AchalasiaARATNCT04065516
ARAT for Reflux Disease After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia
A study testing ARAT technique in people with Achalasia and Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
The peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease compared with Heller's myotomy. Remodeling of the esophagogastric junction with hybrid argon plasma could decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux
- What is being tested?
- ARAT technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 3 Jul 2019to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Achalasia type I, II, III
- Treatment with POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy)
- Abnormal acid exposure (>6%) in the 24h-pHmetry test more than three months after the procedure
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not accept the treatment
- Previous antireflux surgery
- Previous Heller's Myotomy
- Hiatal hernia greater than 3 centimeters
- Hill's Classification Grade IV
- Pregnancy
- Patients with any contraindication for an endoscopy
- Patients with esophageal or gastric varices
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Mexico1 site
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI Hospital de Especialidades
Mexico City, Mexico City, 06700
About this study
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Antireflux Ablation Therapy (ARAT) at Esophagogastric Junction in Patients With Reflux Disease After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in Achalasia
The peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease compared with Heller's myotomy. Remodeling of the esophagogastric junction with hybrid argon plasma could decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus.
Read the detailed description
Achalasia is the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax in the context of dysfunction of esophageal peristalsis. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia has an efficacy above 90%, being comparable with Heller's myotomy. The treatment of achalasia by peroral endoscopic myotomy is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, compared with alternative therapies such as Heller's myotomy or pneumatic dilatation. Hybrid argon plasma at the level of the esophagogastric junction could generate remodeling of this region generating a partial stenosis and thereby decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus.
A clinical trial will be carried out, including all patients with achalasia, treated by peroral myotomy older than 18 years old, with abnormal acid exposure in the pHmetry test 3 months or more after treatment, who accept the management of ablation with hybrid argon plasma. To whom the ablation will be performed with Hybrid Argon Plasma and its effectiveness will be evaluated by clinical questionnaires, endoscopy and pHmetry measurement at the beginning, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure.
Demographic and clinical data will be recorded in a data collection sheet, detailing the reflux questionnaire(GERDQ), Eckardt score, endoscopic findings of esophagitis according to Los Angeles classification and abnormal acid exposure in each evaluation. The data will be condensed into a database for subsequent statistical analysis and publication of results.
- Conditions
- Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Being tested
- ARAT technique
- Keywords
- Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Argon Plasma Coagulation, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ARAT techniqueProcedure or surgery
After an initial endoscopic evaluation, ARAT technique will be performed with marking, submucosal elevation at esophagogastric junction and then ablation with 100-120w of 270-300 degrees at esophagogastric junction, once the application of the therapy is performed mucosal lavage and immersion technique will be made to corroborate integrity and continuity of the gastrointestinal tract and rule out immediate complications.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Argon Plasma Coagulation of the gastroesophageal junction | Experimental | Participants with abnormal acid exposure after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia, will be treated by ablation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma coagulation Receives: Procedure: ARAT technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A change in erosive esophagitis grade assessed by upper endoscopy after ARAT
Upper endoscopy is going to be used to measure the erosive esophagitis grade using the Los Angeles Esophagitis scale(grade A=mild, Grade B=moderate, Grade C=moderate high and Grade D=severe) after after ARAT
Measured: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT
A change in esophageal acid exposure assessed by pHmetry study after ARAT
A 24-hours pHmetry study is going to be used to measure esophageal acid exposure in esophagus after ARAT. DeMeester Score and the percentage of esophagic acid exposure will be used to assess pathologic reflux (>14.73 and > 6%, respectively)
Measured: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT
A change in clinical symptoms of reflux disease assessed with a gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire after ARAT
The clinical evaluation of reflux disease is going to be assessed by the use of a clinical gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) after ARAT. Reflux disease was considered positive when >4 points is observed
Measured: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2019
- Study start3 Jul 2019
- Primary completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AchalasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- A clinical trial will be carried out, including all patients with achalasia, treated by peroral myotomy older than 18 years old, with abnormal acid exposure in the pHmetry test 3 months or more after treatment, who accept the management of ablation with hybrid argon plasma. To whom the ablation will be performed with Hybrid Argon Plasma and its effectiveness will be evaluated by clinical questionnaires, endoscopy and pH measurement at the beginning, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Oscar V Hernandez, MD, Principal investigator, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04065516
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R-2019-3601-135
- Acronym
- ARAT
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1841-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2996.
PubMed 25965233Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):83-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60651-0. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PubMed 23871090Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
PubMed 23877351Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016 Dec;48(12):1059-1068. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114426. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PubMed 27617421Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, Patti MG, Ribeiro U Jr, Richter J, Swanstrom L, Tack J, Triadafilopoulos G, Markar SR, Salvador R, Faccio L, Andreollo NA, Cecconello I, Costamagna G, da Rocha JRM, Hungness ES, Fisichella PM, Fuchs KH, Gockel I, Gurski R, Gyawali CP, Herbella FAM, Holloway RH, Hongo M, Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Katzka DA, Dua KS, Liu D, Moonen A, Nasi A, Pasricha PJ, Penagini R, Perretta S, Sallum RAA, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schlottmann F, Sifrim D, Soper N, Tatum RP, Vaezi MF, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom M, Vanuytsel T, Vela MF, Watson DI, Zerbib F, Gittens S, Pontillo C, Vermigli S, Inama D, Low DE. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus. 2018 Sep 1;31(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy071.
