Heart FailureHEARTNCT03895073
HEart fAiluRe evaluaTion Questionnaire
An observational study of Heart Failure and Heart Failure NYHA Class III, run by John Parissis at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
The "four-point" questionnaire by Severo and his associates was weighted in 2011 in the Portuguese population and aims to characterize the severity of the symptoms of heart failure by providing a way to minimize the reliability of the NYHA classification. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class II
- What is being tested?
- healthy volunteers
- How many people
- 170 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 25 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Heart failure patients vs Healthy matched controls
Who may be able to join
- NYHA classification
- informed consent
- compliant with study procedures
Who cannot join
- no informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Observation Study for the Assessment of the "Four-point" Questionnaire by Severo and His Associates and Its Weighting in the Greek Population to Provide a Powerful Tool for Categorizing the Severity of the Symptoms of Heart Failure
The "four-point" questionnaire by Severo and his associates was weighted in 2011 in the Portuguese population and aims to characterize the severity of the symptoms of heart failure by providing a way to minimize the reliability of the NYHA classification. The questionnaire consists of four closed questions, three possible single-choice answers, coded 0, 1 or 2, and has been translated into Greek in accordance with the internationally-based methodology, with forward-backward translation.
Read the detailed description
In clinical practice, the most commonly used classifications of the severity of CA⸱ are the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA), which is based on symptoms and exercise capacity11 and has been used in the majority of clinical trials combined with the fraction left ventricular ejection and ACC / AHA (American College of Cardiology Foundation / American Heart Association), which describes the disease according to structural lesions and symptoms.
With NYHA calibration, patients can be classified into four classes (I, II, III, IV) according to conclusions drawn from the medical history and / or observations of their physical activity and in some cases from cardiac function measurements . An attempt has been made to increase the objectivity of the method through a more comprehensive assessment, which will also be based on clinical measurements from electrocardiograms, stress tests, x-rays, echocardiograms, etc. There is a very high variability among clinicians' ratings on classifying patients in classes based on the NYHA functional classification as the class is selected according to the physician's personal assessment of the patient's physical condition. This increases the subjectivity of the particular sorting system. Studies have shown that there is agreement on NYHA calibration between different doctors for the same patient, of 55%, which leads to the conclusion that the use of this scale as the endpoint in clinical research is questionable and inadequate.
Patient self-assessments are more reliable with respect to the subjectivity of assessing the severity of symptoms. This is why maximizing the interest of the scientific community, clinicians and pharmaceutical companies in developing more subjective methods of measuring health status. 30% of all new drugs developed use patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as primary or intermediate endpoints.
The different data collection methods and sampling techniques are methods and methodologies that allow for the reduction of the amount of data to be collected, considering data only as some elements of a subset of the cases under consideration. The questionnaire is a form that includes a series of structured questions, in which the respondent is asked to respond in writing and in a specific order. Questionnaires collect data asking people to answer exactly the same set of questions. They are usually used in a research strategy to collect descriptive and explanatory data about views, behaviors, features, attitudes, etc. The questionnaire is the means of communication between the researcher and the respondents, directly or indirectly, depending on the method of data collection. The structure of the questionnaire, due to its qualities, is the most critical and delicate task, crucial to the success of a statistical survey.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class II, Heart Failure NYHA Class I, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV
- Being tested
- healthy volunteers
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
healthy volunteersOther
Also called healthy vs heart failure
the questionnaire has been assessed by both groups, healthy and heart failure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| healthy | healthy volunteers' replies to questionnaire Receives: Other: healthy volunteers | |
| heart failure | heart failure patients' replies the questionnaire Receives: Other: healthy volunteers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
questionnaire replies
rating in Severo questionnaire
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion25 Feb 2019
- Study completion25 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- John Parissis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, John Parissis, Attikon Hospital
- Investigators
- John Parissis, MD, Study chair, Attikon Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03895073
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIS-HEART-2018
- Acronym
- HEART
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observation Study for the Assessment of the "Four-point" Questionnaire by Severo and His Associates and Its Weighting in the Greek Population to Provide a Powerful Tool for Categorizing the Severity of the Symptoms of Heart Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03895073
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HEART / IIS-HEART-2018
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class II, Heart Failure NYHA Class I, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- John ParissisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The "four-point" questionnaire by Severo and his associates was weighted in 2011 in the Portuguese population and aims to characterize the severity of the symptoms of heart failure by providing a way to minimize the reliability of the NYHA classification. The questionnaire consists of four closed questions, three possible single-choice answers, coded 0, 1 or 2, and has been translated into Greek in accordance with the internationally-based methodology, with forward-backward translation.
Detailed description
In clinical practice, the most commonly used classifications of the severity of CA⸱ are the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA), which is based on symptoms and exercise capacity11 and has been used in the majority of clinical trials combined with the fraction left ventricular ejection and ACC / AHA (American College of Cardiology Foundation / American Heart Association), which describes the disease according to structural lesions and symptoms.
With NYHA calibration, patients can be classified into four classes (I, II, III, IV) according to conclusions drawn from the medical history and / or observations of their physical activity and in some cases from cardiac function measurements . An attempt has been made to increase the objectivity of the method through a more comprehensive assessment, which will also be based on clinical measurements from electrocardiograms, stress tests, x-rays, echocardiograms, etc. There is a very high variability among clinicians' ratings on classifying patients in classes based on the NYHA functional classification as the class is selected according to the physician's personal assessment of the patient's physical condition. This increases the subjectivity of the particular sorting system. Studies have shown that there is agreement on NYHA calibration between different doctors for the same patient, of 55%, which leads to the conclusion that the use of this scale as the endpoint in clinical research is questionable and inadequate.
Patient self-assessments are more reliable with respect to the subjectivity of assessing the severity of symptoms. This is why maximizing the interest of the scientific community, clinicians and pharmaceutical companies in developing more subjective methods of measuring health status. 30% of all new drugs developed use patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as primary or intermediate endpoints.
The different data collection methods and sampling techniques are methods and methodologies that allow for the reduction of the amount of data to be collected, considering data only as some elements of a subset of the cases under consideration. The questionnaire is a form that includes a series of structured questions, in which the respondent is asked to respond in writing and in a specific order. Questionnaires collect data asking people to answer exactly the same set of questions. They are usually used in a research strategy to collect descriptive and explanatory data about views, behaviors, features, attitudes, etc. The questionnaire is the means of communication between the researcher and the respondents, directly or indirectly, depending on the method of data collection. The structure of the questionnaire, due to its qualities, is the most critical and delicate task, crucial to the success of a statistical survey.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| healthy | – | Other: healthy volunteershealthy volunteers' replies to questionnaire |
| heart failure | – | Other: healthy volunteersheart failure patients' replies the questionnaire |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Heart failure patients vs Healthy matched controls
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- NYHA classification
- informed consent
- compliant with study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- no informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| healthy volunteersAlso: healthy vs heart failurethe questionnaire has been assessed by both groups, healthy and heart failure | Other | healthy, heart failure |
Primary outcome
questionnaire replies
Time frame: 1 day
rating in Severo questionnaire
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2019.
Related trials for Heart Failure
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REdo Transcatheter Aortic VALVE Implantation for the Management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Failure
Aortic Valve Stenosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload
Acute Heart Failure
Recruiting
Renal Denervation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal), Hypertension
Recruiting
Laser Acupuncture for Fatigue in Hemodialysis Patients
ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease), Dialysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Parissis, MD study chair
Attikon Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heart Failure and Heart Failure NYHA Class III, run by John Parissis at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
questionnaire replies (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2019.