AzTrials
AzTrials

EducationalNCT03979300

Learning Process of Fifth Years Medical Students During a Psychiatric Role Play

An observational study of Educational, run by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to explore learning process in a role play for undergraduate students working on psychiatric interview. This study is one of the 3 studies included in a PhD on learning process during simulation training in psychiatry. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Educational
What is being tested?
Learning process during role play on psychiatric interview
How many people
94 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Nov 2017to 30 Jun 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Undergraduate medical fifth-years student of Paris Descartes University Teachers of Paris Descartes University

Who may be able to join

  • FOR STUDENTS
  • Age > to 18 years old
  • Undergraduate medical fifth-years student of Paris Descartes University
  • Studying on an integrated simulation training of Stomato, ORL, neurology and psychiatry
  • Taking part in psychiatric simulation training associate with the course
  • During university year 2017-2018
Show all 12Show fewer
  • French or English language
  • FOR TEACHERS
  • Age > to 18 years old
  • Teaching in psychiatric part to Undergraduate medical fifth-years student of Paris Descartes University in an integrated course of Stomato, ORL, neurology and psychiatry simulation training
  • During university year 2017-2018
  • French or English language

Who cannot join

  • Refusal of agreement
  • Undergraduate medical fifth-years student of Paris Descartes University, studying on an integrated course of stomatology, ORL, neurology and psychiatry, who didn't taking part in psychiatric simulation training associate with the course.
  • Psychiatric teacher in Paris Descartes University who doesn't take part to psychiatric simulation training .

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

    Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Learning Process of Fifth Years Medical Students During a Psychiatric Role Play : a Mixed Method Study

This study aims to explore learning process in a role play for undergraduate students working on psychiatric interview. This study is one of the 3 studies included in a PhD on learning process during simulation training in psychiatry. The results of this 3 studies will aim at building a formative and summative assessment tool of competences specific to this pedagogic context

Methodology: Mixed method study with:

  • Quantitative features:
  • Self-reported questionnaries : " Learning Effectiveness Inventory Scale "
  • Sociodemographical data and others questions
  • Qualitative : Grounded Theory
  • Semi-structured interview of learners and teachers
  • Record of simulation and audio-record and briefing and debriefing (supplemented by quotation with conversational analysis (Rotterdam Interaction Analysis System, RIAS) for video)
Read the detailed description

Since the end of the nineties, pedagogical transformations question traditional pedagogical system which favored a passive learning from master to student, trying to overcome classical " teaching paradigm" to " learning paradigm ". Despite several critics, the notion of " professional competence " emerges as one of the essential purpose of learning. Competence might be defined as " complex ability that professional built, starting from a specialized knowledge base, developed and controlled by a collegial peer who constitute the profession ", implying " a reflexive practice inside and after action " which creates or increases new competence in return.

However in french context, this paradigmatic revolution didn't really happened yet, including in psychiatry. Moreover, to our knowledge, there are no engineering didactic work on specific skills required by a physician (psychiatrist or not) should have in care of a patient with psychiatric disorders. For instance, skills required when a surgeon has to deliver a "clear, loyal and adjusted" information to a patient with a schizophrenia ; and try to get his or her agreement so as to operate a intestinal blockage? As a matter of facts, no integrated competence referential will be able to be a reference in this work.

In a report which is nowadays a reference for the faculties of medicine all over the world, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (CRMCC) define a framework of essential skills that each physician have to control: medical expertise, erudition ; communicational and relational abilities; collaboration ; professionalism ; management; health promotion. In the French context, skills that each medical student have to provide for the psychiatric speciality are defined by 33 questions of national classifying exam (ECN). The " Psychiatry and Addictology Referential " points to medical students the reference knowledge to provide to respond to these questions during the challenge of ECN. But this referential doesn't explain skills, abilities and attitudes required with a patient with psychiatric disorders.

The places of providing essential skills defined by CRMCC applied in French psychiatry (as relational and communicational skills for instance) are thus often situated in others spaces. Realization of well supervised clerkship in psychiatry constitutes for example one of the privilege way of skills acquisition. Nonetheless in French context, all the undergraduate students can benefit from psychiatry during their clerkship; especially because of the rarefaction of well supervised internship (decreasing demography of psychiatrist), associated with increase number of medical student over the past few years. Moreover, realisation of an only internship can not include all the diversity of main family situation that should be known by each physician; mainly because of dichotomy of internship between adult and child and adolescent psychiatry, specific populations specific who go to different service according to there trouble (emergencies, closed unit, expert diagnosis centers…). Providing pedagogical tools allowing acquisition of basic skills, abilities and attitudes (complementary to knowledge and know-repeat) to care patient with psychiatric disorders seems thus interesting, for improving medical training.

Besides, assessment modalities determine for students work methodology and time involved in each learning, following Hawthorne effect. Assessments support learning assessed, involving long term memory, following " testing effect " ; and hierarchize planning of ulterior learning activities. Trials of ECN in this current shape will probably value acquisition of declarative knowledge for students who would like to succeed in the competition; to the detriment of know-how and life skills. These skills to care patients who suffer from psychiatric disorders won't be neither provided during a specialty residency, unless it might be especially oriented to psychiatry. Thus, it seems important to wider summative assessment modalities in psychiatry during undergraduate medical studies, so as to value acquisition of the wall skills required for a physician in care of a patient with psychiatric disorders. Which implies precise explanation of skills, abilities and attitudes needed, to balance success of ECN with their acquisition. In that context, simulation can offer a good response to this double aim : formative et summative. However, if some theorical approach are references to understand learning process in simulation, very few learning tool are validated in simulation, and none, to our knowledge, did a modelisation on learning process in psychiatric simulation for medical students.

Conditions
Educational
Being tested
Learning process during role play on psychiatric interview
Keywords
Simulation training, Role-play, Psychiatry, Students, Medical, Psychology, Educational, Learning

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Learning process during role play on psychiatric interviewOther

    Methodology: Mixed method study with:

    • Quantitative features:
    • Self-reported questionnaries : " Learning Effectiveness Inventory Scale " (18)
    • Sociodemographical data and others questions
    • Qualitative : Grounded Theory
    • Video-record of simulation and audio-record and briefing and debriefing, quoted with conversational analysis
    • Semi-structured interview of learners and teachers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Learning process

    Learning process of 5th year medical students during simulation training in psychiatry.

    Measured: 6 weeks after learning process

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Factors influencing learning process

    Factor influencing learning process of 5th year medical students during simulation training in psychiatry.

    Measured: 6 weeks after learning process

  2. Satisfaction about learning

    Self-questionnaires : " Learning Effectiveness Inventory Scale "

    Measured: Immediately after simulation training

  3. Other questions (socio-demographic and specific to pedagogical design)

    Age, gender, previous simulation experience, and previous psychiatric experiences and psychiatric simulation experience, first, second and third specialty choice

    Measured: Immediately after simulation training

  4. RIAS video Cotations

    Cotations of simulation video of students interviewed to face with their narratives

    Measured: 6 weeks after learning process

  5. GT analysis of simulation video and audio-recorded briefing and debriefing

    Cotations of simulation video and audio-recorded briefing and debriefing of students interviewed to face with their narratives

    Measured: 6 weeks after learning process

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2019
  2. Study start1 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
94 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03979300
Sponsor's protocol ID
PSY-03-2018
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
3 Aug 2018
Last updated
23 Jul 2019
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Educational, run by Institut Mutualiste Montsouris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Learning process (time frame: 6 weeks after learning process). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in