AzTrials
AzTrials

Cutaneous LeishmaniasesRapidLeishNCT04001335

Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Using the CL-detect Rapid Test in Travelers and Migrants in Belgium

An observational study of Cutaneous Leishmaniases, run by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium at 1 site in Belgium.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical disease which is increasingly seen in travelers and migrants evaluated in travel clinics of non-endemic countries. Various CL species are present in different parts of the world, and these different species vary in severity, prognosis and therapeutic approaches. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Cutaneous Leishmaniases
What is being tested?
Dental Broach
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
12 Aug 2019to 1 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with suspicion of CL will be screened for inclusion.

Who may be able to join

  • Skin biopsy for leishmania test requested by treating ITM clinician OR
  • externally requested skin biopsy for Leishmania tested at ITM with an ITM consultation <7 days of the biopsy sample
  • willing and able to provide consent/assent
  • not on CL treatment

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Institute of Tropical Medicine

    Antwerp, 2000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical disease which is increasingly seen in travelers and migrants evaluated in travel clinics of non-endemic countries. Various CL species are present in different parts of the world, and these different species vary in severity, prognosis and therapeutic approaches.

At ITM, diagnosis of CL in suspected patients is done using a skin biopsy, analyzed by diagnostic PCR, and species typing PCR. This method is invasive, and diagnosis is often delayed for days to weeks.

Read more

The new antigen-based CL Detect Rapid Test uses dental broach sampling and has results within 30 minutes. Dental broach samples left over from the Cl Detect Rapid test may still be used for PCR including species typing.

How well the CL Detect Rapid Test performs in the varied population of a travel clinic and whether it is possible to use dental broach sampling for further PCR tests in this population needs to be evaluated The aim of this study is to study the performance of the CL Detect Rapid Test and whether dental broach sampling can replace skin biopsy for CL at ITM.

Being tested
Dental Broach
Medical subject headings
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dental BroachDiagnostic test

    Dental broach, RDT and PCR

Study groups in NCT04001335
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CL suspicionPatients with skin lesions suspected to be cutaneous leishmaniasis
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Dental Broach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of CL detect RDT

    Against combined reference of microscopy and PCR using skin punch biopsy

    Measured: 2019-2010

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Proportion of PCR positives on dental broach sample

    Compared to PCR positives on skin punch biopsy

    Measured: 2019-2020

  2. Proportion of successful species typing on dental broach sample

    Compared to successful species typing on skin punch biopsy sample

    Measured: 2019-2020

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2019
  2. Study start12 Aug 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2021

Why it stopped: No patient recruitment possible during COVID-19, inavailability RDTs

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04001335
Sponsor's protocol ID
1298/19
Acronym
RapidLeish
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
26 Jun 2019
Last updated
4 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cutaneous Leishmaniases, run by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: No patient recruitment possible during COVID-19, inavailability RDTs). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of CL detect RDT (time frame: 2019-2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in