StrokeHEADS:UPNCT03956693
Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression Following Stroke
A study testing HEADS: UP in people with Stroke and CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), run by Glasgow Caledonian University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of an existing mindfulness intervention called HEADS: UP. The intervention is designed to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Anxiety
- What is being tested?
- HEADS: UP
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 1 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have had ≥1 stroke 3-60 months previously (reflects incidence of anxiety/depression)
- Interested in learning skills to help them cope with self-reported anxiety and/or depression
- Able to speak and understand conversational English
- Able to identify a family member/peer who would: like to take part, can speak and understand conversational English; not participating in another trial.
Who cannot join
- Prior MBSR attendance in the last three years (as this may confound results)
- Current participant in another trial
- Cannot follow a 2-stage command
- ≥28 on Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) scale; assesses the cognitive skills required to engage with group-based interventions (goo.gl/uumeFw)
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); screens for anxiety and depression; used extensively in Primary Care research (goo.gl/TtdDDW). A score of 8-10 suggests mood disorder; ≥11 indicates 'probable presence'. A total cut-off score of 11 achieves optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, and will be used for family/peer participants who have not had a stroke. A lower cut-off score is recommended for stroke survivors i.e. 4 on each sub-scale.
- NOTE: A current prescription for anxiolytics or antidepressants is not an exclusion criterion. If screening identifies a potential participant who requires GP referral, that individual may subsequently be prescribed medication; this is a feature of the pilot work. In a future trial, where participants are randomised to two arms and there is equal probability of people being on medication in each arm, it will not be an issue.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Glasgow Caledonian University
Glasgow, Glasgow (City Of), G4 0BA
About this study
Official title: HEADS: UP (Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression Following Stroke) Psychological Self-management Intervention: Non-randomised Pilot Study
The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of an existing mindfulness intervention called HEADS: UP. The intervention is designed to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Read the detailed description
Mindfulness-based interventions are thought to help people affected by stroke (Lawrence et al., 2013). Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression (HEADS: UP) is an adapted mindfulness-based intervention for people affected by stroke (Lawrence, 2019). This study aligns with the feasibility/piloting stage of the Medical Research Council framework (Craig et al., 2008) and will optimise intervention delivery and study processes, ensuring all elements are working together, ready for testing at a later stage.
The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of HEADS: UP to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression prior to Phase III testing in future work.
This stage is a non-randomised pilot study based in Glasgow, United Kingdom. The purpose of the pilot is to assess feasibility and acceptability of delivering HEADS: UP, and recruitment and questionnaire data collection processes; identify any additional HEADS: UP adaptions.
- Conditions
- Stroke, CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Anxiety, Depression
- Being tested
- HEADS: UP
- Keywords
- Stroke, CVA (cardiovascular accident), Anxiety, Depression, Mindfulness, Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction, Self-management
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Anxiety Disorders, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HEADS: UPBehavioural
HEADS: UP comprises 9 x 2.5 hour mindfulness teaching sessions and a silent retreat in week 7. Course materials include accessible information packs and resources to complement class-based sessions.
The first week of the 9-week course is an introductory class. The purpose of the introductory class is to give participants the opportunity to meet the trainers and to decide if they want to learn more about mindfulness. The introductory session also allows participants to meet other people on the course and to share their (stroke) stories.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HEADS: UP | Experimental | HEADS: UP is group-based mindfulness intervention based on the original mindfulness based stress reduction course, but adapted for people affected by stroke. Receives: Behavioral: HEADS: UP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): change is being assessed
The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) is an outcome measure intended to assess of health-related quality of life for people affected by stroke. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and the questionnaire is usually completed in 10-15 minutes.
Measured: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS): change is being assessed
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a self-report, health status measure for people affected by stroke. It was designed to assess strength, hand function, activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. The SIS can be used both in clinical and research settings. It contains 59 items and assesses 8 domains. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale. A final single-item question assesses the individual's perception of recovery from stroke, measured using a visual analogue scale, where 0 = no recovery \& 100 = full recovery. The scale is normally completed in 15-20 minutes.
