StrokebimMsKLNCT03974750
Bimanual Motor Skill Learning Through Robotics in Stroke Survivors and Healthy Individuals
A study testing Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot in people with Stroke, run by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne at 2 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
To test the capacity of healthy and chronic stroke patients to learn and retain a complex bimanual motor skill, trained on the neurorehabilitation robot REAplan (R) (bimanual version). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2017to 31 Dec 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- having a chronic stroke (>6 months)
- aged 18-90 years
- with demonstrate a stroke lesion on brain imaging.
- 18-90 years
Who cannot join
- difficulty in understanding or executing commands
- drug/alcohol abuse
- severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
- inability to voluntarily move the affected arm (i.e. complete paralysis of the arm)
- multiple strokes / dementia / psychiatric condition
- botulinum toxin injections (to be evaluated)
Show all 10Show fewer
- HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS :
- neurological conditions interfering with the study
- drug/alcohol abuse
- pyschiatric condition
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Belgium2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU UCL Namur, Mont-Godinne, Neurology Department, Stroke Unit
Yvoir, Namur, 5530
Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD, +32 81 42 3321, yves.vandermeeren@uclouvain.be
Mie Leeuwerck, PT
- Recruiting
Department of Neurology, CHU Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, Namur
Yves Vandermeeren, MD,PhD, 081 42 3321 ext. +32, yves.vandermeeren@uclouvain.be
About this study
To test the capacity of healthy and chronic stroke patients to learn and retain a complex bimanual motor skill, trained on the neurorehabilitation robot REAplan (R) (bimanual version).
Read the detailed description
Over 3 consecutive days, healthy individuals and chronic stroke patients (1) will be evaluated and (2) will train on the neurorehabilitation robot REAplan(R).
They will practice several tasks on the robot REAplan (R) (bimanual version), requiring either movements with the affected arm (unimanual tasks) and complex, coordinated movements with both arms (bimanual tasks).
In addition, several "classical" clinical scales and tests will be used to evaluate overall motor-sensory-cognitive functions (clinical tests, questionnaires, ...).
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robotDevice
REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot : training to perform complex, coordinated, bimanual movements
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | Training on the rehabilitation robot REAplan(R) to learn complex, coordinated bimanual movements Receives: Device: Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot |
| control intervention | Active comparator | Training on the rehabilitation robot REAplan(R) with simple movements Receives: Device: Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
bi-SAT, bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off measured by the REAplan robot
bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship bewteen speed and accuracy
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-CO, bimanual Coordination factor measured by the REAplan robot
bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both arms
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-Force, bimanual Coordination factor measured by the REAplan robot
bimanual forces, forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons)
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
Secondary outcomes (8)
bi-SAT on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-Force on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
bimanual forces, forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons)
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-CO on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both arms
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-smoothness on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Smoothness of movement : Spectral Arc Length (SPARC)
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-error on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Error in centimeres or degrees during bimanual reaching
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
BBT
Box \& Blocks Test (timed transfert of blocks from one space to the other, 3 trials/hand)
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
whole-hand GF
whole-hand Grip Force (GF) measured with a dynamometer, 3 trials/hand)
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
Visual Analog Scale for fatigue (VAS fatigue)
Visual Analog Scale to evaluate fatigue = a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points. Range : 0- 10.
Measured: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2019
- Study start1 Jul 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Evaluation of bimanual motor skill learning Motor skill learning with a rehabilitation robot
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Université Catholique de Louvain
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pr Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne
- Investigators
- Yves Y Vandermeeren, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of NeuroScience (IONS) NEUR / CHU
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03974750
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- bimMsKL
- Acronym
- bimMsKL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 28 May 2019
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: the precise IPD plan has to be worked out in order to find the best public repository
Publications
Yeganeh Doost M, Orban de Xivry JJ, Bihin B, Vandermeeren Y. Two Processes in Early Bimanual Motor Skill Learning. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 20;11:618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00618. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29326573Doost MY, Orban de Xivry JJ, Herman B, Vanthournhout L, Riga A, Bihin B, Jamart J, Laloux P, Raymackers JM, Vandermeeren Y. Learning a Bimanual Cooperative Skill in Chronic Stroke Under Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Jun;33(6):486-498. doi: 10.1177/1545968319847963. Epub 2019 May 15.
PubMed 31088342Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, Delaunois E, Mbonda P, Vandermeeren Y, Detrembleur C, Stoquart G. Effectiveness of a single session of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with upper limb robotic-assisted rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Jun;41(2):138-145. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000274.
PubMed 29420360Gerardin E, Bontemps D, Babuin NT, Herman B, Denis A, Bihin B, Regnier M, Leeuwerck M, Deltombe T, Riga A, Vandermeeren Y. Bimanual motor skill learning with robotics in chronic stroke: comparison between minimally impaired and moderately impaired patients, and healthy individuals. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Mar 17;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01009-3.
