Extracorporeal Life SupportRetroECMO-VPNCT03968926
Hypotension During Extracorporeal Circulatory Support Indicated for Cardiogenic Shock
An observational study of Extracorporeal Life Support and Hypotension, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The cardiogenic shock is characterized by an alteration of organs function following a decrease in cardiac output linked to an impairment of cardiac performance. The prognosis remains poor with mortality between 40 and 50%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Extracorporeal Life Support, Hypotension, Vasoplegia
- What is being tested?
- Arterial pressure management during circulatory support by VA-ECMO
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2019to 30 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients admitted in intensive care unit for cardiogenic shock at the Montpellier University Hospital and who required a VA-ECMO implantation
Who may be able to join
- Refractory cardiogenic shock due to an acute coronary syndrome, a decompensation of chronic heart failure, a infectious or adrenergic myocarditis, or in a post-cardiotomy setting
- Admitted in our intensive care unit between January 2015 and December 2018
- Vasoplegia during the first 48 hours of VA-ECMO requiring more than 0.1µg/kg/min of Norepinephrine continuous infusion
Who cannot join
- Others etiologies of cardiogenic shock : heart transplant dysfunction, right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation, drug intoxication, hypothermia, pulmonary embolism
- Primary septic shock
- Cardiac arrest with a no-flow time greater than 5 min or a low-flow time greater than 45 min
- Opposition to participate after reception of the information letter
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Uh Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295
Philippe Gaudard, MD, +33665849543, p-gaudard@chu-montpellier.fr
About this study
Official title: Vasoplegia During VA-ECMO for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock : Descriptive Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort
The cardiogenic shock is characterized by an alteration of organs function following a decrease in cardiac output linked to an impairment of cardiac performance. The prognosis remains poor with mortality between 40 and 50%. Nowadays, Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS or VA-ECMO) is the referent therapy to restore blood flow in the body when medical treatment is not sufficient. Despite a good blood flow provided by the ECLS, many patients develop a severe hypotension (so called vasoplegia) due to a loss of vascular resistance mainly explained by the inflammatory response to shock and extracorporeal circulation. The treatment of this reaction includes vasopressors (Norepinephrine in usual care) and serum surrogate perfusion to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg.
The purpose of this study is to describe the patients with vasoplegia among a retrospective cohort of patients treated with an ECLS in our university center, over the 4 last years, to determine major complication rate (including death, kidney failure and arrythmias) and their outcome. This study will provide consistent data useful for further trials about targets of pressure and treatments to increase blood pressure during ECLS.
Read the detailed description
Cardiogenic shock is characterized by global tissue hypoperfusion following a decrease in cardiac output by impairing myocardial performance in the absence of hypovolemia. This life-threatening hypoperfusion quickly leads to multiple organs dysfunction with a high risk of cardiac arrest. The main cause is ischemic. The prognosis remains poor with mortality between 40 and 50% and depends on the speed of care by a specialized team. Early etiologic treatment is essential, but initial symptomatic management is based on catecholamines, mainly norepinephrine and dobutamine. The intra-aortic balloon pump showed no improvement in survival in large randomized studies. Refractory cardiogenic shock is defined by the inefficiency or intolerance of catecholamines and the indication of temporary circulatory support should be considered as soon as possible in the absence of contraindications (comorbidities, advanced age, therapeutic limitation). The veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO or ECLS) is the preferred circulatory assistance in this indication because it provides an overall circulatory support up to 100% of the theoretical cardiac output, with oxygenation, and is quickly implanted peripherally (surgical or percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vein and the femoral artery). However, this extracorporeal circulation also has disadvantages by opposing a major afterload to the failing left ventricle and reducing or even abolishing the pulmonary circulation and blood flow in the heart chambers. In addition, the interaction with the artificial surfaces and the oxygenation membrane of the extracorporeal circuit contributes to the inflammatory response already initiated as a result of low cardiac output, tissue hypoperfusion, mesenteric ischemia and possibly myocardial infarction in case of acute coronary syndrome. This systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is similar to sepsis and its main clinical presentation is a vascular dysfunction resulting in vasoplegia and capillary leak syndrome responsible for relative hypovolemia and interstitial inflation.
