FibromyalgiaPhase 2NCT03965091
A Study to Test the Effectiveness and Safety of Fremanezumab on Participants With Fibromyalgia
A Phase 2 study testing Fremanezumab in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 49 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the treatment effect of fremanezumab administered subcutaneously (SC) in reducing pain in adult participants with fibromyalgia (FM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fibromyalgia
- What is being tested?
- Fremanezumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 189 participants
- Where
- 49 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Jul 2019to 19 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- approved for study participation by the Fibromyalgia Eligibility Review Committee
- body mass index of 18.5 to 45 kilograms (kg)/square meter (m^2) and a body weight ≥45 kg
- agree to use only acetaminophen as rescue medication for FM-related pain (up to 1000 mg per dose and not to exceed 3000 mg/day for any indication throughout the study period)
- non-pharmacologic interventions (including normal daily exercise routines, chiropractic care, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and massage therapy) are unchanged for a minimum of 30 days prior to screening and will remain unchanged throughout the study
- agree to maintain a usual and unchanged physical exercise regimen
- must be of nonchildbearing potential or, defined as:
Show all 15Show fewer
- women surgically sterile by documented complete hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or
- bitubal ligations or confirmed to be postmenopausal (at least 1 year since last menstrual period) and
- menopausal women confirmed by a follicle-stimulating hormone >35 units (U)/liter (L)
- men surgically sterile by documented vasectomy OR
- If of childbearing potential, patients must meet any of the following criteria:
- must use highly effective contraception method with their partners during the entire study period and for 5 months after the last dose of the study drug.
- sexual abstinence is only considered a highly effective method if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse in the defined period.
- female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test at screening (confirmed by urine dipstick β-HCG pregnancy test at baseline).
- must agree not to participate in another interventional study from the screening period through the end of study (EOS) visit o Additional criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Who cannot join
- unable or unwilling to discontinue/washout of prohibited medications
- ongoing pain that would confound or interfere with the assessment of the participant's FM pain or require excluded therapies during the participant's participation in this study.
- surgery planned during the study period
- receiving prophylactic treatment for migraine-related disorders, including topiramate, valproic acid, onabotulinumtoxinA, amitriptyline, and nortriptyline
- known history of clinically significant or unstable hematologic, cardiac, or thromboembolic events
- known history of suicide attempt, suicidal behavior, or suicidal ideation within the last 12 months
Show all 9Show fewer
- lifetime history of any psychotic and/or bipolar disorder
- current, untreated, moderate or severe major depressive disorder and/or anxiety
- known history of hypersensitivity reactions to injected proteins, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and animal venoms, or a history of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome o Additional criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Trial locations and contacts
49 sites in 1 country.
49 sites in 1 country
United States49 sites
Teva Investigational Site 14181
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Teva Investigational Site 14158
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104
Teva Investigational Site 14163
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104
Teva Investigational Site 14184
Austin, Texas, 78756
Teva Investigational Site 14159
Birmingham, Alabama, 35216
Teva Investigational Site 14429
Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101
Teva Investigational Site 14146
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911
Teva Investigational Site 14148
Chicago, Illinois, 60634
Teva Investigational Site 14153
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Teva Investigational Site 14179
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Teva Investigational Site 14432
Dayton, Ohio, 45432
Teva Investigational Site 14177
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Teva Investigational Site 14155
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Teva Investigational Site 14161
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104
Teva Investigational Site 14436
Flossmoor, Illinois, 60422
Teva Investigational Site 14183
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042
Teva Investigational Site 14174
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Teva Investigational Site 14154
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53144
Teva Investigational Site 14173
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37938
Teva Investigational Site 14165
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
Teva Investigational Site 14434
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Teva Investigational Site 14150
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Teva Investigational Site 14151
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Teva Investigational Site 14178
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Teva Investigational Site 14431
Mesa, Arizona, 85210
Teva Investigational Site 14147
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 02747
Teva Investigational Site 14170
O'Fallon, Missouri, 63368
Teva Investigational Site 14149
Ocala, Florida, 34470
Teva Investigational Site 14166
Oceanside, California, 92056-4515
Teva Investigational Site 14180
Oldsmar, Florida, 34677
Teva Investigational Site 14176
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Teva Investigational Site 14435
Panorama City, California, 91402
Teva Investigational Site 14182
Plantation, Florida, 33317
Teva Investigational Site 14171
Portland, Oregon, 97214
Teva Investigational Site 14157
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169
Teva Investigational Site 14152
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Teva Investigational Site 14185
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Teva Investigational Site 14168
Sacramento, California, 95831
Teva Investigational Site 14175
Salem, Oregon, 97301
Teva Investigational Site 14437
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Teva Investigational Site 14169
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
Teva Investigational Site 14164
San Diego, California, 92103
Teva Investigational Site 14430
Springfield, Missouri, 65810
Teva Investigational Site 14433
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Teva Investigational Site 14162
Tampa, Florida, 33613-3923
Teva Investigational Site 14172
Torrance, California, 90502
Teva Investigational Site 14156
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
Teva Investigational Site 14160
Wichita, Kansas, 67205
Teva Investigational Site 14167
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Proof of Concept Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab for Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the treatment effect of fremanezumab administered subcutaneously (SC) in reducing pain in adult participants with fibromyalgia (FM). A secondary objective is to evaluate the effect of fremanezumab on other efficacy measures, including pain, quality of life, sleep, fatigue, improvement in health, physical functioning, and mood. Another secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of fremanezumab administered SC in adult participants with FM.
