Acute Heart FailurePhase 4SEEQUOIA-AHFNCT04062760
Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential Oral dIuretic Nephron blockAde In Acute Heart Failure
A Phase 4 study testing Standard diuretic therapy and Early sequential nephron blockade in people with Acute Heart Failure, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The SEEQUOIA-AHF (Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential oral dIuretic nephron blockAde in Acute Heart Failure) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial assessing the impact of early sequential nephron blockade (i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Standard diuretic therapy and Early sequential nephron blockade
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 206 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2019to 1 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or non-pregnant female patient, 18 years or older
- Patients admitted to Cardiology or Internal Medicine units with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure and congestion: NT-proBNP > 1,000 pg/ml or BNP >250 pg/ml, dyspnea and at least two of the following clinical signs: 2+ pitting edema, pulmonary edema/pleural effusions at chest x-ray or US body weight increase above usual > 5% over the last 4 weeks
- Clinically stable patients that can be switched to oral diuretic therapy after 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission
- Patients capable to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Serum creatinine levels > 3.5 mg per deciliter at admission to the hospital or usual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 by the MDRD or CKD-EPI formula
- Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg at time of enrollment and/or hemodynamic instability severe enough to require intravenous inotropes, intravenous vasodilators, or both
- Severe arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability or DC shock occurred prior to randomization
- Ascertained acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or ACS occurred within the last 4 weeks
- Hematocrit > 45%
- Use of iodinated radio contrast material occurred in the last 72 hours
Show all 16Show fewer
- Current mechanical ventilator support
- Previous solid organ transplant
- Primary hypertrophic or infiltrative cardiomyopathy, active myocarditis, constrictive pericarditis or cardiac tamponade, severe valvular stenosis
- Complex congenital heart disease
- Liver disease (serum ALT or AST > 4, and/or total serum bilirubin > 3)
- Known bilateral renal artery stenosis
- Active sepsis or ongoing systemic infection
- Active gastrointestinal tract bleeding
- Enrollment in another clinical trial
- Locally advanced or metastatic cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Parma, PR, 43126
Giuseppe Regolisti, MD, +39 348 4450210, giuregolisti@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential Oral dIuretic Nephron blockAde In Acute Heart Failure (SEEQUOIA-AHF)
The SEEQUOIA-AHF (Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential oral dIuretic nephron blockAde in Acute Heart Failure) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial assessing the impact of early sequential nephron blockade (i.e. a regimen based on the combination of four oral diuretics with different sites of action along the nephron at low doses) compared to a conventional approach with a high-dose loop diuretic in the treatment of congestion in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF).
In this study, after 24-72 hours of high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, patients admitted with AHF will be randomized to open-label oral treatment with either low-dose sequential nephron blockade or high-dose furosemide for 96 hours.
The primary end-point will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since randomization. Secondary endpoints will include clinical (e.g., total change in body weight during hospitalization, change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization, 30-day readmission rate) and laboratory (e.g., change in BNP or NT-proBNP at discharge vs randomization) parameters, and safety (e.g., change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus randomization and up to 30 days from discharge) issues.
Read the detailed description
The SEEQUOIA-AHF trial is aimed at ascertaining if the early, oral administration of a combination of four diuretics with different sites of action along sequential nephron segments (i.e., sequential nephron blockade: proximal tubule, loop of Henle, distal tubule, cortical collecting duct) may achieve greater decrease in body weight and lower increase in serum creatinine values as compared with standard of care, i.e. a conventional diuretic therapy regimen based on high-dose oral furosemide. To assess the efficacy and safety of an early sequential nephron blockade, the study intervention will be initiated 24-72 hours after an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission to achieve patient stabilization.
After 24-72 hours of algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide, eligible patients will be randomized to either control (furosemide-only) or intervention (early sequential nephron blockade) arm.
All patients will be put on a low sodium diet (< 70 mEq/24 hours), and will be allowed a fluid intake of < 1 L/day.
