Cardiac ArrestNCT04072484
Effectiveness of Chest Compressions Under Mild Hypoxia
A study testing Mild hypoxia in people with Cardiac Arrest and Hypoxia, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of breathing a slightly reduced amount of oxygen will have on a rescuer's ability to provide chest compressions during CPR. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest, Hypoxia
- What is being tested?
- Mild hypoxia
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Aug 2019to 1 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Previous CPR training
- Baseline exercise tolerance of at least 4 metabolic equivalents (METS)
Who cannot join
- Heart disease
- Moderate or severe asthma
- Carpal tunnel syndrome
- Mononucleosis
- Respiratory infections
- Current injury (e.g., sprain, fracture, or dislocation)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Acute or chronic muscle or joint pain
- Recent exposure to high altitude
- Any other condition that limits physical activity
- Any condition that precludes flying on a commercial airline flight
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Chest Compressions Under Mild Hypoxia: Should Rescuers Breathe Supplemental Oxygen on Commercial Flights?
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of breathing a slightly reduced amount of oxygen will have on a rescuer's ability to provide chest compressions during CPR.
Read the detailed description
Cardiac arrest can occur in any setting, even flying on a commercial airliner, and chest compressions are a critical, lifesaving component of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). If a cardiac arrest occurs on board a commercial flight, CPR may be administered by cabin crew members or health care professionals who are passengers and volunteer their assistance. The in-flight environment presents significant challenges, including an unfamiliar environment, an unknown patient, cramped space, and the fact that the pressure altitude in the cabin is between 6,000 feet and 8,000 feet. Even though the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is still 0.21, with decreased pressure the rescuer is effectively breathing a FiO2 of 0.15 and is mildly hypoxic. Although the decreased PaO2 seen in even in healthy passengers is a normal occurrence when flying on a commercial airliner, it may impair the ability of a rescuer to perform adequate CPR. Administering supplemental oxygen to the rescuer may enable provision of more effective chest compressions. In this study, we will measure the quality of chest compressions in normoxic and hypoxic conditions during short simulation scenarios. We hypothesize that chest compressions will be more effective in a normoxic environment.
All tasks are being performed for research purposes. All tasks will take place at the University of Chicago in an empty conference room. After the pre-study screening survey, subjects will be asked to perform chest compressions during a simulated cardiac arrest and will then fill out a survey. Subjects will participate in 2 sessions each; the sessions will be at least one day apart. During each session, the subject will wear a face mask. Subjects will be randomized and blinded to one of two conditions: During CPR, the subject will receive a FiO2 of 0.21 or 0.15 by face mask, which will produce a partial pressure of oxygen similar to, but slightly higher than, that of a commercial airliner. The gas mixture will be delivered by a normobaric hypoxia training device. During the second session, subjects will receive the other oxygen concentration.
Each session will consist of a simulation in which a passenger on an airplane (i.e., a mannequin) has an asystolic cardiac arrest. Participants will provide compression-only CPR. Every 2 minutes, the preceptor will ask the subject stop compressions for 10 seconds for a pulse and rhythm check, similar to actual established protocols. The participant will be wearing a pulse oximeter. The scenario will end after 30 minutes (14 rounds of 2 minutes each of CPR by the subject, consistent with the Universal Guidelines for Termination of CPR), or if the subject becomes fatigued and wishes to stop or is no longer providing high quality chest compressions.
