Gingival Inflammation and BleedingPhase 2NCT03988374
Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Three Dentifrices
A Phase 2 study testing Dentifrices in people with Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding and Dental Plaque, run by Church & Dwight Company, Inc. at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Clinical study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two baking soda containing dentifrices, containing 20% and 35% baking soda, to a non-baking soda dentifrice for their ability to reduce gingivitis and plaque following 6-months of use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding, Dental Plaque
- What is being tested?
- Dentifrices
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 319 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 22 Feb 2018to 24 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have provided written informed consent prior to being entered into the study.
- Be between 18 and 70 years of age, male or female.
- Have at least eighteen (18) natural teeth with scorable facial and lingual surfaces as determined by the Examiner. Teeth that are grossly carious, orthodontically banded, exhibiting general cervical abrasion and/or enamel abrasion, or third molars will not be included in the tooth count.
- Have a mean baseline plaque index score ≥ 1.95 as determined by the Soparkar Modification of the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (Pl).
- Have a mean baseline gingival index score of ≥ l.70 and ≤ 3.0 as determined by the Modified Gingival Index (MGI).
- Presence of ≥ 10 bleeding sites upon probing.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Agree not to have a dental prophylaxis or any other elective, non-emergency dental procedures any time during the study.
- Agree to abstain from the use of chewing gum, mouth rinses, any toothpaste other than the study toothpaste, tooth whitening products (either professional or at home use) and all other oral hygiene other than the study procedures for the duration of the study.
- Agree to refrain from all oral hygiene on the morning of each evaluation visit and to refrain from eating, drinking, and smoking for 4 hrs, prior to each evaluation visit.
- Agree to comply with the conditions and schedule of the study.
Who cannot join
- Physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude normal tooth brushing.
- Evidence of gross oral pathology, including widespread caries or chronic neglect, extensive restoration, preexisting gross plaque or soft or hard tissue tumor of the oral cavity.
- Heavy supra- or subgingival calculus that might interfere with evaluations as determined by the Investigator/Examiner.
- Evidence of major oral hard or soft tissue lesions or trauma at the baseline visit as determined by the Investigator/Examiner.
- Conditions requiring antibiotic treatment prior to dental procedures.
- History of uncontrolled diabetes or hepatic or renal disease, or other serious conditions or transmittable diseases, (e.g. cardiovascular disease, AIDS).
Show all 18Show fewer
- Subjects with grossly carious, fully crowned, or extensively restored teeth, orthodontic appliances, peri/oral piercings, or removable partial dentures.
- Treatment with antibiotics within the 1-month period before the baseline examination, or a condition that is likely to require antibiotic treatment over the course of the trial.
- Chronic treatment (2 weeks or more) with any medication known to affect periodontal status (including phenytoin, calcium antagonists, cyclosporine, coumarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and aspirin) within 1 month of the baseline examination. All other medications for chronic medical conditions must have been initiated at least 3 months before enrollment.
- Have severe periodontal disease or being actively treated for periodontal disease.
- Having history of early-onset periodontitis or acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis.
- Concomitant periodontal therapy other than prophylaxis in the last 6 months.
- Professional prophylaxis within 1 month prior to the baseline clinical evaluation.
- Subjects who participated in a gingivitis study in the past month.
- Daily use of chemotherapeutic antiplaque/antigingivitis products within the past 4 months.
- History of significant adverse effects following use of oral hygiene products such as toothpastes and mouthrinses.
- Subjects who are allergic to any ingredients in the test or control product, as listed on the IRB Safety Assessment.
- Self-reported pregnancy and nursing since hormonal changes can exaggerate gingival response to dental plaque.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Three Dentifrices Containing 35%, 20%, and 0% Sodium Bicarbonate on the Reduction of Plaque and Gingivitis
Clinical study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two baking soda containing dentifrices, containing 20% and 35% baking soda, to a non-baking soda dentifrice for their ability to reduce gingivitis and plaque following 6-months of use.
- Conditions
- Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding, Dental Plaque
- Being tested
- Dentifrices
- Medical subject headings
- Gingivitis, Hemorrhage, Dental Plaque
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DentifricesDrug
Dentifrice on plaque, gingivitis, and bleeding.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 0% Baking Soda Dentifrice | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Dentifrices |
| 20% Baking Soda Dentifrice | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Dentifrices |
| 35% Baking Soda Dentifrice | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Dentifrices |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Gingival Efficacy
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score as measured by Gingival Index (0=absence of inflammation, 1=mild inflammation: slight change in color, little change in texture of any portion of but not the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit, 2=mild inflammation: slight change in color, little change in texture to entire marginal or papillary gingival unit, 3=moderate inflammation: glazing, redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, 4=severe inflammation: marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration. The scale ranges from 0-4.