Since the flow provided by the centrifugal pump is continuous, the blood pressure under VA-ECMO presents low or no pulsatile waves and is better represented by the mean arterial pressure (MAP). The ideal targets of MAP under VA-ECMO are controversial but it is widely accepted that the MAP should not be less than 65mmHg as recommended in septic shock to maintain an acceptable perfusion pressure and should not exceed 95mmHg to limit afterload. Between these limits, the MAP must be individualized according to each situation (hypertensive patient for example). In France, Norepinephrine is the first-line drug to achieve this goal of MAP after correction of volemia, without dose limitation in the absence of currently validated alternative, while resistance mechanisms can be activated, and its efficiency may be limited in case of acidosis. Potential side effects are the occurrence of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, tachycardia, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, immunosuppression, renal dysfunction.
Management of MAP and vasopressors under VA-ECMO is poorly described in the literature (5), although Norepinephrine is widely used in routine practice. In particular, the investigators do not know the frequency of use and Norepinephrine doses during ECMO-VA, as well as their prognostic involvement. Vasoplegia during VA-ECMO is defined by a Norepinephrine dose greater than 0.1µg/kg/min after a 500ml fluid challenge despite overall blood flow (ECMO + native heart) greater than 2l/min/m2 or allowing to achieve 65% of ScvO2.
This cohort study aims to describe the vasoplegia observed during VA-ECMO, the Norepinephrine treatment characteristics, complications and outcome. The primary end-point is the incidence of a composite criteria of major complications including death, acute kidney injury and arrythmias.
- Conditions
- Extracorporeal Life Support, Hypotension, Vasoplegia
- Being tested
- Arterial pressure management during circulatory support by VA-ECMO
- Keywords
- Cardiogenic shock, Temporary circulatory support, Vasoplegia, Inflammatory response
- Medical subject headings
- Hypotension, Vasoplegia, Shock, Cardiogenic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arterial pressure management during circulatory support by VA-ECMOOther
Norepinephrine continuous infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg or at a higher level depending of the perfusion pressure targeted for the patient (mean arterial pressure between 65 and 85 mmHg)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vasoplegic ECMO | All patients during VA-ECMO support for cardiogenic shock who presented, within 48 hours after implantation, a vasoplegia defined by a norepinephrine dose greater than 0.1µg/kg/min after a 500ml fluid challenge despite overall blood flow (ECMO + native heart) greater than 2l/min/m2 or allowing to achieve 65% of ScvO2 Receives: Other: Arterial pressure management during circulatory support by VA-ECMO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major complication composite criteria
Observation of acute kidney injury defined by KDIGO classification 2 or 3, or severe arrythmia (i.e. atrial fibrillation with heart rate above 150bpm or a mean arterial pressure decrease of at least 20%, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation), or death
Measured: Up to 7 days for acute kidney injury and arrythmia, and 30 days for death
Secondary outcomes (17)
Initial refractory hypotension
Norepinephrine dose maintained always above 1µg/kg/min during the first 2 hours after VA-ECMO implantation for a minimal mean arterial pressure target at 65mmHg
Measured: Up to 2 hours
Refractory vasoplegia
Norepinephrine dose above 1µg/kg/min required to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65mmHg or at the personalized mean arterial pressure target
Measured: Up to 7 days
Mortality rate
Overall mortality rate
Measured: Through ICU discharge, an average of 1 month, up to 7, 30 and 90 days
VA-ECMO free days
Number of days alive free of VA-ECMO at 30 days after VA-ECMO implantation
Measured: At 30 days from the VA-ECMO implantation
Mean arterial pressure
lowest and highest mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Measured: Up to 7 days
Pulse pressure
lowest and highest pulse pressure (mmHg) defined by the difference between systolic and diastolic pressure
Measured: Up to 7 days
Native cardiac output
lowest and highest cardiac output (L/min) measured by echocardiography (Doppler aortic Velocity Time Integration) or by a pulmonary artery catheter
Measured: Up to 7 days
ECMO flow
lowest and highest flow of VA-ECMO (L/min)
Measured: Up to 7 days
Lactate
Highest lactate level of the day (mmol/l)
Measured: Up to 7 days
ScvO2
Highest and lowest central venous oxygen saturation (%)
Measured: Up to 7 days
Urine output
Total urine output of the day (ml/24H)
Measured: Up to 7 days
Hydric balance
Total hydric balance calculated from day 0 to day 7 (ml)
Measured: Up to 7 days
Hospital stay
Length (days) of hospital stay from the VA-ECMO implantation before current care ward discharge (excluding rehabilitation time)
Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 month
Intensive care unit stay
Length (days) of intensive care unit stay from the VA-ECMO implantation
Measured: through study completion, an average of 3 month
Issue of VA-ECMO
Status after VA-ECMO including death, heart transplant, ventricular assist device, recovery, shock recurrence, therapy limitation
Measured: 7 days after VA-ECMO withdrawal
Serious adverse events
Stroke, bleeding requiring blood transfusion or surgical revision, limb ischemia, mesenteric ischemia, documented infection
Measured: Trough VA-ECMO time completion, an average of 2 weeks
Organ failure assessment
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0 to 24), higher values represent a worse outcome
Measured: At day 0, 5 and 10 after VA-ECMO implantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2019
- Study start30 Jun 2019
- Primary completion1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Extracorporeal Life SupportStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, MontpellierThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe Gaudard, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Montpellier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03968926
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RECHMPL19_0049
- Acronym
- RetroECMO-VP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 23 May 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, Thiele H, Washam JB, Cohen MG; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-e268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
PubMed 28923988Tanaka D, Shimada S, Mullin M, Kreitler K, Cavarocchi N, Hirose H. What Is the Optimal Blood Pressure on Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Impact of Mean Arterial Pressure on Survival. ASAIO J. 2019 May/Jun;65(4):336-341. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000824.
