AzTrials
AzTrials

Distal Radius FractureRaDiXNCT03962946

Distal Radius Fracture: Clinical Outcome After Conservative Treatment in the Elder Patient

An observational study of Distal Radius Fracture, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is performed to evaluate the outcome of conservative treatment after distal radius fractures in patients of 65 years or older at the time of the injury, primarily with respect to the prognostic value of the Adolfsson-score for the functional demands of the patient on his hand. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Distal Radius Fracture
What is being tested?
Questionnaires to assess Patient reported Outcomes and wrist function test
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
17 Apr 2018to 18 Oct 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Patients with a distal radius fracture who had undergone a conservative treatment at the University Hospital in Basel

Who may be able to join

  • Distal radius fracture with conservative treatment
  • Treated in 2014 or 2015
  • X-ray of injury
  • Informed consent by the patient to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • No X-ray
  • No signed informed consent
  • Demented patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel

    Basel, 4031

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

This study is performed to evaluate the outcome of conservative treatment after distal radius fractures in patients of 65 years or older at the time of the injury, primarily with respect to the prognostic value of the Adolfsson-score for the functional demands of the patient on his hand.

Being tested
Questionnaires to assess Patient reported Outcomes, wrist function test
Keywords
Adolfsson-score, Suhm Score
Medical subject headings
Wrist Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Questionnaires to assess Patient reported OutcomesOther

    Adolfsson-Score questionnaire quantifies the patient's utility of the hand. Suhm Score questionnaire quantifies the independency of a patient in his daily life.

  • wrist function testOther

    wrist function assessed by the range of motion (ROM) for both the affected and the unaffected side.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adolfsson score

    Adolfsson-Score quantifies the patient's utility of the Hand; 8-point scale ranging from 1 = no activity done using hand/arm to 8 = professional activity with high physical stress for the arm. Lower scores reflect fewer effort in using arm/Hand; higher scores reflect higher strain in using arm/hand

    Measured: single time point assessment at baseline

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Suhm Score

    Suhm Score quantifies the independency of a patient in his daily life. 4-point scale ranging from 1 = living at home, independent to 4 = living in nursing home, dependency. Lower scores reflect high independency of a patient in his daily life; higher scores reflect higher dependency of a patient in his daily life.

    Measured: single time point assessment at baseline

  2. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score

    Quick DASH score is a 11-item, self-report questionnaire that measures physical function and symptoms in people with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. The QuickDASH is scored in two components: the disability/symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5) and the optional high performance sport/Music or work modules (4 items, scored 1-5). A higher score indicates greater disability.

    Measured: single time point assessment at baseline

  3. Range of wrist joint motion (degree)

    Range of wrist joint motion (degree)

    Measured: single time point assessment at baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2019
  2. Study start17 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion18 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion18 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03962946
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-00360; ch19Rikli2
Other IDs
2018
Acronym
RaDiX
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
22 May 2019
Last updated
24 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Distal Radius Fracture, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adolfsson score (time frame: single time point assessment at baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in