Hidradenitis SuppurativaPhase 2NCT04019041
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Bermekimab in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
A Phase 2 study testing bermekimab in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Acne Inversa, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 33 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study further evaluates the efficacy of bermekimab in treating moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa in adults. 1/3 of patients will receive weekly injections of bermekimab, 1/3 will receive alternating every other week injections of bermekimab or placebo, and 1/3 will receive weekly injections of placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Acne Inversa, Suppurative Hidradenitis
- What is being tested?
- bermekimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 153 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Sep 2019to 17 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent provided by the participant
- Male or female, age greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years
- Naïve to OR failure of prior targeted biologic therapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) (including anti-TNF, anti-IL-17, or JAK inhibitor therapy)
- Diagnosis of HS for at least 1 year prior to screening.
- HS affecting at least two distinct anatomic areas, one of which is Hurley II or III stage.
- A total body count of abscesses and inflammatory nodules (AN) of at least 3.
- Full understanding of the procedures of the study protocol and willingness to comply with them.
- In case of female participants of childbearing potential, willingness to use one method of contraception of high efficacy during the entire study period. This method can be hormonal contraceptives or one of the following: condoms, diaphragm, or an intrauterine device. Women of non-childbearing potential include those considered to have a medical history that indicates that pregnancy is not a reasonable risk, including post-menopausal women and those with a history of hysterectomy or surgically sterilized.
Who cannot join
- Age below 18 years.
- History of treatment with bermekimab for any reason.
- Receipt of oral antibiotic treatment for HS within 28 days prior to baseline.
- Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to baseline, and/or systemic non-biologic therapies for HS (immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, retinoids, or hormonal therapies) within 28 days prior to screening.
- Participant has been treated with any investigational drug of chemical or biologic nature within a minimum of 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the drug prior to baseline.
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized, chimeric, or murine monoclonal antibodies.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Has received a live (attenuated) vaccine over the 28 days prior to screening.
- Participant received oral concomitant analgesics (including opioids) for HS-related pain within 14 days prior to baseline.
- If entering the study on concomitant oral analgesics (including opioids) for non-HS-related pain: (a) Participant on opioid analgesics within 14 days prior to baseline visit; (b) Participant not on a stable dose of non-opioid oral analgesics for at least 14 days prior to baseline visit (PRN is not considered a stable dose).
- Participant requires or is expected to require opioid analgesics for any reason (excluding tramadol).
- Participant has a draining fistula count of greater than 20 at baseline.
- Major surgery (requiring general anesthesia or respiratory assistance) within 28 days prior to Day 0 of start of study drug.
- Hepatic dysfunction defined as any value of transaminases, of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γGT) or of total bilirubin > 3x upper normal limit.
- Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections (eg, tuberculosis [TB], histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pneumocystosis, aspergillosis) despite infection resolution.
- Stage C Child-Pugh liver cirrhosis.
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV).
- Neutropenia defined as <1,000 neutrophils/mm3.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 1 country.
33 sites in 1 country
United States33 sites
Oakland Hills Dermatology
Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326
Visionary Investigators Network
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Columbus Regional Research Institute
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
ClinOhio Research Services
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Doral Medical Research
Doral, Florida, 33166
Desert Sky
Gilbert, Arizona, 85295
Marvel Clinical Research
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Clinical Trials of SWLA
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70605
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Dermatology Research Associates
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Floridian Research Institute
Miami, Florida, 33145
Florida International Medical Research
Miami, Florida, 33155
P&S Research, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33175
Clinical Research Solutions, LLC
Milan, Tennessee, 38358
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Accel Clinical Research
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Dominion Medical Associates, Inc.
Richmond, Virginia, 23233
Progressive Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78213
Advanced Medical Research
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328
Syrentis Clinical Research
Santa Ana, California, 92705
Wolverine Clinical Trials
Santa Ana, California, 92705
Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Physica Clinical Research
Sebastian, Florida, 32958
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130
Avita Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Forcare Clinical Research, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Revival Research Institute, LLC
Troy, Michigan, 48084
Randall Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery
West Lafayette, Indiana, 47906
Integrated Clincal Research LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Bermekimab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
This study further evaluates the efficacy of bermekimab in treating moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa in adults. 1/3 of patients will receive weekly injections of bermekimab, 1/3 will receive alternating every other week injections of bermekimab or placebo, and 1/3 will receive weekly injections of placebo.
