area. The intensity of the interactive waveform adjusts in response to changes in skin impedance

Study groups in NCT03882567
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Electro Neuro adaptative RegulatorExperimental8 SCENAR sessions (twice a week) (30 min of duration) following the protocols for treatment several points in the body
Receives: Other: Electro Neuro adaptative Regulator
Sham Electro Neuro adaptative RegulatorSham comparator8 Sham SCENAR sessions (twice a week) (30 min of duration), following the same protocol tan experimental group but the machine will be turn off 30 seconds after starting on the treatment.
Receives: Other: Electro Neuro adaptative Regulator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numerical pain ranting Scale

    The patients will be asked to assess the subjective pain intensity of the painful in whole body by to marking the level of pain on the scale. Pain intensity was measured with the NRS of 11 points (interval from 0 to 10), where 0 corresponds to no pain, and 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of pain intensity at 3 months

  2. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)

    The FIQ, which is a validated self-reported questionnaire to measure multidimensional function/health-related quality of life, will be used.Scores in the FIQ range from 0 to 100, An improvement greater than 30% in the FIQ total score has been identified in clinical trials as sensitive to identify a positive response to treatment.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire at 3 months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Conditioned pain modulation

    After an interval of 5 minutes CPM was assessed by replicating the TS assessment associated with a conditioning stimulus for eliciting CPM. The conditioning stimulus was an occlusion cuff at the left arm inflated, at a rate of 20 mmHg/s until the subject reports "the first sensation of pain". Acquired pressure at this point remained for 30 seconds. The subject described the intensity of pain, because of occlusion in the arm, on a verbal numerical rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain). Then cuff inflation was increased or decreased until the intensity of pain will be 3/10 in verbal rating scale

    Measured: Change from Baseline of CPM at 3 months

  2. Mechanical Hyperalgesia

    Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) were assessed using algometry in the thumb (dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx). The PPT is defined as the lowest pressure that, using standardized testing conditions, needs to be applied to cause the slightest sensation of pain. It is a reliable and widely used measure

    Measured: Change from Baseline of PPT at 3 months

  3. Temporal Summation

    The degree of TS or wind-up will be evaluated in response to 10 applications (pulses) of the algometer, with an approximate rate of pressure increase of 2 Kg/s, at the previously defined PPT at the dorsal surface of the right-hand middle finger midway between the first and second distal joints, and at the middle of the right-hand side upper trapezius belly. Participants were asked to rate the intensity and unpleasantness of the pain intuitively of the first, fifth, and tenth pulse on a numeric pain rating scale.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of TS at 3 months

  4. Pain Catastrophizing

    The Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was used to assess catastrophic thoughts about pain, which has shown appropriate psychometric properties.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of pain catastrophizing at 3 months

  5. State Trait Anxiety Inventory

    All participants will complete the Spanish version of the trait subscale of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T). The STAI-T has been found to possess adequate reliability (alpha coefficients of 0.93, test-retest reliability of 0.80) and validity.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of Anxiety at 3 months

  6. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    The level of depressive symptomatology was measured by the Spanish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); a self-report measure that assesses affective, cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of Depression symptoms at 3 months

  7. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

    Developed by Miller, will be used to assess fear of movement and injury. We'll use the original 17-item version, which has shown good psychometric guarantees

    Measured: Change from Baseline of kinesiophobia at 3 months

  8. Jenkins Sleep Scale

    The Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS) is a 4-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure how often a subject has experienced sleep problems in the past month and has been studied in FM patients and found to be valid, reliable, and able to detect change after treatment.

    Measured: Change from Baseline of sleep scale at 3 months

  9. SF-36. Short Form-36 Health Survey

    The Health related of quality of life will be selected primary outcome. It is a multipurpose, form health survey that includes 36 items taken directly from eight scale scores (physical functioning [PF], role-physical [RP], bodily pain [BP], general health [GH], vitality [VT], social functioning [SF], role-emotional [RE], and mental health [MH]).

    Measured: Change from Baseline of quality of life at 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2019
  2. Study start30 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03882567
Sponsor's protocol ID
03/2015
Acronym
SCENAR
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
4 Sep 2018
Last updated
1 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electro Neuro adaptative Regulator in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numerical pain ranting Scale (time frame: Change from Baseline of pain intensity at 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in