AzTrials
AzTrials

Alcohol MisuseNCT04025151

Nurse-led Alcohol Brief Intervention Plus Mobile Personalized Chat-based Support on Reducing Alcohol Use in University Students

A study testing Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet and Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM) in people with Alcohol Misuse, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to assess the effect of personalized support using instant messaging application on alcohol drinking reduction in university students proactively recruited from universities in Hong Kong. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Alcohol Misuse
What is being tested?
Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet and Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
770 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
30 Sep 2020to 30 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Student aged ≥18 years from local universities in Hong Kong
  • Able to read and communicate in Chinese (Cantonese or Mandarin)
  • Likely to stay in Hong Kong for most of the time in the next 12 months
  • Using IM Apps (WhatsApp or WeChat) installed on a smartphone
  • Baseline AUDIT screening score ≥8

Who cannot join

  • Having a history of psychiatric/psychological disease or currently on regular psychotropic medications
  • Currently participating in treatments or programmes on reducing alcohol use

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Siu Long Chau, PhD contact

+852-39176981

h1357885@connect.hku.hk

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong

    Hong Kong, 000000

    Siu Long Chau, PhD, +852-39176981, h1357885@connect.hku.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Nurse-led Alcohol Brief Intervention Plus Mobile Personalized Chat-based Support on Reducing Alcohol Use in University Students: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to assess the effect of personalized support using instant messaging application on alcohol drinking reduction in university students proactively recruited from universities in Hong Kong.

Read the detailed description

The government has promoted Hong Kong as the Asian's wine hub with zero alcohol tax (ethanol ≤30%) since 2008, which causes dramatic increases in alcohol drinking and binge drinking rates. Alcohol use in youth is the leading cause of disability adjusted life-years loss. Most adult drinkers start drinking at age 18-21. Evidence shows that alcohol brief intervention (ABI) is effective reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol use in university students. The proposed trial aims to enhance the ABI by incorporating information communication technologies (ICTs) such as instant messaging (IM) Apps (e.g. WhatsApp and WeChat) to provide personalized, real-time chat-based support led by nurses. The aims of study are as follows:

  1. To determine the main effect of the Intervention vs. Control group on alcohol consumption per week at 6-month (Primary)
  2. To assess the effects on alcohol consumption per week at 12-month, AUDIT scores at 6 and 12-month, perceived usefulness of IM app at 12-month, intention to use IM app to reduce/quit drinking at 12-month, number of standard drinks, episode of binge drinking, episode of heavy drinking, planned drinking, Academic Role Expectation and Alcohol Scale, Alcohol Problems Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 4-item, Perceived Stress Scale 4-item, Covid-19 related drinking behavioral changes, and self-efficacy to reduce/quit drinking at 6-month and 12-month
  3. To identify mediators between intervention and outcomes to inform the potential mechanisms
  4. To qualitatively explore experience on the interventions for reducing alcohol use and related harms
Conditions
Alcohol Misuse
Being tested
Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet, Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM), Real-time chat-based support through IM Apps, General health through SMS
Keywords
chat-based IM, alcohol brief intervention, alcohol misuse, university students

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Alcohol brief interventionBehavioural

    At baseline, subjects will receive face-to-face or online alcohol brief intervention developed based on the guideline by the World Health Organisation in 5-10 minutes

  • 12-page health warning leafletBehavioural

    Nurses will provide information about the consequences of drinking using a 12-page health warning booklet. Benefits of reducing and quit drinking will be emphasized by focusing on improving their perception towards the impacts on health, social problems, risky behaviors, academic performance and financial issues.

  • Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM)Behavioural

    A total of 26 e-messages will be scheduled: once daily for the first week, 3 time/week for subsequent 4 weeks and 1 time/week for the remaining 7 weeks. The frequency will be adjusted according to IM Apps conversation and subject's requests.

  • Real-time chat-based support through IM AppsBehavioural

    The chat-based IM support is the extension of baseline ABI and regular e-messages, which aims to provide real-time behavioral and psychosocial support to reduce or quit drinking. It will be personalized according to the subjects' characteristics (gender, drinking pattern and alcoholic drinks preferences), intention to drink and specific questions regarding drinking. Through real-time chatting (text and/or voice), drinkers can acquire information on consequences of drinking and gain social support immediately to reduce intention to drink and alcohol consumption.

