AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute LeukemiaPhase 31703/1801NCT03959241

TAC/MTX vs. TAC/MMF/PTCY for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease and Microbiome and Immune Reconstitution Study (BMT CTN 1703/1801)

A Phase 3 study testing Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate, Tacrolimus and Methotrexate in people with Acute Leukemia and Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 39 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

1703: The study is designed as a randomized, phase III, multicenter trial comparing two acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis regimens: tacrolimus/methotrexate (Tac/MTX) versus post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy/Tac/MMF) in the setting of reduced intensity… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate, Tacrolimus and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
431 participants
Where
39 sitesUnited States
Study dates
25 Jun 2019to 19 Sep 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18.0 years or older at the time of enrollment on Segment A
  • Patients with acute leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia with no circulating blasts and with less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow
  • Patients with myelodysplasia/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with no circulating blasts and with less than 10% blasts in the bone marrow (higher blast percentage allowed in MDS due to lack of differences in outcomes with <5% vs. 5-10% blasts in this disease)
  • Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma with chemosensitive disease at time of transplantation
  • Patients with lymphoma [follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma] with chemosensitive disease at the time of transplantation
  • Planned reduced intensity conditioning regimen (see eligible regimens in Table 2.4a)
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Patients must have a related or unrelated peripheral blood stem cell donor as follows:
  • Sibling donor must be a 6/6 match for Human Leukocyte Antigen-A (HLA)-A and -B at intermediate (or higher) resolution, and -DRB1 at high resolution using DNA-based typing, and must be willing to donate peripheral blood stem cells and meet institutional criteria for donation.
  • Unrelated donor must be a 7/8 or 8/8 match at HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 at high resolution using DNA-based typing. Unrelated donor must be willing to donate peripheral blood stem cells and meet National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) criteria for donation.
  • Cardiac function: Left ventricular ejection fraction at least 45%
  • Estimated creatinine clearance acceptable per institutional guidelines
  • Pulmonary function: Diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) corrected for hemoglobin at least 40% and forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) predicted at least 50%
  • Liver function acceptable per institutional guidelines
  • Karnofsky Performance Score at least 60%
  • Female patients (unless postmenopausal for at least 1 year before the screening visit, or surgically sterilized), agree to practice two (2) effective methods of contraception at the same time, or agree to completely abstain from heterosexual intercourse, from the time of signing the informed consent through 12 months post-transplant (see Section 2.6.4 for definition of postmenopausal)
  • Male patients (even if surgically sterilized), of partners of women of childbearing potential must agree to one of the following: practice effective barrier contraception (see Section 2.6.4 for list of barrier methods), or abstain from heterosexual intercourse from the time of signing the informed consent through 12 months post-transplant
  • Plans for the use of post-transplant maintenance therapy must be disclosed upon enrollment and must be used irrespective of the outcome of the randomization. Please note that THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE INVESTIGATIONAL AGENTS and maintenance therapy with investigational treatment requires approval by the study chairs.
  • Voluntary written consent obtained prior to the performance of any study-related procedure that is not a part of standard medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to future medical care.

Who cannot join

  • Prior allogeneic transplant
  • Active central nervous system (CNS) involvement by malignant cells
  • Patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia arising from myeloproliferative disease, including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
  • Patients with uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infections (currently taking medication and with progression or no clinical improvement) at time of enrollment.
  • Presence of clinically significant fluid collection (ascites, pleural or pericardial effusion) that interferes with methotrexate clearance or makes methotrexate use contraindicated
  • Patients seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with detectable viral load. HIV+ patients with an undetectable viral load on antiviral therapy are eligible.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia.
  • Female patients who are pregnant (as per institutional practice) or lactating
  • Patients with a serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to interfere with participation in this clinical study
  • Patients with prior malignancies except resected non-melanoma skin cancer or treated cervical carcinoma in situ. Cancer treated with curative intent ≥ 5 years previously will be allowed. Cancer treated with curative intent < 5 years previously must be reviewed and approved by the Protocol Officer or Chairs.
  • Planned use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab in conditioning regimen

Trial locations and contacts

39 sites in 1 country.