PubMed 30169645
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of Antireflux Ablation Therapy (ARAT) at Esophagogastric Junction in Patients With Reflux Disease After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in Achalasia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04065516
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARAT / R-2019-3601-135
- Conditions
- Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Keywords
- Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Argon Plasma Coagulation, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, MexicoOther government
- Study start
- 3 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease compared with Heller's myotomy. Remodeling of the esophagogastric junction with hybrid argon plasma could decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus.
Detailed description
Achalasia is the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax in the context of dysfunction of esophageal peristalsis. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia has an efficacy above 90%, being comparable with Heller's myotomy. The treatment of achalasia by peroral endoscopic myotomy is associated with a higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, compared with alternative therapies such as Heller's myotomy or pneumatic dilatation. Hybrid argon plasma at the level of the esophagogastric junction could generate remodeling of this region generating a partial stenosis and thereby decrease the passage of gastric or gastroduodenal content into the esophagus.
A clinical trial will be carried out, including all patients with achalasia, treated by peroral myotomy older than 18 years old, with abnormal acid exposure in the pHmetry test 3 months or more after treatment, who accept the management of ablation with hybrid argon plasma. To whom the ablation will be performed with Hybrid Argon Plasma and its effectiveness will be evaluated by clinical questionnaires, endoscopy and pHmetry measurement at the beginning, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure.
Demographic and clinical data will be recorded in a data collection sheet, detailing the reflux questionnaire(GERDQ), Eckardt score, endoscopic findings of esophagitis according to Los Angeles classification and abnormal acid exposure in each evaluation. The data will be condensed into a database for subsequent statistical analysis and publication of results.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- A clinical trial will be carried out, including all patients with achalasia, treated by peroral myotomy older than 18 years old, with abnormal acid exposure in the pHmetry test 3 months or more after treatment, who accept the management of ablation with hybrid argon plasma. To whom the ablation will be performed with Hybrid Argon Plasma and its effectiveness will be evaluated by clinical questionnaires, endoscopy and pH measurement at the beginning, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Argon Plasma Coagulation of the gastroesophageal junction | Experimental | Procedure: ARAT techniqueParticipants with abnormal acid exposure after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia, will be treated by ablation of the gastroesophageal junction with hybrid argon plasma coagulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Achalasia type I, II, III
- Treatment with POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy)
- Abnormal acid exposure (>6%) in the 24h-pHmetry test more than three months after the procedure
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients who do not accept the treatment
- Previous antireflux surgery
- Previous Heller's Myotomy
- Hiatal hernia greater than 3 centimeters
- Hill's Classification Grade IV
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ARAT techniqueAfter an initial endoscopic evaluation, ARAT technique will be performed with marking, submucosal elevation at esophagogastric junction and then ablation with 100-120w of 270-300 degrees at esophagogastric junction, once the application of the therapy is performed mucosal lavage and immersion technique will be made to corroborate integrity and continuity of the gastrointestinal tract and rule out immediate complications. | Procedure or surgery | Argon Plasma Coagulation of the gastroesophageal junction |
Primary outcome
A change in erosive esophagitis grade assessed by upper endoscopy after ARAT
Time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT
Upper endoscopy is going to be used to measure the erosive esophagitis grade using the Los Angeles Esophagitis scale(grade A=mild, Grade B=moderate, Grade C=moderate high and Grade D=severe) after after ARAT
A change in esophageal acid exposure assessed by pHmetry study after ARAT
Time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT
A 24-hours pHmetry study is going to be used to measure esophageal acid exposure in esophagus after ARAT. DeMeester Score and the percentage of esophagic acid exposure will be used to assess pathologic reflux (>14.73 and > 6%, respectively)
A change in clinical symptoms of reflux disease assessed with a gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire after ARAT
Time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT
The clinical evaluation of reflux disease is going to be assessed by the use of a clinical gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) after ARAT. Reflux disease was considered positive when >4 points is observed
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 25965233Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1841-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2996.
- Background: PubMed 23871090Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):83-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60651-0. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
- Background: PubMed 23877351Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 27617421Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016 Dec;48(12):1059-1068. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114426. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 30169645Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, Patti MG, Ribeiro U Jr, Richter J, Swanstrom L, Tack J, Triadafilopoulos G, Markar SR, Salvador R, Faccio L, Andreollo NA, Cecconello I, Costamagna G, da Rocha JRM, Hungness ES, Fisichella PM, Fuchs KH, Gockel I, Gurski R, Gyawali CP, Herbella FAM, Holloway RH, Hongo M, Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Katzka DA, Dua KS, Liu D, Moonen A, Nasi A, Pasricha PJ, Penagini R, Perretta S, Sallum RAA, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schlottmann F, Sifrim D, Soper N, Tatum RP, Vaezi MF, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom M, Vanuytsel T, Vela MF, Watson DI, Zerbib F, Gittens S, Pontillo C, Vermigli S, Inama D, Low DE. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus. 2018 Sep 1;31(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy071.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Achalasia
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Full-thickness Versus Progressive Myotomy in Peroral Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy in Achalasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Achalasia Cardia, Achalasia
RecruitingPhase 3
PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA)
Type I Achalasia, Type II Achalasia
RecruitingObservational study
PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA) - Cohort
Type III Achalasia, EGJ Outflow Obstruction With Spastic/Hypercontractile Features
RecruitingPhase 4
VZV in the Enteric Nervous System: Pathogenesis and Consequences
Achalasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Oscar V Hernandez, MD principal investigator
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ARAT technique in people with Achalasia and Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A change in erosive esophagitis grade assessed by upper endoscopy after ARAT (time frame: measures will be performed at 3,6 and 12 months after ARAT). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04065516, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.