AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisCOPP-MSNCT03917589

Preventive Use of COrticosteroids During the Post-Partum in Relapsing MS Patients (COPP-MS)

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, run by Rennes University Hospital at 5 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is most prevalent among women of childbearing age. The post-partum (PP) period is a critical phase in MS patients, during which a recrudescence of disease activity is expected. Different strategies have been assessed in the prevention of post-partum relapse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 49 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
How many people
350 participants
Where
5 sitesFrance
Study dates
20 Jun 2019to 18 May 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: relapsing MS patients with at least one full pregnancy with live birth between 01/2007 and 01/2017 after the beginning of the MS diagnosis

Who may be able to join

  • Relapsing MS patients according to MacDonald criteria 2010
  • Age between 15 and 49 years old at the pregnancy
  • Age between 18 and 51 years old when filling the questionnaire of the study
  • At least one full pregnancy with live birth after the beginning of the MS diagnosis
  • At least one neurological visit during the 12 months period after the delivery
  • At least one neurological visit per year in the 12 months preceding the pregnancy
  • Pregnancy must occur between 01/2007 and 01/2017 In case of several pregnancies per woman, only the first one occurring in the period will be analyzed
  • Having received information on the protocol and not having expressed opposition to participating in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have received Immunoglobulines or plasma exchanges after the delivery in prevention of a relapse
  • Patients presenting a SPMS or PPMS form at the beginning of pregnancy
  • Protected persons referred to in Articles L. 1121-6 to L. 1121-9 of the code of public health (eg minors, persons deprived of liberty, ..) except nursing mothers postpartum.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

France5 sites
  • CHU Lyon

    Lyon

  • Hôpital Pasteur 2 - CHU Nice

    Nice, 06000

  • CHU Rennes

    Rennes, 35033

  • Hôpital LAENNEC

    Saint-Herblain, Nantes, 44800

  • CHU Strasbourg

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Preventive Use of COrticosteroids During the Post-Partum in Relapsing MS

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is most prevalent among women of childbearing age. The post-partum (PP) period is a critical phase in MS patients, during which a recrudescence of disease activity is expected. Different strategies have been assessed in the prevention of post-partum relapse. High dose methylprednisolone was evaluated in a case control study with historical controls but the positive results have not been confirmed.

In this study, the main objective will be to compare the risk of relapse in the 6 months PP period between patients treated systematically by high dose methylprednisolone after delivery compared to patients who didn't receive a systematic treatment.

The second objective will be focused on the comparison of the disease activity and disability progression in patients who have resumed early a Disease Modifying Drug (DMD) after delivery vs patients who haven't.

Read the detailed description

Even if two small case control studies underlined the positive effect of high dose methylprednisolone on the relapse risk in the PP period in MS, these data have to be confirmed by a larger study. The impact of such a strategy remains also uncertain concerning the risk of long term disability. In this project, the investigators will also analyze the influence of the delay of DMD reintroduction after delivery on the relapse risk but also on the risk of disability. The results will have an important role in the therapeutic management of the post-partum period in MS patients.

Keywords
post-partum, corticosteroids, relapse, disease modifying drugs (DMD)
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03917589
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with corticosteroidsPatients who have systematically been treated by high-dose corticosteroids after the delivery
Patients without corticosteroidsPatients who haven't been systematically treated by high-dose corticosteroids after the delivery.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference of the proportion of patients with >= 1 relapse between the two groups

    proportion of patients with >= 1 relapse during the six-month period after delivery between the patients who have systematically been treated by high-dose corticosteroids after the delivery; and patients who haven't been systematically treated by high-dose corticosteroids.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Difference of the proportion of patients with >= 1 relapse

    proportion of patients with >= 1 relapse during the six-month period after delivery between patients who have resumed a DMD early after the delivery (during the first two months) compared to a delayed reintroduction, or an absence of reintroduction

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Difference of the annualized relapse rate

    Number of the annualized relapse rate after the delivery between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Difference of the annualized relapse rate

    Number of the annualized relapse rate after the delivery between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Difference of the annualized relapse rate

    Number of the annualized relapse rate after the delivery between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: two years

  5. Difference of the time to first relapse

    Time to first relapse after delivery between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: Date of delivery

  6. Difference of the disability progression

    Score of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (from 0=no disability, to 10= Death / No sub scales) between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Difference of the disability progression

    Score of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (from 0=no disability, to 10= Death / No sub scales) between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Difference of the disability progression

    Score of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (from 0=no disability, to 10= Death / No sub scales) between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 2 years

  9. Difference of percentage of with Gadolinium enhancing lesions

    Difference of percentage of with Gadolinium enhancing lesions during the 6-month period after the delivery between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Difference of the number of Gadolinium enhancing lesions

    compare the number of Gadolinium enhancing lesions during the 6-month period after the delivery between corticosteroids or not and between early DMD vs delayed DMD

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Apr 2019
  2. Study start20 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion18 May 2020
  4. Study completion18 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
350 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03917589
Sponsor's protocol ID
35RC18_9844_COPP-MS
Acronym
COPP-MS
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
12 Apr 2019
Last updated
10 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Sclerosis, run by Rennes University Hospital at 5 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference of the proportion of patients with >= 1 relapse between the two groups (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in