Atrial FibrillationEarly Phase 1NCT03943693
Dual Versus Single Shock for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation
A Early Phase 1 study testing Double shock and Single shock in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators aim to investigate the immediate success rate (rate of termination of atrial fibrillation) of dual shock cardioversion compared with standard single shock cardioversion in patients with baseline characteristics adversely influencing successful cardioversion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Double shock and Single shock
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2019to 31 May 2021
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Outpatient or inpatients with atrial fibrillation sent for elective direct current cardioversion (DCCV) with at least 1 of the following risk factors will be included:
- BMI >30
- History of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease/emphysema/asthma
- Significant Valvular heart disease (at least moderate regurgitation/stenosis)
- History of Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction/Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction
- Cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction <40%
Show all 9Show fewer
- Left atrium anterior-posterio (AP) dimension >4.5cm
- Presence of Left ventricular hypertrophy (≥1.1cm septal/posterior wall M-mode) on transthoracic echocardiogram
- History of sleep apnea
Who cannot join
- Consent not obtained
- <18 y.o.
- >80 y.o.
- Not adequately anti-coagulated
- Patient hemodynamically unstable and DCCV required as an emergent procedure
- Prisoners or pregnant patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Oklahoma Health Science Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73105
About this study
Official title: Dual Shock Versus Single Shock Synchronized External Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation - A Double-blinded Randomized Trial
The investigators aim to investigate the immediate success rate (rate of termination of atrial fibrillation) of dual shock cardioversion compared with standard single shock cardioversion in patients with baseline characteristics adversely influencing successful cardioversion. Baseline characteristics known to reduce the success rate of single shock cardioversion include: increased body mass index (BMI), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnea, enlarged left atrium, longer duration of atrial fibrillation and use of amiodarone.
Read the detailed description
Patient Enrollment Patient enrollment will be open enrollment to inpatient/outpatients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria listed above. This is a double-blinded study with randomization to dual shock or standard single shock synchronized cardioversion for patients requiring cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Randomization will be performed using a standard computer-based randomization system.
Cardioversion will be performed with Zoll R series Defibrillator, which was approved by the FDA in 2017 for use as a defibrillator, with a 510K approval for use in cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. After obtaining consent, before sedation is administered, all patients will have 2 pads placed in the antero-posterior pad position on the left chest (guideline recommended position for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation) and an additional 2 pads placed in the standard Ventricular Tachycardia/Advanced Cardiac Life Support positions, where the anterior pad is centered over the right infraclavicular space and the apical pad is placed over the left axilla . All patients will be sedated using propofol administered by anesthesiology or a combination of fentanyl and midazolam administered by cardiology staff.
Patients randomized to single shock will then be treated initially with a 200 Joule shock through the antero-posterior pads only. A repeat attempt will be made using the same approach if the initial shock fails. If the second attempt fails, the single shock approach will be considered to have failed. Patients will be crossed over to dual shock therapy while under the same sedation episode. For cross-over patients, two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks will be delivered through the two sets of pads already in position. If this fails further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist.
Patients randomized to the dual shock group will have two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks delivered through the two sets of pads (antero-posterior position and right infraclavicular-axillary position). The first of these shocks will be synchronized. If the first attempt with this approach fails to terminate atrial fibrillation a second attempt will be made using the same approach. If the second attempt fails the dual shock approach will be considered to have failed and further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist.
Primary Endpoint - Successful termination of atrial fibrillation after initial Direct Current Ccardioversion (DCCV). Successful cardioversion = immediate termination of atrial fibrillation with electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) termination. The physician deciding whether AF was successfully terminated will be blinded to whether the shock was with single or dual shocks. - Partial success will be considered if atrial fibrillation is terminated by the second attempt using the same approach. Secondary Endpoints - Maintenance of normal sinus rhythm at one hour post cardioversion - Presence of symptomatic skin burn (symptoms rated on a scale of 1-10) - Thromboembolic complications - Ventricular Arrhythmias requiring additional shock therapy Documentation of Anticoagulation All patients need to have established therapeutic anticoagulation. Either 1) Therapeutic warfarin (with International normalized ratio (INR) >2) or therapeutic doses of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or edoxaban for at least 3 consecutive weeks before and with plans to continue 4 weeks after cardioversion. 2) Therapeutic anticoagulation with intravenous heparin or therapeutic subcutaneous enoxaparin or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant if atrial fibrillation episode is known to be of recent onset (<48 hours), with anticoagulation to continue for at least one week post cardioversion. 3) Sub-therapeutic or no anticoagulation preceding cardioversion, but transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) confirming absence of intra-cardiac thrombus. Therapeutic anticoagulation should be administered just prior to cardioversion and planned to continue for at least 4 weeks post cardioversion.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Double shock, Single shock
- Keywords
- Cardioversion
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Double shockDevice
Patients randomized to the dual shock group will have two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks delivered through the two sets of pads (antero-posterior position and right infraclavicular-axillary position). The first of these shocks will be synchronized. If the first attempt with this approach fails to terminate atrial fibrillation a second attempt will be made using the same approach. If the second attempt fails the dual shock approach will be considered to have failed and further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist.
