AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Heart FailurePhase 4SEEQUOIA-AHFNCT04062760

Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential Oral dIuretic Nephron blockAde In Acute Heart Failure

A Phase 4 study testing Standard diuretic therapy and Early sequential nephron blockade in people with Acute Heart Failure, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The SEEQUOIA-AHF (Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential oral dIuretic nephron blockAde in Acute Heart Failure) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial assessing the impact of early sequential nephron blockade (i.e. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Standard diuretic therapy and Early sequential nephron blockade
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
206 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Dec 2019to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or non-pregnant female patient, 18 years or older
  • Patients admitted to Cardiology or Internal Medicine units with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure and congestion: NT-proBNP > 1,000 pg/ml or BNP >250 pg/ml, dyspnea and at least two of the following clinical signs: 2+ pitting edema, pulmonary edema/pleural effusions at chest x-ray or US body weight increase above usual > 5% over the last 4 weeks
  • Clinically stable patients that can be switched to oral diuretic therapy after 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission
  • Patients capable to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Serum creatinine levels > 3.5 mg per deciliter at admission to the hospital or usual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 by the MDRD or CKD-EPI formula
  • Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg at time of enrollment and/or hemodynamic instability severe enough to require intravenous inotropes, intravenous vasodilators, or both
  • Severe arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability or DC shock occurred prior to randomization
  • Ascertained acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or ACS occurred within the last 4 weeks
  • Hematocrit > 45%
  • Use of iodinated radio contrast material occurred in the last 72 hours
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Current mechanical ventilator support
  • Previous solid organ transplant
  • Primary hypertrophic or infiltrative cardiomyopathy, active myocarditis, constrictive pericarditis or cardiac tamponade, severe valvular stenosis
  • Complex congenital heart disease
  • Liver disease (serum ALT or AST > 4, and/or total serum bilirubin > 3)
  • Known bilateral renal artery stenosis
  • Active sepsis or ongoing systemic infection
  • Active gastrointestinal tract bleeding
  • Enrollment in another clinical trial
  • Locally advanced or metastatic cancer

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Giuseppe Regolisti, MD contact

+39 348 4450210

giuregolisti@gmail.com

Enrico Fiaccadori, MD, PhD contact

+39 0521 703336

enrico.fiaccadori@unipr.it

Italy1 site
  • UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma

    Parma, PR, 43126

    Giuseppe Regolisti, MD, +39 348 4450210, giuregolisti@gmail.com

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential Oral dIuretic Nephron blockAde In Acute Heart Failure (SEEQUOIA-AHF)

The SEEQUOIA-AHF (Safety and Efficacy of Early, seQUential oral dIuretic nephron blockAde in Acute Heart Failure) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial assessing the impact of early sequential nephron blockade (i.e. a regimen based on the combination of four oral diuretics with different sites of action along the nephron at low doses) compared to a conventional approach with a high-dose loop diuretic in the treatment of congestion in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF).

In this study, after 24-72 hours of high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, patients admitted with AHF will be randomized to open-label oral treatment with either low-dose sequential nephron blockade or high-dose furosemide for 96 hours.

The primary end-point will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since randomization. Secondary endpoints will include clinical (e.g., total change in body weight during hospitalization, change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization, 30-day readmission rate) and laboratory (e.g., change in BNP or NT-proBNP at discharge vs randomization) parameters, and safety (e.g., change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus randomization and up to 30 days from discharge) issues.

Read the detailed description

The SEEQUOIA-AHF trial is aimed at ascertaining if the early, oral administration of a combination of four diuretics with different sites of action along sequential nephron segments (i.e., sequential nephron blockade: proximal tubule, loop of Henle, distal tubule, cortical collecting duct) may achieve greater decrease in body weight and lower increase in serum creatinine values as compared with standard of care, i.e. a conventional diuretic therapy regimen based on high-dose oral furosemide. To assess the efficacy and safety of an early sequential nephron blockade, the study intervention will be initiated 24-72 hours after an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission to achieve patient stabilization.

After 24-72 hours of algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide, eligible patients will be randomized to either control (furosemide-only) or intervention (early sequential nephron blockade) arm.

All patients will be put on a low sodium diet (< 70 mEq/24 hours), and will be allowed a fluid intake of < 1 L/day.

