Acute WoundsSLALOMNCT03897465
Lomatuell Pro® Versus UrgoTul® in the Management of Acute Wounds
A study testing Lomatuell Pro and UrgoTul in people with Acute Wounds, run by Lohmann & Rauscher at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Comparative evaluation of the propertieS of the contact LAyer dressing LOMatuell Pro® versus UrgoTul® in the management of acute wounds Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Wounds
- What is being tested?
- Lomatuell Pro and UrgoTul
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 183 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2019to 6 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Acute wound: traumatic wound (dermabrasion, skin tears, other), small burns 1st and 2nd degree requiring the use of dressings
- Acute wound size between 3 cm² and 24 cm² (wound could be covered by 2 investigational products maximum)
- Wound whose duration is ≤ 3 days
- Both gender with an age ≥ 18 years
- Written confirmation from the study nurse that the patient was informed, orally agreed to participate and to comply with study treatment and planned visits
- Subject able to follow the protocol
Who cannot join
- Chronic and acute surgical wound
- Infected, moderately to strongly exudative and haemorrhagic wound
- Diagnosed underlying disease (e.g. diabetic neuropathy, stroke, etc.) which as judged by the investigator could interfere with the pain assessment
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the investigational products
- Participation in other clinical investigation within one month prior to start of investigation
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
Show all 9Show fewer
- Person protected by a legal regime (tutorship or guardianship)
- Patients unable to manifest an oral consent to participate (e.g. dementia) or to understand the use of the VAS (visual analogue scale) tool
- Patient not covered by health insurance/social security
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Evaluation of the propertieS of the Contact LAyer Dressing LOMatuell Pro® Versus UrgoTul® in the Management of Acute Wounds
Comparative evaluation of the propertieS of the contact LAyer dressing LOMatuell Pro® versus UrgoTul® in the management of acute wounds
Read the detailed description
National, multicenter, prospective, randomized in parallel groups, non-inferiority, open-label investigation study.
- Conditions
- Acute Wounds
- Being tested
- Lomatuell Pro, UrgoTul
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lomatuell ProDevice
Patients will receive Lomatuell Pro dressings during 3 weeks. Lomatuell Pro® may be left in place up to 7 days; additional dressing changes can be performed as often as necessary according to the instruction for use.
UrgoTulDevice
Patients will receive UrgoTul dressings during 3 weeks. UrgoTul® may be left in place up to 7 days; ; additional dressing changes can be performed as often as necessary according to the instruction for use.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lomatuell Pro | Experimental | Lomatuell Pro® is a wound contact layer consisting of wide-meshed tulle, impregnated with a polymer matrix, which form a gel on contact with wound exudate to facilitate moist wound healing. Receives: Device: Lomatuell Pro |
| UrgoTul | Active comparator | UrgoTul® is a flexible contact layer with TLC (Technology Lipido-Colloid) healing matrix comprised of a conformable polyester mesh impregnated with hydrocolloid and petroleum jelly particles. Receives: Device: UrgoTul |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
To evaluate the main study objective, patients were asked to assess the pain they felt during the first dressing removal (D3±2 days) with a means of visual analog scale (VAS), a 100 mm straight line ranging from 0 to 100, where "0" refers to "no pain" and "100" to the "worst pain imaginable". The VAS score was directly measured by the investigator with a scale in millimetres and the number was entered in the patient's case report from (CRF).
Measured: At Visit 2 (Day 3 ± 2 days)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Complete Healing
Percentage of epithelialization of the wound at V3 calculated based on a blind assessment of wound photographs using W.H.A.T. assessment (W.H.A.T. = Wound Healing Analysing Tool is a program for assessment of the wound photos, which allows to obtain automatically-calculated results for wound area, wound dimensions, % of necrotic, granulation or epithelium tissues in the wound bed). "Complete healing" was defined as 100% of the wound area covered by the epithelium.