PubMed 29762229
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vasoplegia During VA-ECMO for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock : Descriptive Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03968926
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RetroECMO-VP / RECHMPL19_0049
- Conditions
- Extracorporeal Life Support, Hypotension, Vasoplegia
- Keywords
- Cardiogenic shock, Temporary circulatory support, Vasoplegia, Inflammatory response
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The cardiogenic shock is characterized by an alteration of organs function following a decrease in cardiac output linked to an impairment of cardiac performance. The prognosis remains poor with mortality between 40 and 50%. Nowadays, Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS or VA-ECMO) is the referent therapy to restore blood flow in the body when medical treatment is not sufficient. Despite a good blood flow provided by the ECLS, many patients develop a severe hypotension (so called vasoplegia) due to a loss of vascular resistance mainly explained by the inflammatory response to shock and extracorporeal circulation. The treatment of this reaction includes vasopressors (Norepinephrine in usual care) and serum surrogate perfusion to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg.
The purpose of this study is to describe the patients with vasoplegia among a retrospective cohort of patients treated with an ECLS in our university center, over the 4 last years, to determine major complication rate (including death, kidney failure and arrythmias) and their outcome. This study will provide consistent data useful for further trials about targets of pressure and treatments to increase blood pressure during ECLS.
Detailed description
Cardiogenic shock is characterized by global tissue hypoperfusion following a decrease in cardiac output by impairing myocardial performance in the absence of hypovolemia. This life-threatening hypoperfusion quickly leads to multiple organs dysfunction with a high risk of cardiac arrest. The main cause is ischemic. The prognosis remains poor with mortality between 40 and 50% and depends on the speed of care by a specialized team. Early etiologic treatment is essential, but initial symptomatic management is based on catecholamines, mainly norepinephrine and dobutamine. The intra-aortic balloon pump showed no improvement in survival in large randomized studies. Refractory cardiogenic shock is defined by the inefficiency or intolerance of catecholamines and the indication of temporary circulatory support should be considered as soon as possible in the absence of contraindications (comorbidities, advanced age, therapeutic limitation). The veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO or ECLS) is the preferred circulatory assistance in this indication because it provides an overall circulatory support up to 100% of the theoretical cardiac output, with oxygenation, and is quickly implanted peripherally (surgical or percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vein and the femoral artery). However, this extracorporeal circulation also has disadvantages by opposing a major afterload to the failing left ventricle and reducing or even abolishing the pulmonary circulation and blood flow in the heart chambers. In addition, the interaction with the artificial surfaces and the oxygenation membrane of the extracorporeal circuit contributes to the inflammatory response already initiated as a result of low cardiac output, tissue hypoperfusion, mesenteric ischemia and possibly myocardial infarction in case of acute coronary syndrome. This systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is similar to sepsis and its main clinical presentation is a vascular dysfunction resulting in vasoplegia and capillary leak syndrome responsible for relative hypovolemia and interstitial inflation.
Since the flow provided by the centrifugal pump is continuous, the blood pressure under VA-ECMO presents low or no pulsatile waves and is better represented by the mean arterial pressure (MAP). The ideal targets of MAP under VA-ECMO are controversial but it is widely accepted that the MAP should not be less than 65mmHg as recommended in septic shock to maintain an acceptable perfusion pressure and should not exceed 95mmHg to limit afterload. Between these limits, the MAP must be individualized according to each situation (hypertensive patient for example). In France, Norepinephrine is the first-line drug to achieve this goal of MAP after correction of volemia, without dose limitation in the absence of currently validated alternative, while resistance mechanisms can be activated, and its efficiency may be limited in case of acidosis. Potential side effects are the occurrence of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, tachycardia, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, immunosuppression, renal dysfunction.
