AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast Ductal Carcinoma in SituPhase 3NCT04046159

Radiotherapy Versus Low-Dose Tamoxifen Following Breast Conserving Surgery for Low-Risk Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

A Phase 3 study testing Low-dose tamoxifen and Whole breast radiotherapy in people with Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although the results obtained from ECOG E5194 cohort 1 (criteria: mammographically detected low- or intermediate-grade DCIS, measuring less than 2.5 cm with margins ≥ 3 mm) and RTOG 9804 trial (the same enrolled clinicopathological features to cohort 1 of ECOG E5194 trial) demonstrated that the 7-year ipsilateral… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
What is being tested?
Low-dose tamoxifen and Whole breast radiotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
810 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
30 Apr 2019to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women
  • New histologically diagnosed breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
  • Age ≥ 40 years
  • Low risks of BRCA (breast cancer)1 and BRCA2: Manchester Score < 10
  • The DCIS must be detected by mammogram and must be unicentric, and no-mass lesion.
  • Status post breast conserving surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Pathological characteristics (all characteristics) 7.1 Lesions ≤ 2.5 cm in greatest dimension on pathologic specimen (use the largest measured size from the pathology report to obtain the required measurement of ≤ 2.5 cm).
  • 7.2 Must be classified as low or intermediate nuclear grade DCIS but without comedo necrosis according to Pathologic Guidelines (section 9.2.2) 7.3 Margins as assessed by the ink method will be 3 mm or greater. 7.4 Must be estrogen receptor (ER)-positive DCIS, ER percentage must be ≥10%
  • Clinically node negative.

Who cannot join

  • Known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
  • Age < 40 years
  • Women whose DCIS is palpable at the time of diagnosis, or multi-centric (mammography), or mass (mammography), or who have bloody nipple discharge.
  • Pathological characteristics 4.1 Lesions measuring greater than 2.5 cm in greatest dimension on pathologic specimen.
  • 4.2.High-grade lesions or low to intermediate grade with comedo necrosis as classified by the Guidelines.
  • 4.3. Margins as assessed by the ink method will be less than 3 mm. 4.4. ER-negative DCIS or ER-positive percentage < 10% in tumor cells
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Post-mastectomy patients
  • Prior diagnosis of neoplasm within 5 years, except cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type 1 (CIN1) or localized non-melanomatous skin cancer.
  • Evidence of clinically significant cardiac disease, as defined by cardiac disease (New York Cardiac disease grade II), history of myocardial infarction, cerebral stroke, unstable arrhythmia, and unstable angina pectoris within 12 months before study entry.
  • Pregnant or lactating status.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chiun-Sheng Huang, MD, PhD, MPH contact

+(886)-2-87339036

huangcs@ntu.edu.tw

Sung-Hsin Kuo, M.D.,Ph.D contact

+886-223123456 ext. 67144

shkuo101@ntu.edu.tw

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 100

    Sung-Hsin Kuo, M.D.,Ph.D., +(886)-223123456 ext. 67144, shkuo101@ntu.edu.tw

    Chiun-Sheng Huang, MD, PhD, MPH

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Radiotherapy Versus Low-Dose Tamoxifen Following Breast Conserving Surgery for Low-Risk and Estrogen Receptor-Positive Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of Breast: an International Open-label Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

Although the results obtained from ECOG E5194 cohort 1 (criteria: mammographically detected low- or intermediate-grade DCIS, measuring less than 2.5 cm with margins ≥ 3 mm) and RTOG 9804 trial (the same enrolled clinicopathological features to cohort 1 of ECOG E5194 trial) demonstrated that the 7-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) ranged from 5.6% to 10.5% for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients, the aforementioned two studies included a proportional patients who had young age and negative estrogen receptor (ER) status tumor. Previous studies and our studies revealed that age < 40 years and ER-negative status in tumor were independent prognostic factor for recurrence of breast DCIS irrespective of tumor characteristics. The UK/ANZ randomized trial, enrolling high-risk and low-risk clinicopathologic features of DCIS, demonstrated that a benefit of tamoxifen in terms of reducing the IBTR is observed in the BCS alone group but not found in the BCS plus RT group. A recent published randomized trial showed that tamoxifen at the dose of 5 mg/day for 3 years.

