Total Hip ArthroplastyNCT03973320
Outcomes After Hypotensive Neuraxial Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
An observational study of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a retrospective chart review to determine if neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Total Hip Arthroplasty, Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty, Hypotension
- What is being tested?
- Chart Review
- How many people
- 11,292 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Dec 2018to 18 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Who may be able to join
- All primary total hip arthroplasty patient data with sufficiently complete intraoperative vital signs
Who cannot join
- Revision primary total hip arthroplasty
- Incomplete intraoperative vital signs
- Anterior total hip arthroplasty
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
This is a retrospective chart review to determine if neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Read the detailed description
The goal of this study is to determine if hypotensive neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. The plan to analyze the outcomes is listed below:
Primary outcomes:
Multiple logistic regression will be used to compute the adjusted odds ratios of any postoperative complications (MI, CVA, death) , adjusting for covariates including duration of intraoperative mean arterial pressure of less than pre-defined threshold, such as 55, or 60 mmHg mean blood pressure.
Sensitivity analyses will also consider the effects of intra-operative hypotension (IOH) defined as mean blood pressure of less than 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, and 65 mm Hg.
Secondary outcomes:
Multiple logistic regression will be to compute the adjusted odds ratios of individual postoperative complications, (such as MI, CVA, stroke) , adjusting for covariates including duration of intraoperative mean blood pressure of less than pre-defined threshold, such as 55, or 60 mmHg mean blood pressure. Sensitivity analyses will also be conducted to test the effects of extend of IOH on complications.
- Being tested
- Chart Review
- Medical subject headings
- Hypotension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chart ReviewOther
This is a chart review to determine if hypotensive neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty | This is a chart review to determine if hypotensive neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Receives: Other: Chart Review |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Experience Myocardial Infarction, Cerebrovascular Accident, or Mortality
The association between levels and length of intraoperative controlled hypotension and incidence rates of individual and composite outcome of any of the following events: (i) myocardial infarction (MI), (ii) cerebrovascular accident (CVA), (iii) death. If any of these events are positive, then the composite outcome will be positive. The units of measurement will be the same.
Measured: Day of Surgery (Day 0) through discharge (days til discharge is an average of 2 days), follow-ups up to 30 days post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2019
- Study start27 Dec 2018
- Primary completion18 Nov 2019
- Study completion18 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Total Hip ArthroplastyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 11,292 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jiabin Liu, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital for Special Surgey
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03973320
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-2235
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 28 May 2019
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcomes After Hypotensive Neuraxial Anesthesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03973320
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-2235
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 11,292 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Apr 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a retrospective chart review to determine if neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Detailed description
The goal of this study is to determine if hypotensive neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. The plan to analyze the outcomes is listed below:
Primary outcomes:
Multiple logistic regression will be used to compute the adjusted odds ratios of any postoperative complications (MI, CVA, death) , adjusting for covariates including duration of intraoperative mean arterial pressure of less than pre-defined threshold, such as 55, or 60 mmHg mean blood pressure.
Sensitivity analyses will also consider the effects of intra-operative hypotension (IOH) defined as mean blood pressure of less than 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, and 65 mm Hg.
Secondary outcomes:
Multiple logistic regression will be to compute the adjusted odds ratios of individual postoperative complications, (such as MI, CVA, stroke) , adjusting for covariates including duration of intraoperative mean blood pressure of less than pre-defined threshold, such as 55, or 60 mmHg mean blood pressure. Sensitivity analyses will also be conducted to test the effects of extend of IOH on complications.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty | – | Other: Chart ReviewThis is a chart review to determine if hypotensive neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All primary total hip arthroplasty patient data with sufficiently complete intraoperative vital signs
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Revision primary total hip arthroplasty
- Incomplete intraoperative vital signs
- Anterior total hip arthroplasty
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chart ReviewThis is a chart review to determine if hypotensive neuraxial anesthesia is associated with worse outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty patients. | Other | Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Experience Myocardial Infarction, Cerebrovascular Accident, or Mortality
Time frame: Day of Surgery (Day 0) through discharge (days til discharge is an average of 2 days), follow-ups up to 30 days post-surgery
The association between levels and length of intraoperative controlled hypotension and incidence rates of individual and composite outcome of any of the following events: (i) myocardial infarction (MI), (ii) cerebrovascular accident (CVA), (iii) death. If any of these events are positive, then the composite outcome will be positive. The units of measurement will be the same.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Total Hip Arthroplasty
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthropathy
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine as a Perioperative Autonomic-Immune Neuromodulator
Hip Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Combined Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Blocks on Anaesthetic Requirements and Electroencephalographic Depth of Anaesthesia During Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jiabin Liu, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital for Special Surgey
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Apr 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Experience Myocardial Infarction, Cerebrovascular Accident, or Mortality (time frame: Day of Surgery (Day 0) through discharge (days til discharge is an average of 2 days), follow-ups up to 30 days post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.