AzTrials
AzTrials

Intensive Care Unit SyndromeNCT03915977

Patterns of PTSD in Adult Patients After Intensive Care

An observational study of Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, run by Holbaek Sygehus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to describe adult patients' patterns of Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at discharge, 3, and 12 months after intensive care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
What is being tested?
Post ICU recovery program
How many people
386 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
2 Dec 2012to 1 Dec 2015
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Intensive care patients (survivors)

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Non-invasive or invasive ventilation ≥ 48 hours ( Non-ivasive ventilation (NIV) from current guidelines)
  • Undiagnosed dementia

Who cannot join

  • Delirium at randomization (positive CAM-ICU score)
  • Participations in scientific projects which include patient interviews
  • Not speaking or understanding danish.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Holbæk Hospital

    Holbæk, Region Sjælland, 4300

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Patterns of PTSD Over Time in Adult Intensive Care Patients - Observations From the RAPIT Trial

This study aims to describe adult patients' patterns of Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at discharge, 3, and 12 months after intensive care.

Read the detailed description

The present study is a secondary analysis of the RAPIT-trial study treating data from patients on Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTDS) (Jensen et al., 2016).

Design Observational study based on data from the RAPIT trial that is a non-blinded, multicentre, parallel-group RCT conducted between December 2012-2015, at 10 intensive care units (ICUs) in four out of five regions in Denmark.

Participants Patients were consecutively recruited during the first 18 months of the study. We included Danish-speaking adults (≥18 years) who received mechanically ventilated ≥48 hours and did not meet the baseline criteria of dementia. We excluded delirious patients unable to give informed consent at randomization, or patients, who were enrolled in other studies. A total of 386 adult patients were randomized to standard care (SC) plus a nurse-led intensive care recovery program or standard care alone after ICU discharge (190 intervention, 196 SC).

Outcomes In this study, we will describe variations in patients, who experience symptoms of PTSD at ICU-discharge, 3 and 12 months after intensive care based on the data collection in the RAPIT-trial (Jensen et al., 2016). We will report trial participants' symptoms of PTSD at baseline, three months and twelve months after Intensive care using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) supplemented with descriptions of patients' experiences of PTSD. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were collected at 3 and 12 months, and utilization of healthcare services including mortality were obtained from hospital charts combined with self-reported data from patients. We will use descriptive statistical methods to analyze data.

Symptoms of PTSD by HTQ-IV consisted of 17 items covering three core symptoms corresponding to DSM-IV criteria for PTSD: re-experience (5 items), avoidance (7 items), and arousal (5 items). This was supplemented by four additional items: one functional and three related to stress. We used a total score, and a cut-off of ≥40 is categorized as "positive PTSD". Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering two dimensions: anxiety (7 items) and depression (7 items); subscale scores were 0-21 with higher scores reflecting greater psychological distress.

Being tested
Post ICU recovery program

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Post ICU recovery programBehavioural

    Standardized follow up program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

    Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, Range 18-72

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Anxiety

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering anxiety (7 items) Range: 0-21

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Anxiety

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering anxiety (7 items) Range: 0-21

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Depression

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering Depression (7 items) Range: 0-21

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Depression

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering depression (7 items) Range: 0-21

    Measured: 3 months

  5. PTSD

    Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, Range 18-72

    Measured: Baseline

  6. PTSD

    Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, Range 18-72

    Measured: 3 months

  7. PTSD

    Change score using Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, Range 18-72

    Measured: Over time at baseline, 3 and 12 months

  8. Anxiety

    Change score Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering anxiety (7 items) Range: 0-21

    Measured: Over time at 3 and 12 months

  9. Depression

    Change score using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) covering depression (7 items) Range: 0-21

    Measured: Over time at 3 months and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Apr 2019
  2. Study start2 Dec 2012
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2015
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
386 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03915977
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-000080
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
12 Apr 2019
Last updated
9 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Jensen JF, Overgaard D, Bestle MH, Christensen DF, Rattray J, Egerod I. Intervention fidelity in postintensive care follow-up consultations at ten sites in the RAPIT-trial: A mixed-methods evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):862-875. doi: 10.1111/jan.13949. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

    PubMed 30644124
  • Jensen JF, Egerod I, Bestle MH, Christensen DF, Elklit A, Hansen RL, Knudsen H, Grode LB, Overgaard D. A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1733-1743. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

    PubMed 27695894

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, run by Holbaek Sygehus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03915977, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in