39 sites in 1 country

United States39 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Blood & Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21231

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • University of North Carolina

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Ohio State/Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute, Children's Hospital of Michigan

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • City of Hope National Medical Center

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

  • University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands)

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • Baylor College of Medicine/The Methodist Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Research Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University Simon Cancer Center

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Indiana BMT - St. Francis Hospital

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46327

  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1009

  • University of Kansas Hospital

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-5156

  • Loyola University

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53211

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Mount Sinai Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10174

  • University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098

  • Virginia Commonwealth University, MCV Hospital

    Richmond, Virginia, 23298

  • Mayo Clinic - Rochester

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98109-1024

  • Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Stanford Hospital and Clinics

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33624

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Versus Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide/Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil in Non-Myeloablative/Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (BMT CTN 1703; Progress III); Companion Study: Microbiome and Immune Reconstitution in Cellular Therapies and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (BMT CTN 1801; Mi-Immune)

1703: The study is designed as a randomized, phase III, multicenter trial comparing two acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis regimens: tacrolimus/methotrexate (Tac/MTX) versus post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy/Tac/MMF) in the setting of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation.

1801: The goal of this protocol is to test the primary hypothesis that the engraftment stool microbiome diversity predicts one-year non-relapse mortality in patients undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic HCT.

Read the detailed description

1703: Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) is a complication that affects many hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients; it occurs when the new cells from a transplant attack the recipient's body. The current standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HSCT involves a combination of immunosuppressive agents given for the first 6 months after transplant.

The standard strategy of Tacrolimus/Methotrexate will be used as a control arm in comparison to one other treatment plan utilizing Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil/Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide. Study participants will receive an infusion of mobilized peripheral blood stem cell grafts on both arms. Study participants will be randomized to one of these two treatment arms.

1801: A relationship between the intestinal microbiota and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has long been appreciated but is still not well understood. Mice transplanted in germ-free conditions or treated with gut-decontaminating antibiotics developed less severe GVHD. Clinical studies initially suggested a benefit from near-total bacterial decontamination, but later showed no clear benefit and this approach was discontinued in the early 1990s. Partial gut decontamination continues to be practiced at many centers. More recently, the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has resulted in cheaper and easier characterization of complex microbial mixtures. This has led to a renewed interest in evaluating the relationship between the microbiota and human health and disease, including recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Similarly, NGS has also contributed to significant advancements in the investigator's understanding of immune reconstitution in HCT patients and how this may impact clinica outcomes.

The goal of this protocol is to test the primary hypothesis that the engraftment stool microbiome diversity predicts one-year non-relapse mortality in patients undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic HCT.

Being tested
Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil/Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Mycophenolate Mofetil
Keywords
Acute Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), Myelodysplasia (MDS), Lymphoma, GVHD prophylaxis, Acute GVHD
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts, Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/MethotrexateProcedure or surgery

    Also called HSCT

    Mobilized PBSC grafts will be administered on Day 0 to all patients according to individual institutional guidelines after appropriate processing and quantification has been performed by the local laboratory. Stem cells are administered through an indwelling central venous catheter. If infusion occurs over two days, Day 0 is the first day the infusion is initiated.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called Prograf®, FK506

    Tacrolimus will be given per institutional practices, orally at a dose of 0.05-0.06 mg/kg/day or intravenously at a dose of 0.02-0.03 mg/kg/day starting on Day -3. The dose of tacrolimus may be rounded to the nearest 0.5 mg for oral formulations. Subsequent dosing will be based on blood levels per institutional guidelines with a suggested range of 5-15. If patients are on medications which alter the metabolism of tacrolimus (e.g.concurrent CYP3A4 inhibitors), the initial starting dose and subsequent doses should be altered as per institutional practices. Tacrolimus taper can be initiated at a minimum of 90 days post HCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD. The rate of tapering will be done according institutional practices and patients should be off tacrolimus by Day 180 post HCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD.

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Also called MTX

    Methotrexate will be administered at the doses of 15 mg/m2 IV bolus on Day +1, and 10 mg/m2 IV bolus on Days +3, +6 and +11 after hematopoietic stem cell infusion. Methotrexate should be dose reduced, given with leucovorin rescue, or held for complications such as severe mucositis per institutional guidelines.

  • Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil/Post-Transplant CyclophosphamideProcedure or surgery

    Also called HSCT

    Mobilized PBSC grafts will be administered on Day 0 to all patients according to individual institutional guidelines after appropriate processing and quantification has been performed by the local laboratory. Stem cells are administered through an indwelling central venous catheter. If infusion occurs over two days, Day 0 is the first day the infusion is initiated.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called Prograf®, FK506

    Tacrolimus will be given per institutional practices, orally at a dose of 0.05-0.06 mg/kg/day or intravenously at a dose of 0.02-0.03 mg/kg/day starting Day +5. Starting tacrolimus dose can be modified to account for possible drug interactions (e.g. concurrent CYP3A4 inhibitor use) according to institutional guides. Serum levels of tacrolimus will be measured at Day +7 and then should be checked weekly thereafter, and the dose adjusted accordingly to maintain a suggested level of 5-15 ng/mL. Tacrolimus taper can be initiated at a minimum of 90 days post HCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD. The rate of tapering will be done according to institutional practices but patients should be off tacrolimus by Day 180 post HCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD

  • Mycophenolate MofetilDrug

    Also called CellCept®, MMF

    MMF will be given at a dose of 15 mg/kg/dose ter in die (TID) (based upon actual body weight) with the maximum total daily dose not to exceed 3 grams (1g TID, IV or PO). MMF prophylaxis will start Day +5 and discontinue after the last dose on Day +35, or may be continued if active GVHD is present.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan®

    Cyclophosphamide [50 mg/kg ideal body weight (IBW); if actual body weight (ABW) < IBW, use ABW] will be given on Day +3 (between 60 and 72 hours after the start of the PBSC infusion) and on Day +4 post-transplant (approximately 24 hours after Day +3 cyclophosphamide). Cyclophosphamide will be given as an IV infusion over 1-2 hours (depending on volume).

Study groups in NCT03959241
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tacrolimus/MethotrexateActive comparatorMobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate
Receives: Procedure: Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Methotrexate
Tacrolimus/MMF/PTCYExperimentalMobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil/Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide
Receives: Procedure: Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil/Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil; Drug: Cyclophosphamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) at One Year

    The primary endpoint is GRFS as a time to event endpoint from randomization. All randomized patients will be followed for one year; however, the primary endpoint will be analyzed as a time to event endpoint. The primary analysis will be done using the randomized population. An event for this time to event outcome is defined as grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immune suppression, disease relapse or progression, or death by any cause, whichever comes first. Time to event analyses were conducted. An unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis was done. Additionally, a multivariate Cox regression model adjusting for the following pre-specified covariates: age group (< 65 vs. 65+), disease risk index (low, intermediate, high/very high), planned RIC conditioning regimen (Fludarabine/Busulfan, Fludarabine/Melphalan, Other), donor type/HLA matching score (related 6/6, unrelated 7/8, unrelated 8/8), and planned use of post-transplant maintenance therapy (Yes vs. no).

    Measured: 1 year post randomization

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Grades II-IV and III-IV Acute GVHD at Day 100 Post-transplant

    Acute GVHD was graded according to Mount Sinai aGVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. 2016) with higher grade indicating worse outcomes. Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver. Grade II is stage 3 skin, stage 1 GI, or stage 1 liver. Grade III is stage 2-3 GI or stage 2-3 liver. Grade IV is stage 4 skin or stage 4 liver. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and III-IV at Day 100 was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with 95% confidence intervals, treating death prior to aGVHD as a competing event. The cumulative incidences of Minnesota standard and high risk aGVHD at Day 100 were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Time to aGVHD is defined as time from transplant until onset of grades II-IV and III-IV aGVHD, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to compare the treatment groups, with adjustment for same baseline characteristics as for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: Days 100 post-transplant

  2. Participants With Maximum Acute GVHD at One Year Post-transplant

    Acute GVHD were graded according to Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2016; 22:4-10). The higher acute GVHD grade indicates worse outcomes. Grade 0 is no acute GVHD of any organ. Grade I acute GVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-3 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver. Max acute GVHD by one-year post-transplant was computed.