  • General health through SMSBehavioural

    After baseline, they will receive regular e-message through SMS with similar frequency to Intervention group with content on general health and the reminding the importance of participating in the follow-up surveys.

  • AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong KongBehavioural

    a diagram explaining drinking behaviour and potential health risks, definitions of "alcohol unit" and "binge drinking", and advise on limiting daily drinking to 2 alcohol units for men and 1 unit for women

Study groups in NCT04025151
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalAlcohol brief intervention, leaflets, regular personalized messages on ABI through IM Apps, real-time chat-based support through IM Apps
Receives: Behavioral: Alcohol brief intervention; Behavioral: 12-page health warning leaflet; Behavioral: Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM); Behavioral: Real-time chat-based support through IM Apps; Behavioral: AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong Kong
control groupActive comparatorAlcohol brief intervention, leaflets, regular messages on general health through SMS
Receives: Behavioral: Alcohol brief intervention; Behavioral: 12-page health warning leaflet; Behavioral: General health through SMS; Behavioral: AUDIT score interpretation sheet adapted from the Department of Health of Hong Kong

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 6-month follow-up

    Assessed by unit in gram and compare the alcohol consumption between intervention and control group at 6-month after baseline.

    Measured: 6-month after baseline

  2. Compare the primary outcome using intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) and as-treated (AP) analysis with Compliance Average Causal Effect (CACE) analysis

    To estimate large, moderate and null (same as the control) treatment effects and check whether ITT, AP and PP analysis estimates are biased compared with CACE estimates (alcohol consumption per week at 6-month follow-up)

    Measured: 6-month after baseline

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 12-month follow-up

    Assessed by unit in gram and compare the alcohol consumption between intervention and control group at 12-month after baseline.

    Measured: 12-month after baseline

  2. AUDIT scores at 6-month follow-up

    Assessed by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (ranged 0-40 with higher score indicating problematic alcohol use) and compare the AUDIT between intervention and control group at 6-month after baseline.

    Measured: 6-month after baseline

  3. AUDIT scores at 12-month follow-up

    Assessed by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (ranged 0-40 with higher score indicating problematic alcohol use) and compare the AUDIT between intervention and control group at 12-month after baseline.

    Measured: 12-month after baseline

  4. Number of standard drinks (10g of alcohol) per week at 6-month follow-up

    Assessed by either increase or decrease in standard drinks number and compared between intervention and control group at 6-month

    Measured: 6-month after baseline

  5. Number of standard drinks (10g of alcohol) per week at 12-month follow-up

    Assessed by either increase or decrease in standard drinks number and compared between intervention and control group at 12-month

    Measured: 12-month after baseline

  6. Episode of binge drinking in the past 30-day at 6-month follow up

    Defined by 5 standard drink [male] or 4 standard drink [female] in one occasion for binge drinking and compare the episode of binge drinking between intervention group and control at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  7. Episode of binge drinking in the past 30-day at 12-month follow up

    Defined by 5 standard drink [male] or 4 standard drink [female] in one occasion for binge drinking and compare the episode of binge drinking between intervention group and control at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  8. Episode of heavy drinking in the past 30-day at 6-month follow up

    Defined by 15 standard drink [male] or 8 standard drink[female] in a week for heavy drinking and compare the episode of heavy drinking between intervention group and control at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6 -month after baseline

  9. Episode of heavy drinking in the past 30-day at 12-month follow up

    Defined by 15 standard drink [male] or 8 standard drink [female] in a week for heavy drinking and compare the episode of heavy drinking between intervention group and control at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  10. Planned drinking measured in the coming 30-day at 6-month follow up

    Compare the number of planned drinking (yes or no) between intervention group and control group at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  11. Planned drinking measured in the coming 30-day at 12-month follow up

    Compare the number of planned drinking (yes or no) between intervention group and control group at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  12. Academic Role Expectation and Alcohol Scale at 6-month follow-up

