Chagas DiseasePhase 4PARACHUTE-HFNCT04023227
Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With CCC
A Phase 4 study testing Sacubitril/valsartan and Enalapril in people with Chagas Disease and Heart Failure, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 79 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg BID compared with enalapril 10 mg BID, in addition to conventional heart failure (HF) treatment, in improving a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chagas Disease, Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Sacubitril/valsartan and Enalapril
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 922 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2019to 31 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of NYHA Class II-IV HFrEF established by:
- LVEF ≤ 40% within 12 months prior to Visit 1 made by any local measurement using echocardiography, multiple gated acquisition scan (MUGA), computerized tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ventricular angiography, provided no subsequent measurement above 40% AND
- NT-proBNP ≥ 600 pg/mL (or BNP ≥ 150 pg/mL) at Visit 1 OR
- NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/mL (or BNP ≥ 100 pg/mL) at Visit 1 and a hospitalization for HF within the last 12 months
- Chagas' disease diagnosis confirmed by at least two different serological tests for anti-Trypanosoma cruzi based on different principles or with different antigenic preparations, such as: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], indirect immunofluorescence [IFI], indirect hemagglutination [IHA], western blot (WB), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). If documented history is not available, the tests may be performed during the screening
Who cannot join
- Patients with history of suspected or proven angioedema or unable to tolerate ACEIs, ARBs or ARNI (e.g., due to cough, hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia)
- Use of sacubitril/valsartan in the past 3 months
- Patients requiring continuous intravenous inotropic therapy or with indication of advanced support intervention for HF:
- already on list for a heart transplantation
- with current indication of left ventricular assist device, or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
- Systemic systolic blood pressure lower than 95 mmHg or symptomatic hypotension
Show all 20Show fewer
- Serum potassium > 5.2 mmol/L
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area
- Severe gastrointestinal form of chronic Chagas' disease (demonstrated megaesophagus and/or important megacolon, e.g.: with compromised oral intake or surgical indication).
- Clinical conditions or systemic diseases limiting proper patient participation
- Pregnant or nursing women or women of child-bearing potential unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception
- Presence of other cardiac conditions:
- Previous cardiac surgery
- Heart failure where, in the Investigator's judgement, there is a possible alternative primary etiology e.g., due to coronary artery disease, valve disease, congenital heart disease or other causes.
- Untreated arrhythmia or serious conduction disease e.g., bradyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, second or third degree atrioventricular block, etc.
- Primary uncorrected valvar pathology like moderate to severe aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis and primary mitral regurgitation
- Planned organ transplantation (or in listing for transplantation), planned cardiac or other major surgery (including ventricular assist device implantation)
- History of malignancy of any organ system within the past 5 years.
- Current confirmed COVID19 infection
- Past COVID19 infection with persistent symptom burden suspected due to COVID19 (persistent symptoms may include, but are not limited to, continued cough, breathing difficulty, muscle/joint aches, and gastrointestinal symptoms from the time of COVID19 infection onward)
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 4 countries.
