Pancreatic CancerPhase 2/3NCT03959150
Metronomic Chemotherapy With Capecitabine for Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 2/3 study testing Capecitabine in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The latest guidelines recommend Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine as the first choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients in good physical condition. In order to prolong the survival of patients and improve the cure rate, metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine is a safe, effective and economical… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Capecitabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 231 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2020to 30 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed pancreatic invasive ductal adenocarcinoma.
- The patient underwent surgery for pancreatic tumor resection, and no gross residual lesions were found postoperatively (R2).
- Stage II/III pancreatic cancer was determined according to AJCC/UICC TNM stage eighth.
- At least 6 cycles of gemcitabine plus capecitabine chemotherapy have been completed.
- Age 18-70 years old, gender not limited.
- ECOG performance score is 0 or 1.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Without dysphagia, able to tolerate oral administration.
- No relevant clinical or imaging evidence of recurrence or metastasis showing within the 28 days before random.
- Chemotherapy with capecitabine combined with gemcitabine regimen was given within 12 weeks after surgery, and last chemotherapy to random time ≤ 6 weeks.
- Adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function in measurements taken within 7 days before registration :
- Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L, Platelet count ≥ 100×109/L, Absolute granulocyte count ≥ 1.5×109/L.
- Note: patients should not receive blood transfusion or growth factor support within 14 days before collection of blood samples.
- Serum creatinine≤ 1.5 ULN, and calculated creatinine clearance of ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2.
- AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 X ULN, serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X ULN (Patients with Gilbert syndrome with total bilirubin≤ 3 X ULN can be enrolled).
- INR or PT ≤ 1.5×ULN,unless the patient is receiving anticoagulant therapy and the PT value is within the expected therapeutic range of the anticoagulant.
- Electrocardiogram and cardiac function were not contraindicated in chemotherapy.
- Women should have a negative pregnancy test, and all the patients have no planning within 3 years and should take contraceptive measures during treatment.
- Informed consent form signed.
Who cannot join
- Other pathological types of pancreatic malignancies (e.g. neuroendocrine carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, etc.).
- With distant metastasis or malignant pleural effusion.
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women.
- Unable to oral medication.
- Previous or concurrent malignancies, excluding curatively treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer, unless at least 5 years have elapsed since last treatment and the patient is considered cured.
- A history of transient ischemic attack, cerebrovascular accident, thrombosis, or thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis) within 180 days before randomization.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Any of the following uncontrolled or severe cardiovascular disease history:
- Myocardial infarction occurred 180 days before randomization.
- Uncontrolled angina occurred within 180 days before randomization.
- Heart failure of class III or IV (according to New York Heart Association functional classification).
- Uncontrolled hypertension after appropriate treatment (e.g. Systolic blood pressure ≥150mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90mmHg for 24h or longer).
- Arrhythmias that require treatment, including pacemakers.
- Serious drug allergy.
- Uncontrolled diabetes or systemic infection.
- Known dihydro pyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
- Any other reasons the investigator considers the patient should not participate in the study.
- Without personal freedom and independent civil capacity.
- Already enrolled into other clinical trials.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital
Shanghai, 200025
Jun Zhang, MD & Ph. D, +86-13818332497, junzhang10977@sjtu.edu.cn
Jinling Jiang, MD & MS, +86-21-13816423993, jiangjinling2000@163.com
About this study
Official title: A Multi-center, II Phase,Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy After Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Standard Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II/III Pancreatic Cancer
The latest guidelines recommend Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine as the first choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients in good physical condition. In order to prolong the survival of patients and improve the cure rate, metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine is a safe, effective and economical treatment mode after adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is trying to determine that compared with observation group, if capecitabine metronomic medication is a better choice after adjuvant chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Capecitabine (Xeloda ®) is currently the most biologically active oral fluoropyrimidine drug, and is widely used in adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. It is usually taken twice a day (in the morning and in the evening) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1 week break before repeating the next dosage cycle. In this study, capecitabine will be prescribed as dosage of 500mg/m2, and maintain for a whole year after the standard treatment in stage II/III pancreatic cancer patients. 1 year disease-free survival is set as the primary outcome, OS, RFS, AEs and exploratory biomarkers including effects of metronome chemotherapy on immune cells, such as NK cells, T cells, TAMs, B cells, etc are also observed as the secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis are made to see compared with observation group, whether this metronomic therapy of capecitabine ( 500mg/m2) will bring benefit to pancreatic cancer patients.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Capecitabine
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CapecitabineDrug
Also called Xeloda
Oral fluorouracil
