Nerve InjuryPhase 2/3NCT04026568
A Single Dose Pharmaco-Diagnostic for Peripheral Nerve Continuity After Trauma
A Phase 2/3 study testing 4-Aminopyridine in people with Nerve Injury, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) on the course of recovery after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injury. The investigational treatment will be used to test the hypothesis that 4-aminopyridine speeds the often slow and unpredictable recovery after peripheral nerve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nerve Injury
- What is being tested?
- 4-Aminopyridine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Aug 2021to 18 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with trauma involving two or less limbs where the continuity of a given peripheral nerve or nerves is unclear on presenting physical examination.
- Closed soft tissue envelope obscuring direct observation of the continuity of the affected nerve.
- Cognitive ability to report sensory and motor deficit during examination.
- Able to complete dosing within four days (96 hours) of nerve injury diagnosis.
- Able to provide informed consent
- Eligible for standard of care plan of monitoring vs surgical exploration of the nerve.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Adults subject aged 18-90
- Known limb trauma which resulted in nerve injury (aim 1) or post-operative/post intervention nerve injury (aim 2).
- Ability to give written informed consent.
- Capable of safely undergoing electrodiagnostic testing (EDX).
- Availability for all testing days and main trial day.
Who cannot join
- Not able to complete dosing within four days (96 hours) of nerve injury diagnosis
- Distracting injury which prevents adequate examination.
- Plan for surgical exploration of the nerve during the ensuing 48 hours.
- Plan for surgical exploration of the nerve as part of another surgical procedure within 48 hours of evaluation.
- Intoxication during examination or evidence of cognitive deficit that emerges during examination.
- History of multiple sclerosis, stroke or any other diagnosed neurological disorder
Show all 18Show fewer
- History of hypersensitivity to AMPYRA® or 4-aminopyridine
- Renal impairment based on calculated GFR (GFR<80 mL/min) This laboratory value is measured in all inpatient trauma patients as part of the standard of care.
- History of difficult compliance with timely follow up or plan to seek care at another institution closer to home.
- Patients outside the age range or unable to consent.
- Patients with a known history of a seizure disorder (4AP overdose can, in selected cases, result in limited seizure activity).
- Patients with a concomitant traumatic brain injury.
- Patients unable to communicate return or loss of sensation.
- Patients unable to exhibit motor control on the affected limb at baseline.
- Patients unwilling to complete the study requirements.
- Patients with injuries too extensive to isolate a single nerve(s) for testing.
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding or incarcerated individuals.
- Patients currently taking organic cat-ion transporter 2 (OCT2) inhibitors, eg. Cimetidine.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
MS Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
About this study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) on the course of recovery after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injury. The investigational treatment will be used to test the hypothesis that 4-aminopyridine speeds the often slow and unpredictable recovery after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injuries.
Read the detailed description
This proposal contains two distinct aims to be investigated in two similar but distinct groups of patients.
Aim 1: To examine the mechanistic effect of 4AP on the return of sensorimotor function and EDX sensitivity in the setting of nerve dysfunction from orthopaedic trauma. This aim tests the hypothesis that oral one-time administration of 4AP provides transient return of function and EDX sensitivity to the traumatically denervated limb in alert patients with known limb injuries not involving the central nervous system.
Aim 2: To examine the mechanistic effect of 4AP on the return of sensorimotor function and EDX sensitivity in the setting of iatrogenic nerve injury after surgical intervention. This aim tests the identical hypothesis as in Aim 1 in a distinct group of patients, whose nerve dysfunction is the result of a clinical intervention, and whose function before that intervention was intact.
Scientific Background and Gaps
Neurological injury in the form of traction or crush to nerves that control muscles and sensory function is common. Because an understanding of these injuries is only now beginning to emerge, research on potential treatments is an important next step. Through experiments performed on animals with the Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. version of the drug (AMPYRA®), 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) has been strikingly effective in ameliorating the effect of a standardized peripheral nerve crush injury. The peripheral nerve injury used in the experiments was a standard model of peripheral nerve injury used to measure recovery in animals and is a model of peripheral nerve traction and crush injury that has been studied for over thirty years. The investigators have found that:
- 4-AP administration in a single dose given on day three after the injury led to a drastic reduction in the dysfunction afforded by a crush injury just days after the crush itself.
- 4-AP treatment's effect was short-lived after a single dose and was, in effect, diagnostic of the potential to recover in a nerve that was crushed but not shattered.
- Severed nerves show no capacity to recover even with 4-AP treatment.
- The treatment in a daily regimen led to profound, lasting, permanent improvement in the speed of recovery in these animals.