    The four items in this scale addressed the number of times the student had been 'late to class', 'missed class', was 'unable to concentrate' and 'failed to complete assignment' (score range 0-16). The responses included 'not at all', 'once', 'twice', 'three times' and 'four times or more'. The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  13. Academic Role Expectation and Alcohol Scale at 12-month follow-up

    The four items in this scale addressed the number of times the student had been 'late to class', 'missed class', was 'unable to concentrate' and 'failed to complete assignment' (score range 0-16). The responses included 'not at all', 'once', 'twice', 'three times' and 'four times or more'. The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  14. Alcohol Problems Scale at 6-month follow-up

    The 14-item measure of alcohol-related personal, social, sexual, and legal problems (eg, being physically aggressive toward someone while under the influence of alcohol).The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  15. Alcohol Problems Scale at 12-month follow-up

    The 14-item measure of alcohol-related personal, social, sexual, and legal problems (eg, being physically aggressive toward someone while under the influence of alcohol).The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12- month after baseline

  16. Mediation analysis of variables at 6-month on weekly amount of alcohol consumption at 12-month

    Mediation analysis of 6-month factors (knowledge of alcohol drinking, perception of alcohol drinking, intention to quit drinking, mental health) on weekly amount of alcohol consumption at 12-month

    Measured: at 12- month after baseline

  17. Subgroup analysis of baseline intention to quit/reduce drinking

    Subgroup analysis to check whether the intervention is more effective with participants with intention to quit/reduce drinking on outcomes

    Measured: at 12- month after baseline

  18. Content analysis of IM Apps conversation using alcohol BCT taxonomy

    The conversations between the participants and the nurse will be analyzed and categorized into different sub-type of BCT taxonomy

    Measured: at 12- month after baseline

  19. Patient Health Questionnaire 4-item (PHQ-4) at 6-month

    Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the 4 items. Scores are rated as normal (0-2), mild (3-5), moderate (6-8), and severe (9-12).

    Total score ≥3 for first 2 questions suggests anxiety. Total score ≥3 for last 2 questions suggests depression. The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  20. Patient Health Questionnaire 4-item (PHQ-4) at 12-month

    Total score is determined by adding together the scores of each of the 4 items. Scores are rated as normal (0-2), mild (3-5), moderate (6-8), and severe (9-12).

    Total score ≥3 for first 2 questions suggests anxiety. Total score ≥3 for last 2 questions suggests depression. The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  21. Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS-4) at 6-month

    Subjects' responses are measured on a five-point scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2

    =sometimes, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often). Scoring: PSS-4 scores are obtained by summing across all four items. Scoring items 2 and 3 require reverse coding. This involves assigning the opposite score. For example, a score of 0=4, 1=3, 2=2, 3=1, and 4=0. The higher the score, the more perceived stress.

    The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  22. Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS-4) at 12-month

    Subjects' responses are measured on a five-point scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2

    =sometimes, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often). Scoring: PSS-4 scores are obtained by summing across all four items. Scoring items 2 and 3 require reverse coding. This involves assigning the opposite score. For example, a score of 0=4, 1=3, 2=2, 3=1, and 4=0. The higher the score, the more perceived stress.

    The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  23. Perceived usefulness of IM app intervention at 12-month

    Score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher score indicates a higher level of usefulness of our intervention.

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  24. Intention to continue using IM app intervention at 12-month

    Ask for intention to use (yes/no) IM app intervention to reduce/quit drinking at 12-month

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  25. Self-efficacy to reduce/quit drinking at 6-month

    Perceived difficulty, confidence and importance of quitting/reducing to drink will be asked.

    Score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher score indicates a high level. The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 6-month after baseline

  26. Self-efficacy to reduce/quit drinking at 12-month

    Perceived difficulty, confidence and importance of quitting/reducing to drink will be asked.