Measured: At Visit 3 (Day 21 or earlier, as soon as the wound is epithelialized)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2019
- Study start11 Feb 2019
- Primary completion6 Dec 2020
- Study completion6 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute WoundsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 183 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lohmann & Rauscher
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- RCTs
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daria TROFIMENKO, Study director, Lohmann & Rauscher
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03897465
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-A02288-47
- Acronym
- SLALOM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Meaume S, Kerihuel JC, Malatesta A, Roux F, Trofimenko D, Abel M. Non-inferiority randomised controlled trial of two contact layer dressings for the treatment of acute wounds (SLALOM). J Wound Care. 2025 Jul 2;34(7):496-505. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0312.
PubMed 40632070
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Evaluation of the propertieS of the Contact LAyer Dressing LOMatuell Pro® Versus UrgoTul® in the Management of Acute Wounds
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03897465
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SLALOM / 2018-A02288-47
- Conditions
- Acute Wounds
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 183 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lohmann & RauscherIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- RCTs
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 7 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparative evaluation of the propertieS of the contact LAyer dressing LOMatuell Pro® versus UrgoTul® in the management of acute wounds
Detailed description
National, multicenter, prospective, randomized in parallel groups, non-inferiority, open-label investigation study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lomatuell Pro | Experimental | Device: Lomatuell ProLomatuell Pro® is a wound contact layer consisting of wide-meshed tulle, impregnated with a polymer matrix, which form a gel on contact with wound exudate to facilitate moist wound healing. |
| UrgoTul | Active comparator | Device: UrgoTulUrgoTul® is a flexible contact layer with TLC (Technology Lipido-Colloid) healing matrix comprised of a conformable polyester mesh impregnated with hydrocolloid and petroleum jelly particles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Acute wound: traumatic wound (dermabrasion, skin tears, other), small burns 1st and 2nd degree requiring the use of dressings
- Acute wound size between 3 cm² and 24 cm² (wound could be covered by 2 investigational products maximum)
- Wound whose duration is ≤ 3 days
- Both gender with an age ≥ 18 years
- Written confirmation from the study nurse that the patient was informed, orally agreed to participate and to comply with study treatment and planned visits
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Chronic and acute surgical wound
- Infected, moderately to strongly exudative and haemorrhagic wound
- Diagnosed underlying disease (e.g. diabetic neuropathy, stroke, etc.) which as judged by the investigator could interfere with the pain assessment
- Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the investigational products
- Participation in other clinical investigation within one month prior to start of investigation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lomatuell ProPatients will receive Lomatuell Pro dressings during 3 weeks. Lomatuell Pro® may be left in place up to 7 days; additional dressing changes can be performed as often as necessary according to the instruction for use. | Device | Lomatuell Pro |
| UrgoTulPatients will receive UrgoTul dressings during 3 weeks. UrgoTul® may be left in place up to 7 days; ; additional dressing changes can be performed as often as necessary according to the instruction for use. | Device | UrgoTul |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: At Visit 2 (Day 3 ± 2 days)
To evaluate the main study objective, patients were asked to assess the pain they felt during the first dressing removal (D3±2 days) with a means of visual analog scale (VAS), a 100 mm straight line ranging from 0 to 100, where "0" refers to "no pain" and "100" to the "worst pain imaginable". The VAS score was directly measured by the investigator with a scale in millimetres and the number was entered in the patient's case report from (CRF).
1 secondary outcome
Complete Healing
Time frame: At Visit 3 (Day 21 or earlier, as soon as the wound is epithelialized)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 40632070Meaume S, Kerihuel JC, Malatesta A, Roux F, Trofimenko D, Abel M. Non-inferiority randomised controlled trial of two contact layer dressings for the treatment of acute wounds (SLALOM). J Wound Care. 2025 Jul 2;34(7):496-505. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0312.
Related trials for Acute Wounds
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
Restorative Early Sleep Treatment After the Emergency Department
Insomnia, Nightmares Associated With Trauma and Stress
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daria TROFIMENKO study director
Lohmann & Rauscher
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lomatuell Pro and UrgoTul in people with Acute Wounds, run by Lohmann & Rauscher at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: At Visit 2 (Day 3 ± 2 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03897465, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2025.