Diaphragm ElevatedNCT04005235
FOT Assessment of Hemi-diaphragm Dysfunction After Upper Extremity Nerve Blocks
An observational study of Diaphragm Elevated and Paresis, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Upper extremity nerve blocks of the brachial plexus using local anesthetic can inadvertently affect the ipsilateral phrenic nerve and result in hemidiaphragm dysfunction. Ultrasonography is often used to assess for hemidiaphragm dysfunction after brachial plexus nerve blocks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diaphragm Elevated, Paresis
- What is being tested?
- Thorasys Tremoflo C-100 Airwave Oscillometry System (FOT)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 31 Jul 2019to 12 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients requiring interscalene or supraclavicular nerve blocks as part of their routine standard of care, who develop ultrasound confirmed ipsilateral hemdiaphragm dysfunction.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients > 18 y
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1-3
- Undergoing upper extremity surgery which requires a pre-operative brachial plexus nerve block as part of their routine standard of care.
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to nerve block
- Pregnant patients
- Patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- Pre-existing hemidiaphragm dysfunction
- Any significant neurologic dysfunction, or inability to visualize the diaphragm during baseline sonographic assessment
- Inability to comply with FOT measurements
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Hemi-diaphragm Dysfunction After Upper Extremity Nerve Blocks Using Passive Oscillometry to Measure Lung Mechanics - A Pilot Study.
Upper extremity nerve blocks of the brachial plexus using local anesthetic can inadvertently affect the ipsilateral phrenic nerve and result in hemidiaphragm dysfunction. Ultrasonography is often used to assess for hemidiaphragm dysfunction after brachial plexus nerve blocks. Alternately, post-operative chest x-rays can also be used to document unilateral hemidiaphragm elevation secondary to phrenic nerve dysfunction. Newly developed passive breathing testing devices (Forced Oscillometry Technique - FOT) use small composite pressure waveforms (5-37Hz) imposed on top of normal breathing and measure the resulting reflected oscillations to assess the mechanical properties of the lungs. The lung resistance R(f) and reactance X(f) are automatically mathematically derived from the reflected pressure waveforms returning from the respiratory system to the FOT device. In this study, we will assess if FOT can be used to detect changes in lung mechanics (lung resistance R(f) and reactance X(f)) after ultrasound proven hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to brachial plexus nerve block.
Read the detailed description
This study will be a prospective single centre observational trial using the Tremoflo Forced Oscillometry Technique (FOT) device to assess the changes in lung mechanical parameters after a brachial plexus nerve block with ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction (HDD). The serial cohort in this study will be patients presenting for unilateral upper extremity surgery who are having a regional nerve block for anesthesia as part of their normal standard of care for surgery.
FOT has proven useful in monitoring and diagnosing small airway diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with further applications of FOT being researched in perioperative care applications including inhaled anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. The Tremoflo is useful in perioperative applications because it does not require active breathing maneuvers, unlike traditional pulmonary function tests like spirometry. This technique uses a composite waveform of (5,11,13,17,19,23, 29, 31 and 37 Hz) to measures respiratory system resistance (R(f), cmH2O/L/sec) as a function of frequency, reactance (X(f), cmH2O/L/sec) as a function of frequency, and the resonance frequency. Resistance increases as the airways narrow while a decrease in reactance represents stiffening or loss of inertia in the lungs. Resonance frequency is the frequency at which reactance as a function of frequency is equal to zero, it represents both the overall stiffening of the lungs and obstruction of the small airways. Oscillation, specifically at low frequencies (5-20Hz), measures the mechanical properties of the peripheral airways while oscillation at higher frequencies (>20Hz) measures the mechanical properties of the central and upper respiratory system, giving one a more complete overview of lung function.
Prior to study enrollment, patients will be screened and consented accordance to the department standard operating procedures. Demographic data will be collected including age, sex, weight, height, comorbid conditions to rule out any exclusion criteria.