    Score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher score indicates a high level. The score will be compared between intervention group and control group at baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires

    Measured: at 12-month after baseline

  27. Covid-19 related drinking behavioral changes at baseline

    Assessed by stop drinking, increase (+50%), slight increase, decrease (-50%), slight decrease or no change of drinking after the start of pandemic

    Measured: at baseline

  28. Covid-19 related drinking behavioral changes at 6-month

    Assessed by stop drinking, increase (+50%), slight increase, decrease (-50%), slight decrease or no change of drinking after the start of pandemic. The changes will be compared between the intervention group and control group at 6-month

    Measured: at 6-month

  29. Covid-19 related drinking behavioral changes at 12-month

    Assessed by stop drinking, increase (+50%), slight increase, decrease (-50%), slight decrease or no change of drinking after the start of pandemic. The changes will be compared between the intervention group and control group at 12-month

    Measured: at 12-month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jul 2019
  2. Study start30 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
770 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04025151
Sponsor's protocol ID
Chat-based ABI (UniStudents)
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
16 Jul 2019
Last updated
13 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Thomas GN, Wang MP, Ho SY, Mak KH, Cheng KK, Lam TH. Adverse lifestyle leads to an annual excess of 2 million deaths in China. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089650. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24586936
  • Gore FM, Bloem PJ, Patton GC, Ferguson J, Joseph V, Coffey C, Sawyer SM, Mathers CD. Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2093-102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60512-6. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

    PubMed 21652063
  • Wang MP, Ho SY, Lam TH. Underage alcohol drinking and medical services use in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002740.

    PubMed 23793697
  • Huang R, Ho SY, Wang MP, Lo WS, Lam TH. Reported alcohol drinking and mental health problems in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jul 1;164:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

    PubMed 27177803
  • Department of Health. Report of population health survey 2014/15, Hong Kong SAR; 2018. Retrived at 24 Oct 2018 from: https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/static/51256.html

  • Kaner EF, Beyer FR, Muirhead C, Campbell F, Pienaar ED, Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Saunders JB, Burnand B. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2(2):CD004148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub4.

    PubMed 29476653
  • Fachini A, Aliane PP, Martinez EZ, Furtado EF. Efficacy of brief alcohol screening intervention for college students (BASICS): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Sep 12;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-40.

    PubMed 22967716
  • Kaner EF, Beyer FR, Garnett C, Crane D, Brown J, Muirhead C, Redmore J, O'Donnell A, Newham JJ, de Vocht F, Hickman M, Brown H, Maniatopoulos G, Michie S. Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2.

    PubMed 28944453
  • Larimer ME, Cronce JM, Lee CM, Kilmer JR. Brief intervention in college settings. Alcohol Res Health. 2004-2005;28(2):94-104.

    PubMed 19006997
  • Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction. 2002 Mar;97(3):279-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x.

    PubMed 11964101
  • Fowler LA, Holt SL, Joshi D. Mobile technology-based interventions for adult users of alcohol: A systematic review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2016 Nov;62:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

    PubMed 27310031
  • Kypri K, Hallett J, Howat P, McManus A, Maycock B, Bowe S, Horton NJ. Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 14;169(16):1508-14. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.249.

    PubMed 19752409
  • Kypri K, Vater T, Bowe SJ, Saunders JB, Cunningham JA, Horton NJ, McCambridge J. Web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014 Mar 26;311(12):1218-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2138.

    PubMed 24668103
  • Hoermann S, McCabe KL, Milne DN, Calvo RA. Application of Synchronous Text-Based Dialogue Systems in Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 21;19(8):e267. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7023.

    PubMed 28784594
  • Luk TT, Li WHC, Cheung DYT, Wong SW, Kwong ACS, Lai VWY, Chan SS, Lam TH, Wang MP. Chat-based instant messaging support combined with brief smoking cessation interventions for Chinese community smokers in Hong Kong: Rationale and study protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;77:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

    PubMed 30593882

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Alcohol brief intervention, 12-page health warning leaflet and Regular messages through Instant Messaging (IM) in people with Alcohol Misuse, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Siu Long Chau, PhD (+852-39176981, h1357885@connect.hku.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Amount of alcohol consumption per week (gram/week) at 6-month follow-up (time frame: 6-month after baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04025151, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in