    Measured: One year post-transplant

  3. Participants With Maximum Stage of Skin, Lower GI, and Liver at Day 100 Post-transplant

    Organ stages were graded according to Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. 2016). Higher stage in any organ indicates worse outcomes. For skin, stage 0-no GVHD rash; 1-Maculopapular Rash <25% BSA; 2-Maculopapular Rash 25-50% BSA; 3-Maculopapular Rash >50% BSA; 4-Generalized Erythroderma Plus Bullous Formation and Desquamation >5% BSA. For Lower GI, 0-No Diarrhea or Diarrhea-Adult: <500 mL/day, <3 Episodes/day; Child: <10 mL/kg/day, <4 Episodes/day; 1-Diarrhea-Adult: 500-999 mL/day, 3-4 Episodes/day; Child: 10-19.9 mL/kg/day, 4-6 Episodes/day; 2-Diarrhea-Adult: 1000-1500 mL/day, 5-7 Episodes/day; Child: 20-30 mL/kg/day, 7-10 Episodes/day; 3-Diarrhea-Adult: >1500 mL/day, >7 Episodes/day; Child: >30 mL/kg/day, >10 Episodes/day; 4-Severe Abdominal Pain With or Without Ileus or Grossly Bloody Stool. For liver, 0-Bilirubin <2.0 mg/dL; 1-Bilirubin 2.0-3.0 mg/dL; 2-Bilirubin 3.1-6.0 mg/dL; 3-Bilirubin 6.1-15.0 mg/dL; 4-Bilirubin >15.0 mg/dL

    Measured: Day 100 post-transplant

  4. Participants With Maximum Stage of Upper GI at Day 100 Post-transplant

    Organ stages were graded according to Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) Criteria (Harris et al. 2016). Higher stage in any organ indicates worse outcomes. For upper GI, stage 0 is no or intermittent nausea, vomiting, or anorexia; stage 1 is persistent nausea, vomiting, or anorexia. The maximum stages of Upper GI at patient level were summarized at Day 100.

    Measured: Day 100 post-transplant

  5. Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Post-transplant

    Percentage of participants with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at one-year will be estimated with 95% confidence intervals for each treatment group using the cumulative incidence estimate with the complementary log-log transformation, treating death prior to cGVHD as a competing event. Chronic GVHD is based on NIH Consensus Criteria (2014 NIH Consensus Criteria) and includes mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD. Eight organs were scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of cGVHD involvement. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of cGVHD were also recorded. Assessment of cGVHD occurred up to one-year post-transplant. This endpoint considers any cGVHD onset. A multivariate Cox regression model for the cause-specific hazard of cGVHD was used to compare the treatment groups, after adjustment for baseline characteristics as described for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: 6, 12 months post-transplant

  6. Number of Participants Experiencing Chronic GVHD With Maximum Severity at 12 Months Post-transplant

    Chronic GVHD data were collected directly from providers and chart review as defined by the NIH Consensus Conference Criteria. Eight organs were scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement per the NIH global severity scores of mild, moderate and severe chronic GVHD. The maximum severity of chronic GVHD through 12 months post-transplant will be tabulated by treatment arm.

    Measured: 12 months post-transplant

  7. Number of Participants With Immunosuppression-Free Survival (ISFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant

    Participants who are alive, relapse-free, and do not need ongoing immune suppression (IS) to control GVHD at one year post-transplant are considered successes for the endpoint immunosuppression-free survival (ISFS). Immune suppression is defined as any systemic agents used to control or suppress GVHD. Corticosteroid doses greater than 10 mg were considered active systemic immune suppression treatment. Participants who discontinued immune suppression within 15 days or less prior to the 1-year time point was considered to be on immune suppression for this endpoint.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  8. Percentage of Participants With Immunosuppression-Free Survival (ISFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant

    Participants who are alive, relapse-free, and do not need ongoing immune suppression to control GVHD at one year post-transplant are considered successes for the endpoint immunosuppression-free survival (ISFS). Percentage of participants alive, relapse free, and off immune suppression at 1 year post-transplant were described for each treatment group, along with 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  9. Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery Post-transplant

    Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery. The competing event is death without neutrophil recovery. For participants who never drop ANC below 500/mm^3, the date of neutrophil recovery will be Day +1 post-transplant. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery by Day 28 and Day 100 was described for each treatment group with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals using the complementary log-log transformation and treating death as a competing event.

