Sedentary BehaviorOWBHSNCT04042610
Office Worker Behavior and Health Study
A study testing Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time in people with Sedentary Behavior, run by Loma Linda University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized intervention study to determine if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time have an effect on job satisfaction, musculoskeletal complaints, and sitting time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedentary Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Sep 2019to 3 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- In generally good health. Access to an IOS device for the duration of the study.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy. Use of activity equipment or devices in the workplace. Extreme exerciser: run marathons, participates in team or competitive sports/activities
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This is a randomized intervention study to determine if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time have an effect on job satisfaction, musculoskeletal complaints, and sitting time.
Read the detailed description
A sedentary lifestyle has been deemed deleterious to health. It contributes to many chronic diseases and illnesses as well as an increase in all-cause mortality. The objective of this study is to investigate if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time can reduce sedentary behavior at work as well as have an effect on job satisfaction, and musculoskeletal complaints. The participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, intervention (n=31) and control (n=31). Informed consent, demographic and socioeconomic data will be obtained from each participant. A questionnaire that includes three different scales will be administered before and after the 12-week intervention to all participants: Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire, Job Satisfaction Index, and Nordic Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Also, physical data will be measured: BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference. All participants will be provided with the Amazfit BIP device to track steps during work hours. The intervention group will receive a prompt every hour during their workday via an iOS application, Stand-Up, through the Amazfit BIP device. The prompt is to interrupt sitting time and encourage two-minutes of physical activity. The intervention group will receive examples of physical activity in addition to educational material on the health benefits of increasing physical activity in the workplace via verbal instruction and written materials. Data analysis will be conducted to determine if there is a difference in sitting time between the two groups over time using repeated-measures ANOVA. Independent samples t-tests will be used to compare job satisfaction and the physical biomarkers for obesity among the intervention and control groups. Chi-square will be used to analyze the reported musculoskeletal complaints between the two groups. If necessary, all analyses will be controlled for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
- Conditions
- Sedentary Behavior
- Being tested
- Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time
- Keywords
- sitting time, Stand-Up, Amazfit
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting TimeBehavioural
An electronic prompt via the IOS application Stand-Up will be given through the Amazfit BIP device to interrupt sitting time every hour during the office workers workday. The office worker will engage in 2 minutes of physical activity with each prompt.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention: electronic prompt to interrupt sitting time | Experimental | The intervention will consist of two components: education and an electronic prompt via the iOS application Stand Up and notification through the Amzafit BIP device. The Stand-Up application will generate a prompt every hour during the workday to interrupt sitting time and encourage 2 minutes of physical activity. The intervention group participants will be given verbal and written educational materials on the health benefits of incorporating physical activity throughout their workday as well as the health risks of a sedentary lifestyle. Suggestions and demonstrations of physical activity will be given including but not limited to: use a restroom further away from their workstation, take a brief walk around the office, walk-in place, stretch. In addition, they will record their steps via the Amazfit BIP device and submit their daily step counts for weeks: 1,2,4, 6 and 8. Receives: Behavioral: Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time |
| Control Group | No intervention | The control group will be given an Amazfit BIP device to record their steps. They will submit their daily steps counts for weeks: 1,2,4, 6 and 8. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sitting Time
Percent of time sitting in a typical workday
Measured: Change measure: baseline and 6 weeks
Activity in steps
The number of steps taken during their workday
Measured: Change measure: week 2 and 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
An Index of Job Satisfaction
This index is by Brayfield and Rothe. There are eighteen questions which assess job satisfaction utilizing a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: Change measure: baseline and 8 weeks
Musculoskeletal complaints questionnaire
The questionnaire is also known as the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. It uses Yes or No response to assess whether or not the participant has had musculoskeletal trouble in their neck, shoulders, upper back, elbows, wrists/hands, lower back, hips/thighs, knees, or ankles/feet over the past twelve months, if musculoskeletal problems have prevented normal function or working during the past twelve months, or if there has been musculoskeletal trouble during the past seven days.
Measured: Change measure: baseline and 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2019
- Study start3 Sep 2019
- Primary completion3 Apr 2020
- Study completion3 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sedentary BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention or control after informed consent is obtained. The intervention will be conducted for 8-weeks and consist of two components: education and electronic prompt to interrupt sitting time. Upon receiving the electronic prompt, the intervention group is encouraged to participate in 2 minutes of physical activity. Both groups will be provided an Amazfit BIP device to record and submit their step count during weeks: 1,2,4, 6 and 8.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hildemar Dos Santos, MD, DrPH, Principal investigator, Loma Linda University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04042610
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- #5190289
- Acronym
- OWBHS
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 17 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Becker I, Wallmann-Sperlich B, Rupp R, Bucksch J. [Workplace Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Aug;81(8-09):606-614. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112746. Epub 2017 Nov 6. German.
