AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic NeoplasmsNCT04053998

Benchmarking Outcomes in Pancreatic Surgery - WhippleBenchmarks.Org

An observational study of Pancreatic Neoplasms and Pancreaticoduodenectomy, run by Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The WhippleBenchmark 2 Collaborative study aims at defining benchmark criteria for best achievable outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreaticoduodenectomy
What is being tested?
Pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
1,462 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
9 Aug 2019to 20 Feb 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with pancreatic malignancy that underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults ≥ 18 years
  • Resectable malignant or benign diseases (i.e. all indications)
  • Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (all techniques allowed) with concurrent portal vein resection

Who cannot join

  • Patients < 18 years
  • Pancreatic resections other than pancreaticoduodenectomy and portal vein resection
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy with arterial reconstruction
  • Laparoscopic or robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Spain1 site
  • Parc de Salut Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom1 site
  • Royal Free Hospital

    London, NW3 2QG

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Benchmarking Outcomes in Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portal Vein Resection - WhippleBenchmarks.Org

The WhippleBenchmark 2 Collaborative study aims at defining benchmark criteria for best achievable outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with portal vein resection (PVR) is performed for the achievement of complete resection (R0) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic head lesions. Despite most commonly performed in high-volume pancreatic surgery centers by experienced surgeons, best achievable outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality, following such complex procedure remain unknown.

The aim is to conduct a retrospective multicenter cohort study to define benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following duodenopancreatectomy (DP) with portal vein resection (PVR).

Data collection and study design are based on to the well established standardized reporting for benchmarking (Sánchez-Velázquez et. al. Ann Surg, February 2019 ).

This multicenter cohort study will include all consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with portal vein resections from at least 20 high volume centers performing over 50 pancreatic operations per year or 150 cases within 3 years from at least 3 continents over a period of 10 years (2009-2019). Every center included in the study must have a prospective database from which data can be collected as well as previous publications critically reporting on their outcome.

Being tested
Pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection
Keywords
Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Portal vein resection, Benchmarks, Outcomes
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resectionProcedure or surgery

    Pancreatic surgery with vein resection to achieve disease clearance.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality rate

    Death due to any cause postoperatively

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Morbidity rate

    Classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of postoperative complications.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Morbidity assessed according to the Comprehensive Complications Index® (CCI®)

    The Comprehensive Complications Index® (CCI®) reports the cumulative postoperative morbidity, a novel metric which measures the overall morbidity on a scale from 0 (no complications) to 100 (death).

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Pancreatic fistula rates

    reported according to both the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) and Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Hospital readmission rate

    Any hospital readmission to the primary or other peripheral hospitals

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Disease free survival rate

    Disease recurrence

    Measured: Up to 10 years postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2019
  2. Study start9 Aug 2019
  3. Primary completion10 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion20 Feb 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,462 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04053998
Sponsor's protocol ID
WB-08-2019
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
9 Aug 2019
Last updated
20 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The study Investigators will act as the custodians of the data. The data however belong to all collaborators. The study investigators will decide after the publication of the main report about requests from the collaborators regarding secondary analyses and will consider all such requests based on quality and the validity of the proposed project.

Publications

  • Sanchez-Velazquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, Park JS, Hwang HK, Napoli N, Javed AA, Inoue Y, Beghdadi N, Kalisvaart M, Vigia E, Walsh CD, Lovasik B, Busquets J, Scandavini C, Robin F, Yoshitomi H, Mackay TM, Busch OR, Hartog H, Heinrich S, Gleisner A, Perinel J, Passeri M, Lluis N, Raptis DA, Tschuor C, Oberkofler CE, DeOliveira ML, Petrowsky H, Martinie J, Asbun H, Adham M, Schulick R, Lang H, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, Han HS, Miyazaki M, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Sulpice L, Boudjema K, Del Chiaro M, Fabregat J, Kooby DA, Allen P, Lavu H, Yeo CJ, Barroso E, Roberts K, Muiesan P, Sauvanet A, Saiura A, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Boggi U, Yoon DS, Bassi C, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. Benchmarks in Pancreatic Surgery: A Novel Tool for Unbiased Outcome Comparisons. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):211-218. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003223.

    PubMed 30829701
  • Raptis DA, Mettler T, Fischer MA, Patak M, Lesurtel M, Eshmuminov D, de Rougemont O, Graf R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S. Managing multicentre clinical trials with open source. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014 Mar;39(2):67-80. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2013.812647.

    PubMed 24517456
  • Raptis DA, Sanchez-Velazquez P, Machairas N, Sauvanet A, Rueda de Leon A, Oba A, Groot Koerkamp B, Lovasik B, Chan C, Yeo CJ, Bassi C, Ferrone CR, Kooby D, Moskal D, Tamburrino D, Yoon DS, Barroso E, de Santibanes E, Kauffmann EF, Vigia E, Robin F, Casciani F, Burdio F, Belfiori G, Malleo G, Lavu H, Hartog H, Hwang HK, Han HS, Poves I, Rosado ID, Park JS, Lillemoe KD, Roberts KJ, Sulpice L, Besselink MG, Abuawwad M, Del Chiaro M, de Santibanes M, Falconi M, D'Silva M, Silva M, Abu Hilal M, Qadan M, Sell NM, Beghdadi N, Napoli N, Busch ORC, Mazza O, Muiesan P, Muller PC, Ravikumar R, Schulick R, Powell-Brett S, Abbas SH, Mackay TM, Stoop TF, Gallagher TK, Boggi U, van Eijck C, Clavien PA, Conlon KCP, Fusai GK. Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portomesenteric Venous Resection. Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):731-737. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004267.

    PubMed 32889866

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pancreatic Neoplasms and Pancreaticoduodenectomy, run by Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Spain, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality rate (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04053998, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in