79 sites in 4 countries
Brazil45 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Belém, Pará, 66087-660
Novartis Investigative Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100
Novartis Investigative Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30140 062
Novartis Investigative Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-270
Novartis Investigative Site
Botucatu, São Paulo, 3880-1001
Novartis Investigative Site
Bragança Paulista, São Paulo, 13183-091
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasila, Federal District, 70673623
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasília, Federal District, 70390-700
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasília, Federal District, 70673-416
Novartis Investigative Site
Campinas, São Paulo, 13020-431
Novartis Investigative Site
Campinas, São Paulo, 13060 080
Novartis Investigative Site
Campinas, São Paulo, 13060-904
Novartis Investigative Site
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60125-025
Novartis Investigative Site
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60430 370
Novartis Investigative Site
Goiânia, Goiás, 74223-060
Novartis Investigative Site
Goiânia, Goiás, 74223-130
Novartis Investigative Site
Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020
Novartis Investigative Site
Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, 98700-000
Novartis Investigative Site
Indaiatuba, São Paulo, 13330-570
Novartis Investigative Site
Londrina, Paraná, 86038-440
Novartis Investigative Site
Marília, São Paulo, 17515-000
Novartis Investigative Site
Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, 39401-001
Novartis Investigative Site
Passos, Minas Gerais, 37904-020
Novartis Investigative Site
Recife, Pernambuco, 50100-060
Novartis Investigative Site
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14010-190
Novartis Investigative Site
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20551-030
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22240-006
Novartis Investigative Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40050-410
Novartis Investigative Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40110060
Novartis Investigative Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40323-010
Novartis Investigative Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41253-190
Novartis Investigative Site
Santo André, São Paulo, 09080-001
Novartis Investigative Site
Sao Jose Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000
Novartis Investigative Site
São Luís, Maranhão, 65020-070
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04012 909
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, 05403-000
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, 15015-210
Novartis Investigative Site
Tatuí, São Paulo, 18270-170
Novartis Investigative Site
Teresina, Piauí, 64001-380
Novartis Investigative Site
Uberaba, Minas Gerais, 38025-440
Novartis Investigative Site
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, 38400 500
Novartis Investigative Site
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, 38400-328
Novartis Investigative Site
Votuporanga, São Paulo, 15500 003
Argentina24 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, C1155 AHD
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1425BEI
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, 5000
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, X5003DCE
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, X5004BAL
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, X5006CBI
Novartis Investigative Site
Corrientes, W3400CDS
Novartis Investigative Site
Formosa, P3600
Novartis Investigative Site
Formosa, P3634XAR
Novartis Investigative Site
Mendoza, M5500CHC
Novartis Investigative Site
Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, B1704ETD
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000DIF
Novartis Investigative Site
Salta, Salta Province, A4406BPF
Novartis Investigative Site
San Martín, Buenos Aires, 1604
Novartis Investigative Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucuman, T4000ICL
Novartis Investigative Site
San Miguel Tucuman, Tucumán Province, T4000IFL
Novartis Investigative Site
San Miguel Tucuman, Tucumán Province, T4000JCU
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Fe, S3000EOZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Fe, S3000FWO
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago del Estero, G4200AQK
Novartis Investigative Site
Temperley, Buenos Aires, 1834
Novartis Investigative Site
Villa María, Córdoba Province, X5900JKA
Colombia6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 110121
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogota DC, 110111
Novartis Investigative Site
Florida Blanca, 681001
Novartis Investigative Site
Floridablanca, 681004
Novartis Investigative Site
San Gil, Santander Department, 684031
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Marta, Magdalena Department, 30360
Mexico4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ciudad de, 14080
Novartis Investigative Site
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
Novartis Investigative Site
Oaxaca City, 68000
Novartis Investigative Site
Xalapa, 91193
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-endpoint, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With Chronic Chagas' Cardiomyopathy. The Study is Also Know as Prevention And Reduction of Adverse Outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation (PARACHUTE-HF).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg BID compared with enalapril 10 mg BID, in addition to conventional heart failure (HF) treatment, in improving a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (i.e. CV death or the occurrence of first HF hospitalization) and causing a greater reduction in n terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, at Week 12 from Baseline) in participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) caused by chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy (CCC).
Read the detailed description
This was a multinational, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, open-label, with blinded-endpoint adjudication, active-controlled study. The target projected sample size was approximately 900 participants (450 in each arm). It was estimated that approximately 1800 participants would be screened at sites in Latin America, including Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.
Participants who met the eligibility requirements were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sacubitril/valsartan (target dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (target dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to their usual therapy, stratified by country, using a central, concealed, web-based, automated randomization system. Both groups entered a titration period of 3 to 6 weeks, aiming to achieve the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily or enalapril 10 mg twice daily. The study follow-up succeeded the titration period and was to last until a total number of 302 events was reached and all randomized participants had a minimum follow-up of 12 weeks.
- Conditions
- Chagas Disease, Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Sacubitril/valsartan, Enalapril
- Keywords
- Chagas' disease, heart failure, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, ARNI, ARB, ACEI, sacubitril/valsartan, enalapril
- Medical subject headings
- Chagas Disease, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sacubitril/valsartanDrug
Also called LCZ696; Entresto; Vymada
Participants randomized to sacubitril/valsartan who were previously treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) had a 36-hour washout prior to receiving oral treatment with 50, 100, or 200 mg, film-coated tablets.