PubMed 35300709Yeganeh Doost M, Herman B, Denis A, Sapin J, Galinski D, Riga A, Laloux P, Bihin B, Vandermeeren Y. Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neural Regen Res. 2021 Aug;16(8):1566-1573. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.301030.
PubMed 33433485
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bimanual Motor Skill Learning Through Robotics in Stroke Survivors and Healthy Individuals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03974750
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- bimMsKL / bimMsKL
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of Mont-GodinneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Université Catholique de Louvain
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To test the capacity of healthy and chronic stroke patients to learn and retain a complex bimanual motor skill, trained on the neurorehabilitation robot REAplan (R) (bimanual version).
Detailed description
Over 3 consecutive days, healthy individuals and chronic stroke patients (1) will be evaluated and (2) will train on the neurorehabilitation robot REAplan(R).
They will practice several tasks on the robot REAplan (R) (bimanual version), requiring either movements with the affected arm (unimanual tasks) and complex, coordinated movements with both arms (bimanual tasks).
In addition, several "classical" clinical scales and tests will be used to evaluate overall motor-sensory-cognitive functions (clinical tests, questionnaires, ...).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Evaluation of bimanual motor skill learning Motor skill learning with a rehabilitation robot
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | Device: Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robotTraining on the rehabilitation robot REAplan(R) to learn complex, coordinated bimanual movements |
| control intervention | Active comparator | Device: Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robotTraining on the rehabilitation robot REAplan(R) with simple movements |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- having a chronic stroke (>6 months)
- aged 18-90 years
- with demonstrate a stroke lesion on brain imaging.
- 18-90 years
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- difficulty in understanding or executing commands
- drug/alcohol abuse
- severe aphasia / cognitive deficits interfering with study
- inability to voluntarily move the affected arm (i.e. complete paralysis of the arm)
- multiple strokes / dementia / psychiatric condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robotREAplan(R) rehabilitation robot : training to perform complex, coordinated, bimanual movements | Device | control intervention, intervention |
Primary outcome
bi-SAT, bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off measured by the REAplan robot
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off: mathematical computation of the relationship bewteen speed and accuracy
bi-CO, bimanual Coordination factor measured by the REAplan robot
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual Coordination factor, mathematical measure of the phase coherence between speeds of both arms
bi-Force, bimanual Coordination factor measured by the REAplan robot
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bimanual forces, forces exerted in the wrong direction by each arm (Newtons)
8 secondary outcomes
bi-SAT on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-Force on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-CO on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-smoothness on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
bi-error on bimanual REACHING (REAplan robot)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
BBT
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
whole-hand GF
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
Visual Analog Scale for fatigue (VAS fatigue)
Time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29326573Yeganeh Doost M, Orban de Xivry JJ, Bihin B, Vandermeeren Y. Two Processes in Early Bimanual Motor Skill Learning. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 20;11:618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00618. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 31088342Doost MY, Orban de Xivry JJ, Herman B, Vanthournhout L, Riga A, Bihin B, Jamart J, Laloux P, Raymackers JM, Vandermeeren Y. Learning a Bimanual Cooperative Skill in Chronic Stroke Under Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Jun;33(6):486-498. doi: 10.1177/1545968319847963. Epub 2019 May 15.
- Background: PubMed 29420360Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, Delaunois E, Mbonda P, Vandermeeren Y, Detrembleur C, Stoquart G. Effectiveness of a single session of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with upper limb robotic-assisted rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Jun;41(2):138-145. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000274.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35300709Gerardin E, Bontemps D, Babuin NT, Herman B, Denis A, Bihin B, Regnier M, Leeuwerck M, Deltombe T, Riga A, Vandermeeren Y. Bimanual motor skill learning with robotics in chronic stroke: comparison between minimally impaired and moderately impaired patients, and healthy individuals. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Mar 17;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01009-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33433485Yeganeh Doost M, Herman B, Denis A, Sapin J, Galinski D, Riga A, Laloux P, Bihin B, Vandermeeren Y. Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neural Regen Res. 2021 Aug;16(8):1566-1573. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.301030.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. the precise IPD plan has to be worked out in order to find the best public repository
Related trials for Stroke
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Symptomatic Carotid Outcomes Registry
Carotid Stenosis, Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingPhase 3
Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of an Augmented Reality-Based Mirror Therapy System in Patients With Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
A Pivotal Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Adaptative Tip Catheter in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Role of EEG in Differentiation Between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yves Y Vandermeeren, MD, PhD principal investigator
Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of NeuroScience (IONS) NEUR / CHU
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bimanual motor skill learning with the REAplan(R) rehabilitation robot in people with Stroke, run by University Hospital of Mont-Godinne at 2 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yves Vandermeeren, MD, PhD (+3281423321, yves.vandermeeren@uclouvain.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
bi-SAT, bimanual Speed/Accurady Trade-off measured by the REAplan robot (time frame: change between baseline (Day 1) and after training (Day 3)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03974750, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025.