Measured: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Secondary outcomes (5)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): change is being assessed
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-administered measure of depression and anxiety. The HADS is not a diagnostic tool, but can screen for anxiety and depression. The HADS has 14 items in total and asks about mood in the past week. Seven items assess depression and seven items assess anxiety. The HADS can be administered repeatedly without impacting on validity. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale and provide a score 0-21. A higher score indicates higher distress.
Usually completed in 2-5 minutes
Measured: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS): change is being assessed
The DASS is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure depression, anxiety and stress. Each of the three DASS scales contains 14 items, divided into subscales of 2-5 items with similar content. The Depression scale assesses dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia, and inertia. The Anxiety scale assesses autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety, and subjective experience of anxious affect. The Stress scale is sensitive to levels of chronic non-specific arousal. It assesses difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, and being easily upset/agitated, irritable/over-reactive and impatient. Subjects are asked to use 4-point severity/frequency scales to rate the extent to which they have experienced each state over the past week. Scores for Depression, Anxiety and Stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items.
Measured: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II): change is being assessed
The Beck Depression Inventory 11 (BDI-II) is a 21 items self-report scale to assess the intensity of depression. Each item is a list of four statements arranged in increasing severity about a symptom of depression. Score range between 0-63 with higher score indicating greater severity.
Normally completed in 5-10 minutes.
Measured: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI): change is being assessed
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a self-report 21-item scale for measuring anxiety. The questions ask about symptoms of anxiety the subject has had during the past week. Each question is scored between 0 (mild) and 3 (severe) and a total score will vary between 0-63. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Measured: Weeks 0, 9 21
EQ-5D 5L: change is being assessed
The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
Measured: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2019
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion22 Oct 2019
- Study completion1 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Pilot study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Glasgow Caledonian University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Stirling, Edinburgh Napier University, The Stroke Association, United Kingdom, Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, University of Strathclyde, University of Manchester
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maggie Lawrence, PhD, Study director, Glasgow Caledonian University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03956693
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SA PPA 18\100011 (stage 1)
- Acronym
- HEADS:UP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 8 May 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PubMed 18824488Lawrence, M. (2019) Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression After Stroke (HEADS: UP): Research Project Briefing from the Chief Scientific Office. Available at: www.cso.scot.nhs.uk (Accessed: 7 May 2019).
Lawrence M, Booth J, Mercer S, Crawford E. A systematic review of the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions following transient ischemic attack and stroke. Int J Stroke. 2013 Aug;8(6):465-74. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12135.
PubMed 23879751
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- HEADS: UP (Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression Following Stroke) Psychological Self-management Intervention: Non-randomised Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03956693
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HEADS:UP / SA PPA 18\100011 (stage 1)
- Conditions
- Stroke, CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Anxiety, Depression
- Keywords
- Stroke, CVA (cardiovascular accident), Anxiety, Depression, Mindfulness, Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction, Self-management
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Glasgow Caledonian UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Stirling, Edinburgh Napier University, The Stroke Association, United Kingdom, Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, University of Strathclyde, University of Manchester
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of an existing mindfulness intervention called HEADS: UP. The intervention is designed to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Detailed description
Mindfulness-based interventions are thought to help people affected by stroke (Lawrence et al., 2013). Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression (HEADS: UP) is an adapted mindfulness-based intervention for people affected by stroke (Lawrence, 2019). This study aligns with the feasibility/piloting stage of the Medical Research Council framework (Craig et al., 2008) and will optimise intervention delivery and study processes, ensuring all elements are working together, ready for testing at a later stage.
The aim of this mixed methods research is to conduct feasibility pilot testing of HEADS: UP to help people affected by stroke self-manage symptoms of anxiety and depression prior to Phase III testing in future work.