EnalaprilDrug
Also called Renitec
Oral treatment with 5 or 10 mg tablets.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sacubitril/valsartan | Experimental | Participants received 3 to 6 weeks of titrated dosing with sacubitril/valsartan to achieve the target dose of 200 mg twice daily. Receives: Drug: Sacubitril/valsartan |
| Enalapril | Active comparator | Participants received 3 to 6 weeks of titrated dosing with enalapril to achieve the target dose of 10 mg twice daily. Receives: Drug: Enalapril |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hierarchical Composite Endpoint Composed of Time to Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Time to First Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, and Relative Change in NT-proBNP From Baseline to Week 12
The primary efficacy endpoint was analyzed using the win ratio approach comparing every participant in the sacubitril/valsartan arm to every participant in the enalapril arm to determine a winner. A winner in the pair-wise comparison had a delayed time to the occurrence of CV death; if time to the occurrence of CV death was censored, a winner had a delayed time to the occurrence of first HF hospitalization event; if the times to both CV events were censored, a winner had a more favorable (less increase or more decrease) change in NT-proBNP between Baseline and Week 12. The estimated win ratio was defined as the total number of winners in the sacubitril/valsartan arm divided by the total number of winners in the enalapril arm. A win ratio >1 represents a favorable outcome for the study drug being assessed.
Measured: Total follow-up time up to approximately 36 months
Percentage of Participants Who Died From Cardiovascular Causes
Measured: Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months
Percentage of Participants With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure
Measured: Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in NT-proBNP Levels
Geometric mean factor change was derived from a linear regression model of log(NT-proBNP), adjusted for country and baseline value.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants With First Hospitalization Due to Heart Failure or Death From Cardiovascular Causes
Measured: From the date of randomization to the first occurrence (total follow up time up to approximately 36 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up to the end of the study, up to approximately 36 months
Number of Participants Who Had Sudden Death or Resuscitated Sudden Cardiac Arrest
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of the sudden death or resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest assessed up to the end of the study, up to approximately 36 months
Number of Participants Who Had Visits to an Emergency Room Due to Heart Failure (HF) Where Intravenous Therapy Was Required
Measured: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.
Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital
The duration of hospital-free survival within 1 year from randomization was summarized.
Measured: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.
Number of Hospitalizations Due to Heart Failure (HF) or Death Due to Cardiovascular (CV) Causes (Recurrent Events)
Measured: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2019
- Study start10 Dec 2019
- Primary completion16 Mar 2025
- Study completion31 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chagas DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a Phase 4, multinational, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint adjudication, active-controlled study to demonstrate superiority of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril in improving a composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (CV death or first heart failure \[HF\] hospitalization), or in causing greater reduction or lesser increase in NT-proBNP levels at Week 12 in participants with HFrEF caused by CCC.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 922 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04023227
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLCZ696B3302
- Acronym
- PARACHUTE-HF
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 11 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Publications
Lopes RD, Bocchi EA, Echeverria LE, Demacq C, de Barros E Silva PGM, Barbosa LM, Damiani L, Sayyed S, Yoshida LAF, Furtado RHM, Morillo CA, Kevorkian R, Ramires F, Bahit MC, Magana A, Chavez-Mendoza A, Miguel da Silva AH, Coelho da Silva A, Freitas AF Jr, Romano AA, Parneix A, Segura A, Franca CCB, Botta CE, de Barros E, Perna ER, Montenegro E, Quiroz Diaz FR, Feitosa-Filho GS, Severini GV, Molina I, Miranda JDSS, Sala J, Kerr Saraiva JF, Carbajales J, Maia LN, Santana Passos LC, Simoes MV, Moreira MDCV, Nunes MCP, Hernandes ME, Hominal M, Zarandon RS, Leon de la Fuente R, Aras R, Bazan SGZ, Luiz da Silva T Jr, Madrini V, de Oliveira WA Jr, Saporito WF, Gimpelewicz C, McMurray JJV; Prevention and Reduction of Adverse Outcomes in Chagasic Heart Failure Trial Evaluation (PARACHUTE-HF) Investigators. Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Heart Failure Due to Chagas Disease: An Open-Label, Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Jan 6;335(1):49-59. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.19808.