4-AP is used in some of the most fragile of neurologically-ailing patients and is currently a mainline treatment in the setting of multiple sclerosis (1). Multiple sclerosis patients suffer a demyelinating disorder that causes the stripping of the myelin sheath from around neurons in the peripheral and central nervous system. The myelin covering allows for normal conduction of impulses and, without such covering, impulses are small, impaired, impeded, and ineffective. The recognition that crush injuries to nerves do not simply sever the axonal fibers but also demyelinate some population of nerve cells has led to the idea to study the treatment of peripheral nerve traumatic injuries in humans using 4-AP.
Previous Data
4-AP has been studied in humans since the early 1980s, and principles of safe usage are extremely well established. For the purposes of this proposal, the immediate release formulation of 4-AP, sometimes called fampridine will be referred to as IR 4-AP. The proposed version of the drug used in this study is an extended release formulation of 4-AP, called dalfampridine, which was marketed under the trade name AMPYRA, by Acorda Therapeutics. Recently, this extended release formulation has become available as a generic, which will be referred to as generic AMPYRA or dalfampridine. Essentially identical principles apply whether 4-AP is provided in an orally available immediate release formulation (IR 4-AP) or an orally available sustained release formulation (dalfampridine). The safety of 4-AP appears to be determined solely by serum levels.
It has long been recognized that the most significant safety concern regarding 4-AP is an increased frequency in seizures, which occurs in a small percentage of patients if serum levels exceed 100 ng/ml. Therefore, dosages are chosen to maintain serum levels that do not exceed 50-60ng/ml. In this proposal, 5mg of study drug will be administered once every six hours, for a total dosage per day of 20 mg. This total dose, as indicated by multiple previous studies on immediate release 4-AP, has an excellent safety profile even in the fragile population of patients with multiple sclerosis. A sustained release formulation of 4-AP (AMPYRA®) at this same dose is FDA approved for use in the multiple sclerosis population even with a known risk of seizure activity in these patients.
It is important to note that multiple studies on 4-AP also include patients with chronic stroke, chronic spinal cord injury, transverse myelitis, primary lateral sclerosis, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, ocular nystagmus, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, spinal muscular atrophy, chronic Guillain-Barre syndrome, episodic ataxia Type 2, obstructive sleep apnea and spinocerebellar ataxias. Over 45 clinical trials have been conducted in the US alone (as listed on the Clinicaltrials.gov website). There are also 49 primary publications on clinical trials outcomes on 4-AP, which include patients with multiple sclerosis, chronic spinal cord injury, spinocerebellar ataxias and chronic stroke.
The many trials on 4-AP have been conducted using both immediate release 4-AP and sustained release 4-AP. The difference between the immediate release and sustained release formulations are that the sustained release formulation helps to decrease the peaks and troughs in serum levels that can occur with larger doses of immediate release formulations.
The Study Rationale is to evaluate the role of 4-aminopyridine (4AP) on the diagnosis of complete (severed) vs incomplete (non-severed) peripheral nerve injury (PNI). The investigational treatment will be used to test the hypothesis that 4AP allows the identification of incomplete injuries earlier than standard electrodiagnostic (EDX) and clinical assessment.
- Conditions
- Nerve Injury
- Being tested
- 4-Aminopyridine, Placebo oral tablet
- Keywords
- Peripheral nerve trauma, laceration, blast injury, mangled limb
- Medical subject headings
- Lacerations, Blast Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
4-AminopyridineDrug
Also called oral dalfampridine
Single drug test for nerve continuity
Placebo oral tabletDrug
Also called Generic placebo
Placebo arm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single dose 4AP | Experimental | 15mm opaque capsule containing 10mg of 4-AP Receives: Drug: 4-Aminopyridine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Opaque capsule identical looking to the 4AP placebo pill Receives: Drug: Placebo oral tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subjective Return of Sensation
Return of lost sensation after nerve injury attributable to circulating 4-AP. Subjective return of sensation in the injured limb or portion of the limb.
Patients for this trial are not able to sense in portions of their limbs. The measure will be sensation, measured on the binary scale of yes or no (able to feel the extremity versus unable to feel) This is assessed through clinical examination of the injured limb.