    Measured: Days 28 and day 100 post-transplant

  10. Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery Post-transplant

    Platelet recovery is defined by two different metrics: the first day of a sustained platelet count greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 or greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days. The first day of sustained platelet count above these thresholds will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. For participants who never drop their platelet count below 20,000/mm^3 or 50,000/mm^3, the date of platelet recovery will be Day +1 post HCT. The competing event is death without platelet recovery. The cumulative incidence estimate of platelet recovery by Day 60 and Day 100 were described by treatment group with 95% confidence intervals (complementary log-log transformation), treating death as a competing event.

    Measured: Day 60 and Day 100 post-transplant

  11. Percentage of Participants With Lymphocyte Recovery Post-transplant

    Lymphocyte recovery is defined as the first day of sustained absolute lymphocyte count greater than or equal to 1000/mm^3. The competing event is death without lymphocyte recovery. The cumulative incidence estimate of Lymphocyte recovery were described by treatment group with 95% confidence intervals (complementary log-log transformation), treating death as a competing event.

    Measured: Day 60, Day 100, 6 Months, and 1 year post-transplant

  12. Number of Participants With Each Level of Donor Cell Engraftment Post-transplant

    Donor cell engraftment were assessed with donor/recipient chimerism studies. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of donor cells, as a proportion of total cells to be less than 95% but at least 5% in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Full donor chimerism is defined as greater than or equal to 95% of donor cells. Mixed and full chimerism will be evidence of donor cell engraftment. Donor cells of less than 5% will be considered as graft rejection. The number of participants with each level of chimerism described above is described as part of this outcome.

    Measured: Day 28 and Day 100 post-transplant

  13. Summary Statistics for Donor Chimerism

    Donor cell engraftment were assessed with donor/recipient chimerism studies. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of donor cells, as a percentage of total cells to be less than 95% but at least 5% in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Full donor chimerism is defined as greater than or equal to 95% of donor cells. Mixed and full chimerism will be evidence of donor cell engraftment. Donor cells of less than 5% will be considered as graft rejection. Donor chimerism at Day 28 and Day 100 after transplant in each of the randomized treatment arms will be described numerically as median and range for those evaluable.

    Measured: Day 28 and Day 100 post-transplant

  14. Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse at 1 Year Post-transplant

    Disease relapse/progression is defined as being alive and free of relapse/progression of the primary disease. The time from transplant until relapse/progression of the primary disease, or cumulative incidence, was estimated at one-year post-transplant along with 95% CIs computed using the complementary log-log transformation, treating death prior to disease relapse as a competing event. A multivariate Cox regression model for the cause-specific hazard of relapse or progression will be used to compare the treatment groups, after adjustment for baseline characteristics as described for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  15. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM) Post-transplant

    An event for this endpoint TRM is death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence. Disease progression or recurrence will be considered a competing event. The time from transplant until TRM, or cumulative incidence, estimated at specific time points along with 95% CIs computed using the complementary log-log transformation, treating relapse/progression of the primary disease as a competing risk. A multivariate Cox regression model for the cause-specific hazard of TRM was used to compare the treatment groups, after adjustment for baseline characteristics as described for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: Days 100, 180 and 1 year post-transplant

  16. Number of Participants Reporting Grade 3-5 Toxicities by 1 Year Post-transplant

    All Grade 3-5 toxicities will be tabulated by grade for each randomized treatment arm, by type of toxicity as well as the peak grade overall. Toxicities were evaluated using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  17. Frequencies of Infections Categorized by Infection Type

    All Grade 2 and 3 infections were reported according to the BMT CTN Technical Manual of Procedures (MOP) up to 1 year post-transplant. The frequency of Grade 2-3 infections and the number of participants experiencing infections occurring within 1 year post-transplant, are tabulated by treatment arm, organism, time period of infection onset, and severity, with Grade defined per the BMT CTN Technical MOP.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  18. Number of Participants With Grade 2 and 3 Infections

    All Grade 2 and 3 infections were reported according to the BMT CTN Technical Manual of Procedures (MOP) up to 1 year post-transplant. The frequency of Grade 2-3 infections and the number of participants experiencing infections occurring within 1 year post-transplant, are tabulated by treatment arm, organism, time period of infection onset, and severity, with Grade defined per the BMT CTN Technical MOP.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  19. Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 and 3 Infections

    Grade 2 and 3 infections, as defined by the BMT CTN Technical Manual of Procedures (MOP), are reported on the study. The cumulative incidence of infections post transplantation, treating death as a competing risk, were compared between the treatment groups using the Gray's test.