- Being tested
- bermekimab, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bermekimabDrug
bermekimab 2 mL (200 mg/mL) pre-filled syringe
placeboDrug
placebo 2 mL pre-filled syringe
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| bermekimab ew | Experimental | 2 800 mg bermekimab loading dose subcutaneous injections, followed by weekly 400 mg bermekimab injections Receives: Drug: bermekimab |
| bermekimab eow | Experimental | 2 800 mg loading dose subcutaneous injections, followed by alternating weekly 400 mg bermekimab injections with matching placebo injections Receives: Drug: bermekimab; Drug: placebo |
| placebo ew | Placebo comparator | 2 800 mg placebo loading dose subcutaneous injections, followed by weekly placebo subcutaneous injections Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12
HiSCR was defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (15)
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain & Itch at Weeks 12 and 16
Change from baseline in NRS for pain and itch at Weeks 12 and 16 was reported. Participants were given a take-home diary to complete each night before bed. Participants were asked to report "average pain", and "worst moment pain" as well as "average itch" and "worst moment itch" on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0=no itch or no pain and 10=worst itch or worst pain. Higher score indicated more severity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change Form Baseline in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Weeks 12 and 16
Change form baseline in total AN count at Weeks 12 and 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Weeks 12 and 16
Change form baseline in number of draining fistulas at Weeks 12 and 16 was reported. Draining fistula were defined as fistulas that drain serious or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
HiSCR was defined as at least 50% reduction in AN count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score (mHSS) at Weeks 12 and 16
Change from baseline in mHSS at Weeks 12 and 16 was reported. The sartorius scale was used to quantify the severity of HS. Points were awarded for 12 body areas (left and right axillae, left and right sub/inframammary areas, intermammary area, left and right buttocks, left and right inguino-crural folds, perianal area, perineal area, and other): points were awarded for nodules (2 points for each); abscesses (4 points); fistulas (4 points); scars (1 point); other findings (1 point); and longest distance between 2 lesions (2-6 points, 0 if no lesions); and if lesions were separated by normal skin (yes: 0 points; no: 6 points). The total sartorius score was the sum of the 12 regional scores. Scale scores range from 0 to infinite, with larger scores representing higher severity of HS.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HS-PGA of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) or HS-PGA Score of Mild or Better (<=2) With at Least a 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Weeks 12 and 16
HS-PGA was physician assessment of severity of disease based on 6-point scale:Clear (0)=total number of abscesses, inflammatory nodule, non-inflammatory nodule and draining fistulas was 0;Minimal (1)=total number of abscesses,draining fistulas, inflammatory nodule was 0, presence of non-inflammatory nodule;Mild (2)=total number of abscesses, draining fistulas was 0, total number of inflammatory nodule was 1-4, or presence of 1 abscess or draining fistula and absence of any inflammatory nodules;Moderate (3)=total number of abscesses and draining fistulas was 0, total number of inflammatory nodule was at least 5; or presence of 1 abscess or draining fistula and at least 1 inflammatory nodule; or 2-5 abscesses or draining fistulas, fewer than 10 inflammatory nodule;Severe (4)=total number of abscesses or draining fistulas was 2-5, total number of inflammatory nodule was at least 10;Very severe (5)=more than 5 abscesses or draining fistulas.Higher score indicated more severity of disease.
Measured: Weeks 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 16
The HADS was an instrument for screening anxiety and depression in non-psychiatric populations; repeated administration also provides information about changes in a participant's emotional state. It comprises 14 items, seven to assess anxiety (HADS-A), namely items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13; and seven to assess depression (HADS-D), namely items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Each item receives a score from 0 to 3 on a Likert Scale. The total score for each HADS-A and HADS-D scale was obtained by adding the individual scores for each item, with the maximum score 21. The presence or absence of depression and anxiety was defined, for each respective scale, based on the following cutoff values: HADS (anxiety): 0-8 equal to (=) no anxiety; greater than (>) 9 = anxiety; HADS (depression): 0-8 = no depression; >9 = depression.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 16
DLQI was a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. The DLQI domains include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participant respond on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). The DLQI total score was derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. A lower score (that is, negative change score) indicated improvement in the Quality of Life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension Instrument-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Weeks 12 and 16
The EQ-5D-3L was a standardized 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D-3L-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows the participants to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Positive change in score indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-c) at Week 12 and 16
The PGI-c was a single-item patient reported outcome (PRO) that assessed change in severity of skin pain due to HS. Participants rated how his/her HS had changed since the beginning of the study using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 where 1 indicates "very much better", 2 indicates "Much better', 3 indicates "A little better", 4 indicates "No change", 5 indicates "A little worse", 6 indicates "Much worse" and 7 indicates "Very much worse".
