AzTrials
AzTrials

Tooth DemineralizationNCT03971084

Impact of Chewing Gum With CPP-ACP on Tooth Mineralisation in Situ

A study testing Sugar free gum without CPP-ACP and Sugar free gum with CPP-ACP in people with Tooth Demineralization, run by Mondelēz International, Inc..

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Monocentric, randomised, double-blind, cross-over controlled study with two arms. This study aims to analyse the impact on mineralisation of Sugar Free Gum (SFG) containing CPP-ACP in healthy adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tooth Demineralization
What is being tested?
Sugar free gum without CPP-ACP and Sugar free gum with CPP-ACP
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
14 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2021to Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy adults aged between 18 and 55 years old (inclusive)
  • Subject has read, signed and received a copy of the Informed Consent prior to initiation of study procedures
  • Subject is willing and able to follow the study directions, to participate in the study, returning for all specified visits at their appointed time, and to use the product as per instructions
  • Subject is in good general health based on medical history and oral soft and hard tissue examination
  • Subject with normal salivary flow (unstimulated flow rate ≥0.3ml/min)
  • Subject not disliking the taste of the SFG provided
  • Subject with stable dietary habits and willing to consume 3 main meals per day with two extra-prandial intakes
  • Healthy adults with a BMI value between 20 and 30 kg/m²

Who cannot join

  • General criteria
  • Subject under legal protection measure
  • Subject deprived of liberty by a court or an administrative decision
  • Subject currently participating in another study or being in the exclusion period of another study
  • Biological, therapeutic and medical criteria
  • Subject is pregnant, lactating or intend to become pregnant during the course of the clinical study based on oral interview only, as pregnancy may interfere with the outcome of the study
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Subject has a systemic health condition and disorders (such as diabetes HIV positive, AIDS and systemic lupus erythematosis) that could affect the outcome of the study at the discretion of the Investigator
  • Any active oral condition, such as caries, periodontal disease, chronic dental neglect or any oral pathology including xerostomia determined by oral evaluation and subject history that in the opinion of the dental examiner could affect the outcome of the study
  • Subject has full or partial dentures or any orthodontic appliances (i.e. braces or use of night guards) or tongue or mouth piercing
  • Use of other oral care products except the one provided by study team during the wash out period or during the treatment period
  • Participation in a research study within the last 30 days
  • Subjects treated with antibiotics during the last 30 days or other medications, which in the opinion of the Investigator might influence the study outcome
  • Subjects with a history of sensitivity or allergies to ingredients in the study products or allergens present in the production facility (facility which also handles milk, egg, soy, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, fish, crustacean, mollusk, lupine, sesame, seeds, sulphites)Subjects with any concurrent illness, such as a cold, flu, upper respiratory infection, sinusitis or other infectious conditions
  • Subjects under a restrictive diet or with a planned weight loss program during the study
  • Subjects with severe eating disorders (e.g. anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder and bulimia)
  • Subjects without stable dietary habits or with specific dieting regime, for instance Atkins diet, gluten-free diet and additional specific diets at the discretion of the Investigator
  • Subjects who smokes or vapes

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Gleb N. Komarov, Dr contact

+441517065511

komarovg@liv.ac.uk

Aurelie Goux, Dr contact

+33183114620

aurelie.goux@mdlz.com

About this study

Official title: Impact of Chewing Gum Containing CPP-ACP on Tooth Mineralisation, Using an in Situ Appliance in Healthy Subjects

Monocentric, randomised, double-blind, cross-over controlled study with two arms.

This study aims to analyse the impact on mineralisation of Sugar Free Gum (SFG) containing CPP-ACP in healthy adults.

Read the detailed description

There is some promising evidence in the literature to support a significant favourable impact of the consumption of Sugar Free Gum (SFG) containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) on tooth mineralisation and especially on the promotion of tooth remineralisation, over and above the well-established role of regular SFG, in humans.