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year post-transplant

  20. Percentage of Participants With CMV at Day 100 Post-transplant

    The cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic treatment for CMV was compared between the treatment groups using the Gray's test, with death treated as a competing risk. Estimates of the cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation are provided at Day 100 post-transplant.

    Measured: Day 100 post-transplant

  21. Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 1 Year Post-transplant

    DFS is defined as being alive and free of relapse/progression of the primary disease. The time from transplant until death or relapse/progression (DFS failure) was described for each treatment arm using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with numbers of subjects at risk at specific time points presented for each treatment group. A multivariate Cox regression model for the hazard of death will be used to compare the treatment groups, after adjustment for baseline characteristics as described for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  22. Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year Post-transplant

    The event for this endpoint OS is death from any cause post-transplant. Time to overall survival is defined as the time interval between date of transplant and date of death from any cause. Surviving participants will be censored at last follow-up or 1 year post-transplant, whichever comes first. The time from transplant until death from any cause was described graphically for each treatment arm using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with numbers of subjects at risk at specific time points presented for each treatment group. A multivariate Cox regression model for the hazard of death will be used to compare the treatment groups, after adjustment for baseline characteristics as described for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: 1 year post-transplant

  23. Percentage of Participants With Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) at 1 Year Post-Transplant

    The cumulative incidence of lymphoproliferative disease at 1-year post-transplant is described with 95% confidence intervals for each treatment group using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, treating death as a competing event.

    Measured: 1 year Post-Transplant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2019
  2. Study start25 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion19 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion19 Sep 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 between the treatment arms using permuted blocks of random sizes.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
431 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03959241
Sponsor's protocol ID
BMT CTN 1703/1801
Other IDs
2U10HL069294-11
Acronym
1703/1801
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
20 May 2019
Last updated
4 Apr 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).

Publications

  • Bolanos-Meade J, Hamadani M, Wu J, Al Malki MM, Martens MJ, Runaas L, Elmariah H, Rezvani AR, Gooptu M, Larkin KT, Shaffer BC, El Jurdi N, Loren AW, Solh M, Hall AC, Alousi AM, Jamy OH, Perales MA, Yao JM, Applegate K, Bhatt AS, Kean LS, Efebera YA, Reshef R, Clark W, DiFronzo NL, Leifer E, Horowitz MM, Jones RJ, Holtan SG; BMT CTN 1703 Investigators. Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 22;388(25):2338-2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2215943.

    PubMed 37342922
  • Abedin S, Martens MJ, Bolanos-Meade J, Al Malki MM, Lian Q, Runaas L, Elmariah H, Gooptu M, Larkin KT, Shaffer BC, Loren AW, Solh M, Alousi AM, Jamy OH, Perales MA, Rezvani A, Bhatt A, El Jurdi N, Yao JM, Applegate K, Kean LS, Efebera YA, Reshef R, Clark W, Leifer E, Saber W, Horowitz MM, Jones RJ, Holtan SG, Hamadani M. Impact of posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based GVHD prophylaxis in patients 70 years and older: an update from BMT CTN 1703. Blood Adv. 2025 Jul 22;9(14):3495-3501. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015964.

    PubMed 40305657
  • Holtan SG, Bolanos-Meade J, Al Malki MM, Wu J, Kitko CL, Reshef R, Rezvani AR, Shaffer BC, Solh MM, Yao JM, Runaas L, Elmariah H, Larkin KT, El Jurdi N, Gooptu M, Loren AW, Hall AC, Alousi AM, Jamy O, Clark W, Kean L, Bhatt AS, Perales MA, Applegate K, Efebera YA, Leifer E, Jones RJ, Horowitz MM, Mattila D, Saber W, Hamadani M, Martens MJ. Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide: A Quality-of-Life Evaluation and 2-Year Outcomes of BMT CTN 1703. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;43(8):912-918. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00921. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

    PubMed 39752608

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft with Tacrolimus/Methotrexate, Tacrolimus and Methotrexate in people with Acute Leukemia and Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 39 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 39 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jan 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) at One Year (time frame: 1 year post randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03959241, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in