Following randomization patients will be started on oral diuretic therapy according to two different approaches, namely:

  1. High-dose oral furosemide-only arm A furosemide oral dose equivalent to twice the intravenous dose of the last 24 hours will be given in two daily divided doses. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value Oral or intravenous potassium supplementation (potassium chloride at least 24 mEq/day) will be started if serum potassium value is lower than 4.0 mEq/L
  2. Early sequential oral diuretic nephron blockade
  3. Furosemide A furosemide oral dose equivalent to the previous 24-hour intravenous dose will be given in two divided doses
  4. Metolazone. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
  5. Acetazolamide. Dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
  6. Spironolactone or Potassium Canrenoate. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5.0 mEq/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.

In both arms, if within the first 48 hours since randomization urine output is lower than 1.5 L/day and/or body weight decrease is less than 0.5 Kg/day, the oral dose of furosemide will be doubled, or the patient will be switched to intravenous administration at the discretion of the attending physician. If urinary output exceeds 50 ml/Kg/day current furosemide dose will be halved. Diuretics can be decreased or temporarily discontinued if there is a decrease in systolic blood pressure (> 25% of basal value) or worsening kidney function (WKF, defined as an increase in serum creatinine value ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or 25% from baseline value within 24-48 hours) that is felt as being be due to a transient episode of intravascular volume depletion. After the patient has stabilized, if congestion persists, diuretics will be reinitiated or their doses will be increased until the patient's fluid balance has been optimized. Investigators may opt-out of the treatment algorithm if they feel that it is in the interest of patient care.

The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.

According to the data from the study of Grodin et al (J Card Fail 2016; 22:26-32), comparing subjects randomized to stepped-care diuretic treatment in the Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (CARRESS-HF) trial with those developing the cardiorenal syndrome during standard treatment with intravenous furosemide in the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation Acute Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF) trial and the Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE-AHF) trial, the mean difference in body weight obtained with the stepped-care oral approach versus the intravenous approach was -1.2 Kg, with a standard deviation (SD) ranging between 1.5 and 2.4 Kg; the mean difference in serum creatinine was -0.1 mg/dL, with a SD of 0.3 mg/dL. Thus, the investigators estimated that the enrollment of 206 patients would yield a 90% power to detect a 0.5 effect size for either component of the bivariate primary endpoint (1.2/2.4 Kg and 0.15/0.30 mg, respectively) with a two-sided 0.05 alpha level.

Being tested
Standard diuretic therapy, Early sequential nephron blockade
Keywords
Acute Heart Failure, Diuretics, Sequential nephron blockade, Fluid balance, Worsening kidney failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard diuretic therapyDrug

    The patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at twice the intravenous dose administered during the past 24 hours. Unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L, oral spironolactone or potassium canrenoate will be added; dose will be established based on serum creatinine value.

  • Early sequential nephron blockadeDrug

    After 24-72 hours of an algorithm-based treatment with high-dose intravenous furosemide started at the time of hospital admission, the patients in this arm will be randomized to receiving:

    1. oral furosemide in 2 daily divided doses at a dose equivalent to that administered intravenously during the past 24 hours
    2. metolazone at a dose based on serum creatinine value
    3. acetazolamide at a dose based on serum creatinine value
    4. spironolactone or potassium canrenoate (unless serum potassium value is higher than 5 mmol/L); dose will be established based on serum creatinine value
Study groups in NCT04062760
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard diuretic therapy (SDT)Active comparatorFurosemide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate
Receives: Drug: Standard diuretic therapy
Early sequential nephron blockade (ESNB)ExperimentalFurosemide + metolazone + acetazolamide +/- spironolactone or potassium canrenoate
Receives: Drug: Early sequential nephron blockade

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Body weight change at 96 hours since randomization

    Difference between body weight (in Kg) at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  2. Serum creatinine change at 96 hours since randomization

    Difference between the concentration of serum creatinine (in mg/dL) at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

Secondary outcomes (30)
  1. Efficacy: Total weight change during hospitalization

    Difference between body weight (in Kg) at discharge and the value at admission

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  2. Efficacy: Percent change in body weight at discharge versus at randomization

    Percent change in body weight at discharge relative to the value at randomization

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  3. Efficacy: Change in dyspnea score at 96 hours since randomization

    Difference in dyspnea score (visual analog scale, VAS) at 96 hours since randomization and the score at randomization. For each patient, a plot of the respective VAS score over time will be constructed with points existing for each of the VAS measurements at pre-specified time points (e.g., randomization, 24 hours after randomizatio, etc, through 96 hours after randomization). A straight line will be drawn connecting each of the points showing the trend over time. The area under the entire piecewise line is the response variable. Increasing values indicate worse dyspnea, and viceversa. Range of VAS is approximately 0 to 900 points

