AzTrials
AzTrials

ST-T Segment ChangesNCT04003883

ST-T Segment Changes in Emergency Physicians While on Duty

An observational study of ST-T Segment Changes, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Preclinical emergency management is frequently associated with a combination of physical and psychological stress. This stress is known to lead to a broad variety of changes in the physiology even extending in the cardiovascular system. Both physical and psychological stress induces ECG changes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 68 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
ST-T Segment Changes
What is being tested?
Holter ECG
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
1 Nov 2019to 30 Nov 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 68 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Emergency physicians working at the Medical University of Vienna's emergency response cars will be invited to take part in this trial. Participants will be recruited by personalised phone contact, via email or direct approach and will not financially benefit for participation. The emergency physicians are anaesthesiologists and emergency medicine consultants and senior anaesthesia or emergency medical residents with prehospital emergency medicine credentials.

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy emergency physicians doing shifts at the Medical University of Vienna's emergency response car

Who cannot join

  • Known pregnancy
  • Pre-existing cardiac diseases (valvular heart disease > I°, any form of cardiomyopathy, history of coronary artery disease, history of myocarditis, any channelopathy, known high degree (>1% of all beats within 24h) premature atrial or ventricular beats or atrial fibrillation or conduction disturbance.
  • Any antiarrhythmic therapy
  • Any implanted cardiac device
  • Manifest Hyperthyroidism
  • Termination of exercise testing due to the commonly used criteria26 or not reaching 85% of maximal predicted load.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Preclinical emergency management is frequently associated with a combination of physical and psychological stress.

This stress is known to lead to a broad variety of changes in the physiology even extending in the cardiovascular system. Both physical and psychological stress induces ECG changes. These changes include not only arrhythmias but also deviations in ST-T segment representing the phase of repolarization.

Read more

Information about changes in ST-T segment are missing until now. The investigators hypothesise that ST-T deviations occur in emergency physicians during shift at an emergency response car.

In order to show changes in ST-T segment a prospective observational trial will be conducted. By using a 12 lead ECG Holter the investigators will obtain ECGs during shifts of emergency physicians at an emergency response vehicle.

During 12-hour shifts emergency physicians will be attached to the 12 lead Holter ECG. ECGs will be analysed after blinding of names and reason of call (code) to the investigators. The primary outcome will be ST-T segment changes greater than 0.1mV in two corresponding leads for more than 30 seconds per 100 calls.

As secondary outcomes, other ECG changes such as ST-T segment changes <0.1mV, T wave inversion or HRV will be analysed. Furthermore, surrogate parameter of stress will be measured using NASA-Task Load Index and cognitive appraisal and correlated to ST-T segment changes. Correlations between different phases of calls, different indications of calls and ECG changes will be assessed. Furthermore, correlation between alarm codes apriori defined as stressfull using a delphi process and ST-T segment changes as well es surrogate parameters of stress will be assessed.

Being tested
Holter ECG
Keywords
ST segment, preclinical emergency medicine, stress, occupational health, emergency medicine, 24h ECG

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Holter ECGDevice

    A Holter ECG will be recorderd during shifts

Study groups in NCT04003883
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Emergency physiciansEmergency physicians doing shifts at the Medical University of Vienna's emergency response car will recieve a thorough cardiac pretesting. During shifts they will be attached to a Holter-ECG to detect changes in ST-T Segment and other ECG changes. Furthermore surrogate parameters of stress will be measured
Receives: Device: Holter ECG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ST-T segment change

    ST-T segment changes of at least 0.1mV in two corresponding leads occurring for more than 30 seconds per 100 prehospital emergency response calls

    Measured: Day1-3

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. ST-T segment change <0.1mV, <30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  2. T wave inversion > 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  3. T wave inversion <= 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  4. Changes in HRV

    Changes in HRV (SDNN, r-MSSD and pNN50) during calls compared to a baseline of 10min rest recorded at the beginning of shift as an emergency physician

    Measured: Day1-3

  5. Association of different phases of a call to changes in ST-T segments > 0.1mV in two corresponding leads for > 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  6. Association of different phases of a call to changes in HRV (SDNN, r-MSSD and pNN50)

    Measured: Day1-3

  7. Association of the ten most stressful alarm codes to changes in ST-T segments > 0.1mV in two corresponding leads for > 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  8. Association of the ten most stressful alarm codes to changes in HRV (SDNN, r-MSSD and pNN50)

    Measured: Day1-3

  9. Psychological stress during calls by means of NASA TLX

    Measured: Day1-3

  10. Frequency of calls being perceived as threat by using cognitive appraisal testing

    Measured: Day1-3

  11. Association of stressful and non-stressful calls to psychological stress measured using NASA TLX

    Measured: Day1-3

  12. Association of stressful and non-stressful calls to cognitive appraisal and calls that are perceived as threat.

    Measured: Day1-3

  13. Correlation of events logged

    Correlation of events logged by the emergency physician (treating a child, managing polytrauma, being woken up by the alarm, experiencing chest pain, performing an intubation or giving i.v. medication) to ST-T segment changes > 0.1mV in two corresponding leads for > 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  14. Association of NASA TLX to ST-T segment changes > 0.1mV in two corresponding leads for > 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

  15. Association of cognitive appraisal to ST-T segment changes > 0.1mV in two corresponding leads for > 30sec.

    Measured: Day1-3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2019
  2. Study start1 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion1 May 2021
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04003883
Sponsor's protocol ID
1646/2019
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
25 Jun 2019
Last updated
15 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Maleczek M, Schebesta K, Hamp T, Burger AL, Pezawas T, Krammel M, Roessler B. ST-T segment changes in prehospital emergency physicians in the field: a prospective observational trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 15;30(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01033-1.

    PubMed 35841049

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of ST-T Segment Changes, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ST-T segment change (time frame: Day1-3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04003883, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in