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy | Experimental | Capecitabine 500mg/m2 po qd Receives: Drug: Capecitabine |
| Observation | No intervention | Observation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
One year disease-free survival
was defined as the rate of disease recurrence, metastasis or death due to disease progression within 1 year after the surgery
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
Overall Survival (OS)
was defined as the time from the date of surgery until the date of any death occurred
Measured: 5 year
Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)
was defined as the time from the date of surgery until the date of local recurrence of the tumor
Measured: 1 year
AEs
Hand and foot syndrome and other treatment related AE
Measured: 5 year
Exploratory biomarkers
including effects of metronome chemotherapy on immune cells, such as NK cells, T cells, TAMs, B cells, etc
Measured: 1 yaer
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2019
- Study start5 Jan 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ruijin HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 231 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jun Zhang, Ruijin Hospital
- Investigators
- Jun Zhang, MD & Ph. D, Principal investigator, Ruijin Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03959150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Metro-PC
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 18 May 2019
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Siravegna G, Bardelli A. Blood circulating tumor DNA for non-invasive genotyping of colon cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2016 Mar;10(3):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
PubMed 26774880Witkowski ER, Smith JK, Tseng JF. Outcomes following resection of pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;107(1):97-103. doi: 10.1002/jso.23267. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
PubMed 22991309Ansari D, Gustafsson A, Andersson R. Update on the management of pancreatic cancer: surgery is not enough. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 21;21(11):3157-65. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3157.
PubMed 25805920Liao WC, Chien KL, Lin YL, Wu MS, Lin JT, Wang HP, Tu YK. Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1095-1103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70388-7. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
PubMed 24035532Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP, Zheng H, Szymonifka J, Wargo JA, Thayer SP, Lauwers GY, Deshpande V, Mino-Kenudson M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Warshaw AL. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3 Suppl 1):S43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
PubMed 22763261Narang AK, Miller RC, Hsu CC, Bhatia S, Pawlik TM, Laheru D, Hruban RH, Zhou J, Winter JM, Haddock MG, Donohue JH, Schulick RD, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Herman JM. Evaluation of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: the Johns Hopkins Hospital-Mayo Clinic collaborative study. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Sep 28;6:126. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-126.
PubMed 21951377Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985 Aug;120(8):899-903. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390320023003.
PubMed 4015380Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403.
PubMed 9196156Javle M, Hsueh CT. Updates in Gastrointestinal Oncology - insights from the 2008 44th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Hematol Oncol. 2009 Feb 23;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-2-9.
PubMed 19236713Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, Hartmann JT, Gellert K, Ridwelski K, Niedergethmann M, Zulke C, Fahlke J, Arning MB, Sinn M, Hinke A, Riess H. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1473-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279201.
PubMed 24104372Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, Okamura Y, Konishi M, Matsumoto I, Kaneoka Y, Shimizu Y, Nakamori S, Sakamoto H, Morinaga S, Kainuma O, Imai K, Sata N, Hishinuma S, Ojima H, Yamaguchi R, Hirano S, Sudo T, Ohashi Y; JASPAC 01 Study Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):248-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
PubMed 27265347Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Dervenis C, Smith D, Glimelius B, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Lerch MM, Olah A, Rawcliffe CL, Verbeke CS, Campbell F, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):147-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7352.
PubMed 22782416Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, Psarelli EE, Valle JW, Halloran CM, Faluyi O, O'Reilly DA, Cunningham D, Wadsley J, Darby S, Meyer T, Gillmore R, Anthoney A, Lind P, Glimelius B, Falk S, Izbicki JR, Middleton GW, Cummins S, Ross PJ, Wasan H, McDonald A, Crosby T, Ma YT, Patel K, Sherriff D, Soomal R, Borg D, Sothi S, Hammel P, Hackert T, Jackson R, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Mar 11;389(10073):1011-1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32409-6. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
PubMed 28129987Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, Engebretson A, Hong TS, Maitra A, Mohile SG, Mumber M, Schulick R, Shapiro M, Urba S, Zeh HJ, Katz MHG. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2324-2328. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.4948. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
PubMed 28398845
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-center, II Phase,Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy After Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Standard Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II/III Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03959150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Metro-PC
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 231 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The latest guidelines recommend Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine as the first choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients in good physical condition. In order to prolong the survival of patients and improve the cure rate, metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine is a safe, effective and economical treatment mode after adjuvant chemotherapy. This study is trying to determine that compared with observation group, if capecitabine metronomic medication is a better choice after adjuvant chemotherapy.