    Measured: 96 hours since patient randomization

  4. Efficacy: Total equivalent furosemide dose at 96 hours since randomization

    Total equivalent furosemide dose administered within the first 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since patient randomization

  5. Efficacy: Proportion of patients requiring an increase in furosemide dose or switching to intravenous infusion within the first 96 hours since randomization

    Proportion of patients requiring an increase in furosemide dose or switching to intravenous infusion within the first 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since patient randomization

  6. Efficacy: Change in BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentrations at discharge versus at randomization

    Difference between in BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentrations at discharge and values at randomization

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  7. Efficacy: Percentage of patients with BNP or NT-pro BNP decrease > 30% at discharge versus at randomization

    Percentage of patients with BNP or NT-pro BNP serum concentration decrease > 30% at discharge relative to the value at randomization

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  8. Efficacy: Length-of-hospital stay

    Duration of patient hospitalization, in days

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  9. Efficacy: 30-day readmission rate

    Rate of hospital readmission within 30 days since patient discharge

    Measured: 30 days since patient discharge

  10. Safety: Change in serum creatinine value at discharge versus at randomization

    Difference between serum creatinine value (in mg/dL) at discharge and the value at randomization

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  11. Safety: Change in serum creatinine concentration at 30 days since discharge versus at randomization

    Difference between serum creatinine concenctration at 30 days since discharge and the value at randomization

    Measured: Since patient randomization to 30 days after discharge

  12. Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at 96 hours since randomization

    Difference between serum urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio at 96 hours since randomization and the value at randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  13. Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at discharge versus at randomization

    Difference in serum urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio at discharge and the value at randomization

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  14. Safety: Change in BUN/creatinine ratio at 30 days since discharge versus at randomization

    Difference in serum urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio at 30 days since discharge and the value at randomization

    Measured: Since patient randomization to 30 days after discharge

  15. Safety: Percentage of patients with WKF at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with worsening kidney function at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  16. Safety: Percentage of patients with WKF at discharge versus at randomization

    Percentage of patients with worsening kidney function at discharge versus at randomization

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  17. Safety: Percentage of patients with hyponatremia at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with serum sodium concentration less than 136 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  18. Safety: Percentage of patients with severe hyponatremia at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with serum sodium concentration lower than 125 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  19. Safety: Percentage of patients with hypernatremia at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with serum sodium concentration higher than 144 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  20. Safety: Percentage of patients with hypokalemia at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with serum potassium concentration lower than 3.5 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  21. Safety: Percentage of patients with hyperkalemia at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with serum potassium concentration higher than 5.5 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  22. Safety: Percentage of patients with metabolic alkalosis at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with plasma bicarbonate concentration higher than 30 mEq/L at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  23. Safety: Percentage of patients with hypomagnesemia at 96 hours since randomization

    Percentage of patients with serum magnesium concentration lower than 1.6 mg/dL at 96 hours since randomization

    Measured: 96 hours since randomization

  24. Safety: Days with hyponatremia since randomization to discharge

    Days with serum sodium concentration less than 136 mEq/L since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  25. Safety: Days with severe hyponatremia since randomization to discharge

    Days with serum sodium concentration less than 125 mEq/L since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  26. Safety: Days with hypernatremia since randomization to discharge

    Days with serum sodium concentration higher than 144 mEq/L since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  27. Safety: Days with hypokalemia since randomization to discharge

    Days with serum potassium concentration lower than 3.5 mEq/L since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  28. Safety: Days with hyperkalemia since randomization to discharge

    Days with serum potassium concentration higher than 5.5 mEq/L since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  29. Safety: Days with metabolic alkalosis since randomization to discharge

    Days with plasma bicarbonate concentration higher than 30 mEq/L since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  30. Safety: Days with hypomagnesemia since randomization to discharge

    Days with serum magnesium concentration lower than 1.6 mg/dL since randomization to discharge

    Measured: Up to 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2019
  2. Study start1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 proportion to treatment with either high-dose oral furosemide or sequential nephron blockade with different classes of diuretics at low doses. The primary endpoint will be the bivariate change in body weight and serum creatinine value at 96 hours since patient randomization.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
206 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04062760
Sponsor's protocol ID
SEEQUOIA-AHF
Acronym
SEEQUOIA-AHF
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
16 Aug 2019
Last updated
20 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Standard diuretic therapy and Early sequential nephron blockade in people with Acute Heart Failure, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Giuseppe Regolisti, MD (+39 348 4450210, giuregolisti@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Body weight change at 96 hours since randomization (time frame: 96 hours since randomization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in