Single shockDevice
Patients randomized to single shock will then be treated initially with a 200 Joule shock through the antero-posterior pads only. A repeat attempt will be made using the same approach if the initial shock fails. If the second attempt fails, the single shock approach will be considered to have failed. Patients will be crossed over to dual shock therapy while under the same sedation episode. For cross-over patients, two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks will be delivered through the two sets of pads already in position. If this fails further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Shock Group | Active comparator | Patients randomized to single shock will then be treated initially with a 200 Joule shock through the antero-posterior pads only. Receives: Device: Single shock |
| Double Shock Group | Active comparator | Patients randomized to the dual shock group will have two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks delivered through the two sets of pads (antero-posterior position and right infraclavicular-axillary position). The first of these shocks will be synchronized. Receives: Device: Double shock |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cardioversion to sinus rhythm
Successful termination of atrial fibrillation after initial DCCV. Successful = cardioversion = immediate termination of atrial fibrillation
Measured: Immediately following cardioversion
Secondary outcomes (4)
Maintenance of normal sinus rhythm at one hour post cardioversion
Measured: Within 24 hours
Presence of symptomatic skin burn
Symptoms rated on a scale 1-10
Measured: Immediately following cardioversion
Thromboembolic complications
Measured: Within 24 hours
Ventricular arrhythmias requiring additional shock therapy
Measured: Immediately following cardioversion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2019
- Study start1 Apr 2019
- Primary completion31 May 2021
- Study completion31 May 2021
Why it stopped: Poor enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OklahomaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oklahoma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Deborah Lockwood, MD, Principal investigator, University of Oklahoma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03943693
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10276T
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 May 2019
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Saliba W, Juratli N, Chung MK, Niebauer MJ, Erdogan O, Trohman R, Wilkoff BL, Augostini R, Mowrey KA, Nadzam GR, Tchou PJ. Higher energy synchronized external direct current cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):2031-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00463-5.
PubMed 10588220Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH Jr, Zheng ZJ, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJ. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):837-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
PubMed 24345399Boriani G, Diemberger I, Biffi M, Domenichini G, Martignani C, Valzania C, Branzi A. Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in clinical practice: predictors of long-term outcome. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 May;61(5):748-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01298.x.
PubMed 17493088Larsen MT, Lyngborg K, Pedersen F, Corell P. [Predictive factors of maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current (DC) cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Sep 5;167(36):3408-12. Danish.
PubMed 16159494Vinolas X, Freire F, Romero-Menor C, Alegret JM. [Predictors of reversion to sinus rhythm previous to electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs]. Med Clin (Barc). 2013 Apr 20;140(8):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Spanish.
PubMed 22982132Marrouche NF, Bardy GH, Frielitz HJ, Gunther J, Brachmann J. Quadruple pads approach for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Sep;24(9 Pt 1):1321-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01321.x.
PubMed 11584453
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dual Shock Versus Single Shock Synchronized External Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation - A Double-blinded Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03943693
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10276T
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Cardioversion
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Poor enrollment
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OklahomaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators aim to investigate the immediate success rate (rate of termination of atrial fibrillation) of dual shock cardioversion compared with standard single shock cardioversion in patients with baseline characteristics adversely influencing successful cardioversion. Baseline characteristics known to reduce the success rate of single shock cardioversion include: increased body mass index (BMI), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnea, enlarged left atrium, longer duration of atrial fibrillation and use of amiodarone.
Detailed description
Patient Enrollment Patient enrollment will be open enrollment to inpatient/outpatients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria listed above. This is a double-blinded study with randomization to dual shock or standard single shock synchronized cardioversion for patients requiring cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Randomization will be performed using a standard computer-based randomization system.
Cardioversion will be performed with Zoll R series Defibrillator, which was approved by the FDA in 2017 for use as a defibrillator, with a 510K approval for use in cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. After obtaining consent, before sedation is administered, all patients will have 2 pads placed in the antero-posterior pad position on the left chest (guideline recommended position for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation) and an additional 2 pads placed in the standard Ventricular Tachycardia/Advanced Cardiac Life Support positions, where the anterior pad is centered over the right infraclavicular space and the apical pad is placed over the left axilla . All patients will be sedated using propofol administered by anesthesiology or a combination of fentanyl and midazolam administered by cardiology staff.
Patients randomized to single shock will then be treated initially with a 200 Joule shock through the antero-posterior pads only. A repeat attempt will be made using the same approach if the initial shock fails. If the second attempt fails, the single shock approach will be considered to have failed. Patients will be crossed over to dual shock therapy while under the same sedation episode. For cross-over patients, two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks will be delivered through the two sets of pads already in position. If this fails further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist.
Patients randomized to the dual shock group will have two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks delivered through the two sets of pads (antero-posterior position and right infraclavicular-axillary position). The first of these shocks will be synchronized. If the first attempt with this approach fails to terminate atrial fibrillation a second attempt will be made using the same approach. If the second attempt fails the dual shock approach will be considered to have failed and further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist.