Measured: baseline, six weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Gingival Bleeding Efficacy
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score as measured by Gingival Bleeding Index (0=absence of bleeding after 30 seconds, 1= bleeding observed after 30 seconds, 2= bleeding occurs instantly). The scale ranges from 0-2.
Measured: baseline, six week, three months, and six months
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Plaque Efficacy
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score as measured by Plaque Index (0=no visible plaque, 1=separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth, 2=a thin, continuous band of plaque (up to 1mm wide) at the cervical margin, 3= a band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than one-third of the crown, 4=plaque covering at least one-third but less than two-thirds of the crown, 5= plaque covering two-thirds or more of the crown). The scale ranges from 0-5.
Measured: baseline, six weeks, three months, and six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2019
- Study start22 Feb 2018
- Primary completion24 Aug 2018
- Study completion24 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Gingival Inflammation and BleedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 319 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Church & Dwight Company, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03988374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ST-7700
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Three Dentifrices Containing 35%, 20%, and 0% Sodium Bicarbonate on the Reduction of Plaque and Gingivitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03988374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ST-7700
- Conditions
- Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding, Dental Plaque
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 319 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Church & Dwight Company, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Aug 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two baking soda containing dentifrices, containing 20% and 35% baking soda, to a non-baking soda dentifrice for their ability to reduce gingivitis and plaque following 6-months of use.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 0% Baking Soda Dentifrice | Active comparator | Drug: Dentifrices |
| 20% Baking Soda Dentifrice | Active comparator | Drug: Dentifrices |
| 35% Baking Soda Dentifrice | Active comparator | Drug: Dentifrices |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Have provided written informed consent prior to being entered into the study.
- Be between 18 and 70 years of age, male or female.
- Have at least eighteen (18) natural teeth with scorable facial and lingual surfaces as determined by the Examiner. Teeth that are grossly carious, orthodontically banded, exhibiting general cervical abrasion and/or enamel abrasion, or third molars will not be included in the tooth count.
- Have a mean baseline plaque index score ≥ 1.95 as determined by the Soparkar Modification of the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (Pl).
- Have a mean baseline gingival index score of ≥ l.70 and ≤ 3.0 as determined by the Modified Gingival Index (MGI).
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude normal tooth brushing.
- Evidence of gross oral pathology, including widespread caries or chronic neglect, extensive restoration, preexisting gross plaque or soft or hard tissue tumor of the oral cavity.
- Heavy supra- or subgingival calculus that might interfere with evaluations as determined by the Investigator/Examiner.
- Evidence of major oral hard or soft tissue lesions or trauma at the baseline visit as determined by the Investigator/Examiner.
- Conditions requiring antibiotic treatment prior to dental procedures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DentifricesDentifrice on plaque, gingivitis, and bleeding. | Drug | 0% Baking Soda Dentifrice, 20% Baking Soda Dentifrice, 35% Baking Soda Dentifrice |
Primary outcome
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Gingival Efficacy
Time frame: baseline, six weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score as measured by Gingival Index (0=absence of inflammation, 1=mild inflammation: slight change in color, little change in texture of any portion of but not the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit, 2=mild inflammation: slight change in color, little change in texture to entire marginal or papillary gingival unit, 3=moderate inflammation: glazing, redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, 4=severe inflammation: marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration. The scale ranges from 0-4.
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Gingival Bleeding Efficacy
Time frame: baseline, six week, three months, and six months
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score as measured by Gingival Bleeding Index (0=absence of bleeding after 30 seconds, 1= bleeding observed after 30 seconds, 2= bleeding occurs instantly). The scale ranges from 0-2.
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Plaque Efficacy
Time frame: baseline, six weeks, three months, and six months
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score as measured by Plaque Index (0=no visible plaque, 1=separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth, 2=a thin, continuous band of plaque (up to 1mm wide) at the cervical margin, 3= a band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than one-third of the crown, 4=plaque covering at least one-third but less than two-thirds of the crown, 5= plaque covering two-thirds or more of the crown). The scale ranges from 0-5.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding
RecruitingObservational study
Prevalence and Associated Factors of High BMI and Periodontitis in Thai Adults Aged Under 60 Years
Diabete Mellitus, Dyslipidaemia
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Interactive Techniques on Oral Hygiene Skills in a Group of Autistic Egyptian Children
Autism Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of a Toothpaste Containing a Gum Health Active in Participants With Gingival Problem
Gingival Inflammation, Gingival Bleeding
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of Flaus Electric Flosser on Plaque and Gingivitis Compared to a Manual Toothbrush
Gingivitis, Gingival Bleeding
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Oral Hygiene Regimens in Patients Undergoing Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment
Periodontal Disease, Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Dentifrices in people with Gingival Inflammation and Bleeding and Dental Plaque, run by Church & Dwight Company, Inc. at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Score - Gingival Efficacy (time frame: baseline, six weeks, 3 months and 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2021.