Chest TraumaTrOMaThoNCT03997630
Management of Moderately Hypoxemic Thoracic Trauma
A study testing High flow Oxygenation and Standard oxygen in people with Chest Trauma and High Flow Oxygenation, run by University Hospital, Brest at 18 sites in France.
Trial summary
In France, the average incidence of thoracic trauma is 10,000 to 15,000 each year. These patients are at risk of early and late post traumatic respiratory complications as follows: pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), hypoxemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chest Trauma, High Flow Oxygenation
- What is being tested?
- High flow Oxygenation and Standard oxygen
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 770 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 12 Nov 2019to Feb 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major patient (age ≥ 18 years),
- Admitted to intensive care unit for less than 48 hours for the management of chest trauma.
- Closed chest trauma, non-penetrating, with a TTSS score> or equal to 4.
- Need for conventional oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2 greater than or equal to 95%.
- Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme
- Patient having signed a consent
Who cannot join
- Severe hypoxemia defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 noted before randomization
- Recommended indication for NIV: cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, decompensated COPD.
- Indication to immediate oro-tracheal intubation. (will not be excluded patients requiring general anaesthesia for a surgical procedure for a peripheral surgical procedure or embolization)
- Patient with acute respiratory distress, whatever the cause.
- Hemodynamic instability marked by a fall of the PAS> 30% or a PAS <110 mmHg despite the initial resuscitation measures
- Neurological degradation with Glasgow score less than 12
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnant or lactating woman
- Patient under guardianship or curatorship
- Contraindication to the use of one or both devices studied (decaying facial trauma)
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
France18 sites
Angers university hospital
Angers
CHU de Brest
Brest, 29200
Chartres Hospital
Chartres, 28000
HIA Percy
Clamart, 92141
Dreux hospital
Dreux
Le Mans hospital
Le Mans
Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud
Lorient, 56100
La Timone Hospital (AP-HM)
Marseille, 13005
Marseille university horpital
Marseille
CHRU de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295
Morlaix hospital
Morlaix
Nantes university hospital
Nantes
CHRU de la Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, 75651
Kremlin Bicêtre university hospital (APHP)
Paris
Centre Hospitalier de Cornouaille
Quimper, Brittany Region, 29000
Rennes, university Hospital
Rennes, 35000
Tours university hospital
Tours
CHBA de Vannes
Vannes, 56017
About this study
Official title: Post Traumatic Early Use of High Flow Oxygenation Versus Standard Oxygen for Management of Moderately Hypoxemic Thoracic Trauma: TrOMaTho Study
In France, the average incidence of thoracic trauma is 10,000 to 15,000 each year. These patients are at risk of early and late post traumatic respiratory complications as follows: pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), hypoxemia. Main issues of thoracic trauma management were recently published by French anesthesiologist and intensivist experts. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was recommended in case of severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 200). In comparison to conventional oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, NIV reduced length of stay, incidence of complications and mortality in case of severe hypoxemia. For mild or moderate hypoxemic patients, no devices were tested to prevent respiratory complications. At the moment, low-flow oxygenation is administered to these patients in the absence of severe hypoxemia. Recently, many studies have found promising results with high-flow oxygenation delivered by nasal cannula. This device has many physiological advantages: wash out the naso-pharyngeal dead space, increase end expiratory lung volume, deliver a moderate or low level of Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), improve work of breathing and confort. Several randomized controlled trials tested this device in many clinical settings, but there are no studies on its use after thoracic trauma. A comparative trial is needed to evaluate early prophylactic administration of high-flow oxygenation after thoracic trauma.
Read the detailed description
TrOMaTho study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare a prophylactic use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (experimental group) to low-flow oxygenation (control group) after thoracic trauma. 770 patients will be included. Randomization will be conducted with random block and patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio in one of the two groups. Randomization process will be stratified on: age (more or less 65 years old), use of peridural analgesia and existence of extra thoracic trauma. Only the oxygenation technique is studied, all other aspects of management will be handle by the attending physician.
All patients will be followed from enrollment to hospital discharge. To ensure the same data collection in all centers, six visits are planned: day (D) 1 (inclusion), D7, D14, D28.
Classical blinded methods cannot be used for the evaluation of these kinds of devices. To ensure the same evaluation for all patients and in all centers, all relevant outcomes will be evaluated by an independent clinical event committee. Statistical analysis will be performed by an independent statistician.