PubMed 29108081Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311. doi:10.1037/h0055617
Buman MP, Mullane SL, Toledo MJ, Rydell SA, Gaesser GA, Crespo NC, Hannan P, Feltes L, Vuong B, Pereira MA. An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
PubMed 27940181Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Chey T, Bauman AE. Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults. Prev Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;54(3-4):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
PubMed 22227284Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, Martin CK, Blair SN, Bouchard C. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019657. Epub 2011 May 25.
PubMed 21647427Commissaris DACM, Huysmans MA, Mathiassen SE, Srinivasan D, Koppes LLJ, Hendriksen IJM. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase physical activity during productive work: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):181-191. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3544. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
PubMed 26683116Crawford, J. O. (2007). The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 57(4), 300-301. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm036
Daneshmandi H, Choobineh A, Ghaem H, Karimi M. Adverse Effects of Prolonged Sitting Behavior on the General Health of Office Workers. J Lifestyle Med. 2017 Jul;7(2):69-75. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2017.7.2.69. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
PubMed 29026727Duncan, M. D., Kazi, A., & Haslam, C. O. (2013/05/16/May 16-19, 2013). Sedentary behaviour at work: The impact on employee health.
Dunstan DW, Howard B, Healy GN, Owen N. Too much sitting--a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
PubMed 22682948Foley B, Engelen L, Gale J, Bauman A, Mackey M. Sedentary Behavior and Musculoskeletal Discomfort Are Reduced When Office Workers Trial an Activity-Based Work Environment. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;58(9):924-31. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000828.
PubMed 27454397Gibbs BB, Hergenroeder AL, Katzmarzyk PT, Lee IM, Jakicic JM. Definition, measurement, and health risks associated with sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jun;47(6):1295-300. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000517.
PubMed 25222816Gilson ND, Ng N, Pavey TG, Ryde GC, Straker L, Brown WJ. Project Energise: Using participatory approaches and real time computer prompts to reduce occupational sitting and increase work time physical activity in office workers. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Nov;19(11):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
PubMed 26922132Healy GN, Eakin EG, Owen N, Lamontagne AD, Moodie M, Winkler EA, Fjeldsoe BS, Wiesner G, Willenberg L, Dunstan DW. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time: Effect on Activity Outcomes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1787-97. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000972.
PubMed 27526175Jancey J, Tye M, McGann S, Blackford K, Lee AH. Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers. BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 29;14:762. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-762.
PubMed 25069528
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Office Worker Behavior and Health Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04042610
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OWBHS / #5190289
- Conditions
- Sedentary Behavior
- Keywords
- sitting time, Stand-Up, Amazfit
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized intervention study to determine if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time have an effect on job satisfaction, musculoskeletal complaints, and sitting time.
Detailed description
A sedentary lifestyle has been deemed deleterious to health. It contributes to many chronic diseases and illnesses as well as an increase in all-cause mortality. The objective of this study is to investigate if electronic prompted interruptions in sitting time can reduce sedentary behavior at work as well as have an effect on job satisfaction, and musculoskeletal complaints. The participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, intervention (n=31) and control (n=31). Informed consent, demographic and socioeconomic data will be obtained from each participant. A questionnaire that includes three different scales will be administered before and after the 12-week intervention to all participants: Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire, Job Satisfaction Index, and Nordic Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Also, physical data will be measured: BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference. All participants will be provided with the Amazfit BIP device to track steps during work hours. The intervention group will receive a prompt every hour during their workday via an iOS application, Stand-Up, through the Amazfit BIP device. The prompt is to interrupt sitting time and encourage two-minutes of physical activity. The intervention group will receive examples of physical activity in addition to educational material on the health benefits of increasing physical activity in the workplace via verbal instruction and written materials. Data analysis will be conducted to determine if there is a difference in sitting time between the two groups over time using repeated-measures ANOVA. Independent samples t-tests will be used to compare job satisfaction and the physical biomarkers for obesity among the intervention and control groups. Chi-square will be used to analyze the reported musculoskeletal complaints between the two groups. If necessary, all analyses will be controlled for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention or control after informed consent is obtained. The intervention will be conducted for 8-weeks and consist of two components: education and electronic prompt to interrupt sitting time. Upon receiving the electronic prompt, the intervention group is encouraged to participate in 2 minutes of physical activity. Both groups will be provided an Amazfit BIP device to record and submit their step count during weeks: 1,2,4, 6 and 8.