A baseline ultrasonographic diaphragmatic assessment and Tremoflo measurement will be completed by all participants prior to nerve block. Any significant neurologic dysfunction, inability to visualize the diaphragm during sonographic assessment, pre-existing HDD or inability to use the Tremoflo device will result in withdrawing the patient from the study. Study participants will then receive a pre-operative ultrasound guided interscalene (ISB) or supraclavicular (SCB) brachial plexus block as per standard of care. A standard clinical mixture of ropivacaine and lidocaine will be injected incrementally at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
An ultrasound machine with a linear transducer will be used to assess for hemidiaphragm dysfunction every 5 minutes after nerve block or until 30 minutes has elapsed. All subjects will lie in a semi-recumbent position. With the ultrasound set in B-mode, a longitudinal scan will be performed. The ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability and exposure) evaluation approach will be used which involves first placing the ultrasound probe along the anterior axillary line just below the 4th intercostal space on the ipsilateral side to the brachial plexus block. The movement of the pleura on top of the diaphragm will be visualized between the two ribs during normal breathing. The probe will then be moved caudally along the anterior axillary line to identify diaphragmatic thickening, where it will no longer be hidden under the pleura during inspiration, for examination. The diaphragm can then be easily distinguished from the adjacent intercostal muscles with visualization of the pleura just superficial to the diaphragm. The operator will visually examine the diaphragmatic muscle for the presence of a change in thickness. The probe will then be moved caudally, and when diaphragmatic thickening is clearly visualized in the zone of apposition, the thickness of diaphragm during expiration and deep inspiration will be determined using on-screen measurement caliper software built into ultrasound machine. Diaphragmatic dysfunction will be determined by intercostal diaphragm thickening based on validated criteria, with diaphragm thickening of less than 20% defined as dysfunction. The ultrasound image will be saved anonymously using a predefined study number.
The Tremoflo FOT assessment will be repeated after confirmed HDD by ultrasound criteria. All measurements will be taken while patients are in the semi-recumbent position, with the nostrils occluded using a disposable plastic clip that is routinely used with the Tremoflo device. A research team member will hold the Tremoflo device in the patients mouth and research staff or a Block room team member will gently support cheeks during all Tremoflo measurements. The research team will need to hold the device and support the cheeks as the patient will lack motor and sensory function due to the ISB/SCB nerve block.
After completion of the surgery, ultrasound diaphragmatic motion assessment and Tremoflo FOT measurement will be repeated in the post-operative care unit in the semi-recumbent position.
Subjective self-reported dyspnea (using the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, ordinal 0-10 scale with 0 = no breathlessness and 10 = maximal breathlessness) will be measured at baseline, then every 5 minutes after the nerve block until patient leaves for operating room or 30 minutes (whatever is earlier) and in the post-operative care unit at the time of ultrasound and FOT measurement.
The patients' data including age, sex, height (cm), weight (kg), body mass index (BMI) kg/m2, pertinent cardio-thoracic and neurologic medical history, nerve block details, ultrasound images and relevant anesthesia/surgical details (duration of surgical procedure, anesthetic type - regional anesthesia only vs. general anesthesia combined with upper extremity nerve block, muscle relaxant/reversal use - drug type and dose, airway management - oxygen face mask vs. laryngeal mask airway vs. tracheal tube) will be recorded for study purposes.
The co-primary outcome measures of this pilot study will be to determine:
- Changes in FOT measured lung resistance R(f) after ultrasound confirmed HDD.
- Changes in FOT measured lung reactance X(f) after ultrasound confirmed HDD.
The secondary outcomes will be to determine the incidence of subjective shortness of breath associated with an ISB/SCB and to determine FOT measured lung reactance and resistance changes after both a regional block and general anesthetic.
The sample size for the primary outcome measure was estimated using data from a study of FOT lung resistance changes at 5 Hz (R5) before and after patients underwent surgery for >2hrs under general anesthetic. Based on those outcomes, using a 1-sided T-test with alpha = 0.05, and beta = 0.8, sigma = 0.82, u1 = 2.31 and u2 = 2.75 the sample size required is 22 subjects. In order to account for drop-outs/attrition, 25 patients who experience HDD will be recruited to complete the study. The rate of HDD is different for the two standard types of upper extremity of nerve blocks used in this study. In the literature, ISB causes HDD in 100% of cases, while SCB incidence of HDD has been estimated at 50-67%. Historically, SCB are performed at a 4:1 ratio compared to ISB at our institution during normal surgical case loads. Based on these approximations, we anticipate recruiting 5 ISB (with 100% HDD) and 40 SCB (with a conservative estimated rate of 50% HDD) nerve block patients to meet our event rate based recruitment of a total of 25 patients who develop HDD for a total of 45 patients recruited.