Management of MAP and vasopressors under VA-ECMO is poorly described in the literature (5), although Norepinephrine is widely used in routine practice. In particular, the investigators do not know the frequency of use and Norepinephrine doses during ECMO-VA, as well as their prognostic involvement. Vasoplegia during VA-ECMO is defined by a Norepinephrine dose greater than 0.1µg/kg/min after a 500ml fluid challenge despite overall blood flow (ECMO + native heart) greater than 2l/min/m2 or allowing to achieve 65% of ScvO2.
This cohort study aims to describe the vasoplegia observed during VA-ECMO, the Norepinephrine treatment characteristics, complications and outcome. The primary end-point is the incidence of a composite criteria of major complications including death, acute kidney injury and arrythmias.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vasoplegic ECMO | – | Other: Arterial pressure management during circulatory support by VA-ECMOAll patients during VA-ECMO support for cardiogenic shock who presented, within 48 hours after implantation, a vasoplegia defined by a norepinephrine dose greater than 0.1µg/kg/min after a 500ml fluid challenge despite overall blood flow (ECMO + native heart) greater than 2l/min/m2 or allowing to achieve 65% of ScvO2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients admitted in intensive care unit for cardiogenic shock at the Montpellier University Hospital and who required a VA-ECMO implantation
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Refractory cardiogenic shock due to an acute coronary syndrome, a decompensation of chronic heart failure, a infectious or adrenergic myocarditis, or in a post-cardiotomy setting
- Admitted in our intensive care unit between January 2015 and December 2018
- Vasoplegia during the first 48 hours of VA-ECMO requiring more than 0.1µg/kg/min of Norepinephrine continuous infusion
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Others etiologies of cardiogenic shock : heart transplant dysfunction, right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation, drug intoxication, hypothermia, pulmonary embolism
- Primary septic shock
- Cardiac arrest with a no-flow time greater than 5 min or a low-flow time greater than 45 min
- Opposition to participate after reception of the information letter
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arterial pressure management during circulatory support by VA-ECMONorepinephrine continuous infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg or at a higher level depending of the perfusion pressure targeted for the patient (mean arterial pressure between 65 and 85 mmHg) | Other | Vasoplegic ECMO |
Primary outcome
Major complication composite criteria
Time frame: Up to 7 days for acute kidney injury and arrythmia, and 30 days for death
Observation of acute kidney injury defined by KDIGO classification 2 or 3, or severe arrythmia (i.e. atrial fibrillation with heart rate above 150bpm or a mean arterial pressure decrease of at least 20%, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation), or death
17 secondary outcomes
Initial refractory hypotension
Time frame: Up to 2 hours
Refractory vasoplegia
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Mortality rate
Time frame: Through ICU discharge, an average of 1 month, up to 7, 30 and 90 days
VA-ECMO free days
Time frame: At 30 days from the VA-ECMO implantation
Mean arterial pressure
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Pulse pressure
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Native cardiac output
Time frame: Up to 7 days
ECMO flow
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Lactate
Time frame: Up to 7 days
ScvO2
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Urine output
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Hydric balance
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Hospital stay
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 month
Intensive care unit stay
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 3 month
Issue of VA-ECMO
Time frame: 7 days after VA-ECMO withdrawal
Serious adverse events
Time frame: Trough VA-ECMO time completion, an average of 2 weeks
Organ failure assessment
Time frame: At day 0, 5 and 10 after VA-ECMO implantation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 28923988van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, Thiele H, Washam JB, Cohen MG; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-e268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 29762229Tanaka D, Shimada S, Mullin M, Kreitler K, Cavarocchi N, Hirose H. What Is the Optimal Blood Pressure on Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Impact of Mean Arterial Pressure on Survival. ASAIO J. 2019 May/Jun;65(4):336-341. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000824.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Extracorporeal Life Support
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diagnosis of ECMO Cannula Infection: Prospective Comparison of Sampling Methods
ECMO Cannula Infection, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Transpulmonary MP on Prognosis of Patients With Severe ARDS Treated With VV-ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
PACE: Prostacyclin AntiCoagulation in ECMO
ECMO
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacokinetics of Sedatives and Analgesics During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support
Drug Effect
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Gaudard, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Montpellier
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Extracorporeal Life Support and Hypotension, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Philippe Gaudard, MD (+33665849543, p-gaudard@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major complication composite criteria (time frame: Up to 7 days for acute kidney injury and arrythmia, and 30 days for death). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03968926, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2020.