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention: electronic prompt to interrupt sitting time | Experimental | Behavioral: Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting TimeThe intervention will consist of two components: education and an electronic prompt via the iOS application Stand Up and notification through the Amzafit BIP device. The Stand-Up application will generate a prompt every hour during the workday to interrupt sitting time and encourage 2 minutes of physical activity. The intervention group participants will be given verbal and written educational materials on the health benefits of incorporating physical activity throughout their workday as well as the health risks of a sedentary lifestyle. Suggestions and demonstrations of physical activity will be given including but not limited to: use a restroom further away from their workstation, take a brief walk around the office, walk-in place, stretch. In addition, they will record their steps via the Amazfit BIP device and submit their daily step counts for weeks: 1,2,4, 6 and 8. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –The control group will be given an Amazfit BIP device to record their steps. They will submit their daily steps counts for weeks: 1,2,4, 6 and 8. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- In generally good health. Access to an IOS device for the duration of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancy. Use of activity equipment or devices in the workplace. Extreme exerciser: run marathons, participates in team or competitive sports/activities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting TimeAn electronic prompt via the IOS application Stand-Up will be given through the Amazfit BIP device to interrupt sitting time every hour during the office workers workday. The office worker will engage in 2 minutes of physical activity with each prompt. | Behavioural | Intervention: electronic prompt to interrupt sitting time |
Primary outcome
Sitting Time
Time frame: Change measure: baseline and 6 weeks
Percent of time sitting in a typical workday
Activity in steps
Time frame: Change measure: week 2 and 6 weeks
The number of steps taken during their workday
2 secondary outcomes
An Index of Job Satisfaction
Time frame: Change measure: baseline and 8 weeks
Musculoskeletal complaints questionnaire
Time frame: Change measure: baseline and 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29108081Becker I, Wallmann-Sperlich B, Rupp R, Bucksch J. [Workplace Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Aug;81(8-09):606-614. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112746. Epub 2017 Nov 6. German.
- BackgroundBrayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311. doi:10.1037/h0055617
- Background: PubMed 27940181Buman MP, Mullane SL, Toledo MJ, Rydell SA, Gaesser GA, Crespo NC, Hannan P, Feltes L, Vuong B, Pereira MA. An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 22227284Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Chey T, Bauman AE. Cross-sectional associations between occupational and leisure-time sitting, physical activity and obesity in working adults. Prev Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;54(3-4):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
- Background: PubMed 21647427Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, Martin CK, Blair SN, Bouchard C. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019657. Epub 2011 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 26683116Commissaris DACM, Huysmans MA, Mathiassen SE, Srinivasan D, Koppes LLJ, Hendriksen IJM. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase physical activity during productive work: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):181-191. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3544. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
- BackgroundCrawford, J. O. (2007). The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 57(4), 300-301. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm036
- Background: PubMed 29026727Daneshmandi H, Choobineh A, Ghaem H, Karimi M. Adverse Effects of Prolonged Sitting Behavior on the General Health of Office Workers. J Lifestyle Med. 2017 Jul;7(2):69-75. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2017.7.2.69. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
- BackgroundDuncan, M. D., Kazi, A., & Haslam, C. O. (2013/05/16/May 16-19, 2013). Sedentary behaviour at work: The impact on employee health.
- Background: PubMed 22682948Dunstan DW, Howard B, Healy GN, Owen N. Too much sitting--a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
- Background: PubMed 27454397Foley B, Engelen L, Gale J, Bauman A, Mackey M. Sedentary Behavior and Musculoskeletal Discomfort Are Reduced When Office Workers Trial an Activity-Based Work Environment. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;58(9):924-31. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000828.
- Background: PubMed 25222816Gibbs BB, Hergenroeder AL, Katzmarzyk PT, Lee IM, Jakicic JM. Definition, measurement, and health risks associated with sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jun;47(6):1295-300. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000517.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sedentary Behavior
Active, not recruiting
A Mobile App to Improve 24-Hour Movement Guideline Adherence in Preschoolers
Healthy, 24-Hour Movement Guidelines
Recruiting
Acute Endocrine Responses to Aerobic and Anaerobic Exercise in Sedentary Women: A Comparative Analysis of Thyroid Hormones and Cortisol
Sedentary Behavior, Acute Exercise
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Exercise Types on Irisin, Leptin, and Ghrelin Levels in Sedentary Women
Exercise Physiology, Metabolic Hormones
Not yet recruiting
Wearable Ankle Power Training (WearAPT) for Enhanced Mobility in Aging
Sedentary Behavior / Physical Inactivity, Aged
Active, not recruiting
Promoting Physical Activity in Older Hispanic/Latino(a) Adults
Sedentary Behavior, Physical Inactivity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hildemar Dos Santos, MD, DrPH principal investigator
Loma Linda University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Electronic Prompt for Interrupting Sitting Time in people with Sedentary Behavior, run by Loma Linda University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sitting Time (time frame: Change measure: baseline and 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04042610, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2023.