Based on the aforementioned results, we hypothesized that the administration of tamoxifen is not inferior than the prescription of RT in terms of reducing the IBTR for DCIS patients who had age more than 40 years, the pathological features meeting the ECOG E5194 cohort 1 criteria, and positive ER status in tumors. To approve the hypothesis, we will design a randomized non-inferiority trial to assess whether the effect of administration of tamoxfien (5 mg per day) for 10 years following BCS is not inferior in terms of reducing IBTR when comparing RT following BCS for patients who had low-risk clinicopathologic features (age more than 40 years and ECOG E5194 cohort 1 criteria) and positive-ER status of breast DCIS.

Read the detailed description

[Background] Radiotherapy (RT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) is commonly used in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of breast to decrease local recurrence. Previous retrospective studies suggested that a substantial proportional of low-risk DCIS patients who underwent BCS alone will not develop a subsequent invasive breast cancer over time.

To further identify a population of patients with low-risk DCIS in whom adjuvant RT could be safely omitted, two prospective trials and one randomized trial have been published the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate in patients with low-risk breast DCIS, including smaller size, larger margin width, and lower grade. The 5-year IBTR rate in Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Institute (low to intermediate grade disease and a margin width of 10 mm) was 12% for breast DCIS patients who underwent BCS alone. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) E5194 reported a 12-year IBTR rate of 14.4% (7-year IBTR rate, 10.5%) for patients with low-risk DCIS (cohort 1 criteria: mammographically detected low- or intermediate-grade DCIS, measuring less than 2.5 cm with margins ≥ 3 mm) who underwent BCS alone. The risk for DCIS and invasive cancer increased steadily over time, without any plateau.

Another randomized trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9804, showed the IBTR rates from that at 5 years (3.5%) to that at 7 years (6.7%) in post-BCS patients with low-risk breast DCIS (similar criteria of ECOG E5194 trial, cohort 1) who did not receive RT. In contrast, the 7-year IBTR rate was low (0.9%) for patients who underwent BCS and received RT in RTOG 9804 trial. Our retrospective study showed that the 7-year IBTR rate was 5.6% in breast DCIS patients who had criteria of cohort 1 of ECOG E5194 trial and underwent BCS alone. Taken together, two prospective clinical trials and our retrospective study disclosed that the 7-year IBTR for BCS alone group (no RT) ranged from 5.6% to 10.5%, even if patients whose clinicopathologic features met the criteria of ECOG E5194 cohort 1. These results suggest that RT following BCS is indicated for these patients who have low-risk breast DCIS.

Another randomized trial, UK/ANZ [UK, Australia, and New Zealand] DCIS trial], including high-risk and low-risk breast DCIS patients, demonstrated a significant benefit of tamoxifen (20 mg every day for 5 years) in terms of reducing the ipsilateral (Hazard ratio [HR], 0·77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0·59-0·98; P = 0·04) and contralateral breast events (HR, 0·27; 95% CI, 0·12-0·59; P = 0·001) in the BCS alone group, and this benefit of tamoxifen was not observed in the BCS plus RT group for ipsilateral events (HR, 0·93; 95%, 0·50-1·75; P = 0·8). These findings suggest that even if patients with low-risk clinicopatholgical features of DCIS (relatively low-risk of IBTR), the addition of tamoxifen in patients who had received RT may not reduce IBTR than those receiving RT alone. However, the estrogen receptor (ER) status among the patients with DCIS enrolled in the aforementioned three prospective randomized trials (ECOG E5194 trial, RT9804 trial, and UK/ANZ trial) was initially unknown.

In a retrospective analysis of the relationship between ER status and response to tamoxifen in 732 patients (41%) who comprised the original NSABP B-24 population (76% positive for ER), the significant effect of tamoxifen in reducing ipsilateral and contralateral breast events was demonstrated in ER-positive DCIS but not in ER-negative tumors. Our retrospective study also showed that age < 40 years and negative ER status in tumors were closely associated with the higher IBTR rate. Among our patients with cohort 1 criteria of ECOG E519 study, the 7-year IBTR rate for ER-positive group and ER-negative group was 5.0% and 8.0%, respectively.