The total duration of participant participation in the study is planned to be 21 weeks, consisting of a screening period of up to 5 weeks (ranging from 17 to 35 days), and a double-blind treatment period of 16 weeks.
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Being tested
- Fremanezumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Fibromyalgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FremanezumabDrug
Fremanezumab will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching to fremanezumab will be administered per schedule specified in the arm description.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo matching to fremanezumab SC on Days 1, 29, 57, and 85. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Fremanezumab Dose A | Experimental | Participants will receive fremanezumab SC on Days 1, 29, and 57 and placebo matched to fremanezumab SC on Day 85. Receives: Drug: Fremanezumab |
| Fremanezumab Dose B | Experimental | Participants will receive fremanezumab SC on Days 1, 29, and 57 and placebo matched to fremanezumab SC on Day 85. Receives: Drug: Fremanezumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score Over the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
The PI-NRS is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain; higher scores indicating more pain. Weekly average of the daily average PI-NRS pain score over the past 24 hours was derived using formula: Summation of non-missing efficacy variable in an analysis week divided by the number of days with non-missing efficacy variable in the analysis week. Baseline was defined as the last 14 days before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (19)
Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) Score: Symptom Subscore, Impact Subscore, and Functional Subscore at Week 12
The FIQR is a commonly used instrument in the evaluation of fibromyalgia participants. It contains 21 questions in 3 domains: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Questions are graded on a 0 to 10 numeric scale with 10 being the worst. All questions are framed in the context of the last 7 days. The sub-total score for each domain is the summation of scores in the domain. The function sub-total score ranges from 0 (better) to 90 (worst), with a lower score indicating better (higher) function; overall impact sub-total score ranges from 0 to 20, with a lower score indicating better (lower) impact; the symptoms sub-total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a better (lower) level of symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last 14 days before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Responder Rate of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Rating: Number of Participants Who Were Much Improved or Very Much Improved at Week 12
The PGIC scale evaluates all aspects of participants' health and assesses if there has been an improvement or decline in clinical status since the start of the study. Participants recorded responses to the PGIC scale at Week 12. Improvement was recorded on a 7-point scale, with 1 = very much improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse. Scale "much improved" or "very much improved" were considered improved.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Experienced ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Average PI-NRS Score at Week 12
The PI-NRS is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain; higher scores indication more pain. Weekly average of the daily average PI-NRS pain score over the past 24 hours was derived using formula: Summation of non-missing efficacy variable in an analysis week divided by the number of days with non-missing efficacy variable in the analysis week.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Experienced ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Average PI-NRS Score at Week 12
The PI-NRS is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain; higher scores indication more pain. Weekly average of the daily average PI-NRS pain score over the past 24 hours was derived using formula: Summation of non-missing efficacy variable in an analysis week divided by the number of days with non-missing efficacy variable in the analysis week.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Daily Worst PI-NRS Score Over Past 24 Hours at Week 12
The PI-NRS is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain; higher scores indication more pain. Weekly average of the daily worst PI-NRS pain score over the past 24 hours was derived using formula: Summation of non-missing efficacy variable in an analysis week divided by the number of days with non-missing efficacy variable in the analysis week. Baseline was defined as the last 14 days before the first dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short Form (SF) 8a T-score at Week 12
The PROMIS SF8a scale contains 8 items and assesses sleep disturbance over the past 7 days. One item assessing overall sleep quality use a scale of very poor, poor, fair, good, or very good. Other 7 items use a scale of not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, or very much. Each item of the PROMIS sleep disturbance SF8a is on 5-point scales (1 to 5), with 1 for the lowest sleep disturbance and 5 for the highest sleep disturbance. The total score ranging from 8 (lowest sleep disturbance) to 40 (highest sleep disturbance) was calculated as the summation of 8 non-missing scores. T-score was calculated from the total raw score using the scoring table (PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance Scoring Manual) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Possible range for T-score is 30 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep impairment.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Physical Function SF 12a Scale Score at Week 12
