Anesthesia, RegionalAnkietaRANCT03923751
Survey of Regional Anesthesia Practice in Poland
An observational study of Anesthesia, Regional, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The study is being conducted to gain insight into regional anesthesia practice in polish hospitals specifically asking for methods used, accessibility to equipment and preference for regional blockade and perioperative analgesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Regional
- What is being tested?
- Invitation to regional anesthesia survey
- How many people
- 700 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 21 May 2019to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Anesthetists in Polish Hospitals
Who may be able to join
- All Polish hospitals practising anesthesiology and intensive care in the national register of medical practices (www.rpwdl.csioz.gov.pl)
Who cannot join
- Hospitals and medical practices not practising anesthesiology or intensive care
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
I Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Warsaw Medical University
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-005
About this study
Official title: Survey of Regional Anesthesia Practice in Poland - National Survey 2018
The study is being conducted to gain insight into regional anesthesia practice in polish hospitals specifically asking for methods used, accessibility to equipment and preference for regional blockade and perioperative analgesia.
Read the detailed description
In recent years, regional anesthesia has become one of the most dynamic parts of anesthesiology. This is in part due to less invasive surgical procedures, surgical enhanced recovery protocols as well as the incorporation of ultrasonography into the daily practice of regional anesthesia.
The aim of this retrospective survey is to track and analyse the changes in everyday practice of regional anesthesia in Poland that have occurred in the year 2018.
An invitation to the survey will be sent to all heads of anesthesiology departments in Poland. The answers to the survey will be collected using an internet based website created by the authors of the study.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Regional
- Being tested
- Invitation to regional anesthesia survey
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Invitation to regional anesthesia surveyOther
An invitation letter sent to Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department of Polish Hospital
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Polish Hospitals | Hospitals with anesthesia or intensive care practices Receives: Other: Invitation to regional anesthesia survey |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Regional anesthesia practice
Answers of head of anesthesiology and intensive care departments regarding regional anesthesia practice in their respective department by completing the Regional Anesthesia Survey 2018: multiple and single choice answers
Measured: Up to 12 months practice in the year 2018
Regional anesthesia practitioners
Answers of head of anesthesiology and intensive care departments regarding number of anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia
Measured: Up to 12 months in the year 2018
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2019
- Study start21 May 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anesthesia, RegionalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of WarsawThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Czerniakowski Hospital, Warsaw, Polskie Towarzystwo Znieczulenia Regionalnego i Leczenia Bólu (Polish ESRA), Sekcja Znieczulenia Regionalnego i Terapii Bólu, Polskie Towarzystwo Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii (PTAiIT)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marek Janiak, Medical University of Warsaw
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03923751
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ankieta RA 2018
- Acronym
- AnkietaRA
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Results will be published only as collective data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Survey of Regional Anesthesia Practice in Poland - National Survey 2018
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03923751
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AnkietaRA / Ankieta RA 2018
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Regional
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of WarsawUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Czerniakowski Hospital, Warsaw, Polskie Towarzystwo Znieczulenia Regionalnego i Leczenia Bólu (Polish ESRA), Sekcja Znieczulenia Regionalnego i Terapii Bólu, Polskie Towarzystwo Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii (PTAiIT)
- Study start
- 21 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is being conducted to gain insight into regional anesthesia practice in polish hospitals specifically asking for methods used, accessibility to equipment and preference for regional blockade and perioperative analgesia.
Detailed description
In recent years, regional anesthesia has become one of the most dynamic parts of anesthesiology. This is in part due to less invasive surgical procedures, surgical enhanced recovery protocols as well as the incorporation of ultrasonography into the daily practice of regional anesthesia.
The aim of this retrospective survey is to track and analyse the changes in everyday practice of regional anesthesia in Poland that have occurred in the year 2018.
An invitation to the survey will be sent to all heads of anesthesiology departments in Poland. The answers to the survey will be collected using an internet based website created by the authors of the study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Polish Hospitals | – | Other: Invitation to regional anesthesia surveyHospitals with anesthesia or intensive care practices |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Anesthetists in Polish Hospitals
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All Polish hospitals practising anesthesiology and intensive care in the national register of medical practices (www.rpwdl.csioz.gov.pl)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Hospitals and medical practices not practising anesthesiology or intensive care
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Invitation to regional anesthesia surveyAn invitation letter sent to Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department of Polish Hospital | Other | Polish Hospitals |
Primary outcome
Regional anesthesia practice
Time frame: Up to 12 months practice in the year 2018
Answers of head of anesthesiology and intensive care departments regarding regional anesthesia practice in their respective department by completing the Regional Anesthesia Survey 2018: multiple and single choice answers
Regional anesthesia practitioners
Time frame: Up to 12 months in the year 2018
Answers of head of anesthesiology and intensive care departments regarding number of anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Results will be published only as collective data
Related trials for Anesthesia, Regional
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Use of a Virtual Reality Headset During Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia to Improve the Patient's Experience
Prostate Biopsy
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anesthesia, Regional, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Regional anesthesia practice (time frame: Up to 12 months practice in the year 2018). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2020.