Continuous respiratory variables automatically calculated by the Tremflo FOT device, such as respiratory system resistance, reactance, resonance frequency, tidal volume and respiratory rate will be expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range dependant on their distribution. Changes in respiratory system resistance, reactance, resonance frequency, tidal volume and respiratory rate from before and after nerve block will be compared using ANOVA or appropriate non-parametric testing.
Participants will not be receiving any compensation, financial or otherwise, for their participation in this study.
- Conditions
- Diaphragm Elevated, Paresis
- Being tested
- Thorasys Tremoflo C-100 Airwave Oscillometry System (FOT)
- Keywords
- phrenic nerve, nerve block, ultrasonography, breath tests, oscillometry, brachial plexus
- Medical subject headings
- Paresis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Thorasys Tremoflo C-100 Airwave Oscillometry System (FOT)Device
Also called Hemidiaphragm ultrasonography
Ultrasonography will be used to confirm hemidiaphragm dysfunction after brachial plexus nerve block. In subjects with U/S confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction, FOT measurements will be taken before and after nerve block and post-operatively after upper extremity surgery.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lung resistance - R(f) changes after brachial plexus block and ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction
Change from baseline FOT measured lung resistance R(f) in cmH2O/L/s
Measured: Baseline FOT measurements taken before nerve block and repeated immediately after ultrasound confirmation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to nerve block (onset of HDD estimated to be 5-30 mins after nerve block, per serial ultrasound assessments)
Lung reactance - X(f) changes after brachial plexus block and ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction
Change from baseline FOT measured lung reactance X(f) in cmH2O/L/s
Measured: Baseline FOT measurements taken before nerve block and repeated immediately after ultrasound confirmation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to nerve block (onset of HDD estimated to be 5-30 mins after nerve block, per serial ultrasound assessments)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Subjective patient self reported dyspnea after brachial plexus nerve block
Using standard MBDS scale ("Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale", ordinal scale 0-10, 0 = no difficulty at all, 10 = maximal breathing difficulty)
Measured: Every 5 minutes up to 30 minutes after the brachial plexus nerve block
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2019
- Study start31 Jul 2019
- Primary completion12 Mar 2020
- Study completion12 Mar 2020
Why it stopped: Covid-19 pandemic, aerosol generating procedures
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diaphragm ElevatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nova Scotia Health AuthorityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrew Milne, Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Investigators
- Andrew Mine, Principal investigator, Staff
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04005235
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FOTHDD1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Khurana J, Gartner SC, Naik L, Tsui BCH. Ultrasound Identification of Diaphragm by Novices Using ABCDE Technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000718.
PubMed 29315130Gerscovich EO, Cronan M, McGahan JP, Jain K, Jones CD, McDonald C. Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Jun;20(6):597-604. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.597.
PubMed 11400933Kuzukawa Y, Nakahira J, Sawai T, Minami T. A Perioperative Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics Using the Forced Oscillation Technique. Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1202-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000720.
PubMed 25839180Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.
PubMed 2006740Knoblanche GE. The incidence and aetiology of phrenic nerve blockade associated with supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1979 Nov;7(4):346-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X7900700406.
PubMed 525758Neal JM, Moore JM, Kopacz DJ, Liu SS, Kramer DJ, Plorde JJ. Quantitative analysis of respiratory, motor, and sensory function after supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1239-44. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199806000-00020.
PubMed 9620512Mak PH, Irwin MG, Ooi CG, Chow BF. Incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its effect on pulmonary function. Anaesthesia. 2001 Apr;56(4):352-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01708-2.x.
PubMed 11284823Oostveen E, MacLeod D, Lorino H, Farre R, Hantos Z, Desager K, Marchal F; ERS Task Force on Respiratory Impedance Measurements. The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments. Eur Respir J. 2003 Dec;22(6):1026-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00089403.
PubMed 14680096Kanda S, Fujimoto K, Komatsu Y, Yasuo M, Hanaoka M, Kubo K. Evaluation of respiratory impedance in asthma and COPD by an impulse oscillation system. Intern Med. 2010;49(1):23-30. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.2191. Epub 2010 Jan 1.