Following randomization patients will be started on oral diuretic therapy according to two different approaches, namely:
- High-dose oral furosemide-only arm A furosemide oral dose equivalent to twice the intravenous dose of the last 24 hours will be given in two daily divided doses. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value Oral or intravenous potassium supplementation (potassium chloride at least 24 mEq/day) will be started if serum potassium value is lower than 4.0 mEq/L
- Early sequential oral diuretic nephron blockade
- Furosemide A furosemide oral dose equivalent to the previous 24-hour intravenous dose will be given in two divided doses
- Metolazone. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
- Acetazolamide. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
- Spironolactone or Potassium Canrenoate. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.
In both arms, if within the first 48 hours since randomization urine output is lower than 1.5 L/day and/or body weight decrease is less than 0.5 Kg/day, the oral dose of furosemide will be doubled, or the patient will be switched to intravenous administration at the discretion of the attending physician. If urinary output exceeds 50 ml/Kg/day current furosemide dose will be halved. Diuretics can be decreased or temporarily discontinued if there is a decrease in systolic blood pressure (> 25% of basal value) or worsening kidney function (WKF, defined as an increase in serum creatinine value ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or 25% from baseline value within 24-48 hours) that is felt as being be due to a transient episode of intravascular volume depletion. After the patient has stabilized, if congestion persists, diuretics will be reinitiated or their doses will be increased until the patient's fluid balance has been optimized. Investigators may opt-out of the treatment algorithm if they feel that it is in the interest of patient care.
The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
According to the data from the study of Grodin et al (J Card Fail 2016; 22:26-32), comparing subjects randomized to stepped-care diuretic treatment in the Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (CARRESS-HF) trial with those developing the cardiorenal syndrome during standard treatment with intravenous furosemide in the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation Acute Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF) trial and the Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE-AHF) trial, the mean difference in body weight obtained with the stepped-care oral approach versus the intravenous approach was -1.2 Kg, with a standard deviation (SD) ranging between 1.5 and 2.4 Kg; the mean difference in serum creatinine was -0.1 mg/dL, with a SD of 0.3 mg/dL. Thus, the investigators estimated that the enrollment of 206 patients would yield a 90% power to detect a 0.5 effect size for either component of the bivariate primary endpoint (1.2/2.4 Kg and 0.15/0.30 mg, respectively) with a two-sided 0.05 alpha level.
- Conditions
- Acute Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Standard diuretic therapy, Early sequential nephron blockade
- Keywords
- Acute Heart Failure, Diuretics, Sequential nephron blockade, Fluid balance, Worsening kidney failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard diuretic therapyDrug
The patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at twice the intravenous dose administered during the past 24 hours. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.
Early sequential nephron blockadeDrug
After 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, the patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving:
- oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at a dose equivalent to that administered intravenously during the past 24 hours
- metolazone at a dose based on serum creatinine value
- acetazolamide at a dose based on serum creatinine value
- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate (unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L); dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard diuretic therapy (SDT) | Active comparator | Furosemide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate Receives: Drug: Standard diuretic therapy |
| Early sequential nephron blockade (ESNB) | Experimental | Furosemide + metolazone + acetazolamide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate Receives: Drug: Early sequential nephron blockade |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Body weight change at 96 hours since randomization
Difference between body weight (in Kg) at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Serum creatinine change at 96 hours since randomization
Difference between the concentration of serum creatinine (in mg/dL) at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Secondary outcomes (30)
Efficacy: Total weight change during hospitalization
Difference between body weight (in Kg) at discharge and the value at admission
Measured: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Percent change in body weight at discharge versus at randomization
Percent change in body weight at discharge relative to the value at randomization
Measured: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization
Difference in dyspnea score (visual analog scale, VAS) at 96 hours since randomization and the score at randomization. For each patient, a plot of the respective VAS score over time will be constructed with points existing for each of the VAS measurements at pre-specified time points (e.g., randomization, 24 hours after randomizatio, etc, through 96 hours after randomization). A straight line will be drawn connecting each of the points showing the trend over time. The area under the entire piecewise line is the response variable. Increasing values indicate worse dyspnea, and viceversa. Range of VAS is approximately 0 to 900 points
Measured: 96 hours since patient randomization
Efficacy: Total equivalent furosemide dose at 96 hours since randomization
Total equivalent furosemide dose administered within the first 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since patient randomization
Efficacy: Proportion of patients requiring an increase in furosemide dose or switching to intravenous infusion within the first 96 hours since randomization
Proportion of patients requiring an increase in furosemide dose or switching to intravenous infusion within the first 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since patient randomization
Efficacy: Change in BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentrations at discharge versus at randomization