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Hypoxia
- Being tested
- Mild hypoxia
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest, Hypoxia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mild hypoxiaOther
The subject will breathe a gas mixture containing 15% oxygen instead of 21% oxygen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Room Air | No intervention | The reduced oxygen breathing device will be set to deliver room air. (i.e., no oxygen is removed from the gas mixture. The subject will perform CPR while breathing through mask and tubing that is connected to the device. |
| Hypoxia | Experimental | The reduced oxygen breathing device will be set to deliver a gas mixture with15% oxygen. (Equivalent to the partial pressure of oxygen at 2,438 meters.) The subject will perform CPR while breathing through mask and tubing that is connected to the device. Receives: Other: Mild hypoxia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Successful CPR
Number of successful two-minute CPR rounds
Measured: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (3)
Lowest oxygen saturation
Lowest oxygen saturation observed during CPR
Measured: 30 minutes
Survey results - Fatigue
Participants will rate their level of fatigue on a scale from 0 - 100 (100 = maximum fatigue)
Measured: 30 minutes
Survey results - Chest compression
Participants will rate the quality of chest compressions on a scale from 0 - 100 (100 = best chest compressions)
Measured: 30 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2019
- Study start16 Aug 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion1 Oct 2020
Why it stopped: Research at the University of Chicago was halted in March 2020.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Keith J Ruskin, MD, Principal investigator, University of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04072484
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB19-0535
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kleinman ME, Goldberger ZD, Rea T, Swor RA, Bobrow BJ, Brennan EE, Terry M, Hemphill R, Gazmuri RJ, Hazinski MF, Travers AH. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):e7-e13. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000539. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PubMed 29114008Ruskin KJ, Ricaurte EM, Alves PM. Medical Guidelines for Airline Travel: Management of In-Flight Cardiac Arrest. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018 Aug 1;89(8):754-759. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5038.2018.
PubMed 30020062Muhm JM. Predicted arterial oxygenation at commercial aircraft cabin altitudes. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Oct;75(10):905-12.
PubMed 15497372Kwak SJ, Kim YM, Baek HJ, Kim SH, Yim HW. Chest compression quality, exercise intensity, and energy expenditure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using compression-to-ventilation ratios of 15:1 or 30:2 or chest compression only: a randomized, crossover manikin study. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Sep 30;3(3):148-157. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.105. eCollection 2016 Sep.
PubMed 27752633Romer LM, Haverkamp HC, Amann M, Lovering AT, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA. Effect of acute severe hypoxia on peripheral fatigue and endurance capacity in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Jan;292(1):R598-606. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00269.2006. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
PubMed 16959862Drennan IR, Case E, Verbeek PR, Reynolds JC, Goldberger ZD, Jasti J, Charleston M, Herren H, Idris AH, Leslie PR, Austin MA, Xiong Y, Schmicker RH, Morrison LJ; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. A comparison of the universal TOR Guideline to the absence of prehospital ROSC and duration of resuscitation in predicting futility from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017 Feb;111:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
PubMed 27923115Wang JC, Tsai SH, Chen YL, Hsu CW, Lai KC, Liao WI, Li LY, Kao WF, Fan JS, Chen YH. The physiological effects and quality of chest compressions during CPR at sea level and high altitude. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
PubMed 25154345
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Chest Compressions Under Mild Hypoxia: Should Rescuers Breathe Supplemental Oxygen on Commercial Flights?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04072484
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB19-0535
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest, Hypoxia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Research at the University of Chicago was halted in March 2020.
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of breathing a slightly reduced amount of oxygen will have on a rescuer's ability to provide chest compressions during CPR.
Detailed description
Cardiac arrest can occur in any setting, even flying on a commercial airliner, and chest compressions are a critical, lifesaving component of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). If a cardiac arrest occurs on board a commercial flight, CPR may be administered by cabin crew members or health care professionals who are passengers and volunteer their assistance. The in-flight environment presents significant challenges, including an unfamiliar environment, an unknown patient, cramped space, and the fact that the pressure altitude in the cabin is between 6,000 feet and 8,000 feet. Even though the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is still 0.21, with decreased pressure the rescuer is effectively breathing a FiO2 of 0.15 and is mildly hypoxic. Although the decreased PaO2 seen in even in healthy passengers is a normal occurrence when flying on a commercial airliner, it may impair the ability of a rescuer to perform adequate CPR. Administering supplemental oxygen to the rescuer may enable provision of more effective chest compressions. In this study, we will measure the quality of chest compressions in normoxic and hypoxic conditions during short simulation scenarios. We hypothesize that chest compressions will be more effective in a normoxic environment.
All tasks are being performed for research purposes. All tasks will take place at the University of Chicago in an empty conference room. After the pre-study screening survey, subjects will be asked to perform chest compressions during a simulated cardiac arrest and will then fill out a survey. Subjects will participate in 2 sessions each; the sessions will be at least one day apart. During each session, the subject will wear a face mask. Subjects will be randomized and blinded to one of two conditions: During CPR, the subject will receive a FiO2 of 0.21 or 0.15 by face mask, which will produce a partial pressure of oxygen similar to, but slightly higher than, that of a commercial airliner. The gas mixture will be delivered by a normobaric hypoxia training device. During the second session, subjects will receive the other oxygen concentration.
