AcneNCT03961607
Conventional Photodynamic Therapy vs. Painless Photodynamic Therapy for Moderate or Severe Acne
A study testing Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy in people with Acne, run by Shanghai Dermatology Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study is being done to compare a new, continuous illumination and short Incubation time regimen of aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy#ALA- PDT) to a conventional regimen for treatment of Moderate or Severe Acne. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acne
- What is being tested?
- Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 10 May 2019to 30 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosed with moderate to severe acne;
- Male and female patients of age between 18-30 years old ;
- All patients read the instructions of the subject, willing to follow the program requirements;
- No other topical treatment received within 2 weeks prior to enrollment;
- No systemic treatment was given within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;
- Patients were unsuitable for surgery for various reasons,unwilling to undergo surgery, and signed informed consent when they had informed other alternatives and agreed to take pictures of the lesion. -
Who cannot join
- Those who did not complete the informed consent;
- The lesions belongs to any of the following conditions: There is damage and inflammation, which may lead to the drug entering the open wound;
- Patients with skin photoallergic diseases, porphyria;
- Known to have a history of allergies to test drugs (porphyrins) and their chemically similar drugs;
- Patients with other obvious diseases that may affect the evaluation of efficacy;
- Scars or patients with a tendency to form scars;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Known to have severe immune dysfunction, or long-term use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants;
- Severe heart, liver, kidney disease; with hereditary or acquired People with sexual coagulopathy;
- Those with severe neurological, psychiatric or endocrine diseases; (10)Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or using inappropriate contraceptives; those with a history of drug abuse; those who have participated in other drug clinical trials within 4 weeks before treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Yunfeng Zhang
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200443
Yunfeng Zhang, MD, yunfeng0519116@aliyun.com
Haiyan Zhang, MD, zhanghaiyan10842@163.com
About this study
Official title: Conventional Photodynamic Therapy vs. Painless Photodynamic Therapy for Moderate or Severe Acne#a Randomized, Open-label Trial
This study is being done to compare a new, continuous illumination and short Incubation time regimen of aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy#ALA- PDT) to a conventional regimen for treatment of Moderate or Severe Acne. The hypothesis is that the continuous illumination approach will be less or even no painful, but equally efficacious, as the old regimen.
- Conditions
- Acne
- Being tested
- Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy
- Keywords
- Photodynamic Therapy, Conventional, Painless, Acne
- Medical subject headings
- Acne Vulgaris
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapyProcedure or surgery
Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Painless Photodynamic Therapy(P-PDT) group | Experimental | The painless photodynamic therapy group underwent narrow-band light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation (630 nm; 150 J/cm2) after applying 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid#ALA#cream for 30min. A repeat treatment was administered once weekly for a maximum of 3 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy |
| Conventional Photodynamic Therapy(C-PDT) group | Active comparator | The conventional photodynamic therapy(C-PDT) group underwent narrow-band light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation (630 nm; 50 J/cm2) after applying 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid cream for 1.5h.A repeat treatment was administered once weekly for a maximum of 3 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne
The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne will be measured at one month after the last treatment
Measured: The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne will be measured at one month after the last treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pain assessment
The pain will be assessed using Visual Analogue Scale#VAS) with a score range of 0-10. The higher the score, the greater the pain, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most unbearable pain. Pain will be measured at different time points during and after every treatment #including immediately, 1st min, 3rd min, 5th min, 7th min, 10th min and 2nd h, 12th h, 24th h and 48th h after treatment.
Measured: Immediately, 1st minute, 3rd minute, 5th minute, 7th minute, 10th minute and 2 hours, 12 hours, 24hours and 48 hours after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2019
- Study start10 May 2019
- Primary completion30 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AcneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Dermatology Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiuli Wang, Shanghai Dermatology Hospital
- Investigators
- Xiuli Wang, PhD, MD, Study chair, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03961607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-10
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 19 May 2019
- Last updated
- 23 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Conventional Photodynamic Therapy vs. Painless Photodynamic Therapy for Moderate or Severe Acne#a Randomized, Open-label Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03961607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-10
- Conditions
- Acne
- Keywords
- Photodynamic Therapy, Conventional, Painless, Acne
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Dermatology HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is being done to compare a new, continuous illumination and short Incubation time regimen of aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy#ALA- PDT) to a conventional regimen for treatment of Moderate or Severe Acne. The hypothesis is that the continuous illumination approach will be less or even no painful, but equally efficacious, as the old regimen.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Painless Photodynamic Therapy(P-PDT) group | Experimental | Procedure: Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapyThe painless photodynamic therapy group underwent narrow-band light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation (630 nm; 150 J/cm2) after applying 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid#ALA#cream for 30min. A repeat treatment was administered once weekly for a maximum of 3 weeks. |
| Conventional Photodynamic Therapy(C-PDT) group | Active comparator | Procedure: Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapyThe conventional photodynamic therapy(C-PDT) group underwent narrow-band light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation (630 nm; 50 J/cm2) after applying 5% 5-aminolevulinic acid cream for 1.5h.A repeat treatment was administered once weekly for a maximum of 3 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Clinical diagnosed with moderate to severe acne;
- Male and female patients of age between 18-30 years old ;
- All patients read the instructions of the subject, willing to follow the program requirements;
- No other topical treatment received within 2 weeks prior to enrollment;
- No systemic treatment was given within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Those who did not complete the informed consent;
- The lesions belongs to any of the following conditions: There is damage and inflammation, which may lead to the drug entering the open wound;
- Patients with skin photoallergic diseases, porphyria;
- Known to have a history of allergies to test drugs (porphyrins) and their chemically similar drugs;
- Patients with other obvious diseases that may affect the evaluation of efficacy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapyAminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy | Procedure or surgery | Conventional Photodynamic Therapy(C-PDT) group, Painless Photodynamic Therapy(P-PDT) group |
Primary outcome
The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne
Time frame: The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne will be measured at one month after the last treatment
The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne will be measured at one month after the last treatment
1 secondary outcome
Pain assessment
Time frame: Immediately, 1st minute, 3rd minute, 5th minute, 7th minute, 10th minute and 2 hours, 12 hours, 24hours and 48 hours after treatment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Acne
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO₂ Laser With and Without Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Inflammatory Facial Acne Vulgaris.
Acne, Acne Papulopustulosa
RecruitingPhase 4
Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Effectiveness of Adapalene/Clindamycin Phosphate Gel (Klenzit®-C) in Vietnamese Patients With Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris
Acne
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Study of Denifanstat in Participants With Moderate to Severe Acne (AURORA)
Acne Vulgaris
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparing Nadifloxacin Plus Tretinoin Versus Clindamycin Plus Tretinoin Creams for Mild-to-Moderate Acne
Acne Vulgaris
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology
Hair Reduction, Tattoo Removal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiuli Wang, PhD, MD study chair
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy in people with Acne, run by Shanghai Dermatology Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yunfeng Zhang, MD (+86-18017336550, yunfeng0519116@aliyun.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne (time frame: The clearance rate of Moderate or Severe Acne will be measured at one month after the last treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2019.