Primary endpoint will be analyzed according to intention to treat. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed as exploratory analysis.
- Conditions
- Chest Trauma, High Flow Oxygenation
- Being tested
- High flow Oxygenation, Standard oxygen
- Medical subject headings
- Thoracic Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High flow OxygenationDevice
Interventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol.
Standard oxygenDevice
Control group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate < 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional group | Experimental | Interventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol. Receives: Device: High flow Oxygenation |
| Control group | Active comparator | Control group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate < 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min). Receives: Device: Standard oxygen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
safety event
The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint defined by:
- The use of non-invasive ventilation whatever the cause before the 14th day following the trauma (yes/no) OR
- The use of orotracheal intubation whatever the cause before the 14th day following on the thoracic traumatism.(yes/no) OR
- The death any cause confused with D28. (yes/no)
Measured: Day 28
Secondary outcomes (13)
Severe hypoxemia
Severe hypoxemia before day 7: SpO2 < 92% or PaO2/FiO2 < 200 without oxygenation
Measured: day 7
Severe hypoxemia
Severe hypoxemia before day 14: SpO2 < 92% or PaO2/FiO2 < 200 without oxygenation
Measured: day 14
Respiratory tract infection
Respiratory tract infection before day 7 defined according to international recommendations on health-associated pneumonia or trachea-bronchitis.
Measured: day 7
Respiratory tract infection
Respiratory tract infection before day 14 defined according to international recommendations on health-associated pneumonia or trachea-bronchitis.
Measured: day 14
Mechanical ventilation
Need for mechanical ventilation before day 7. Criteria used to define the need of mechanical ventilation is an acute respiratory distress defined as: the inability to clear tracheal secretion, a deterioration of neurological status (decrease in GCS of 2 points), a respiratory acidosis (pH < 7,25 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg), signs of persisting or worsening respiratory failure (respiratory rate > 35/min, high respiratory-muscle workload) with a poor response to another oxygenation device.
Measured: day 7
Mechanical ventilation
Need for mechanical ventilation before day 14. Criteria used to define the need of mechanical ventilation is an acute respiratory distress defined as: the inability to clear tracheal secretion, a deterioration of neurological status (decrease in GCS of 2 points), a respiratory acidosis (pH < 7,25 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg), signs of persisting or worsening respiratory failure (respiratory rate > 35/min, high respiratory-muscle workload) with a poor response to another oxygenation device.
Measured: day 14
oxygen free days
number of day without oxygen
Measured: day 14
ventilator free days
number of day without ventilation
Measured: day 14
ICU length of stay
number of day in ICU
Measured: day 90
Hospital length of stay
number of day of the total stay in hospital
Measured: day 90
All cause of mortality
Mortality (yes/no)
Measured: day 28 or day 90
quality of life 3 months after High flow oxgenation with the The Short Form (36) Health Survey score
SF 36 questionnary total score
Measured: day 90
Severity of dyspnea using a Saint Georges respiratory questionnaire
Saint Georges questionnary total score
Measured: day 90
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2019
- Study start12 Nov 2019
- Primary completionFeb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chest TraumaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 770 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03997630
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 29BRC18.0159
- Acronym
- TrOMaTho
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 14 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All collected data that underlie results in a publication
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post Traumatic Early Use of High Flow Oxygenation Versus Standard Oxygen for Management of Moderately Hypoxemic Thoracic Trauma: TrOMaTho Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03997630
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TrOMaTho / 29BRC18.0159
- Conditions
- Chest Trauma, High Flow Oxygenation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 770 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BrestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In France, the average incidence of thoracic trauma is 10,000 to 15,000 each year. These patients are at risk of early and late post traumatic respiratory complications as follows: pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), hypoxemia. Main issues of thoracic trauma management were recently published by French anesthesiologist and intensivist experts. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was recommended in case of severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 200). In comparison to conventional oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, NIV reduced length of stay, incidence of complications and mortality in case of severe hypoxemia. For mild or moderate hypoxemic patients, no devices were tested to prevent respiratory complications. At the moment, low-flow oxygenation is administered to these patients in the absence of severe hypoxemia. Recently, many studies have found promising results with high-flow oxygenation delivered by nasal cannula. This device has many physiological advantages: wash out the naso-pharyngeal dead space, increase end expiratory lung volume, deliver a moderate or low level of Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), improve work of breathing and confort. Several randomized controlled trials tested this device in many clinical settings, but there are no studies on its use after thoracic trauma. A comparative trial is needed to evaluate early prophylactic administration of high-flow oxygenation after thoracic trauma.