PubMed 41335448Bocchi EA, Echeverria LE, Demacq C, de Barros E Silva PGM, Mazza Barbosa L, Chiang LM, Damiani L, Morillo CA, Kevorkian R, Ramires F, Bahit MC, Ferrari A, Chavez-Mendoza A, Magana-Serrano JA, McMurray JJV, Gimpelewicz C, Lopes RD; PARACHUTE-HF Investigators. Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy: Rationale and Design of the PARACHUTE-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;12(8):1473-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.05.021.
PubMed 39111953
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-endpoint, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With Chronic Chagas' Cardiomyopathy. The Study is Also Know as Prevention And Reduction of Adverse Outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation (PARACHUTE-HF).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04023227
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PARACHUTE-HF / CLCZ696B3302
- Conditions
- Chagas Disease, Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Chagas' disease, heart failure, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, ARNI, ARB, ACEI, sacubitril/valsartan, enalapril
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 922 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 May 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg BID compared with enalapril 10 mg BID, in addition to conventional heart failure (HF) treatment, in improving a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (i.e. CV death or the occurrence of first HF hospitalization) and causing a greater reduction in n terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, at Week 12 from Baseline) in participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) caused by chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy (CCC).
Detailed description
This was a multinational, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, open-label, with blinded-endpoint adjudication, active-controlled study. The target projected sample size was approximately 900 participants (450 in each arm). It was estimated that approximately 1800 participants would be screened at sites in Latin America, including Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.
Participants who met the eligibility requirements were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sacubitril/valsartan (target dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (target dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to their usual therapy, stratified by country, using a central, concealed, web-based, automated randomization system. Both groups entered a titration period of 3 to 6 weeks, aiming to achieve the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily or enalapril 10 mg twice daily. The study follow-up succeeded the titration period and was to last until a total number of 302 events was reached and all randomized participants had a minimum follow-up of 12 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a Phase 4, multinational, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint adjudication, active-controlled study to demonstrate superiority of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril in improving a composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (CV death or first heart failure [HF] hospitalization), or in causing greater reduction or lesser increase in NT-proBNP levels at Week 12 in participants with HFrEF caused by CCC.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sacubitril/valsartan | Experimental | Drug: Sacubitril/valsartanParticipants received 3 to 6 weeks of titrated dosing with sacubitril/valsartan to achieve the target dose of 200 mg twice daily. |
| Enalapril | Active comparator | Drug: EnalaprilParticipants received 3 to 6 weeks of titrated dosing with enalapril to achieve the target dose of 10 mg twice daily. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of NYHA Class II-IV HFrEF established by:
- Chagas' disease diagnosis confirmed by at least two different serological tests for anti-Trypanosoma cruzi based on different principles or with different antigenic preparations, such as: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], indirect immunofluorescence [IFI], indirect hemagglutination [IHA], western blot (WB), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). If documented history is not available, the tests may be performed during the screening
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Patients with history of suspected or proven angioedema or unable to tolerate ACEIs, ARBs or ARNI (e.g., due to cough, hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia)
- Use of sacubitril/valsartan in the past 3 months
- Patients requiring continuous intravenous inotropic therapy or with indication of advanced support intervention for HF:
- Systemic systolic blood pressure lower than 95 mmHg or symptomatic hypotension
- Serum potassium > 5.2 mmol/L
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sacubitril/valsartanAlso: LCZ696; Entresto; VymadaParticipants randomized to sacubitril/valsartan who were previously treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) had a 36-hour washout prior to receiving oral treatment with 50, 100, or 200 mg, film-coated tablets. | Drug | Sacubitril/valsartan |
| EnalaprilAlso: RenitecOral treatment with 5 or 10 mg tablets. | Drug | Enalapril |
Primary outcome
Hierarchical Composite Endpoint Composed of Time to Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Time to First Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, and Relative Change in NT-proBNP From Baseline to Week 12
Time frame: Total follow-up time up to approximately 36 months
The primary efficacy endpoint was analyzed using the win ratio approach comparing every participant in the sacubitril/valsartan arm to every participant in the enalapril arm to determine a winner. A winner in the pair-wise comparison had a delayed time to the occurrence of CV death; if time to the occurrence of CV death was censored, a winner had a delayed time to the occurrence of first HF hospitalization event; if the times to both CV events were censored, a winner had a more favorable (less increase or more decrease) change in NT-proBNP between Baseline and Week 12. The estimated win ratio was defined as the total number of winners in the sacubitril/valsartan arm divided by the total number of winners in the enalapril arm. A win ratio >1 represents a favorable outcome for the study drug being assessed.