PubMed 20045997
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Hemi-diaphragm Dysfunction After Upper Extremity Nerve Blocks Using Passive Oscillometry to Measure Lung Mechanics - A Pilot Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04005235
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FOTHDD1
- Conditions
- Diaphragm Elevated, Paresis
- Keywords
- phrenic nerve, nerve block, ultrasonography, breath tests, oscillometry, brachial plexus
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Covid-19 pandemic, aerosol generating procedures
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Upper extremity nerve blocks of the brachial plexus using local anesthetic can inadvertently affect the ipsilateral phrenic nerve and result in hemidiaphragm dysfunction. Ultrasonography is often used to assess for hemidiaphragm dysfunction after brachial plexus nerve blocks. Alternately, post-operative chest x-rays can also be used to document unilateral hemidiaphragm elevation secondary to phrenic nerve dysfunction. Newly developed passive breathing testing devices (Forced Oscillometry Technique - FOT) use small composite pressure waveforms (5-37Hz) imposed on top of normal breathing and measure the resulting reflected oscillations to assess the mechanical properties of the lungs. The lung resistance R(f) and reactance X(f) are automatically mathematically derived from the reflected pressure waveforms returning from the respiratory system to the FOT device. In this study, we will assess if FOT can be used to detect changes in lung mechanics (lung resistance R(f) and reactance X(f)) after ultrasound proven hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to brachial plexus nerve block.
Detailed description
This study will be a prospective single centre observational trial using the Tremoflo Forced Oscillometry Technique (FOT) device to assess the changes in lung mechanical parameters after a brachial plexus nerve block with ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction (HDD). The serial cohort in this study will be patients presenting for unilateral upper extremity surgery who are having a regional nerve block for anesthesia as part of their normal standard of care for surgery.
FOT has proven useful in monitoring and diagnosing small airway diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with further applications of FOT being researched in perioperative care applications including inhaled anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. The Tremoflo is useful in perioperative applications because it does not require active breathing maneuvers, unlike traditional pulmonary function tests like spirometry. This technique uses a composite waveform of (5,11,13,17,19,23, 29, 31 and 37 Hz) to measures respiratory system resistance (R(f), cmH2O/L/sec) as a function of frequency, reactance (X(f), cmH2O/L/sec) as a function of frequency, and the resonance frequency. Resistance increases as the airways narrow while a decrease in reactance represents stiffening or loss of inertia in the lungs. Resonance frequency is the frequency at which reactance as a function of frequency is equal to zero, it represents both the overall stiffening of the lungs and obstruction of the small airways. Oscillation, specifically at low frequencies (5-20Hz), measures the mechanical properties of the peripheral airways while oscillation at higher frequencies (>20Hz) measures the mechanical properties of the central and upper respiratory system, giving one a more complete overview of lung function.
Prior to study enrollment, patients will be screened and consented accordance to the department standard operating procedures. Demographic data will be collected including age, sex, weight, height, comorbid conditions to rule out any exclusion criteria.
A baseline ultrasonographic diaphragmatic assessment and Tremoflo measurement will be completed by all participants prior to nerve block. Any significant neurologic dysfunction, inability to visualize the diaphragm during sonographic assessment, pre-existing HDD or inability to use the Tremoflo device will result in withdrawing the patient from the study. Study participants will then receive a pre-operative ultrasound guided interscalene (ISB) or supraclavicular (SCB) brachial plexus block as per standard of care. A standard clinical mixture of ropivacaine and lidocaine will be injected incrementally at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
An ultrasound machine with a linear transducer will be used to assess for hemidiaphragm dysfunction every 5 minutes after nerve block or until 30 minutes has elapsed. All subjects will lie in a semi-recumbent position. With the ultrasound set in B-mode, a longitudinal scan will be performed. The ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability and exposure) evaluation approach will be used which involves first placing the ultrasound probe along the anterior axillary line just below the 4th intercostal space on the ipsilateral side to the brachial plexus block. The movement of the pleura on top of the diaphragm will be visualized between the two ribs during normal breathing. The probe will then be moved caudally along the anterior axillary line to identify diaphragmatic thickening, where it will no longer be hidden under the pleura during inspiration, for examination. The diaphragm can then be easily distinguished from the adjacent intercostal muscles with visualization of the pleura just superficial to the diaphragm. The operator will visually examine the diaphragmatic muscle for the presence of a change in thickness. The probe will then be moved caudally, and when diaphragmatic thickening is clearly visualized in the zone of apposition, the thickness of diaphragm during expiration and deep inspiration will be determined using on-screen measurement caliper software built into ultrasound machine. Diaphragmatic dysfunction will be determined by intercostal diaphragm thickening based on validated criteria, with diaphragm thickening of less than 20% defined as dysfunction. The ultrasound image will be saved anonymously using a predefined study number.