Detailed description
Capecitabine (Xeloda ®) is currently the most biologically active oral fluoropyrimidine drug, and is widely used in adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. It is usually taken twice a day (in the morning and in the evening) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1 week break before repeating the next dosage cycle. In this study, capecitabine will be prescribed as dosage of 500mg/m2, and maintain for a whole year after the standard treatment in stage II/III pancreatic cancer patients. 1 year disease-free survival is set as the primary outcome, OS, RFS, AEs and exploratory biomarkers including effects of metronome chemotherapy on immune cells, such as NK cells, T cells, TAMs, B cells, etc are also observed as the secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis are made to see compared with observation group, whether this metronomic therapy of capecitabine ( 500mg/m2) will bring benefit to pancreatic cancer patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: CapecitabineCapecitabine 500mg/m2 po qd |
| Observation | No intervention | –Observation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Histologically confirmed pancreatic invasive ductal adenocarcinoma.
- The patient underwent surgery for pancreatic tumor resection, and no gross residual lesions were found postoperatively (R2).
- Stage II/III pancreatic cancer was determined according to AJCC/UICC TNM stage eighth.
- At least 6 cycles of gemcitabine plus capecitabine chemotherapy have been completed.
- Age 18-70 years old, gender not limited.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Other pathological types of pancreatic malignancies (e.g. neuroendocrine carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, etc.).
- With distant metastasis or malignant pleural effusion.
- Pregnant and breast-feeding women.
- Unable to oral medication.
- Previous or concurrent malignancies, excluding curatively treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer, unless at least 5 years have elapsed since last treatment and the patient is considered cured.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CapecitabineAlso: XelodaOral fluorouracil | Drug | Capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
One year disease-free survival
Time frame: 1 year
was defined as the rate of disease recurrence, metastasis or death due to disease progression within 1 year after the surgery
4 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: 5 year
Recurrence-free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: 1 year
AEs
Time frame: 5 year
Exploratory biomarkers
Time frame: 1 yaer
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 26774880Siravegna G, Bardelli A. Blood circulating tumor DNA for non-invasive genotyping of colon cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2016 Mar;10(3):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 22991309Witkowski ER, Smith JK, Tseng JF. Outcomes following resection of pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;107(1):97-103. doi: 10.1002/jso.23267. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 25805920Ansari D, Gustafsson A, Andersson R. Update on the management of pancreatic cancer: surgery is not enough. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 21;21(11):3157-65. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3157.
- Background: PubMed 24035532Liao WC, Chien KL, Lin YL, Wu MS, Lin JT, Wang HP, Tu YK. Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1095-1103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70388-7. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 22763261Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP, Zheng H, Szymonifka J, Wargo JA, Thayer SP, Lauwers GY, Deshpande V, Mino-Kenudson M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Warshaw AL. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3 Suppl 1):S43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 21951377Narang AK, Miller RC, Hsu CC, Bhatia S, Pawlik TM, Laheru D, Hruban RH, Zhou J, Winter JM, Haddock MG, Donohue JH, Schulick RD, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Herman JM. Evaluation of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: the Johns Hopkins Hospital-Mayo Clinic collaborative study. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Sep 28;6:126. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-126.
- Background: PubMed 4015380Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985 Aug;120(8):899-903. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390320023003.
- Background: PubMed 9196156Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403.
- Background: PubMed 19236713Javle M, Hsueh CT. Updates in Gastrointestinal Oncology - insights from the 2008 44th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Hematol Oncol. 2009 Feb 23;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-2-9.
- Background: PubMed 24104372Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, Hartmann JT, Gellert K, Ridwelski K, Niedergethmann M, Zulke C, Fahlke J, Arning MB, Sinn M, Hinke A, Riess H. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1473-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279201.
- Background: PubMed 27265347Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, Okamura Y, Konishi M, Matsumoto I, Kaneoka Y, Shimizu Y, Nakamori S, Sakamoto H, Morinaga S, Kainuma O, Imai K, Sata N, Hishinuma S, Ojima H, Yamaguchi R, Hirano S, Sudo T, Ohashi Y; JASPAC 01 Study Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet. 2016 Jul 16;388(10041):248-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30583-9. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 22782416Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Dervenis C, Smith D, Glimelius B, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Lerch MM, Olah A, Rawcliffe CL, Verbeke CS, Campbell F, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):147-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7352.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jun Zhang, MD & Ph. D principal investigator
Ruijin Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Capecitabine in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jun Zhang, MD & Ph. D (+86-13818332497, junzhang10977@sjtu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
One year disease-free survival (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03959150, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2021.