Measured: Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-s) at Weeks 12 and 16
The PGI-s was a single-item PRO that assessed change in a participant's impression of their disease severity. The PGI-s item asks the respondent to best describe how his/her HS symptoms are now (that is, "check the one number that best describes how your HS symptoms are now") on a 4-point scale scored as: "normal" (1), "mild" (2), "moderate" (3), or "severe" (4)".
Measured: Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score in the past 24 hours based on HSSD was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Total Symptom Score at Weeks 12 and 16
The HSSD was a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assessed 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms had a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. Each individual symptom scale score, ranging from 0-10, was summarized. A total symptom score, which also ranged from 0-10, was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Serum Concentration of Bermekimab
Serum concentration of bermekimab was reported. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arms only.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 16
Reduction From Baseline in Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Reduction from baseline in serum IL-6 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2019
- Study start16 Sep 2019
- Primary completion19 May 2020
- Study completion17 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hidradenitis SuppurativaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be randomized to every week bermekimab injections, every other week bermekimab injections, or every week placebo injections.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04019041
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR108834
- Other IDs
- 77474462HDS2002
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Bermekimab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04019041
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR108834
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 153 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study further evaluates the efficacy of bermekimab in treating moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa in adults. 1/3 of patients will receive weekly injections of bermekimab, 1/3 will receive alternating every other week injections of bermekimab or placebo, and 1/3 will receive weekly injections of placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Patients will be randomized to every week bermekimab injections, every other week bermekimab injections, or every week placebo injections.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| bermekimab ew | Experimental | Drug: bermekimab2 800 mg bermekimab loading dose subcutaneous injections, followed by weekly 400 mg bermekimab injections |
| bermekimab eow | Experimental | Drug: bermekimab, Drug: placebo2 800 mg loading dose subcutaneous injections, followed by alternating weekly 400 mg bermekimab injections with matching placebo injections |
| placebo ew | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo2 800 mg placebo loading dose subcutaneous injections, followed by weekly placebo subcutaneous injections |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Written informed consent provided by the participant
- Male or female, age greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years
- Naïve to OR failure of prior targeted biologic therapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) (including anti-TNF, anti-IL-17, or JAK inhibitor therapy)
- Diagnosis of HS for at least 1 year prior to screening.
- HS affecting at least two distinct anatomic areas, one of which is Hurley II or III stage.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Age below 18 years.
- History of treatment with bermekimab for any reason.
- Receipt of oral antibiotic treatment for HS within 28 days prior to baseline.
- Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to baseline, and/or systemic non-biologic therapies for HS (immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, retinoids, or hormonal therapies) within 28 days prior to screening.
- Participant has been treated with any investigational drug of chemical or biologic nature within a minimum of 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the drug prior to baseline.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bermekimabbermekimab 2 mL (200 mg/mL) pre-filled syringe | Drug | bermekimab eow, bermekimab ew |
| placeboplacebo 2 mL pre-filled syringe | Drug | bermekimab eow, placebo ew |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
HiSCR was defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
15 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain & Itch at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change Form Baseline in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score (mHSS) at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HS-PGA of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) or HS-PGA Score of Mild or Better (<=2) With at Least a 2-grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension Instrument-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-c) at Week 12 and 16
Time frame: Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-s) at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Total Symptom Score at Weeks 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 16
Serum Concentration of Bermekimab
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 16
Reduction From Baseline in Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
RecruitingPhase 3
Rollover Study for Participants Previously Enrolled in Clinical Trials of Povorcitinib
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Active, not recruiting
Pilot MBSR for People With HS
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingPhase 2
ORKA-002 Versus Placebo in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Samples From Subjects With Various Skin Conditions and Healthy Volunteers
Acne, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
SAR447971 First-in-human Study
Hidradenitis, Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
33 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing bermekimab in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Acne Inversa, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 33 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2023.