Measured: During dosing of drug intervention (5 hours) and 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20 weeks post injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2019
- Study start17 Aug 2021
- Primary completion18 Jul 2022
- Study completion18 Jul 2022
Why it stopped: Study investigator left Institution
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nerve InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John C Elfar, MD, Principal investigator, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04026568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00012040
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The results include both subjective and objective measures. Subjective measures will not be hidden from patients given the nature of measurements. Active discussion of objective measures will wait until final follow up at 20 weeks. Patients can use their subjective assessments in their standard-of-care treatment decisions and with their doctors. Investigators will not inform other physicians except at the consent of patients. Objective test results will not be discussed with treating physicians until 20 weeks. If a patient wants further surgical exploration of an injured peripheral nerve based on subjective return of function (or lack) with members of the study team, a patient conference will be arranged with ethicist and DSMB (Data Safety Monitoring Board). The patient's decision in conjunction with the treating surgeon (not on study team to avoid any conflicts) is to be paramount. Unblinding will also be discussed then with the DSMB.
Publications
Robinson LR. Role of neurophysiologic evaluation in diagnosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 May-Jun;8(3):190-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200005000-00006.
PubMed 10874226Robinson LR. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Jun;23(6):863-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200006)23:63.0.co;2-0.
PubMed 10842261Wilbourn AJ. The electrodiagnostic examination with peripheral nerve injuries. Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Apr;30(2):139-54. doi: 10.1016/s0094-1298(02)00099-8.
PubMed 12737349Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol. 1943 Sep 30;102(2):191-215. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004027. No abstract available.
PubMed 16991601SEDDON HJ. Nerve grafting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1963 May;32(5):269-80. No abstract available.
PubMed 13987582SUNDERLAND S, BRADLEY KC. Denervation atrophy of the distal stump of a severed nerve. J Comp Neurol. 1950 Dec;93(3):401-9. doi: 10.1002/cne.900930304. No abstract available.
PubMed 14803568SUNDERLAND S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951 Dec;74(4):491-516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. No abstract available.
PubMed 14895767Korompilias AV, Lykissas MG, Kostas-Agnantis IP, Vekris MD, Soucacos PN, Beris AE. Approach to radial nerve palsy caused by humerus shaft fracture: is primary exploration necessary? Injury. 2013 Mar;44(3):323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
PubMed 23352153Niver GE, Ilyas AM. Management of radial nerve palsy following fractures of the humerus. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Jul;44(3):419-24, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
PubMed 23827843Li Y, Ning G, Wu Q, Wu Q, Li Y, Feng S. Review of literature of radial nerve injuries associated with humeral fractures-an integrated management strategy. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e78576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078576. eCollection 2013.
PubMed 24250799Rocchi M, Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Adani R. Humerus shaft fracture complicated by radial nerve palsy: Is surgical exploration necessary? Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Dec;100(Suppl 1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0414-3. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
PubMed 27900704Han SH, Hong IT, Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Kim U, Kim DW. Primary exploration for radial nerve palsy associated with unstable closed humeral shaft fracture. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Sep;23(5):405-409. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.26517.
PubMed 29052827Chang G, Ilyas AM. Radial Nerve Palsy After Humeral Shaft Fractures: The Case for Early Exploration and a New Classification to Guide Treatment and Prognosis. Hand Clin. 2018 Feb;34(1):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.09.011.
PubMed 29169591Perry JD. Electrodiagnosis in musculo-skeletal disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Jun;19(3):453-66. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.01.007.
PubMed 15939369Korte N, Schenk HC, Grothe C, Tipold A, Haastert-Talini K. Evaluation of periodic electrodiagnostic measurements to monitor motor recovery after different peripheral nerve lesions in the rat. Muscle Nerve. 2011 Jul;44(1):63-73. doi: 10.1002/mus.22023.
PubMed 21674522
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Dose Pharmaco-Diagnostic for Peripheral Nerve Continuity After Trauma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04026568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00012040
- Conditions
- Nerve Injury
- Keywords
- Peripheral nerve trauma, laceration, blast injury, mangled limb
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study investigator left Institution
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Sep 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) on the course of recovery after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injury. The investigational treatment will be used to test the hypothesis that 4-aminopyridine speeds the often slow and unpredictable recovery after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injuries.
Detailed description
This proposal contains two distinct aims to be investigated in two similar but distinct groups of patients.
Aim 1: To examine the mechanistic effect of 4AP on the return of sensorimotor function and EDX sensitivity in the setting of nerve dysfunction from orthopaedic trauma. This aim tests the hypothesis that oral one-time administration of 4AP provides transient return of function and EDX sensitivity to the traumatically denervated limb in alert patients with known limb injuries not involving the central nervous system.
Aim 2: To examine the mechanistic effect of 4AP on the return of sensorimotor function and EDX sensitivity in the setting of iatrogenic nerve injury after surgical intervention. This aim tests the identical hypothesis as in Aim 1 in a distinct group of patients, whose nerve dysfunction is the result of a clinical intervention, and whose function before that intervention was intact.