The PROMIS physical function scale measures self-reported capability. This includes the functioning of one's upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back), as well as instrumental activities of daily living, such as running errands over the past 7 days. A single physical function capability score is obtained from a SF. The PROMIS physical function SF12a scale contains 12 items with 5-point scales (1 [not at all] to 5 [very much]) for each item with a total score ranging from 12 (poor physical function) to 60 (better physical function). A higher score indicates greater level of physical capability. Total raw score was calculated as the summation of 12 non-missing scores for participants who can walk 25 feet or summation of 6 non-missing scores for participants who cannot walk for 25 feet. The calculated total raw score was converted into scale score using the scoring tables (PROMIS-Physical Function Scoring Manual).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Fatigue SF 8a T-Score at Week 12
The PROMIS Fatigue SF8a contains 8 items with 5-point scales (1 [never] to 5 [always]) for each item over the past 7 days. The total raw score ranges from 8 (lowest level of fatigue) to 40 (highest level of fatigue) was calculated as the summation of 8 non-missing scores. T-score was calculated from the total raw score using the scoring table (PROMIS-Fatigue Scoring Manual) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; scores higher than 50 indicate greater fatigue compared to the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. Any AE occurring on or after the first dose of study drug is considered a treatment-emergent AE (TEAE). A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Serum Chemistry Value
Potentially clinically significant serum chemistry abnormalities included: Blood urea nitrogen ≥10.71 millimoles (mmol)/liter (L) and Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) ≥3 * upper limit of normal (ULN).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value
Potentially clinically significant hematological abnormalities included: White blood cells (WBCs) count ≤3.0 * 10^9/L; Hemoglobin ≤95 grams (g)/L in females; Hematocrit <0.32 L/L in females; Platelets ≥700 * 10^9/L; and Eosinophils/Leukocytes ≥10%.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Urinalysis Abnormalities
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value
Clinically significant vital signs abnormalities included: Systolic blood pressure (BP): ≤90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and decrease from baseline of 20 mm Hg; Diastolic BP: ≥105 mmHg and increase from baseline of ≥15 mmHg or ≤50 mmHg and decrease from baseline of ≥15 mmHg.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Physical Examination Abnormal Finding
Physical examination included: General appearance, HEENT (head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat examination), chest and lungs, heart, cardiovascular, abdomen, musculoskeletal, skin, lymph nodes, neurological, and extremities/back.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
The number of participants with a difference (shift) from baseline in any of the following ECG parameters is reported by group: heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, RR interval, QT interval corrected usingthe Fridericia formula (QTcF) and QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB). Shifts represented as Baseline - endpoint value (last observed post-baseline value).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Injection Site AE
Injection site AEs included injection site pain, injection site erythema, injection site induration, injection site pruritus, injection site bruising, injection site nodule, injection site swelling, and injection site warmth.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity/Anaphylaxis Reactions
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Time to Withdrawal of Treatment Due to Lack of Efficacy
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Time to Withdrawal of Treatment Due to AEs
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 May 2019
- Study start31 Jul 2019
- Primary completion19 Jan 2022
- Study completion19 Jan 2022
Why it stopped: Met pre-specified criteria for futility at interim analysis
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for FibromyalgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 189 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Teva Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03965091
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TV48125-PN-20028
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 23 May 2019
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the study protocol and the statistical analysis plan. Requests will be reviewed for scientific merit, product approval status, and conflicts of interest. Patient level data will be de-identified and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants and to protect commercially confidential information. Please email USMedInfo@tevapharm.com to make your request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Proof of Concept Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab for Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03965091
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TV48125-PN-20028
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Met pre-specified criteria for futility at interim analysis
- Enrolment
- 189 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Mar 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the treatment effect of fremanezumab administered subcutaneously (SC) in reducing pain in adult participants with fibromyalgia (FM). A secondary objective is to evaluate the effect of fremanezumab on other efficacy measures, including pain, quality of life, sleep, fatigue, improvement in health, physical functioning, and mood. Another secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of fremanezumab administered SC in adult participants with FM.
