Feeding BehaviorNCT03926065
Variations in Palatability and Portion Size of Vegetables on Meal Intake of Preschool Children
A study testing Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size, Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size and Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size in people with Feeding Behavior, run by Penn State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to determine the effect of varying both the palatability and portion size of vegetables served to preschool children at a meal on the outcomes of food and energy intake at the meal. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Feeding Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size, Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size and Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 May 2019to 29 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children who are enrolled in a scheduled classroom of the designated childcare centers
Who cannot join
- Children who are allergic to any of the foods served
- Children whose diets exclude any of the foods served
- Children who will not be present at the childcare center for all of the scheduled study days
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Laboratory for the Study of Human Ingestive Behavior, The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802
About this study
Official title: Lunchtime Meal Feeding Study for Preschool Children
The aim of the study is to determine the effect of varying both the palatability and portion size of vegetables served to preschool children at a meal on the outcomes of food and energy intake at the meal.
- Conditions
- Feeding Behavior
- Being tested
- Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size, Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size, Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size, Enhanced Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size
- Medical subject headings
- Feeding Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion SizeOther
Lunch includes (a) vegetables without added flavoring (b) the baseline portion size of vegetables
Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion SizeOther
Lunch includes (a) vegetables without added flavoring (b) 200% of the baseline portion size of vegetables
Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion SizeOther
Lunch includes (a) vegetables with added flavoring (b) the baseline portion size of vegetables
Enhanced Vegetables Served in 200% Portion SizeOther
Lunch includes (a) vegetables with added flavoring (b) 200% of the baseline portion size of vegetables
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Palatability and Standard Portion Size | Experimental | Vegetables with Standard Palatability and Standard Portion Size Receives: Other: Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size |
| Standard Palatability and Larger Portion Size | Experimental | Vegetables with Standard Palatability and Larger Portion Size Receives: Other: Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size |
| Enhanced Palatability and Standard Portion Size | Experimental | Vegetables with Enhanced Palatability and Standard Portion Size Receives: Other: Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size |
| Enhanced Palatability and Larger Portion Size | Experimental | Vegetables with Enhanced Palatability and Larger Portion Size Receives: Other: Enhanced Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference Between Interventions in Vegetable Intake
Weight of vegetables consumed at the meal (grams)
Measured: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Difference Between Interventions in Food Intake
Weight of food (including milk) consumed at the meal (grams)
Measured: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Difference Between Interventions in Meal Energy Intake
Energy consumed at the meal (kilocalories)
Measured: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Difference Between Interventions in Meal Energy Density
Energy density of the food consumed at the meal (kilocalories/gram)
Measured: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2019
- Study start28 May 2019
- Primary completion24 Oct 2019
- Study completion29 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Feeding BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Penn State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Penn State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Barbara J. Rolls, Penn State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03926065
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ChildFood402
- Other IDs
- R01DK082580
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Diktas HE, Roe LS, Keller KL, Sanchez CE, Rolls BJ. Promoting vegetable intake in preschool children: Independent and combined effects of portion size and flavor enhancement. Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105250. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105250. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
PubMed 33836215
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lunchtime Meal Feeding Study for Preschool Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03926065
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ChildFood402
- Conditions
- Feeding Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Penn State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
- Study start
- 28 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to determine the effect of varying both the palatability and portion size of vegetables served to preschool children at a meal on the outcomes of food and energy intake at the meal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Palatability and Standard Portion Size | Experimental | Other: Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion SizeVegetables with Standard Palatability and Standard Portion Size |
| Standard Palatability and Larger Portion Size | Experimental | Other: Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion SizeVegetables with Standard Palatability and Larger Portion Size |
| Enhanced Palatability and Standard Portion Size | Experimental | Other: Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion SizeVegetables with Enhanced Palatability and Standard Portion Size |
| Enhanced Palatability and Larger Portion Size | Experimental | Other: Enhanced Vegetables Served in 200% Portion SizeVegetables with Enhanced Palatability and Larger Portion Size |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children who are enrolled in a scheduled classroom of the designated childcare centers
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children who are allergic to any of the foods served
- Children whose diets exclude any of the foods served
- Children who will not be present at the childcare center for all of the scheduled study days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion SizeLunch includes (a) vegetables without added flavoring (b) the baseline portion size of vegetables | Other | Standard Palatability and Standard Portion Size |
| Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion SizeLunch includes (a) vegetables without added flavoring (b) 200% of the baseline portion size of vegetables | Other | Standard Palatability and Larger Portion Size |
| Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion SizeLunch includes (a) vegetables with added flavoring (b) the baseline portion size of vegetables | Other | Enhanced Palatability and Standard Portion Size |
| Enhanced Vegetables Served in 200% Portion SizeLunch includes (a) vegetables with added flavoring (b) 200% of the baseline portion size of vegetables | Other | Enhanced Palatability and Larger Portion Size |
Primary outcome
Difference Between Interventions in Vegetable Intake
Time frame: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Weight of vegetables consumed at the meal (grams)
3 secondary outcomes
Difference Between Interventions in Food Intake
Time frame: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Difference Between Interventions in Meal Energy Intake
Time frame: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Difference Between Interventions in Meal Energy Density
Time frame: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33836215Diktas HE, Roe LS, Keller KL, Sanchez CE, Rolls BJ. Promoting vegetable intake in preschool children: Independent and combined effects of portion size and flavor enhancement. Appetite. 2021 Sep 1;164:105250. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105250. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Feeding Behavior
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Environmental Comfort and Oral Motor Stimulation on Comfort and Oral Feeding Readiness in Preterm Infants
Prematurity, Feeding Behaviors
Recruiting
Momentary Coping Prompts and Hair Steroids in College Students
Emotional Regulation, Alcohol Drinking in College
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Plain Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size, Plain Vegetables Served in 200% Portion Size and Enhanced Vegetables Served in 100% Portion Size in people with Feeding Behavior, run by Penn State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference Between Interventions in Vegetable Intake (time frame: One meal per week for each intervention (Study weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03926065, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2020.