Each session will consist of a simulation in which a passenger on an airplane (i.e., a mannequin) has an asystolic cardiac arrest. Participants will provide compression-only CPR. Every 2 minutes, the preceptor will ask the subject stop compressions for 10 seconds for a pulse and rhythm check, similar to actual established protocols. The participant will be wearing a pulse oximeter. The scenario will end after 30 minutes (14 rounds of 2 minutes each of CPR by the subject, consistent with the Universal Guidelines for Termination of CPR), or if the subject becomes fatigued and wishes to stop or is no longer providing high quality chest compressions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Room Air | No intervention | –The reduced oxygen breathing device will be set to deliver room air. (i.e., no oxygen is removed from the gas mixture. The subject will perform CPR while breathing through mask and tubing that is connected to the device. |
| Hypoxia | Experimental | Other: Mild hypoxiaThe reduced oxygen breathing device will be set to deliver a gas mixture with15% oxygen. (Equivalent to the partial pressure of oxygen at 2,438 meters.) The subject will perform CPR while breathing through mask and tubing that is connected to the device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previous CPR training
- Baseline exercise tolerance of at least 4 metabolic equivalents (METS)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Heart disease
- Moderate or severe asthma
- Carpal tunnel syndrome
- Mononucleosis
- Respiratory infections
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mild hypoxiaThe subject will breathe a gas mixture containing 15% oxygen instead of 21% oxygen. | Other | Hypoxia |
Primary outcome
Successful CPR
Time frame: 30 minutes
Number of successful two-minute CPR rounds
3 secondary outcomes
Lowest oxygen saturation
Time frame: 30 minutes
Survey results - Fatigue
Time frame: 30 minutes
Survey results - Chest compression
Time frame: 30 minutes
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Research at the University of Chicago was halted in March 2020.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 29114008Kleinman ME, Goldberger ZD, Rea T, Swor RA, Bobrow BJ, Brennan EE, Terry M, Hemphill R, Gazmuri RJ, Hazinski MF, Travers AH. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):e7-e13. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000539. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
- Background: PubMed 30020062Ruskin KJ, Ricaurte EM, Alves PM. Medical Guidelines for Airline Travel: Management of In-Flight Cardiac Arrest. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018 Aug 1;89(8):754-759. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5038.2018.
- Background: PubMed 15497372Muhm JM. Predicted arterial oxygenation at commercial aircraft cabin altitudes. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Oct;75(10):905-12.
- Background: PubMed 27752633Kwak SJ, Kim YM, Baek HJ, Kim SH, Yim HW. Chest compression quality, exercise intensity, and energy expenditure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using compression-to-ventilation ratios of 15:1 or 30:2 or chest compression only: a randomized, crossover manikin study. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Sep 30;3(3):148-157. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.105. eCollection 2016 Sep.
- Background: PubMed 16959862Romer LM, Haverkamp HC, Amann M, Lovering AT, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA. Effect of acute severe hypoxia on peripheral fatigue and endurance capacity in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Jan;292(1):R598-606. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00269.2006. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 27923115Drennan IR, Case E, Verbeek PR, Reynolds JC, Goldberger ZD, Jasti J, Charleston M, Herren H, Idris AH, Leslie PR, Austin MA, Xiong Y, Schmicker RH, Morrison LJ; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. A comparison of the universal TOR Guideline to the absence of prehospital ROSC and duration of resuscitation in predicting futility from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017 Feb;111:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 25154345Wang JC, Tsai SH, Chen YL, Hsu CW, Lai KC, Liao WI, Li LY, Kao WF, Fan JS, Chen YH. The physiological effects and quality of chest compressions during CPR at sea level and high altitude. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Keith J Ruskin, MD principal investigator
University of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mild hypoxia in people with Cardiac Arrest and Hypoxia, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Research at the University of Chicago was halted in March 2020.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Successful CPR (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04072484, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.