Percentage of Participants Who Died From Cardiovascular Causes
Time frame: Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months
Percentage of Participants With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure
Time frame: Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in NT-proBNP Levels
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Geometric mean factor change was derived from a linear regression model of log(NT-proBNP), adjusted for country and baseline value.
6 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With First Hospitalization Due to Heart Failure or Death From Cardiovascular Causes
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first occurrence (total follow up time up to approximately 36 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up to the end of the study, up to approximately 36 months
Number of Participants Who Had Sudden Death or Resuscitated Sudden Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of the sudden death or resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest assessed up to the end of the study, up to approximately 36 months
Number of Participants Who Had Visits to an Emergency Room Due to Heart Failure (HF) Where Intravenous Therapy Was Required
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.
Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.
Number of Hospitalizations Due to Heart Failure (HF) or Death Due to Cardiovascular (CV) Causes (Recurrent Events)
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41335448Lopes RD, Bocchi EA, Echeverria LE, Demacq C, de Barros E Silva PGM, Barbosa LM, Damiani L, Sayyed S, Yoshida LAF, Furtado RHM, Morillo CA, Kevorkian R, Ramires F, Bahit MC, Magana A, Chavez-Mendoza A, Miguel da Silva AH, Coelho da Silva A, Freitas AF Jr, Romano AA, Parneix A, Segura A, Franca CCB, Botta CE, de Barros E, Perna ER, Montenegro E, Quiroz Diaz FR, Feitosa-Filho GS, Severini GV, Molina I, Miranda JDSS, Sala J, Kerr Saraiva JF, Carbajales J, Maia LN, Santana Passos LC, Simoes MV, Moreira MDCV, Nunes MCP, Hernandes ME, Hominal M, Zarandon RS, Leon de la Fuente R, Aras R, Bazan SGZ, Luiz da Silva T Jr, Madrini V, de Oliveira WA Jr, Saporito WF, Gimpelewicz C, McMurray JJV; Prevention and Reduction of Adverse Outcomes in Chagasic Heart Failure Trial Evaluation (PARACHUTE-HF) Investigators. Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Heart Failure Due to Chagas Disease: An Open-Label, Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Jan 6;335(1):49-59. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.19808.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39111953Bocchi EA, Echeverria LE, Demacq C, de Barros E Silva PGM, Mazza Barbosa L, Chiang LM, Damiani L, Morillo CA, Kevorkian R, Ramires F, Bahit MC, Ferrari A, Chavez-Mendoza A, Magana-Serrano JA, McMurray JJV, Gimpelewicz C, Lopes RD; PARACHUTE-HF Investigators. Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy: Rationale and Design of the PARACHUTE-HF Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;12(8):1473-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.05.021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Related trials for Chagas Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of the Risk of Zoonotic Infections in Prisons in French Guiana
Q Fever, Leptospirosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability of LXE408 in Participants With Chronic Chagas Disease.
Chagas Disease
Recruiting
Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Chagas Heart Disease
Chagas Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
An Observational Pregnancy Safety Study in Women Who Were Exposed to the Drug Nifurtimox During Pregnancy to Learn About the Risk of Pregnancy Complications and About the Mother's and Baby's Health
Chagas Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Prospective Study of Benznidazole for Chagas' Disease Children With Chronic Indeterminate Chagas Disease
Chagas Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
79 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Sacubitril/valsartan and Enalapril in people with Chagas Disease and Heart Failure, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 79 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hierarchical Composite Endpoint Composed of Time to Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Time to First Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, and Relative Change in NT-proBNP From Baseline to Week 12 (time frame: Total follow-up time up to approximately 36 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04023227, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2026.