Detailed description
TrOMaTho study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare a prophylactic use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (experimental group) to low-flow oxygenation (control group) after thoracic trauma. 770 patients will be included. Randomization will be conducted with random block and patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio in one of the two groups. Randomization process will be stratified on: age (more or less 65 years old), use of peridural analgesia and existence of extra thoracic trauma. Only the oxygenation technique is studied, all other aspects of management will be handle by the attending physician.
All patients will be followed from enrollment to hospital discharge. To ensure the same data collection in all centers, six visits are planned: day (D) 1 (inclusion), D7, D14, D28.
Classical blinded methods cannot be used for the evaluation of these kinds of devices. To ensure the same evaluation for all patients and in all centers, all relevant outcomes will be evaluated by an independent clinical event committee. Statistical analysis will be performed by an independent statistician.
Primary endpoint will be analyzed according to intention to treat. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed as exploratory analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional group | Experimental | Device: High flow OxygenationInterventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol. |
| Control group | Active comparator | Device: Standard oxygenControl group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate < 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Major patient (age ≥ 18 years),
- Admitted to intensive care unit for less than 48 hours for the management of chest trauma.
- Closed chest trauma, non-penetrating, with a TTSS score> or equal to 4.
- Need for conventional oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2 greater than or equal to 95%.
- Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Severe hypoxemia defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 noted before randomization
- Recommended indication for NIV: cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, decompensated COPD.
- Indication to immediate oro-tracheal intubation. (will not be excluded patients requiring general anaesthesia for a surgical procedure for a peripheral surgical procedure or embolization)
- Pregnant or lactating woman
- Patient under guardianship or curatorship
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High flow OxygenationInterventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol. | Device | Interventional group |
| Standard oxygenControl group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate < 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min). | Device | Control group |
Primary outcome
safety event
Time frame: Day 28
The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint defined by: * The use of non-invasive ventilation whatever the cause before the 14th day following the trauma (yes/no) OR * The use of orotracheal intubation whatever the cause before the 14th day following on the thoracic traumatism.(yes/no) OR * The death any cause confused with D28. (yes/no)
13 secondary outcomes
Severe hypoxemia
Time frame: day 7
Severe hypoxemia
Time frame: day 14
Respiratory tract infection
Time frame: day 7
Respiratory tract infection
Time frame: day 14
Mechanical ventilation
Time frame: day 7
Mechanical ventilation
Time frame: day 14
oxygen free days
Time frame: day 14
ventilator free days
Time frame: day 14
ICU length of stay
Time frame: day 90
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: day 90
All cause of mortality
Time frame: day 28 or day 90
quality of life 3 months after High flow oxgenation with the The Short Form (36) Health Survey score
Time frame: day 90
Severity of dyspnea using a Saint Georges respiratory questionnaire
Time frame: day 90
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All collected data that underlie results in a publication
Related trials for Chest Trauma
RecruitingObservational study
Exploration of Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Combined With PD-1 Inhibitors on Brain Injury
Small Cell Lung Cancer ( SCLC ), Brain Injury
RecruitingPhase 4
INTERCOSTAL NERVE BLOCK: Efficacy of CINB for Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures
Rib Fractures
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Results of Medical and Nursing Record,Physical Examination, Blood Test and Radiological Examination of Multiple Trauma to Find the Correlation With Patient's Morality and Mobility
Trauma Centers/Statistics & Numerical Data, Trauma Blunt
Recruiting
Erector Spinae Plane vs Serratus Anterior Plane Catheter Infusions for Acute Pain Management in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures
Traumatic Rib Fracture(s), Traumatic Rib Fracture
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety of CRT100 on Treatment Spinal Cord Injury
Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High flow Oxygenation and Standard oxygen in people with Chest Trauma and High Flow Oxygenation, run by University Hospital, Brest at 18 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
safety event (time frame: Day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2025.