Difference between in BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentrations at discharge and values at randomization
Measured: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Percentage of patients with BNP or NT-pro BNP decrease > 30% at discharge versus at randomization
Percentage of patients with BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentration decrease > 30% at discharge relative to the value at randomization
Measured: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Length-of-hospital stay
Duration of patient hospitalization, in days
Measured: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: 30-day readmission rate
Rate of hospital readmission within 30 days since patient discharge
Measured: 30 days since patient discharge
Safety: Change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus at randomization
Difference between serum creatinine value (in mg/dL) at discharge and the value at randomization
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Change in serum creatinine concentration at 30 days since discharge versus at randomization
Difference between serum creatinine concenctration at 30 days since discharge and the value at randomization
Measured: Since patient randomization to 30 days after discharge
Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at 96 hours since randomization
Difference between serum urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at discharge versus at randomization
Difference in serum urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio at discharge and the value at randomization
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at 30 days since discharge versus at randomization
Difference in serum urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio at 30 days since discharge and the value at randomization
Measured: Since patient randomization to 30 days after discharge
Safety: Percentage of patients with WKF at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with worsening kidney function at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with WKF at discharge versus at randomization
Percentage of patients with worsening kidney function at discharge versus at randomization
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Percentage of patients with hyponatremia at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with serum sodium concentration less than 136 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with severe hyponatremia at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with serum sodium concentration lower than 125 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hypernatremia at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with serum sodium concentration higher than 144 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hypokalemia at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with serum potassium concentration lower than 3.5 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hyperkalemia at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with serum potassium concentration higher than 5.5 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with metabolic alkalosis at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with plasma bicarbonate concentration higher than 30 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hypomagnesemia at 96 hours since randomization
Percentage of patients with serum magnesium concentration lower than 1.6 mg/dL at 96 hours since randomization
Measured: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Days with hyponatremia since randomization to discharge
Days with serum sodium concentration less than 136 mEq/L since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with severe hyponatremia since randomization to discharge
Days with serum sodium concentration less than 125 mEq/L since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hypernatremia since randomization to discharge
Days with serum sodium concentration higher than 144 mEq/L since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hypokalemia since randomization to discharge
Days with serum potassium concentration lower than 3.5 mEq/L since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hyperkalemia since randomization to discharge
Days with serum potassium concentration higher than 5.5 mEq/L since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with metabolic alkalosis since randomization to discharge
Days with plasma bicarbonate concentration higher than 30 mEq/L since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hypomagnesemia since randomization to discharge
Days with serum magnesium concentration lower than 1.6 mg/dL since randomization to discharge
Measured: Up to 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2019
- Study start1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 proportion to treatment with either high-dose oral furosemide or sequential nephron blockade with different classes of diuretics at low doses. The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Parma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Azienda USL di Parma, Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Enrico Fiaccadori, University of Parma
- Investigators
- Enrico Fiaccadori, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Universita degli Studi di ParmaGiuseppe Regolisti, MD, Study director, UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04062760
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SEEQUOIA-AHF
- Acronym
- SEEQUOIA-AHF
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential Oral dIuretic Nephron blockAde In Acute Heart Failure (SEEQUOIA-AHF)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04062760
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SEEQUOIA-AHF / SEEQUOIA-AHF
- Conditions
- Acute Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Acute Heart Failure, Diuretics, Sequential nephron blockade, Fluid balance, Worsening kidney failure
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ParmaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Azienda USL di Parma, Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The SEEQUOIA-AHF (Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential oral dIuretic nephron blockAde in Acute Heart Failure) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial assessing the impact of early sequential nephron blockade (i.e. a regimen based on the combination of four oral diuretics with different sites of action along the nephron at low doses) compared to a conventional approach with a high-dose loop diuretic in the treatment of congestion in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF).