The Tremoflo FOT assessment will be repeated after confirmed HDD by ultrasound criteria. All measurements will be taken while patients are in the semi-recumbent position, with the nostrils occluded using a disposable plastic clip that is routinely used with the Tremoflo device. A research team member will hold the Tremoflo device in the patients mouth and research staff or a Block room team member will gently support cheeks during all Tremoflo measurements. The research team will need to hold the device and support the cheeks as the patient will lack motor and sensory function due to the ISB/SCB nerve block.
After completion of the surgery, ultrasound diaphragmatic motion assessment and Tremoflo FOT measurement will be repeated in the post-operative care unit in the semi-recumbent position.
Subjective self-reported dyspnea (using the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, ordinal 0-10 scale with 0 = no breathlessness and 10 = maximal breathlessness) will be measured at baseline, then every 5 minutes after the nerve block until patient leaves for operating room or 30 minutes (whatever is earlier) and in the post-operative care unit at the time of ultrasound and FOT measurement.
The patients' data including age, sex, height (cm), weight (kg), body mass index (BMI) kg/m2, pertinent cardio-thoracic and neurologic medical history, nerve block details, ultrasound images and relevant anesthesia/surgical details (duration of surgical procedure, anesthetic type - regional anesthesia only vs. general anesthesia combined with upper extremity nerve block, muscle relaxant/reversal use - drug type and dose, airway management - oxygen face mask vs. laryngeal mask airway vs. tracheal tube) will be recorded for study purposes.
The co-primary outcome measures of this pilot study will be to determine:
- Changes in FOT measured lung resistance R(f) after ultrasound confirmed HDD.
- Changes in FOT measured lung reactance X(f) after ultrasound confirmed HDD.
The secondary outcomes will be to determine the incidence of subjective shortness of breath associated with an ISB/SCB and to determine FOT measured lung reactance and resistance changes after both a regional block and general anesthetic.
The sample size for the primary outcome measure was estimated using data from a study of FOT lung resistance changes at 5 Hz (R5) before and after patients underwent surgery for >2hrs under general anesthetic. Based on those outcomes, using a 1-sided T-test with alpha = 0.05, and beta = 0.8, sigma = 0.82, u1 = 2.31 and u2 = 2.75 the sample size required is 22 subjects. In order to account for drop-outs/attrition, 25 patients who experience HDD will be recruited to complete the study. The rate of HDD is different for the two standard types of upper extremity of nerve blocks used in this study. In the literature, ISB causes HDD in 100% of cases, while SCB incidence of HDD has been estimated at 50-67%. Historically, SCB are performed at a 4:1 ratio compared to ISB at our institution during normal surgical case loads. Based on these approximations, we anticipate recruiting 5 ISB (with 100% HDD) and 40 SCB (with a conservative estimated rate of 50% HDD) nerve block patients to meet our event rate based recruitment of a total of 25 patients who develop HDD for a total of 45 patients recruited.
Continuous respiratory variables automatically calculated by the Tremflo FOT device, such as respiratory system resistance, reactance, resonance frequency, tidal volume and respiratory rate will be expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range dependant on their distribution. Changes in respiratory system resistance, reactance, resonance frequency, tidal volume and respiratory rate from before and after nerve block will be compared using ANOVA or appropriate non-parametric testing.