This stage is a non-randomised pilot study based in Glasgow, United Kingdom. The purpose of the pilot is to assess feasibility and acceptability of delivering HEADS: UP, and recruitment and questionnaire data collection processes; identify any additional HEADS: UP adaptions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Pilot study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HEADS: UP | Experimental | Behavioral: HEADS: UPHEADS: UP is group-based mindfulness intervention based on the original mindfulness based stress reduction course, but adapted for people affected by stroke. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Have had ≥1 stroke 3-60 months previously (reflects incidence of anxiety/depression)
- Interested in learning skills to help them cope with self-reported anxiety and/or depression
- Able to speak and understand conversational English
- Able to identify a family member/peer who would: like to take part, can speak and understand conversational English; not participating in another trial.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Prior MBSR attendance in the last three years (as this may confound results)
- Current participant in another trial
- Cannot follow a 2-stage command
- ≥28 on Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) scale; assesses the cognitive skills required to engage with group-based interventions (goo.gl/uumeFw)
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); screens for anxiety and depression; used extensively in Primary Care research (goo.gl/TtdDDW). A score of 8-10 suggests mood disorder; ≥11 indicates 'probable presence'. A total cut-off score of 11 achieves optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, and will be used for family/peer participants who have not had a stroke. A lower cut-off score is recommended for stroke survivors i.e. 4 on each sub-scale.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HEADS: UPHEADS: UP comprises 9 x 2.5 hour mindfulness teaching sessions and a silent retreat in week 7. Course materials include accessible information packs and resources to complement class-based sessions. The first week of the 9-week course is an introductory class. The purpose of the introductory class is to give participants the opportunity to meet the trainers and to decide if they want to learn more about mindfulness. The introductory session also allows participants to meet other people on the course and to share their (stroke) stories. | Behavioural | HEADS: UP |
Primary outcome
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) is an outcome measure intended to assess of health-related quality of life for people affected by stroke. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and the questionnaire is usually completed in 10-15 minutes.
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS): change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a self-report, health status measure for people affected by stroke. It was designed to assess strength, hand function, activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. The SIS can be used both in clinical and research settings. It contains 59 items and assesses 8 domains. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale. A final single-item question assesses the individual's perception of recovery from stroke, measured using a visual analogue scale, where 0 = no recovery \& 100 = full recovery. The scale is normally completed in 15-20 minutes.
5 secondary outcomes
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS): change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II): change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI): change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9 21
EQ-5D 5L: change is being assessed
Time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2020.
- Background: PubMed 18824488Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
- BackgroundLawrence, M. (2019) Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression After Stroke (HEADS: UP): Research Project Briefing from the Chief Scientific Office. Available at: www.cso.scot.nhs.uk (Accessed: 7 May 2019).
- Background: PubMed 23879751Lawrence M, Booth J, Mercer S, Crawford E. A systematic review of the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions following transient ischemic attack and stroke. Int J Stroke. 2013 Aug;8(6):465-74. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12135.
- Helping Ease Anxiety and Depression after Stroke (HEADS: UP) - Research BriefingLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Foot Drop Rehabilitation and Mobility in Chronic Stroke
Stroke
Enrolling by invitation
Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface With MRI-Guided Multi-Channel Time-Domain Interference Stimulation in Treating Motor Dysfunction in Acute Cerebral Infarction Patients
Acute Ichemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Development, Validation and Normative Data of the Italian Battery for the Recognition of Famous Faces (FAME)
Stroke, Alzheimer s Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Long-Term Clinical, Health Economic, and Process Evaluation of Intensive Technology-Integrated Motor Rehabilitation in Chronic Neurological Conditions (INTeRAcT-bis)
Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Rimonabant for Improving Walking Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Chronic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maggie Lawrence, PhD study director
Glasgow Caledonian University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HEADS: UP in people with Stroke and CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), run by Glasgow Caledonian University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): change is being assessed (time frame: Weeks 0, 9, 21). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03956693, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2020.