In this study, after 24-72 hours of high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, patients admitted with AHF will be randomized to open-label oral treatment with either low-dose sequential nephron blockade or high-dose furosemide for 96 hours.
The primary end-point will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since randomization. Secondary endpoints will include clinical (e.g., total change in body weight during hospitalization, change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization, 30-day readmission rate) and laboratory (e.g., change in BNP or NT-proBNP at discharge vs randomization) parameters, and safety (e.g., change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus randomization and up to 30 days from discharge) issues.
Detailed description
The SEEQUOIA-AHF trial is aimed at ascertaining if the early, oral administration of a combination of four diuretics with different sites of action along sequential nephron segments (i.e., sequential nephron blockade: proximal tubule, loop of Henle, distal tubule, cortical collecting duct) may achieve greater decrease in body weight and lower increase in serum creatinine values as compared with standard of care, i.e. a conventional diuretic therapy regimen based on high-dose oral furosemide. To assess the efficacy and safety of an early sequential nephron blockade, the study intervention will be initiated 24-72 hours after an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission to achieve patient stabilization.
After 24-72 hours of algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide, eligible patients will be randomized to either control (furosemide-only) or intervention (early sequential nephron blockade) arm.
All patients will be put on a low sodium diet (< 70 mEq/24 hours), and will be allowed a fluid intake of < 1 L/day.
Following randomization patients will be started on oral diuretic therapy according to two different approaches, namely:
- High-dose oral furosemide-only arm A furosemide oral dose equivalent to twice the intravenous dose of the last 24 hours will be given in two daily divided doses. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value Oral or intravenous potassium supplementation (potassium chloride at least 24 mEq/day) will be started if serum potassium value is lower than 4.0 mEq/L
- Early sequential oral diuretic nephron blockade
- Furosemide A furosemide oral dose equivalent to the previous 24-hour intravenous dose will be given in two divided doses
- Metolazone. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
- Acetazolamide. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
- Spironolactone or Potassium Canrenoate. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.
In both arms, if within the first 48 hours since randomization urine output is lower than 1.5 L/day and/or body weight decrease is less than 0.5 Kg/day, the oral dose of furosemide will be doubled, or the patient will be switched to intravenous administration at the discretion of the attending physician. If urinary output exceeds 50 ml/Kg/day current furosemide dose will be halved. Diuretics can be decreased or temporarily discontinued if there is a decrease in systolic blood pressure (> 25% of basal value) or worsening kidney function (WKF, defined as an increase in serum creatinine value ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or 25% from baseline value within 24-48 hours) that is felt as being be due to a transient episode of intravascular volume depletion. After the patient has stabilized, if congestion persists, diuretics will be reinitiated or their doses will be increased until the patient's fluid balance has been optimized. Investigators may opt-out of the treatment algorithm if they feel that it is in the interest of patient care.