[Rationale] Although the results obtained from ECOG E5194 (cohort 1) and RTOG 9804 trial (the same enrolled clinicopathological features to cohort 1 of ECOG E5194 trial) demonstrated that the 7-year IBTR ranged from 5.6% to 10.5% for low-risk DCIS patients, the aforementioned two studies included a proportional patients who had young age and negative ER status tumor. Previous studies and our studies revealed that age < 40 years and ER-negative status in tumor were independent prognostic factor for recurrence of breast DCIS irrespective of tumor characteristics.

The UK/ANZ randomized trial, enrolling high-risk and low-risk clinicopathologic features of DCIS, demonstrated that a benefit of tamoxifen in terms of reducing the IBTR is observed in the BCS alone group but not found in the BCS plus RT group. In a recent published data of a randomized trial of comparing low-dose tamoxifen (5 mg QD) for 3 years with placebo in prevention of recurrence of women with hormone-positive DCIS or lobular carcinoma in situ, low-dose tamoxifen was demonstrated to significantly decrease local recurrence when compared with placebo arm. These findings indicate that tamoxifen at the dose of 5 mg/day can decrease the incidence of recurrence in women with operated hormone sensitive DCIS with a limited toxicity. However, the effect of the administration of low-dose tamoxifen is similar to the RT effect in terms of reducing IBTR for patients who had the criteria of ECOG E5194 cohort 1 and positive ER status remains unclear.

[Hypotheses] Based on the aforementioned results, we hypothesized that the administration of tamoxifen is not inferior than the prescription of RT in terms of reducing the IBTR for DCIS patients who had age more than 40 years, the pathological features meeting the ECOG E5194 cohort 1 criteria, and positive ER status in tumors.

To approve the hypothesis, we will design a randomized non-inferiority trial to assess whether the effect of administration of tamoxfien (5 mg per day) for 10 years following BCS is not inferior in terms of reducing IBTR when comparing RT following BCS for patients who had low-risk clinicopathologic features and positive-ER status of breast DCIS.

[Study Design] We will design a randomized non-inferiority trial to assess whether the effect of administration of tamoxfien (5 mg) for 10 years following BCS is not inferior in terms of reducing IBTR when comparing RT (in terms of 50 Gy in 25 fractions or 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions) following BCS for patients who had age more than and equal 40 years, low-risk clinicopathological features (ECOG E5194 cohort 1 criteria), and positive-ER status of breast DCIS.

Being tested
Low-dose tamoxifen, Whole breast radiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low-dose tamoxifenDrug

    Also called LDT

    Low-dose tamoxifen is not inferior than radiotherapy in decreasing ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and side effect

  • Whole breast radiotherapyRadiation

    Also called WBRT

    Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and side effect

Study groups in NCT04046159
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiotherapy armActive comparatorRadiotherapy for ipsilateral whole breast with 50 Gy/25 fractions or 40.05 Gy/15 fractions
Receives: Radiation: Whole breast radiotherapy
Tamoxifen armExperimentalTamoxifen 5 mg QD for 10 years
Receives: Drug: Low-dose tamoxifen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Breast tumor recurrence

    Ispilateral, regional recurrence, contralateral recurrence, and distant recurrence [DCIS or invasive cancer event]

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The overall survival

    Overall survival

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Adverse effects

    Adverse effects of radiotherapy and tamoxifen

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2019
  2. Study start30 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Non-inferiority trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
810 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04046159
Sponsor's protocol ID
201902048MINC
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
7 Jul 2019
Last updated
6 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Share participant data

Publications

  • Kuo SH, Tseng LM, Chen ST, Sagara Y, Chang YC, Yeh HT, Kuo YL, Hung CC, Lu TP, Lee YH, Toi M, Huang CS. Radiotherapy versus low-dose tamoxifen following breast-conserving surgery for low-risk and estrogen receptor-positive breast ductal carcinoma in situ: an international open-label randomized non-inferiority trial (TBCC-ARO DCIS Trial). BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 14;23(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11291-6.

    PubMed 37710198

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Low-dose tamoxifen and Whole breast radiotherapy in people with Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chiun-Sheng Huang, MD, PhD, MPH (+(886)-2-87339036, huangcs@ntu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Breast tumor recurrence (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04046159, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in