Scientific Background and Gaps
Neurological injury in the form of traction or crush to nerves that control muscles and sensory function is common. Because an understanding of these injuries is only now beginning to emerge, research on potential treatments is an important next step. Through experiments performed on animals with the Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. version of the drug (AMPYRA®), 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) has been strikingly effective in ameliorating the effect of a standardized peripheral nerve crush injury. The peripheral nerve injury used in the experiments was a standard model of peripheral nerve injury used to measure recovery in animals and is a model of peripheral nerve traction and crush injury that has been studied for over thirty years. The investigators have found that:
- 4-AP administration in a single dose given on day three after the injury led to a drastic reduction in the dysfunction afforded by a crush injury just days after the crush itself.
- 4-AP treatment's effect was short-lived after a single dose and was, in effect, diagnostic of the potential to recover in a nerve that was crushed but not shattered.
- Severed nerves show no capacity to recover even with 4-AP treatment.
- The treatment in a daily regimen led to profound, lasting, permanent improvement in the speed of recovery in these animals.
4-AP is used in some of the most fragile of neurologically-ailing patients and is currently a mainline treatment in the setting of multiple sclerosis (1). Multiple sclerosis patients suffer a demyelinating disorder that causes the stripping of the myelin sheath from around neurons in the peripheral and central nervous system. The myelin covering allows for normal conduction of impulses and, without such covering, impulses are small, impaired, impeded, and ineffective. The recognition that crush injuries to nerves do not simply sever the axonal fibers but also demyelinate some population of nerve cells has led to the idea to study the treatment of peripheral nerve traumatic injuries in humans using 4-AP.
Previous Data
4-AP has been studied in humans since the early 1980s, and principles of safe usage are extremely well established. For the purposes of this proposal, the immediate release formulation of 4-AP, sometimes called fampridine will be referred to as IR 4-AP. The proposed version of the drug used in this study is an extended release formulation of 4-AP, called dalfampridine, which was marketed under the trade name AMPYRA, by Acorda Therapeutics. Recently, this extended release formulation has become available as a generic, which will be referred to as generic AMPYRA or dalfampridine. Essentially identical principles apply whether 4-AP is provided in an orally available immediate release formulation (IR 4-AP) or an orally available sustained release formulation (dalfampridine). The safety of 4-AP appears to be determined solely by serum levels.
It has long been recognized that the most significant safety concern regarding 4-AP is an increased frequency in seizures, which occurs in a small percentage of patients if serum levels exceed 100 ng/ml. Therefore, dosages are chosen to maintain serum levels that do not exceed 50-60ng/ml. In this proposal, 5mg of study drug will be administered once every six hours, for a total dosage per day of 20 mg. This total dose, as indicated by multiple previous studies on immediate release 4-AP, has an excellent safety profile even in the fragile population of patients with multiple sclerosis. A sustained release formulation of 4-AP (AMPYRA®) at this same dose is FDA approved for use in the multiple sclerosis population even with a known risk of seizure activity in these patients.
It is important to note that multiple studies on 4-AP also include patients with chronic stroke, chronic spinal cord injury, transverse myelitis, primary lateral sclerosis, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, ocular nystagmus, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, spinal muscular atrophy, chronic Guillain-Barre syndrome, episodic ataxia Type 2, obstructive sleep apnea and spinocerebellar ataxias. Over 45 clinical trials have been conducted in the US alone (as listed on the Clinicaltrials.gov website). There are also 49 primary publications on clinical trials outcomes on 4-AP, which include patients with multiple sclerosis, chronic spinal cord injury, spinocerebellar ataxias and chronic stroke.
The many trials on 4-AP have been conducted using both immediate release 4-AP and sustained release 4-AP. The difference between the immediate release and sustained release formulations are that the sustained release formulation helps to decrease the peaks and troughs in serum levels that can occur with larger doses of immediate release formulations.
The Study Rationale is to evaluate the role of 4-aminopyridine (4AP) on the diagnosis of complete (severed) vs incomplete (non-severed) peripheral nerve injury (PNI). The investigational treatment will be used to test the hypothesis that 4AP allows the identification of incomplete injuries earlier than standard electrodiagnostic (EDX) and clinical assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single dose 4AP | Experimental | Drug: 4-Aminopyridine15mm opaque capsule containing 10mg of 4-AP |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo oral tabletOpaque capsule identical looking to the 4AP placebo pill |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with trauma involving two or less limbs where the continuity of a given peripheral nerve or nerves is unclear on presenting physical examination.
- Closed soft tissue envelope obscuring direct observation of the continuity of the affected nerve.
- Cognitive ability to report sensory and motor deficit during examination.