The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
According to the data from the study of Grodin et al (J Card Fail 2016; 22:26-32), comparing subjects randomized to stepped-care diuretic treatment in the Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (CARRESS-HF) trial with those developing the cardiorenal syndrome during standard treatment with intravenous furosemide in the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation Acute Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF) trial and the Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE-AHF) trial, the mean difference in body weight obtained with the stepped-care oral approach versus the intravenous approach was -1.2 Kg, with a standard deviation (SD) ranging between 1.5 and 2.4 Kg; the mean difference in serum creatinine was -0.1 mg/dL, with a SD of 0.3 mg/dL. Thus, the investigators estimated that the enrollment of 206 patients would yield a 90% power to detect a 0.5 effect size for either component of the bivariate primary endpoint (1.2/2.4 Kg and 0.15/0.30 mg, respectively) with a two-sided 0.05 alpha level.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 proportion to treatment with either high-dose oral furosemide or sequential nephron blockade with different classes of diuretics at low doses. The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard diuretic therapy (SDT) | Active comparator | Drug: Standard diuretic therapyFurosemide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate |
| Early sequential nephron blockade (ESNB) | Experimental | Drug: Early sequential nephron blockadeFurosemide + metolazone + acetazolamide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or non-pregnant female patient, 18 years or older
- Patients admitted to Cardiology or Internal Medicine units with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure and congestion: NT-proBNP > 1,000 pg/ml or BNP >250 pg/ml, dyspnea and at least two of the following clinical signs: 2+ pitting edema, pulmonary edema/pleural effusions at chest x-ray or US body weight increase above usual > 5% over the last 4 weeks
- Clinically stable patients that can be switched to oral diuretic therapy after 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission
- Patients capable to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Serum creatinine levels > 3.5 mg per deciliter at admission to the hospital or usual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 by the MDRD or CKD-EPI formula
- Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg at time of enrollment and/or hemodynamic instability severe enough to require intravenous inotropes, intravenous vasodilators, or both
- Severe arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability or DC shock occurred prior to randomization
- Ascertained acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or ACS occurred within the last 4 weeks
- Hematocrit > 45%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard diuretic therapyThe patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at twice the intravenous dose administered during the past 24 hours. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value. | Drug | Standard diuretic therapy (SDT) |
| Early sequential nephron blockadeAfter 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, the patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving: 1. oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at a dose equivalent to that administered intravenously during the past 24 hours 2. metolazone at a dose based on serum creatinine value 3. acetazolamide at a dose based on serum creatinine value 4. spironolactone or potassium canrenoate (unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L); dose will be established based on serum creatinine value | Drug | Early sequential nephron blockade (ESNB) |
Primary outcome
Body weight change at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Difference between body weight (in Kg) at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization
Serum creatinine change at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Difference between the concentration of serum creatinine (in mg/dL) at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization
30 secondary outcomes
Efficacy: Total weight change during hospitalization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Percent change in body weight at discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since patient randomization
Efficacy: Total equivalent furosemide dose at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since patient randomization
Efficacy: Proportion of patients requiring an increase in furosemide dose or switching to intravenous infusion within the first 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since patient randomization
Efficacy: Change in BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentrations at discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Percentage of patients with BNP or NT-pro BNP decrease > 30% at discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: Length-of-hospital stay
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Efficacy: 30-day readmission rate
Time frame: 30 days since patient discharge
Safety: Change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Change in serum creatinine concentration at 30 days since discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Since patient randomization to 30 days after discharge
Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at 30 days since discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Since patient randomization to 30 days after discharge
Safety: Percentage of patients with WKF at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with WKF at discharge versus at randomization
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Percentage of patients with hyponatremia at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with severe hyponatremia at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hypernatremia at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hypokalemia at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hyperkalemia at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with metabolic alkalosis at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Percentage of patients with hypomagnesemia at 96 hours since randomization
Time frame: 96 hours since randomization
Safety: Days with hyponatremia since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with severe hyponatremia since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hypernatremia since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hypokalemia since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hyperkalemia since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with metabolic alkalosis since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Safety: Days with hypomagnesemia since randomization to discharge
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiencies
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Early Discharge With Subcutaneous Furosemide Versus Standard Care in Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Enrico Fiaccadori, MD, PhD principal investigator
Universita degli Studi di Parma
Giuseppe Regolisti, MD study director
UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Standard diuretic therapy and Early sequential nephron blockade in people with Acute Heart Failure, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Giuseppe Regolisti, MD (+39 348 4450210, giuregolisti@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Body weight change at 96 hours since randomization (time frame: 96 hours since randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2019.