This study is a monocentric, randomised, double-blind, cross-over and controlled study. The research hypothesis is that chewing a SFG containing CPP-ACP from Recaldent will better remineralise the enamel in healthy subjects compared with regular SFG, after 2 weeks of gum chewing 5 times a day for 20 minutes within 5 minutes after each meal and snack occasion, with a CPP-ACP dose of 18.8 mg per SFG. This will be studied with an in situ model study, with palatal appliances bearing recessed (1,5mm) human demineralised enamel blocks with caries-like lesions (subsurface lesions), which should be worn 24 h a day by the subjects, including during eating and drinking (but the appliances should be removed for daily oral hygiene procedure and cleaning of the appliance itself). Each appliance will contain two types of the demineralised enamel blocks: half of the blocks will contain shallow subsurface lesions (Carbopol method) and the other half reflecting deeper subsurface lesions (hydroxy-ethyl cellulose method). Both types of lesions have been the subject of oral research interest, as both shallow and deep lesions are involved in caries genesis. Changes in mineralisation of the lesions will be assessed using Transverse Microradiography (TMR).

Being tested
Sugar free gum without CPP-ACP, Sugar free gum with CPP-ACP
Keywords
casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, CPP-ACP, in situ appliance, Transverse Microradiography, TMR, Recaldent, Tooth Remineralization
Medical subject headings
Tooth Demineralization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sugar free gum without CPP-ACPOther

    Sugar free gum without CPP-ACP, consumed 5 times a day, for 20 min each time, within 5 minutes after 3 main meals plus 2 snacks occasion, during 14 days.

  • Sugar free gum with CPP-ACPOther

    Also called Recaldent

    Sugar free gum with 18.8 mg CPP-ACP per gum, consumed 5 times a day, for 20 min each time, within 5 minutes after 3 main meals plus 2 snacks occasion, during 14 days.

Study groups in NCT03971084
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sugar free gum without CPP-ACPPlacebo comparatorSugar free gum without CPP-ACP, consumed 5 times a day, for 20 min each time, within 5 minutes after 3 main meals plus 2 snacks occasion, during 14 days.
Receives: Other: Sugar free gum without CPP-ACP
Sugar free gum with CPP-ACPActive comparatorSugar free gum with 18.8 mg CPP-ACP per gum, consumed 5 times a day, for 20 min each time, within 5 minutes after 3 main meals plus 2 snacks occasion, during 14 days.
Receives: Other: Sugar free gum with CPP-ACP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare the relative mineral weight content measured by Transverse Microradiography (DeltaZd-DeltaZr) on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Compare the densitometric profile of the demineralised lesion (Delta Zd) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  2. Compare the densitometric profile of the remineralised lesion (Delta Zr) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  3. Compare the percent mineral change (%R) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  4. Compare the lesion depth (LD) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  5. Compare the change in lesion depth (LDd - LDr) after treatment measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  6. Compare the relative mineral weight content measured by Transverse Microradiography (DeltaZd-DeltaZr) on subsurface lesions created by hydroxy-ethyl cellulose (HEC) method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  7. Compare the densitometric profile of the demineralised lesion (Delta Zd) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by hydroxy-ethyl cellulose (HEC) method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  8. Compare the densitometric profile of the remineralised lesion (Delta Zr) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by hydroxy-ethyl cellulose (HEC) method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  9. Compare the percent mineral change (%R) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by hydroxy-ethyl cellulose (HEC) method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  10. Compare the lesion depth (LD) measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by hydroxy-ethyl cellulose (HEC) method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  11. Compare the change in lesion depth (LDd - LDr) after treatment measured by Transverse Microradiography on subsurface lesions created by hydroxy-ethyl cellulose (HEC) method

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  12. Compliance to the number of chewing-gum consumption per day

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  13. Compliance to the length of chewing-gum occasion

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  14. Compliance to the number of meal and snack consumption per day

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  15. Evaluation the compliance to oral appliance wearing (length of appliance wearing per day)

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  16. Evaluation the compliance to oral hygiene compliance: number of oral procedures per day

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

  17. Evaluation the compliance to oral hygiene compliance: weight of unused toothpaste

    Comparison between the 2 groups

    Measured: After 2 weeks intervention period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2019
  2. Study startOct 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Monocentric, randomised, double-blind, cross-over controlled study with two arms
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
14 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03971084
Sponsor's protocol ID
KBE057
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
22 May 2019
Last updated
18 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sugar free gum without CPP-ACP and Sugar free gum with CPP-ACP in people with Tooth Demineralization, run by Mondelēz International, Inc..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gleb N. Komarov, Dr (+441517065511, komarovg@liv.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare the relative mineral weight content measured by Transverse Microradiography (DeltaZd-DeltaZr) on subsurface lesions created by Carbopol method (time frame: After 2 weeks intervention period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in