- Able to complete dosing within four days (96 hours) of nerve injury diagnosis.
- Able to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Not able to complete dosing within four days (96 hours) of nerve injury diagnosis
- Distracting injury which prevents adequate examination.
- Plan for surgical exploration of the nerve during the ensuing 48 hours.
- Plan for surgical exploration of the nerve as part of another surgical procedure within 48 hours of evaluation.
- Intoxication during examination or evidence of cognitive deficit that emerges during examination.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 4-AminopyridineAlso: oral dalfampridineSingle drug test for nerve continuity | Drug | Single dose 4AP |
| Placebo oral tabletAlso: Generic placeboPlacebo arm | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Subjective Return of Sensation
Time frame: During dosing of drug intervention (5 hours) and 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20 weeks post injury
Return of lost sensation after nerve injury attributable to circulating 4-AP. Subjective return of sensation in the injured limb or portion of the limb. Patients for this trial are not able to sense in portions of their limbs. The measure will be sensation, measured on the binary scale of yes or no (able to feel the extremity versus unable to feel) This is assessed through clinical examination of the injured limb.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 10874226Robinson LR. Role of neurophysiologic evaluation in diagnosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 May-Jun;8(3):190-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200005000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 10842261Robinson LR. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 2000 Jun;23(6):863-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200006)23:63.0.co;2-0.
- Background: PubMed 12737349Wilbourn AJ. The electrodiagnostic examination with peripheral nerve injuries. Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Apr;30(2):139-54. doi: 10.1016/s0094-1298(02)00099-8.
- Background: PubMed 16991601Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol. 1943 Sep 30;102(2):191-215. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004027. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 13987582SEDDON HJ. Nerve grafting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1963 May;32(5):269-80. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14803568SUNDERLAND S, BRADLEY KC. Denervation atrophy of the distal stump of a severed nerve. J Comp Neurol. 1950 Dec;93(3):401-9. doi: 10.1002/cne.900930304. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14895767SUNDERLAND S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951 Dec;74(4):491-516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23352153Korompilias AV, Lykissas MG, Kostas-Agnantis IP, Vekris MD, Soucacos PN, Beris AE. Approach to radial nerve palsy caused by humerus shaft fracture: is primary exploration necessary? Injury. 2013 Mar;44(3):323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 23827843Niver GE, Ilyas AM. Management of radial nerve palsy following fractures of the humerus. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Jul;44(3):419-24, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 24250799Li Y, Ning G, Wu Q, Wu Q, Li Y, Feng S. Review of literature of radial nerve injuries associated with humeral fractures-an integrated management strategy. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e78576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078576. eCollection 2013.
- Background: PubMed 27900704Rocchi M, Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Adani R. Humerus shaft fracture complicated by radial nerve palsy: Is surgical exploration necessary? Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Dec;100(Suppl 1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0414-3. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 29052827Han SH, Hong IT, Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Kim U, Kim DW. Primary exploration for radial nerve palsy associated with unstable closed humeral shaft fracture. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Sep;23(5):405-409. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.26517.
- Hand sensibility, strength, and laxity of high-level musicians compared to nonmusiciansLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The results include both subjective and objective measures. Subjective measures will not be hidden from patients given the nature of measurements. Active discussion of objective measures will wait until final follow up at 20 weeks. Patients can use their subjective assessments in their standard-of-care treatment decisions and with their doctors. Investigators will not inform other physicians except at the consent of patients. Objective test results will not be discussed with treating physicians until 20 weeks. If a patient wants further surgical exploration of an injured peripheral nerve based on subjective return of function (or lack) with members of the study team, a patient conference will be arranged with ethicist and DSMB (Data Safety Monitoring Board). The patient's decision in conjunction with the treating surgeon (not on study team to avoid any conflicts) is to be paramount. Unblinding will also be discussed then with the DSMB.
Related trials for Nerve Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Nerve Transfer Surgery to Restore Upper-limb Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Cutaneous Nerve of the Forearm Epicondylar Branch Block on Pain and Function in Lateral Epicondylitis (PCNF-BrEpi)
Lateral Epicondylitis
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Wrist Reduction Intervention: Supracondylar Technique for Radial Nerve Block vs. Hematoma Block (WRIST Block Study)
Wrist Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study of Regional Nerve Blocks in Primary Cleft Palate Repair
Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate +/- Lip
Not yet recruiting
Posterior Pericapsular Deep-gluteal Block
Pain, Postoperative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John C Elfar, MD principal investigator
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing 4-Aminopyridine in people with Nerve Injury, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subjective Return of Sensation (time frame: During dosing of drug intervention (5 hours) and 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20 weeks post injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04026568, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2022.