Primary Endpoint - Successful termination of atrial fibrillation after initial Direct Current Ccardioversion (DCCV). Successful cardioversion = immediate termination of atrial fibrillation with electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) termination. The physician deciding whether AF was successfully terminated will be blinded to whether the shock was with single or dual shocks. - Partial success will be considered if atrial fibrillation is terminated by the second attempt using the same approach. Secondary Endpoints - Maintenance of normal sinus rhythm at one hour post cardioversion - Presence of symptomatic skin burn (symptoms rated on a scale of 1-10) - Thromboembolic complications - Ventricular Arrhythmias requiring additional shock therapy Documentation of Anticoagulation All patients need to have established therapeutic anticoagulation. Either 1) Therapeutic warfarin (with International normalized ratio (INR) >2) or therapeutic doses of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or edoxaban for at least 3 consecutive weeks before and with plans to continue 4 weeks after cardioversion. 2) Therapeutic anticoagulation with intravenous heparin or therapeutic subcutaneous enoxaparin or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant if atrial fibrillation episode is known to be of recent onset (<48 hours), with anticoagulation to continue for at least one week post cardioversion. 3) Sub-therapeutic or no anticoagulation preceding cardioversion, but transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) confirming absence of intra-cardiac thrombus. Therapeutic anticoagulation should be administered just prior to cardioversion and planned to continue for at least 4 weeks post cardioversion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Shock Group | Active comparator | Device: Single shockPatients randomized to single shock will then be treated initially with a 200 Joule shock through the antero-posterior pads only. |
| Double Shock Group | Active comparator | Device: Double shockPatients randomized to the dual shock group will have two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks delivered through the two sets of pads (antero-posterior position and right infraclavicular-axillary position). The first of these shocks will be synchronized. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Outpatient or inpatients with atrial fibrillation sent for elective direct current cardioversion (DCCV) with at least 1 of the following risk factors will be included:
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Consent not obtained
- <18 y.o.
- >80 y.o.
- Not adequately anti-coagulated
- Patient hemodynamically unstable and DCCV required as an emergent procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Double shockPatients randomized to the dual shock group will have two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks delivered through the two sets of pads (antero-posterior position and right infraclavicular-axillary position). The first of these shocks will be synchronized. If the first attempt with this approach fails to terminate atrial fibrillation a second attempt will be made using the same approach. If the second attempt fails the dual shock approach will be considered to have failed and further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist. | Device | Double Shock Group |
| Single shockPatients randomized to single shock will then be treated initially with a 200 Joule shock through the antero-posterior pads only. A repeat attempt will be made using the same approach if the initial shock fails. If the second attempt fails, the single shock approach will be considered to have failed. Patients will be crossed over to dual shock therapy while under the same sedation episode. For cross-over patients, two near-simultaneous 200-Joule shocks will be delivered through the two sets of pads already in position. If this fails further treatment will be determined by the primary team/attending cardiologist. | Device | Single Shock Group |
Primary outcome
Cardioversion to sinus rhythm
Time frame: Immediately following cardioversion
Successful termination of atrial fibrillation after initial DCCV. Successful = cardioversion = immediate termination of atrial fibrillation
4 secondary outcomes
Maintenance of normal sinus rhythm at one hour post cardioversion
Time frame: Within 24 hours
Presence of symptomatic skin burn
Time frame: Immediately following cardioversion
Thromboembolic complications
Time frame: Within 24 hours
Ventricular arrhythmias requiring additional shock therapy
Time frame: Immediately following cardioversion
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Poor enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 10588220Saliba W, Juratli N, Chung MK, Niebauer MJ, Erdogan O, Trohman R, Wilkoff BL, Augostini R, Mowrey KA, Nadzam GR, Tchou PJ. Higher energy synchronized external direct current cardioversion for refractory atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Dec;34(7):2031-4. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00463-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 24345399Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH Jr, Zheng ZJ, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJ. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):837-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 17493088Boriani G, Diemberger I, Biffi M, Domenichini G, Martignani C, Valzania C, Branzi A. Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in clinical practice: predictors of long-term outcome. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 May;61(5):748-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01298.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 16159494Larsen MT, Lyngborg K, Pedersen F, Corell P. [Predictive factors of maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current (DC) cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Sep 5;167(36):3408-12. Danish.
- Results publication: PubMed 22982132Vinolas X, Freire F, Romero-Menor C, Alegret JM. [Predictors of reversion to sinus rhythm previous to electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs]. Med Clin (Barc). 2013 Apr 20;140(8):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 11584453Marrouche NF, Bardy GH, Frielitz HJ, Gunther J, Brachmann J. Quadruple pads approach for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Sep;24(9 Pt 1):1321-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01321.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deborah Lockwood, MD principal investigator
University of Oklahoma
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Double shock and Single shock in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by University of Oklahoma at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Poor enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cardioversion to sinus rhythm (time frame: Immediately following cardioversion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03943693, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.