Participants will not be receiving any compensation, financial or otherwise, for their participation in this study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients requiring interscalene or supraclavicular nerve blocks as part of their routine standard of care, who develop ultrasound confirmed ipsilateral hemdiaphragm dysfunction.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients > 18 y
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1-3
- Undergoing upper extremity surgery which requires a pre-operative brachial plexus nerve block as part of their routine standard of care.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Contraindication to nerve block
- Pregnant patients
- Patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- Pre-existing hemidiaphragm dysfunction
- Any significant neurologic dysfunction, or inability to visualize the diaphragm during baseline sonographic assessment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Thorasys Tremoflo C-100 Airwave Oscillometry System (FOT)Also: Hemidiaphragm ultrasonographyUltrasonography will be used to confirm hemidiaphragm dysfunction after brachial plexus nerve block. In subjects with U/S confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction, FOT measurements will be taken before and after nerve block and post-operatively after upper extremity surgery. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Lung resistance - R(f) changes after brachial plexus block and ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction
Time frame: Baseline FOT measurements taken before nerve block and repeated immediately after ultrasound confirmation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to nerve block (onset of HDD estimated to be 5-30 mins after nerve block, per serial ultrasound assessments)
Change from baseline FOT measured lung resistance R(f) in cmH2O/L/s
Lung reactance - X(f) changes after brachial plexus block and ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction
Time frame: Baseline FOT measurements taken before nerve block and repeated immediately after ultrasound confirmation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to nerve block (onset of HDD estimated to be 5-30 mins after nerve block, per serial ultrasound assessments)
Change from baseline FOT measured lung reactance X(f) in cmH2O/L/s
1 secondary outcome
Subjective patient self reported dyspnea after brachial plexus nerve block
Time frame: Every 5 minutes up to 30 minutes after the brachial plexus nerve block
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Covid-19 pandemic, aerosol generating procedures). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 29315130Khurana J, Gartner SC, Naik L, Tsui BCH. Ultrasound Identification of Diaphragm by Novices Using ABCDE Technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000718.
- Background: PubMed 11400933Gerscovich EO, Cronan M, McGahan JP, Jain K, Jones CD, McDonald C. Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Jun;20(6):597-604. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.597.
- Background: PubMed 25839180Kuzukawa Y, Nakahira J, Sawai T, Minami T. A Perioperative Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics Using the Forced Oscillation Technique. Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1202-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000720.
- Background: PubMed 2006740Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.
- Background: PubMed 525758Knoblanche GE. The incidence and aetiology of phrenic nerve blockade associated with supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1979 Nov;7(4):346-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X7900700406.
- Background: PubMed 9620512Neal JM, Moore JM, Kopacz DJ, Liu SS, Kramer DJ, Plorde JJ. Quantitative analysis of respiratory, motor, and sensory function after supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1239-44. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199806000-00020.
- Background: PubMed 11284823Mak PH, Irwin MG, Ooi CG, Chow BF. Incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its effect on pulmonary function. Anaesthesia. 2001 Apr;56(4):352-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01708-2.x.
- Background: PubMed 14680096Oostveen E, MacLeod D, Lorino H, Farre R, Hantos Z, Desager K, Marchal F; ERS Task Force on Respiratory Impedance Measurements. The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments. Eur Respir J. 2003 Dec;22(6):1026-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00089403.
- Background: PubMed 20045997Kanda S, Fujimoto K, Komatsu Y, Yasuo M, Hanaoka M, Kubo K. Evaluation of respiratory impedance in asthma and COPD by an impulse oscillation system. Intern Med. 2010;49(1):23-30. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.2191. Epub 2010 Jan 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diaphragm Elevated
Not yet recruiting
Impact of High Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Diaphragmatic Function: a Prospective Study
Breast Cancer Surgery, Breast Cancer Surgery Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Predictors of Symptom Improvement After Laparoscopic Fundoplication
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatal Hernia
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Effects of Opioid Exposure on the Ability of the Diaphragm Muscle
Respiratory Function Loss, Respiratory Complication
Not yet recruiting
Combined Inspiratory Muscle Training and Functional High-Intensity Interval Training in Boys With Obesity
Obesity & Overweight, Childhood Obesity
Recruiting
The Impact of Low Versus High Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Diaphragm Function, Ventilation Efficiency, and Lung Mechanics
Respiratory Failure, ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew Mine principal investigator
Staff
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diaphragm Elevated and Paresis, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Covid-19 pandemic, aerosol generating procedures). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lung resistance - R(f) changes after brachial plexus block and ultrasound confirmed hemidiaphragm dysfunction (time frame: Baseline FOT measurements taken before nerve block and repeated immediately after ultrasound confirmation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction secondary to nerve block (onset of HDD estimated to be 5-30 mins after nerve block, per serial ultrasound assessments)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04005235, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2021.