The total duration of participant participation in the study is planned to be 21 weeks, consisting of a screening period of up to 5 weeks (ranging from 17 to 35 days), and a double-blind treatment period of 16 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo matching to fremanezumab SC on Days 1, 29, 57, and 85. |
| Fremanezumab Dose A | Experimental | Drug: FremanezumabParticipants will receive fremanezumab SC on Days 1, 29, and 57 and placebo matched to fremanezumab SC on Day 85. |
| Fremanezumab Dose B | Experimental | Drug: FremanezumabParticipants will receive fremanezumab SC on Days 1, 29, and 57 and placebo matched to fremanezumab SC on Day 85. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- approved for study participation by the Fibromyalgia Eligibility Review Committee
- body mass index of 18.5 to 45 kilograms (kg)/square meter (m^2) and a body weight ≥45 kg
- agree to use only acetaminophen as rescue medication for FM-related pain (up to 1000 mg per dose and not to exceed 3000 mg/day for any indication throughout the study period)
- non-pharmacologic interventions (including normal daily exercise routines, chiropractic care, physical therapy, psychotherapy, and massage therapy) are unchanged for a minimum of 30 days prior to screening and will remain unchanged throughout the study
- agree to maintain a usual and unchanged physical exercise regimen
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- unable or unwilling to discontinue/washout of prohibited medications
- ongoing pain that would confound or interfere with the assessment of the participant's FM pain or require excluded therapies during the participant's participation in this study.
- surgery planned during the study period
- receiving prophylactic treatment for migraine-related disorders, including topiramate, valproic acid, onabotulinumtoxinA, amitriptyline, and nortriptyline
- known history of clinically significant or unstable hematologic, cardiac, or thromboembolic events
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FremanezumabFremanezumab will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description. | Drug | Fremanezumab Dose A, Fremanezumab Dose B |
| PlaceboPlacebo matching to fremanezumab will be administered per schedule specified in the arm description. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score Over the Past 24 Hours at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The PI-NRS is an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain; higher scores indicating more pain. Weekly average of the daily average PI-NRS pain score over the past 24 hours was derived using formula: Summation of non-missing efficacy variable in an analysis week divided by the number of days with non-missing efficacy variable in the analysis week. Baseline was defined as the last 14 days before the first dose of study drug.
19 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) Score: Symptom Subscore, Impact Subscore, and Functional Subscore at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Responder Rate of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Rating: Number of Participants Who Were Much Improved or Very Much Improved at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Experienced ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Average PI-NRS Score at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Experienced ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Average PI-NRS Score at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Daily Worst PI-NRS Score Over Past 24 Hours at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short Form (SF) 8a T-score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Physical Function SF 12a Scale Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the PROMIS Fatigue SF 8a T-Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Serum Chemistry Value
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Hematology Value
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Potentially Clinically Significant Urinalysis Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Value
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Physical Examination Abnormal Finding
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Number of Participants With at Least 1 Injection Site AE
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity/Anaphylaxis Reactions
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Time to Withdrawal of Treatment Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Time to Withdrawal of Treatment Due to AEs
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the study protocol and the statistical analysis plan. Requests will be reviewed for scientific merit, product approval status, and conflicts of interest. Patient level data will be de-identified and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants and to protect commercially confidential information. Please email USMedInfo@tevapharm.com to make your request.
Related trials for Fibromyalgia
Active, not recruiting
Objective Measurement of Pain Regulation in Individuals Who Have Received Internet-delivered Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Fibromyalgia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Open-Label Safety Study of AXS-14 in Subjects With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Whole-body Cryotherapy in Those With Chronic Fatigue: A Feasibility Study
ME/CFS, Fibromyalgia (FM)
Recruiting
Auricular Acupuncture for Autonomic Balance and Pain in Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Teva Medical Expert, MD study director
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
49 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Fremanezumab in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 49 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 49 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score Over the Past 24 Hours at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2023.